Tomahawk Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Pros and Cons of an 18-game NFL Schedule

FSU Tournament Tracker 2/22 Projection: IN

02/22- 02/28

What a week!  Last Monday I wrote:

As for this week, we need to win one game. That's it.  Just one. 

KenPom gives us a 50% chance to beat Miami at home and a 41% chance to beat Virginia Tech.  We have about a 20% chance to win both, a 30% chance to lose both, and a 50% chance to win 1 of the two games.

Mission accomplished.  The 'Noles didn't win one game.  They won two, taking down Miami on Wednesday night and squeaking by Virginia Tech on Saturday.  The 'Noles now sit at 21-6 overall (8-4 ACC).  Florida State is 2nd in the ACC!!

                        Overall  Conf
W-L W-L Pomeroy/Rnk AdjO/Rnk AdjD/Rnk AdjT/Rnk SOS/Rnk NCSOS/Rnk

North Carolina 24-3 10-3 .9733/2 123.2/2 90.1/21 75.1/4 .7535/10 .5828/109
Florida St. 21-6 8-4 .8626/47 103.7/127 88.4/11 67.4/137 .7173/27 .5256/153
Duke 21-5 7-4 .9645/5 114.9/18 86.2/7 68.7/89 .7331/17 .6065/89
Clemson 21-4 7-4 .9452/13 116.5/9 90.9/25 69.1/68 .6506/63 .4097/259
Wake Forest 20-4 7-4 .9381/19 110.5/48 87.2/8 74.1/7 .6465/68 .3866/274
Boston College 19-9 7-6 .8207/59 114.0/24 99.9/150 67.1/149 .6757/47 .3901/273
Maryland 17-9 6-6 .8122/66 106.6/88 93.8/54 68.9/77 .7044/33 .4578/218
Virginia Tech 16-10 6-6 .7804/77 110.1/53 98.6/121 66.3/182 .6721/49 .4508/227
North Carolina St. 15-10 5-7 .7985/71 112.1/38 99.4/142 64.9/242 .6090/90 .2476/340
Miami FL 16-10 5-8 .9042/29 113.9/25 93.7/52 65.2/227 .7185/26 .4051/262
Virginia 9-14 3-9 .7091/92 103.8/126 96.0/74 68.6/95 .7387/14 .4513/226
Georgia Tech 10-15 1-11 .6642/101 97.2/231 91.6/32 71.7/22 .6506/64 .3620/288

Nobody saw the 'Noles sitting in 2nd place through February.  Now, Wake or Duke will tie us tomorrow night, and they hold the tie-breaker, but for one night...  Pomeroy has us as the 5th best ACC team and thinks we've been a little lucky so far.  In fact, we're the 12th luckiest team in the nation.  That doesn't matter.  We won't be giving back any of those close wins. 

Here are the numbers for the 47th best team in the nation.:

                      Offense               Defense
Raw Efficiency : 99.8 (196) 92.9 ( 24)
Adj Efficiency : 103.7 (127) 88.4 ( 11)

Effective FG% : 48.3 (194) 44.2 ( 20)
Turnover Pct. : 22.6 (274) 23.2 ( 43)
Off. Rebound% : 35.1 ( 93) 35.3 (266)
Free Throw Rate: 41.8 ( 43) 36.1 (168)

3-Point FG% : 32.8 (230) 31.7 ( 47)
2-Point FG% : 47.9 (175) 42.4 ( 19)
Free Throw Pct.: 72.0 ( 67) 68.2 (131)
Block Pct. : 7.7 ( 98) 16.1 ( 8)
Steal Pct. : 10.0 (190) 12.9 ( 16)

3PA/FGA : 34.2 (131) 35.4 (257)
A/FGM : 52.7 (209) 46.5 ( 19)

That offensive number has been creeping up while the defense stays insanely good.  The turnover numbers are improving as well, which is excellent.  A concern:  we're getting lazy feet and fouling too much.

Here's this week's slate and the team (s) we need to win in Bold

02/22/09 Clemson @ Georgia Tech Raycom
  Wake Forest @ Duke FSN
02/24/09 Florida State @ Boston College ESPNU
02/25/09 Virginia Tech @ Clemson ESPN2
  Duke @ Maryland ESPN
02/26/09
NC State @ Wake Forest Raycom
 02/28/09 Clemson @ Florida State Raycom
  Wake Forest @ Virginia Raycom
  Duke @ Virginia Tech ABC

We have two tough games this week and Kenpom gives us a 17.25% chance to win both, a 48.53% chance to win one, and a 34.25% chance to lose both games. 

Guess what?  To get in to the tournament, it doesn't matter.  FSU is in, fo the first time in over 10 years, and that's a good thing.  If this team does win both, however, which is possible... you could be looking at a 3 or 4 seed in the NCAA tourney.  With that in mind, the goal for this week is to win one game and get to 9-5 in conference.  A 10-6 finish probably gets this team a bye in the ACC tournament. 

Read that last sentence.  

Star-divide

This will be the official fanpost where we discuss the chances of our Seminoles making the tournament.  I've decided to start this because it will help to keep the fanpost section uncluttered.  For instance, we currently have 4 Bowden threads in the fanpost sidebar.  Most of them say something similar.  I love the participation, but sometimes things get repetitive.

Can someone "rec" this so it gets on the preferred list?  I plan to update 2x per week.

In this thread, we can discuss:

  • What the Noles must do to make the big dance
  • Optimal outcomes of games playes by our opponents
  • What the experts are saying
  • Anything NCAA Tournament related

 

02/16/09- 02/22-09

The 'Noles ended the week on a disappointing note but it is important for FSU fans to remember that we did achieve our goal of winning one game (via defeating Virginia).  The 'Noles are now 6-4 in conference play, which is exactly where we wanted to be after last week.

As of 02/16, we are not ranked, but we are still receiving votes.  The 'Noles are still rated #52 in the Pomeroy ratings.

                      Offense               Defense
Raw Efficiency : 98.7 (215) 92.2 ( 21)
Adj Efficiency : 102.2 (151) 88.0 ( 12)

Effective FG% : 48.1 (202) 43.8 ( 12)
Turnover Pct. : 23.3 (295) 23.5 ( 33)
Off. Rebound% : 36.0 ( 71) 35.6 (276)
Free Throw Rate: 41.7 ( 45) 35.9 (158)

3-Point FG% : 32.5 (235) 30.9 ( 28)
2-Point FG% : 47.8 (176) 42.4 ( 19)
Free Throw Pct.: 70.7 (107) 68.2 (139)
Block Pct. : 7.2 ( 63) 16.3 ( 8)
Steal Pct. : 10.4 (236) 13.2 ( 15)

3PA/FGA : 33.7 (150) 35.0 (247)
A/FGM : 53.0 (203) 45.9 ( 16)

A top 12 defense and an offense outside the top 150.  We are scrappy and resourceful.  FSU could really do a better job with that defensive rebounding number-- a jump from 276th to even 225th would be huge.  The defensive free throw number is starting to trouble me as well.  It seems our defense is becoming more undisciplined as the season wears on.  Leonard Hamilton needs to whip these guys in practice and get their heads back on straight. 

As for the offense, we're still horrible.  We have the worst offense of any team in contention for an at-large bid.  The 'Noles need to stop shooting so man 3 point shots and focus their efforts on getting the ball inside, crashing the glass, and getting to the line.  We are a horrible shooting team and our turnover numbers are still atrocious as Toney can't run the offense as a shooting guard.

Bracketology projects the 'Noles as an 8 seed, but still very comfortably in.  Sports Illustrated Projects the 'Noles as a 5 seed, which is probably too high.  Both ESPN and Sports Illustrated project 8 ACC teams in the tournament.  Interestingly, I heard an ESPN Expert, Joe Lunardi, say that Miami is in right now at 4-7 in conference because of their close losses.

02/17/09 Maryland @ Clemson ESPN2
02/18/09 Miami @ Florida State ESPNU
  Virginia Tech @ Virginia RAYCOM
02/19/09 Duke @ St. John's ESPN
02/21/09 Boston College @ Miami RSN
  North Carolina @ Maryland ABC
  Florida State @ Virginia Tech RSN
02/22/09 Clemson @ Georgia Tech Raycom

NOTE:  I am slightly uncertain as to who we want to win between BC and Miami.

As for this week, we need to win one game. That's it.  Just one. 

KenPom gives us a 50% chance to beat Miami at home and a 41% chance to beat Virginia Tech.  We have about a 20% chance to win both, a 30% chance to lose both, and a 50% chance to win 1 of the two games. 

FSU really needs to get to 7-5 in the conference this week.  It will be an interesting week and I look forward to two great discussions, starting Wednesday night.

At a minimum, the Noles will need to get 7 ACC wins (7-9) to go along with our 13-2 out of conference record.  

2/09- 2/15

What a week!  I don't think you can find a better week for FSU basketball than the week gone by.  The wins over GTech and Clemson were huge.  In fact, ESPN named FSU Team of the Week.  If the season ended today, FSU would be a lock for the tournament.  Joe Lunardi's Bracketology has the Noles as a #9 seed, and nowhere close to the bubble.  In fact, he has 8 ACC teams in the tourney.  The ACC is clearly the best conference, with 8 of 12 teams in, as opposed to only 8 of 16 Big East teams.    As a side note, he has us playing Arizona State, a team that is a bad matchup for us. 

The Noles start the week as the #52 team in the Pomeroy Ratings.  He now projects us to go 22-9 Overall and 9-7 in the ACC.  That finish would make us an 8 seed in the tourney.  As of now, we are more likely to finish 9-7 than 7-9, though 7-9 could still get the 'Noles in.  Kenpom calls us the 6th best team in the ACC, and projects us to finish 9-7, along with BC, ahead of VT and Miami who are projected to go 8-8.   The key is to win the games we should win.  We are ahead of the pace and do not need to score any more upsets to reach the tournament.

The defensive rebounding and the turnovers are still a huge problem, but the 'Noles formula is to play suffocating defense, pick up cheap points, get to the line, and frustrate the heck out of their opponent. 

This week's key games (with the team we want to win in Bold)

02/10/09 Virginia @ Florida State
  Clemson @ Boston College
02/11/09 Georgia Tech @ Virginia Tech
02/14/09
Florida State @ Wake Forest
  Virginia Tech @ Maryland
  Duke @ Boston College
  North Carolina @ Miami

This week's goal is to go 1-1 and end up at 6-4 in conference play.  Remember that our previous goal was to get to 5-5.  We are ahead of pace.  This week could really hurt Boston College, as they will probably be underdogs at home, twice.

FSU's 5 losses have come to the teams ranked 63rd, 4th, 1st, 26th, and 3rd in the ratings.  Quality losses do matter a bit at tournament time.

The most important thing for this team to do is stay healthy.  Our depth is really paying off and we can't afford to lose it.  This team is IN unless something big happens.

1/26-2/1

1/28:  Miami lost @ NCST last night and BC won @ Maryland. 

                        Overall  Conf
W-L W-L Pomeroy/Rnk AdjO/Rnk AdjD/Rnk

Duke 18-1 5-0 .9865/1 118.0/6 81.2/2
Virginia Tech 14-5 4-1 .8254/61 108.4/70 94.7/67
Wake Forest 16-1 3-1 .9574/11 110.3/47 84.2/5
North Carolina 17-2 3-2 .9774/2 120.4/3 86.7/11
Clemson 17-2 3-2 .9272/22 112.8/27 90.4/30
Florida St. 16-4 3-2 .8386/57 101.7/145 88.1/18
Boston College 16-6 4-3 .8051/69 111.8/32 98.8/135
Miami FL 14-6 3-4 .8769/42 113.8/23 95.9/81
Maryland 13-7 2-4 .7735/83 102.1/141 91.7/36
North Carolina St. 11-7 2-4 .7303/89 108.7/65 99.7/149
Virginia 7-9 1-4 .7050/99 105.3/100 97.6/112
Georgia Tech 9-10 0-6 .6701/104 97.8/216 91.9/38

As of 1/28, Kenpom projects:

VT 9-7 (4-1 currently)
FSU 8-8 (3-2)
BOSTON COLLEGE 8-8 (4-3)
MIAMI 7-9 (3-4)

Guess what folks... we're not getting 8 ACC teams in.  FSU now looks like they must finish at 8-8 in the conference.  FSU and VT really can make or break some ground in the next two weeks as they have some ground to make up.

I personally think FSU will get to 5-4 (should win v. GT and v. UVA, lose to UNC and @ Clemson).  At that point, we'd need to win 3 of 5: v. Miami, @ VT, @ BC, v. CLEM, and v. VT.   I don't see us winning @ Wake or @ Duke.

If the 'Noles take care of business tonight, all bets are off.

 

1/26:  The Noles sit at 3-2 in conference play, well ahead of the pace many thought they would be through 5 games.  This past week was pretty good for the Noles, as FSU went 1-1, slightly better than what the experts had us doing (we had a better chance to lose both than win one or both). 

Ken Pomeroy now has the 'Noles as the 58th best team in America, which is good for 6th in the ACC.  He projects FSU to finish at 8-8 in conference, tied with Virginia Tech, for 6th/7th place.  VTech is rated 72nd overall.  FSU's RPI is skyrocketing and last I checked the 'Noles were 20th Nationally in RPI.

In the latest Bracketology, the 'Noles are a 10 seed in the Minneapolis Region and has the ACC with 7 teams in.

Opponent Watch:  In the important wins category, UF lost by one to South Carolina and crushed Vanderbilt, both on the road.  That's probably a wash, and the 'Noles win over UF continues to look impressive.  Cal had a bad loss to Oregon State but did beat Oregon to salvage an otherwise poor week.  Cincinnati continues to be a fairly worthless win as they lost to providence and then beat St. Johns.  On the flip side of the coin, some of our losses don't look quite as bad.  Northwestern beat Michigan State in East Lansing and then proceeded to lose to the lesser of the Michigan Schools, falling to thew Wolverines.  That's a good week for Northwestern, who looks like a tournament team.  Pittsburgh had a monster week as they pounded Syracuse at home and West Virginia on the road (ranked teams). 

This week, the 'Noles play only one game:  North Carolina, at home.  Make sure to get your questions in for the UNC expert!

Here are the updated ACC standings:

                        Overall  Conf
W-L W-L Pomeroy/Rnk AdjO/Rnk AdjD/Rnk

Duke 18-1 5-0 .9866/1 118.1/6 81.3/2
Virginia Tech 14-5 4-1 .8246/62 108.5/68 94.8/67
Wake Forest 16-1 3-1 .9574/11 110.4/47 84.2/5
North Carolina 17-2 3-2 .9776/2 120.4/3 86.7/12
Clemson 17-2 3-2 .9266/22 112.9/27 90.5/31
Florida St. 16-4 3-2 .8403/58 101.8/145 88.1/18
Miami FL 14-5 3-3 .8848/39 113.4/23 95.0/70
Boston College 15-6 3-3 .7827/79 111.1/39 99.3/145
Maryland 13-6 2-3 .7997/71 102.6/139 90.9/33
North Carolina St. 10-7 1-4 .7168/96 107.6/76 99.3/144
Virginia 7-9 1-4 .7089/98 105.4/98 97.5/115
Georgia Tech 9-10 0-6 .6696/103 97.7/220 91.9/39

The general consensus is that Duke, Wake, UNC, and Clemson will take the top 4 spots, probably in that order.  Most would have put Miami into the 5th slot before last night's events (see below).  Things have changed, however.

We have a new foe.   VTech beat Miami last night.  Virginia Tech now sits at 4-1 in ACC play and Pomeroy predicts them to go 9-7 in conference, giving them the 5th spot.  Miami is projected to go 8-8, as is FSU.  

Our rooting interests are now pretty clear.  We need to root against VTech, Miami, and Boston College. 

This week, there are many important ACC games:

01/27/09 Miami @ NC State NEED:  NCState
ESPNU
  Boston College @ Maryland Maryland
ESPN2
01/29/09 Clemson @ Virginia Tech Clemson
ESPN/ESPN2
  Miami @ Maryland Maryland
Raycom
  Virginia Tech @ Boston College Boston College
Raycom

This is a big week for the 'Noles.  FSU will probably lose to UNC and drop to 3-3 in the conference.  That's fine as we'd still be ahead of schedule, but it's very important for Miami and VTech to drop at least one game a piece.  They play three of their four games on the road and I think that's likely.

Can the ACC now get in 7 ACC teams? A week ago I would have said no way, but I now think it is very possible.  7-9 probably will no longer get it done for the Noles. 

Bracketology available later today, and I'll post it then. 

Lingering concerns for the 'Noles?  Turning the ball over and not rebounding:

 

 

1/18- 1/24

1/22:  We had a tough loss last night as Miami is a better team than we are and showed why their offense is so good.  We had one of our better offensive games of the year and by far our worst defensive game. 

This was a very bad night overall, however, as this week is shaping up to be as bad as last week was good.

1/20 BC @ GT (GT).  BC Won.
UVA @ MD (UVA) MD Won
NCST @ DUKE (Duke) Duke Won

1/21 VT @ Wake (Wake)  VT Won

Northwestern BEAT #7 Michigan State, helping our non conference slate!

Ken Pomeroy doesn't see last night's loss as a bad loss and actually moved us up from #63 to #62. 

What does hurt, however, is that as opposed to last week when Pomeroy projected us as the only 7-9 ACC team, he now projects that us, BC, and Maryland will all go 7-9. 

 

 

1/19: 

After a week where the Noles went 2-0 in the ACC and the Noles out of conference opponents played very well, the Noles are ahead of where most thought they would be and the experts notices:

Joe Lunardi has us as a 10 seed (solidly in) in his latest Bracketology.  We're not even in the "last four in" category.

Jim Young says we look like a tournament team:

I don't want to get your hopes up Seminoles fans, but this is starting to look like an NCAA Tournament-worthy team. We already know FSU has done the work it needed during its non-conference schedule, knocking off Cal, Florida and Western Kentucky. Now the Seminoles are winning games like this one, in which they rebounded in overtime after frittering away an 11-point lead. It wasn't pretty, but it's the kind of win FSU wasn't getting in previous seasons, when it kept coming up just short of the NCAA Tournament.

 

1/18: KenPomeroy now projects us as the only 7-9 ACC team, the first time this year he has projected us to hold the 6th spot all to ourselves.  He still says Maryland is a better team, however, and this new projection is based mostly on some optimal outcomes in the games of the past week.  We could be ranked when the polls debut on Monday.

Northwestern beat 18th ranked Minnesota, 74-63, in what was an upset in ranking only, as Northwestern was favored. 

FSU has lost 3 games to opponents whose combined records are 41-8 (Northwestern at 9-6 drags it down).

Key Games for this week (team we need to win in parenthesis)

1/20
BC @ GT (GT)
UVA @ MD (UVA)
NCST @ DUKE (Duke)

1/21
VT @ Wake (Wake)
FSU @ Miami (important test but not essential for our tournament hopes)

1/24
MD @ DUKE (Duke)
NCST @ BC (I think NCST, since BC has a signature win, but this is largely irrelevant)
FSU @ UVA (important game for the Noles, one of our rare legit chances to win a road game)

 

1/18: KenPomeroy now projects us as the only 7-9 ACC team, the first time this year he has projected us to hold the 6th spot all to ourselves.  He still says Maryland is a better team, however, and this new projection is based mostly on some optimal outcomes in the games of the past week.  We could be ranked when the polls debut on Monday.

Northwestern beat 18th ranked Minnesota, 74-63, in what was an upset in ranking only, as Northwestern was favored. 

FSU has lost 3 games to opponents whose combined records are 41-8 (Northwestern at 9-6 drags it down).

1.11-1.17

Games: @ NCST (Win 78-65), v. Maryland (Win 76-73 OT)

1/17: FSU defeats Maryland 76-73 in an overtime game that we should probably be mad most committee members didn't get on their cable.

FSU is now 2-1 in the ACC.  Kenpom thought we would be 1.02- 1.98 so far (.03 for Duke, .38 for NCST and .61 for Maryland).  We need to win 5 of our last 13 ACC games to have a shot.  Kenpom says we will win 5.09 of them (favoring us in three).  Still much work to be done.

1/15 Last night was perfect as we achieved all of the optimal outcomes in our opponents games.  I have to think we are IN.

1/14:  Pomeroy moved us up from 74th nationally to 65th.  He considers us the 7th best team in the ACC, moving us ahead of Boston College.  He moved his win projection from 18-13 (5-11) to 20-11 (7-9).  

1/13: The Noles defeated the NC State Wolfpack, 78-65 for their 1st ACC win.  We beat the odds on this one, as Pomeroy gave us a 37% chance of winning.  

We currently sit at 1-1 in the ACC.  Pomeroy predicts that we will win 5.46 more ACC games, giving us 6.46 ACC wins.  NOTE: that prediction doesn't include the ratings adjustment that will come after tonight's win.  Things are starting to look okay for this team.  

We were the only ACC team to play Tuesday (the rest play Wednesday).  While this could have been pretty bad for the Noles, it is now to our advantage as we get an extra day of rest, preparation, and practice before facing Maryland on Saturday.  

Important games for our opponents for the week of 1/11- 1/17:

The top 4 slots in the ACC will be Duke, UNC, Wake, and Clemson in some order.  Most think Miami takes the 5th spot.  Our goal is to grab the 6th and final spot.  

Here are the important ACC games for the week: (who we need to win in parenthesis)

1/14/2009
Duke @ Georgia Tech (DUKE) Duke won 70-56
Richmond @ Virginia Tech (VT, for conference reputation) VT won 62-48
Maryland @ Miami (Miami, this one is very big) Miami won 62-60 !!
Wake Forest @ Boston College (Wake, this one is huge) Wake crushed BC, in BC, 83-63.  Wake is scary. 

1/15/2009
North Carolina @ Virginia (UNC) UNC crushed them

Purdue @ Northwestern (a Northwestern win would be big) Purdue came back to win in a big one :(

1/17/2009
Georgia Tech @ NC State (GTech) :(  NCST beat GTech 76-71 in Overtime.
Georgetown @ Duke (Duke, conference reputation) Duke Spanked GTown
Boston College @ Virginia Tech (VTech. Very important)
Miami @ North Carolina (UNC, on some off chance we're in position to leap Miami)

Other important games:
1.17.09 Cal @ Stanford 1.17 (Cal is a pretty good team and we beat them and so did Standford...the word used in the ESPN article title: Stanford SHOCKS No 23 Cal)
Cinci v. Rutgers (1.14) (Cinci won) and @ Depaul (Cinci Won 59-55)

Thoughts?  Concerns?

RPI SOS Tracker: Updated 1/19

7 recs  |  Comment 167 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Maryland will have a hard time scoring on us

They have absolutely no inside presence. We are just a much better team than them, as I think Douglas can somewhat neutralize Vazquez.
This is game that we can not give away if we realistically want to make the Big Dance.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 13, 2009 10:30 PM EST reply actions  

I e-mailed TC after tonight's game

I said “Maryland won’t score a point in their half court set. They will have to get everything off of our turnovers”

Kenpom says they are better than we are (53rd to 73rd). If Miami beats them, however, we could end up ranked higher, as we get the upwards adjustment from the NCST game.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 13, 2009 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Closing out on 3 point shooters will be key

Let them pump and drive into our length. The only way I see them winning or staying close is putting on a 3 pt. shooting exhibition. Hayes, Milbourne, and Vazquez haven’t shot the 3 very well this year, but they all have the potential to light fire.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 13, 2009 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know if i can get my hopes up for this again.

I have an awful feeling we’re going to get left out again. I have no idea how at this point espn experts are predicting us to be in the 2nd four out. We just played the #1 and #2 teams in the nation pretty darn close.

I think we can beat out Miami for the 5th spot., but we need some big time wins. If we can get 8 wins, and beat UNC and then surprise the hell out of Duke March 3, I’ll buy tickets…

…to the NIT Semifinal.

by Weasie on Jan 14, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions  

Reason for optimism

The ESPN “last 4 out” was done yesterday morning. They had us in before the Duke game.

Ken Pomeroy is changing college basketball. Remarkably so. With people taking note of this guys amazing work, they will start to realize how strong the ACC really is.

Pomeroy has us at 7-9 ACC now (up from 5-11).

by Bud Elliott on Jan 14, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I think we can beat out Miami for the 5th spot

We disagree on this, but I don’t think we need to. The 6th spot will go to the tournament. They could take 7 ACC teams.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 14, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

You may be right

But the way I see it right now, we’re still pretty even with them. Granted our Big 10 loss was to a crappier team. I still think we can beat them…twice. A win in either that Pitt or Duke game would have changed things drastically.

by Weasie on Jan 14, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Couple of thoughts....

I agree with FSUncensored (thanks for starting this discussion!) that we may not take the 5th spot. It is certainly possible and after our performance against NC State…I think it is even more of a possibility. I think 6 teams will go from the ACC this year, which is selling our conference short. Currently, the Big East and the Big Ten are getting a lot of press and recognition. They also have a lot of teams that have a long standing history in NCAA Basketball. Yes, the ACC does as well, but for whatever reason I think the teams like Wake, Maryland and Clemson don’t generate the hype that a Wisconsin, Ohio State or Louisville do. This is just a personal hunch and may result from living in Chicago…all you hear about is the Big Ten and the Big East. There is no doubt that the ACC, Big East and Big 10 are outstanding conferences this year. The Big 12 and Pac 10 are also making some noise about being the top conference in the nation as well.

Yes, our loss to Northwestern sucked and we shouldn’t have lost that game, but it isn’t as terrible as you think. First, it was on the road at the end of an extremely long road trip that included wins over Cincinnati and Cal. Both games were played in Las Vegas. The Northwestern game was the 4th game in 10 days for the Noles and the Northwestern offense is unlike anything we’ll see this year. We had no time to prepare for it.

Miami lost to OSU at home. Their previous two games: Stetson and San Diego. Miami has had a difficult OOC schedule and they are currently ranked 27th according to Pomeroy. OSU is 44. Northwestern is 60. When we played them, they were ranked much higher…I think they made it up to 14th or something ridiculous like that.

Miami doesn’t generate turnovers…just like NC State. They don’t create steals and they allow their opponents to get to the line often. They do, however, defend the three very well. Sound familiar…NC State. We had our mental moments against NC State…but we ended up winning that game on the road by a lot…most of which were free throws at the end. We should be able to beat Miami twice. Particularly if our offense can build off last night’s win. It was a very different team we saw out their. We had our second lowest turnover percentage all year.

A win over Duke or UNC on the road will sky rocket us up the NCAA ranks and in the eyes of the tournament committee. Beating Clemson or Wake will do the same. Take care of business at home. Win a big game on the road and win the expected ones on the road and we’ll be in.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 14, 2009 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

And remember...

Miami lost their best player in the game after he slapped that OSU player in the face. Miami was up 14 at the time i think and came back and beat them. Miami should have won this game had McClinton not been ejected

by Renegade11 on Jan 15, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

RPI

Historically, the tourney committee weighs RPI pretty heavily. Right now, they have us at 27 (Cal is 10 btw, that win is looking bigger and bigger). I think the Pomeroy ratings are better as a predictor to who’s going to win – especially after a large body of work, but the RPI is good as a scorecard too.

A lot of Ken’s rankings are based on margin of victory, total points allowed and total points scored which aren’t necessarily a predictive indicator; especially, if you’ve been resting your veterans to get your freshman and sophomores more reps before conference play starts.

The real key to making the tourney is beating the teams we’re better than. If we beat MD (home), GA Tech(home), VA twice and VATech twice, just like that we’re at 20 wins and I think we get a tournament win. (Of course, an upset over one of the big powers wouldn’t hurt either – always nice to get a marquis win)

by CelticPride on Jan 14, 2009 6:39 PM EST reply actions  

I agree that the RPI is typically used by the committe and the public to rank teams.

We have some great OOC wins against good teams. If we can keep our RPI in the 20’s, it would be daylight robbery if we don’t get in. It has happened before…

According to Lunardi at ESPN, we’re out and BC is in, as is Miami. The others from the ACC are Duke, UNC, Clemson, Wake…no surprises there. I think we can beat BC and Miami. I don’t think the Big East will finish with 9 teams in nor do I think the Big 10 will finish with 7 teams in, as projected by Lunardi.

Should be a fun season and I think we have as good a chance as ever to get in.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 14, 2009 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

You and I both know

That Lunardi’s rankings change weekly. (We’re probably back in now after the win at NC St.)
BC is presently in based on its big win over UNC. If the season were over today, FSU would be dancing based on its record and RPI (That win over undefeated in the Pac-10 Cal would be huge…)

by CelticPride on Jan 14, 2009 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll take what this guys says and everyone other analyst's predictions with a grain of salt...

At this point our OOC schedule is stronger than BC’s but who knows what it will be by the end of the year. Not to mention after BC’s win against UNC they have rolled off three straight losses at home to Wake (by 20), Miami, and of course their historical loss to Harvard.

by Renegade11 on Jan 15, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

that loss to Harvard really hurts BC

Bad losses tend to outweigh Good wins
Of course, late season winning streaks are also worth gold

by CelticPride on Jan 15, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

And there is still a long long long way to go this season...and unfortunately our stretch run is brutal.

Sat Feb 14 (9) Wake Forest L, 76-62 76 8% Away
Wed Feb 18 (28) Miami FL L, 65-64 67 44% Home
Sat Feb 21 (83) Virginia Tech L, 63-62 67 44% Away
Tue Feb 24 (80) Boston College L, 69-68 70 42% Away
Sat Feb 28 (17) Clemson L, 70-66 71 33% Home
Tue Mar 3 (1) Duke L, 74-56 71 4% Away
Sun Mar 8 (83) Virginia Tech W, 66-60 67 74% Home

Let’s hope it doesn’t start with a Valentine’s Day Massacre at Wake.
The numbers are Pomeroy’s predicted score, our predicted pace and the likelihood of us winning the game.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 15, 2009 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Well Maryland just collapsed to Miami

I think this is good for us. Very deflating loss against a better team.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 14, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions  

Every team that needed to win last night did.

Saturday’s game should be interesting. Losing the way Maryland did will require a heck of a coaching job from Gary Williams to get back on track. If he doesn’t get them prepared mentally their season could slip away and the Sweating One could be looking for a new job.

by MattDNole on Jan 15, 2009 9:50 AM EST reply actions  

WarrenNolan.com

Does anyone ever check this site out? It’s pretty basic, but I use it to track RPI and SOS and such.

by HeedNole on Jan 15, 2009 7:02 PM EST reply actions  

Game tied

Purdue with ball with about 8 seconds to go.

Northwestern, doing what any good basketball team would do, fouled him “in the act of shooting.” Sank both.

BS.

Our goal is simple: Best in the land

Kill a fly with an axe -- Mickey Andrews

by FSUSOM on Jan 15, 2009 10:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Nitpicky but,

the foul was before the shot. Johnson was pretty open and with good position and the scrawny white guy in purple clearly pushed him with arms extended as the ball was being delivered. The strip on the shot was all ball, and after the whistle.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 15, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

well, in fairness to me, I was a little distracted at the time.

I tuned in when that N’Western kid was running down the court with the ball. I assumed he had been fouled while shooting.

Thanks for clarification, Zach Nole.

Our goal is simple: Best in the land

Kill a fly with an axe -- Mickey Andrews

by FSUSOM on Jan 15, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha, no big deal

I was ticked because I had Purdue -4.5, and I was hoping for overtime so they could cover! When they first called the foul I was shocked, but the replay made it pretty clear it was a good call.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 15, 2009 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Does anyone think we are capable....

…of dominating an ACC team?
Leading from beginning to end and winning by 20.

by Zach_Nole on Jan 15, 2009 10:24 PM EST reply actions  

i'm not so sure...

From watching the nc state game you could tell we were a much more talented basketball team. but it wasn’t until the end that we pulled away. that game was a very close game for most of it and we very easily could have let that slip away.

with our tendency to play to our opponents i really don’t see us completely dominating an ACC team. we had trouble as it was completely dominating some of our easier OOC opponents. that’s not to say we won’t win just the way in which we win won’t be overwhelming. imho

i really hope i’m wrong tho

by Renegade11 on Jan 16, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Duke just beat Georgetown 76-67.

Duke scored 40 in the first half against the #12 team in the nation. How many did they score against us? 19. Another bonus for the Noles in their quest to make it to the tournament.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 3:45 PM EST reply actions  

We definitely could if the hype for the Big East slows down and that people realize that the Pac-10 isn't as good as they think it is.

If we get 7, I imagine it would be Duke, UNC, Clemson, Wake, Miami, FSU, Maryland. The first four should be a lock to get in. Miami, FSU and Maryland will be tough. I think at least two of the three get in. We have to watch our for NC State as they could easily slip into that group. VTech could also make a run (unlikely). I don’t like how Lunardi is currently drinking the Big East Kool-Aid. Clearly, the tournament is far away and things can change. I think 7 from the ACC is more realistic than 9 from the Big East.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh what could have been

Wish we would have beaten Pitt.

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a Catch 22- If we beat them. They are not #1. We hold them to their closest game of the year....we look good.

Tough call…I really wish we beat them. Cal hasn’t suffered any ill effects from losing to us…

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

IMHO

The more Pitt wins and the more they blow out teams in the big east…the better we look. What does everyone else think? We have held Duke and Pitt to some of their lowest scoring totals and worst offensive games of the year. That helps our tournament resume a ton.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

It seems obvious

but It seems like we do this stuff every year and always end up on the bubble without any love.

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

People, meaning the tournament committee, generally see us as a football school...

There is no reason we shouldn’t get a taste of March Madness. Hamilton deserves it. As much as we have questioned him at times, he has really done a phenomenal job with this team. I don’t know about you, but I love watching this team and they have a ton of potential. It’s not like Duke who has an amazing basketball team and no football team. We have excellent clubs in both sports (toss in baseball and track as well)…I hope we finally get some respect. Hey, defense wins championships, right?

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I like this team the most out of the past few years' squades.

It’s just frustrating at times because you can tell we could be so much better. Alabi and Singleton could really dominate. I usually dont really like college bball until march madness, but this year is particularly interesting. I think if we can get Loucks and Dulkys and Kitchen to really come into their own we could be locks for the tournament in future years

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Go Pitt!

http://today.sportingnews.com/sportingnewstoday/20081229/?pg=2

by tdchrisdavis on Jan 17, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Wake Forest took care of business.

Wake 78 Clemson 68. Clemson was in it until 4 minutes to go in the 1st. They then came back to get it within 2 half way through the second only to see Wake walk away with it, most of which came on free throws.

If we can beat Wake….March Madness here we come. I doubt that we’ll beat them.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 17, 2009 6:49 PM EST reply actions  

I am

Go Canes… screw the heels.

http://today.sportingnews.com/sportingnewstoday/20081229/?pg=2

by tdchrisdavis on Jan 17, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

That jam a while ago was amazing

Really shut up the UNC fans.

http://today.sportingnews.com/sportingnewstoday/20081229/?pg=2

by tdchrisdavis on Jan 17, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

UNC is taking over

They still are not very impressive.

http://today.sportingnews.com/sportingnewstoday/20081229/?pg=2

by tdchrisdavis on Jan 17, 2009 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

They are just patient

They don’t concern themselves with swings. They just play their game. I will agree that they are probably overrated but it only helps us at this point for them to be highly regarded

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

yah

I dont know if we want to root for Miami…The general concensus is that they’re standing in the way of our tournament hopes

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm ready to call this one for UNC

but I am certainly fearing Miami much more now

by Weasie on Jan 17, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions  

500 in the ACC _better_ get us in

I think 7-9 with a first round win in the ACC tourney does as well.

This year, we have no bad losses.

Of course, we can’t go 0-10 down the stretch – b/c that looks bad to the committee too.

by CelticPride on Jan 17, 2009 11:11 PM EST reply actions  

500 in the ACC

will def get us in. Your right 7-9 plus a tourney win should do it as well. If we dont get in this year I will be very dissapointed. I really like the way our guys are playing right now.

by fsunole23 on Jan 19, 2009 5:27 PM EST reply actions  

Other interesting notes from yesterday:

Northwestern upsets #7 Michigan State

  1. Wake Forest loses to Virginia Tech…

These are a couple of other reasons we’re getting some love in the RPI…we have an unbelievably difficult schedule.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 22, 2009 8:22 PM EST reply actions  

Prediction

Clemson will be held in far lower esteem at the end of the season than they are right now.

by Fsued on Jan 26, 2009 10:35 AM EST reply actions  

This is only my opinion, but

I haven’t believed in Clemson over the past few seasons. They are over reliant on opponent’s turnovers. That works to beat bad or average teams but not against elite competition. This year’s Clemson team is the best in some time. For that reason, I think they are safe at the #4 spot in the ACC. They should continue to do very well against the bottom 8 teams while struggling with the top three.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 26, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Seems like VT

is doing what we need to be doing. They are winning the games expected, getting HUGE upsets and winning on the road.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 26, 2009 11:10 AM EST reply actions  

VT always

pulls this garbage. Bad non-conference losses then a good ACC season.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 26, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Very True....

They barely escaped Virginia at home and we all saw how UVA truly is on Saturday.

by Renegade11 on Jan 26, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Alabi

have a chance at slowing Hansborough?

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 26, 2009 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

I don't know if you can give a certain answer to this.

Certainly Hansborough will body the hell out of him. But Alabi has an odd style where he likes to back off to get blocks. Hansborough is prob smart enough to get good position, use the rim to shield, and draw some fouls with an oscar worthy performance. I hate him.

by Weasie on Jan 26, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha....

I dont know if any of you remember Joe Wolf. He played for several teams in the early 90’s in the NBA. He was one of those players that you look at, and get angry.

Tyler does this to me.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 26, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Played for UNC

too if I remember right. What a great comparison (pats self on back).

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 26, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Montross

I remember Eric Montross getting far too many calls over Corey Louis back in the day. Still mad about that.

by The K-Man on Jan 26, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction

I guess it was Andre Reid and Rodney Dobard who didn’t get any calls.

by The K-Man on Jan 26, 2009 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

ESPN Poll

Notre Dame still ranked.

Sigh.

by Fsued on Jan 26, 2009 2:22 PM EST reply actions  

Really?

Tradition. Popular schools get the benefit of the doubt. The fact that they are on national TV all the time helps (whether they win or loose it helps). FSU has benefitted from this in football in the past. The rankings don’t much matter IMO. Only when the tournament seeds come out does it matter. (I’ll conceed that the rankings press helps teams though.)

by evenflow58 on Jan 26, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Three straight losses

I do see your point and you are correct about seedings/ ratings

by Bud Elliott on Jan 26, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

what I saw in bowl.

I finally started to see end of the year the Offense show up. Once it did like in the bowl the D wrecks havoc again. Biggest D problem last several years running. the Offense. I am not playing D so allow me to point the finger for them. The O must not do so little that the D is out there all day, the opposing O is allowed to try everything in the book with no need of fear of not scoring and is able to call plays that would never be called if we were scoring and/or moving the ball and does not constently put the D in bad field position situations all day because of turnovers and 3 and outs or close to it.

I finally at times this saw the O move the ball, get some first downs, score and make some big plays and rarely when that happen did the play not also improve on the other side of the ball. some aspects as the above article details are independant however, over the course of a long day where even when they are not able to move the ball early an offense is given many good opportunities and also are not falling behind in the game they will find plays to explot tendencies or things the cordinator finds. This would not happen near as much if the offense did what it did in the bowl this year and moved the ball a little, scored a little and put some pressure on the opposing offense before it got on the field to face our D.

by mikmac on Jan 27, 2009 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Welcome, Mike! Our offense was finally better than our defense, for once.

In going through the season, I came up with these conclusions. these are all considering the level of opponent.

Wake: Offense Bad, Defense Good
Colorado: Offense good, Defense Avg
Miami: Offense and Defense good; special teams horrible.
NCST: Offense good, Defense BAD (like 7 yards per play allowed in non-garbage time)
GTech: Offense Good, Defense BAD
VTECH: Offense Poor Defense AVG (considering the QBs knocked out for VT)
CLEMSON: Offense Great, Defense above average/ good
BC: Offense Bad, Defense Bad
Maryland: Offense Good, Defense Excellent
UF: Offense Horrible, defense Bad
Wisconsin: Offense Good, defense below average

I think your paragraph is basically better suited for the 2004-2007 teams, but the 2008 team was carried by the offense. The defense got really lucky and more often than not played like garbage.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 27, 2009 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Was the Clemson offense really great?

I would be more inclined to say that about GT than I would Clemson. Also…UF was TRASH

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 27, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

?

They had about 6 against us but avg about 4.5 for the season.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Jan 27, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

The defense also forced several turnovers. While I don’t like to give too much credit for that, I have to award some.

by Bud Elliott on Jan 27, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok BC and Maryland....

Let’s make an agreement. Whoever loses tonight will just go away. Lose the games you’re supposed to lose and even some of the ones you should win. Just please freaking go away.

PS- Don’t think I’m not watching you too, Va Tech.

by MattDNole on Jan 27, 2009 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

Yup... it's Maryland.

After the way they lost to Miami earlier in the year, the way they were blown out by Duke, and this come from ahead loss I’m beginning to think Gary may have to do his best coaching job yet if he wants to keep his job much longer.

by MattDNole on Jan 28, 2009 8:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Maryland just beat Miami.

I think that helps us in the short term.

Va Tech and BC are tied with 50 seconds to go.

by MattDNole on Jan 31, 2009 9:57 PM EST reply actions  

Do we still want BC to win?

We play Va Tech twice, so technically we can control more of their season than we can of BC’s.

by MattDNole on Jan 31, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Side Note:

It’s amazing how athletic Raji for BC is….

I mean, to go from being a 350 pound defensive tackle during football season and drop the weight and compete in basketball as a small forward in a hand full of weeks is amazing.

;)

by MattDNole on Jan 31, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn't matter now.

BC just won 67-66.

They are now 5-3 in the ACC.

Va Tech has fallen to 4-3 after a tough week.

by MattDNole on Jan 31, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Ideally...we need to win all three games...VTech is deceptively good and I think we will struggle. BC is hit or miss...

We need to finish 8-8 to have a chance of getting into the tournament…

Right now Pomeroy has us projected at 7-9. We should beat GTech and Virginia. That means we need to win 3-4 from VTech x 2, Boston College and Miami. We also have Clemson twice, Wake Forest and Duke to round out the schedule. Winning one of those would be huge…Clemson is probably our best chance at beating one of the top teams in the ACC. It’s unlikely that we will beat Duke i Cameron Indoor, though we have done it before.

by TrueCubbie on Jan 31, 2009 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I was looking over the schedule today...

I think we need to win one of the two games against both VT and Clemson. If every oher game plays out as it should, we will most likely be in. Two wins over VT along with one over Clemson would seal it.

by TBfisherman on Feb 1, 2009 9:55 PM EST reply actions  

Why do we get a 11 day hiatus -

Who schedules these things.

I can see us going 9-7 without too big of an upset.
We have home games vs.GaTech, UVA, Miami and VATech. All of these games we should win. The games @VATech and @BC are also very winnable. The other four games – @Wake, @Duke and home-and-home and Clemson are not automatic losses either.

This team should make the tourney. A fifth place finish is within our reach.

by CelticPride on Feb 4, 2009 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

Let's go Jackets!!

Could be a knockout game for Maryland.

That would get the ACC down to 8 teams competing for 6-7 spots in the Dance.

by MattDNole on Feb 8, 2009 9:23 PM EST reply actions  

First time since 98

pretty startling.

According to AC it is the latest in the season we have been ranked since 93. Good stuff.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Feb 9, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

It's pretty sad when you think about it.

Regardless, it’s nice to see a competitive team- especially one that can win on the road.

Here is that 1992-93 team courtesy of nolefan.org:

1992-93 Roster – By Name

21 Derrick Carroll F 6-6 215 Fr Columbia, SC (Eau Claire)
10 Sam Cassell G 6-3 195 Sr Baltimore, MD (Dunbar/San Jacinto JC)
34 Rodney Dobard F-C 6-9 210 Sr Delray Beach (Atlantic)
5 Ray Donald G 6-8 205 So Pensacola (Washington)
32 Doug Edwards F 6-9 220 Sr Miami (Miami Senior)
4 Chuck Graham G 6-3 190 Sr Augusta, GA (Richmond Academy)
31 Stephen Gruhl F-C 6-8 210 So Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Cathedral)
11 Lorenzo Hands G 6-3 195 Sr-R West Palm Beach (Twin Lakes)
54 Jonathan Kerner C 6-11 230 Fr Atlanta, GA (Saint Pius X Catholic)
20 Scott Porter G 6-5 200 Sr West Palm Beach
44 Andre Reid C 7-0 250 Jr Miami (Sunset)
45 Maurice Robinson F 6-6 235 Fr Little Rock, AR (Parkview)
2 Scott Shepherd G 5-11 180 Fr Carmel, IN (Carmel)
3 Bob Sura F 6-5 200 So Wilkes-Barre, PA (G.A.R. Memorial)
12 Charlie Ward G 6-1 190 Jr-R Thomasville, GA (Central)
33 Byron Wells F 6-10 235 Sr-R Tampa (King)

by coonhound on Feb 9, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the update FSUn!

I have been waiting for it since the GT game. I was thinking about the season and realized that we have a chance to get a good seed for the ACC tourney. That’s pretty exciting that we could conceivably still be playing on Saturday of the conference tourney. The thought of being a higher seed for the first game of the NCAA tourney is also pretty cool. I don’t want to get my expectations too high, but the team is improving, and I am a Rays fan, so I am spoiled.

by TBfisherman on Feb 9, 2009 7:51 PM EST reply actions  

We are undervalued in Bracketology

I know it’s inconsequential and there is a way to go, but they have us as an 8th seed.
We have a very impressive 18-5 resume with only one “bad loss” in at Northwestern.
Teams that I think we have a stronger resume than that Lunardi has above us:

5 seed Ohio State (17-5)
7 seed Minnesota (17-5)
5 seed Purdue (17-6)
6 seed Florida (19-4)
7 seed California (18-6)
6 seed Tennesee???? (14-8)
7 seed Texas (15-7)

by Zach_Nole on Feb 9, 2009 9:30 PM EST reply actions  

The SEC teams in his bracket

are curiously high considering how dreadful that conference is this year. I would contribute that simply to the normal expectation that at least one SEC team is traditionally competing for one of the top 8 seeds. They don’t have anyone with a higher RPI than 31 (Kentucky) currently, and only four other teams (Florida, Tennessee, LSU, and USC) in the SEC are in the top 65 currently.

Additionally, Ken Pomeroy has FSU with a 52 RPI. If we translated RPIs to seeds, that would be a 13 seed. If we translated rankings to seeds, FSU would be a 7 seed. So, I’m not so sure he has us too far off if the season ended today. Of course, I expect FSU to continue decent play- we’re usually well into a nose dive at this point in the season.

Also, those SEC teams, while mediocre, do have higher RPIs: Kentucy 31 (7 seed translated, 11 Lunardi), Florida 37 (10 seed translated, 6 Lunardi), LSU 39 (10 seed translated, 9 Lunardi), Tennessee 41 (11 seed translated, 6 Lunardi). And USC 53 (14 seed translated, 10 Lunardi) is one spot behind FSU 52.

Comparing the RPIs to Lunardi’s seeding, it does appear that Florida and Tennessee are a bit overrated.

Obviously, with automatic berths and such, RPIs and rankings never translate straight to a seeding. However, it sure is nice to be in the mix and not mentioned as a long-shot bubble. I think our late season mention over the past 10 years has been, “if FSU wins its final games against Duke and UNC, and then runs the table at the ACC tournament, they may get into the dance.”

by coonhound on Feb 9, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Additionally, Ken Pomeroy has FSU with a 52 RPI. If we translated RPIs to seeds, that would be a 13 seed. If we translated rankings to seeds, FSU would be a 7 seed. So, I’m not so sure he has us too far off if the season ended today. Of course, I expect FSU to continue decent play- we’re usually well into a nose dive at this point in the season.

I think a 7-9 seed is just fine. I don’t think Pomeroy does RPI anymore, however.

Here’s something interesting:

SEC: Yes, Every Team Plays the No-Respect Card, but LSU Actually Has a Point

                                     Opp.
                     Pace PPP PPP EM
1. LSU 69.6 1.12 0.91 +0.21
2. Florida 72.5 1.09 0.98 +0.11
3. Kentucky 70.2 1.03 0.93 +0.10
4. Tennessee 70.9 1.09 1.05 +0.04
5. Mississippi St. 68.1 1.00 0.97 +0.03
6. South Carolina 76.1 1.02 1.01 +0.01
7. Ole Miss 68.4 1.04 1.07 -0.03
8. Auburn 70.2 0.97 1.00 -0.04
9. Alabama 69.9 1.01 1.07 -0.06
10. Vanderbilt 68.6 0.99 1.07 -0.08
11. Arkansas 70.2 0.95 1.08 -0.13
12. Georgia 70.0 0.84 1.04 -0.20

I know i’ll be using that come bracket time. Will you be playing in our pool?

Good post, coon.

by Bud Elliott on Feb 10, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Honestly, after all these years with no Dance entry tickets, I could care less where we get seeded at, just as long as we are in.

by thirdcoastnole on Feb 9, 2009 10:27 PM EST reply actions  

I agree but

there is a huge difference between Sweet 16 odds if we are a 6 compared to an 8.
If you are an 8 you have a very difficult first round matchup in a 9, and even if you advance, you are GUARANTEED a #1 seed in the second round.

As a 6, you usually get close to a bubble team in the first round, and most likely a 3 seed in the second. You also have a slight possibility of a 14 seed in the second round.

I’d rather face a Marquette or Kansas in the second round, rather than a UNC or UConn.

by Zach_Nole on Feb 10, 2009 7:16 AM EST up reply actions  

For years I've looked at Lunardi's seeds throughout the season

And they don’t mean squat until the end.

1) The last 10 games a team plays are more weighted higher by the committee. (unless we win an ACC tournament game, the Clemson game will be in our last 10 :)

2) You never know how that win against FLA, Cal, Cincy is going to play out until you see their body of work.

3) The committee uses RPI not Pomeroy. The reason why our Pomeroy rating is so low is our margins of victory over inferior teams was so small. In the first three games of the season, we beat Jacksonville, Stetson and La Salle by a combined 8 points. We are definitely a better team than that now.

4) Tonight’s game is vital. It’s the easiest game we have left (our last chance at a bad loss

by CelticPride on Feb 10, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions  

Very nice

The three game ACC winning streak puts us in a sweet position (3rd place in the ACC :) )
The upcoming three game stretch vs Miami, @VaTech, @BC is going to be critical to our tourney hopes. But there’s this sneaky in between game @WF that no one expects us to win and it becomes a no-lose situation for us. (As in, a win would be great and a loss would be no big deal).

One of our tendencies is to play to the level of our competition and I expect Saturday’s showdown to be fun.

by CelticPride on Feb 11, 2009 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

Blech!

I don’t like the Wake loss on Wednesday. This now looks more like a should-win then a chance at a major upset.

by CelticPride on Feb 12, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Can you see the pattern?

Guess what the following is:

14 44
35 43
29 37 10
29 40
30 43
35 42
25 37
22 43
20 48

by CelticPride on Feb 11, 2009 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

Got it in one

So why is that?
I mean, this isn’t just a coincidence.

14 44? 20 48? Those are huge disparities

My hypothesis is that TD tries to get the “other guys” involved early. Then, in the second half, he takes the scoring burden on himself. After he gets hot, the opps start to double and triple him and he starts passing to open FSU shooters who hit their shots.

At least, that’s what I’ve noticed.

by CelticPride on Feb 11, 2009 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe it's because Deividas adjusts his contact lenses at halftime?

Don’t get me wrong, love the kid’s shot and his off the ball defense.

But when dude misses… he really misses.

by MattDNole on Feb 11, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Most of the time scoring more in the second half makes sense

I can see more possessions in the second half due to one team fouling a lot to extend the game.
But we’re talking extremes here. Against Duke we scored more than three times as many points in the second half!

by CelticPride on Feb 12, 2009 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

I am currently in agreement with you that we should hope BC beats Miami.

Miami, even if they lose to us and drop to 4-8, has 3 extremely winnable games after BC. Right now, I am not eliminating any mid-level ACC team from contention until they have 9 losses. The 2 bottom feeders are done even though Virginia only has 8 losses right now. Two losses for Miami this week would put them there, and that’s one less team we have to fight for a bid.

According to this logic, here’s how the teams stand.
Done:
Ga Tech
Virginia

Miracles? Well, can you walk on water?:
Maryland
NC State

Would have to go on a really good run, but can do it:
Miami

Need to take care of business, but in:

Va Tech
Florida State

Probably in, barring collapse:
Boston College

In, no questions asked:
UNC
Duke
Wake
Clemson

Despite where we currently stand, I don’t see us getting one of the top 4 seeds, Clemson and Wake are just too good, IMO. I think it’s extremely important for us to avoid the 7 or 8 seed (well duh), because we don’t want a game against Maryland or a streaking NC State on day 1 and Duke or UNC on day 2. It depends on if Wake or Clemson gets the 3 on whether it would be better for us to be at 5 or 6. Wake just presents such matchup problems for us, I’d like to stay away from them.

Wednesday night is a must win for us. Uncensored and I have talked about this statement quite a bit: A team that deserves to go to the tournament would win this game on Wednesday night.

I’d also really like for us to win 2 of our next 3, almost guaranteeing us a spot, but Pomeroy doesn’t think too highly of those chances.

by MattDNole on Feb 17, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I agree we need 2 of 3

These next three games are crucial and will go a long way to deciding our season.

by CelticPride on Feb 17, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Tonight will be a great test...

In the past 3 seasons, we have come out flat and could not put anything together in games like the one against Miami tonight. We have a chance to really solidify our bid for the tourney tonight and in seasons proir we have always come up short. While tonight is not a “must win” it will be a true character test. I think we can handle a loss if McClinton shoots lights our and we lose a nail-biter in a well played game. At this point of the season, I have learned to expect us to start out slow, but we need to settle down and get in a rhythm to demonstrate that this program has taken the next step. I expect the team to come out with great effort considering Miami is not a lower-tier team and we seem to handle challenges (except Wake) well this season.

by TBfisherman on Feb 18, 2009 8:23 AM EST reply actions  

I hope the team fights as well

I think we match up well against Miami and I happen to think we will win. This game is not a must win— but it is close.

by Bud Elliott on Feb 18, 2009 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

We simply must get to 9-7 in the ACC.

We have got to get to 9-7 this year. I really hope that Miami, Maryland, and NC State fall off the wagon and finish no better than 7-9. Hopefully we can have a hand in putting Va Tech at 8-8.

That would mark a clear cut point for the ACC at 6/7 teams with Va Tech sweating the bubble, not us: UNC, Duke, Wake, Clemson, BC, Florida State, and Va Tech. Note: I think all 7 deserve to be in, but I doubt that ESPN will hype the ACC much since they have the broadcast rights to the Big East tournament.

If Miami, Maryland, or NC State could get to 8-8 and join the discussion, then the Tournament Committee could start doing crazy things, which I don’t want.

Additionally, if we’re the team to finish 8-8, instead of Va Tech, you’ll begin to hear people on tWWL say things like "Well if Florida State can only get 3 wins in the ACC tournament, then they’ll be in." They won’t look at our resume, it will just be easier for them to claim we need to do more. Then when we can’t go on some impossible run in the ACC tourney, they’ll call us unworthy of the Dance. I know ESPN doesn’t make the selections, but they can control the dialogue and poison the Committee’s opinions.

I’d rather Va Tech be in that spot than us, so I think winning 2 of our next 3 is huge. We could help to eliminate Miami tonight, root hard for BC to finish the job on Saturday, then give BC an unexpected loss to balance their unexpected win and keep them close to 9-7 (I’m using Pomeroy’s projections here). Beat Va Tech to finish the year and we finish 9-7 and they hopefully finish 8-8 or below. We’d probably be tied for 5th (owning the tiebreaker) or 6th in the ACC in that scenario.

by MattDNole on Feb 18, 2009 9:05 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Big win for us last night

VA Tech with a bad loss in VA.
I hate it when teams we’re about to play have bad losses.
It morivates them for the next game and it diminishes our achievement value for beating them. (If we win, they’re not that good, if we lose, it looks bad…)

by CelticPride on Feb 19, 2009 9:56 AM EST reply actions  

I've learned not to count chickens...

While I don’t believe it will happen, if FSU goes on a 6 game slide, there is a chance we don’t make the dance. I really want us to win these next two games. They’re both winnable games, but we’ve had problems @BC and @VaTech in the past.. The last game of the season (home vs. VaTech) is one a lot of people are putting in their pocket, but it’s not a slam-dunk either. I think we go 3-2 down the stretch and win at least one tourney game. But I don’t want to be 7-9 going into the tourney and have to win two games there (including one against UNC or Duke) AGAIN!

by CelticPride on Feb 19, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

And the committee seems to put an emphasis on the latter part of schedule

not to mention i want us to be playing our best basketball going into the ACC tourney. Our focus at this point should be to strive for that 6 seed

by Renegade11 on Feb 20, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

If we're 6th, right now it looks like we'd have a first round game versus Virginia and a 2nd rounder versus Clemson (I'm guessing).

I don’t know if we’d rather play each of those teams a 3rd time or get the 5 seed, play Ga Tech, and challenge ourselves against Wake in the 2nd round.

NOTE:
My current assumption is that the top four in the ACC are: 1)UNC 2)Duke 3)Clemson 4)Wake.
That projected order looks like a bigger and bigger long shot as the season goes on. We could conceivably finished tied for 4th (but losing the tiebreaker) with Wake.

by MattDNole on Feb 20, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

sorry i should have clarified

i was talking about the NCAA tourney not the ACC. It may be a stretch but it’s one we should have as a goal

by Renegade11 on Feb 20, 2009 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't follow college basketball stats...

so I have no idea what Pomeroy bases “luck” on, however ranking “Luckiest” teams is pretty absurd. Winning close games doesn’t constitute as luck in my book. The old saying luck is where preparation meets opportunity.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Feb 22, 2009 8:57 AM EST reply actions  

Luck is an absurd way of saying team X is better than we thought

An anomaly when confined to a few instances, a sign of a good team when not

by realnole1128 on Feb 22, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

It's okay to be lucky

It’s just shown that no team has some ability to win all their games close. From year to year, the team who wins all their close games usually regresses to the mean in year two.

You winning % in close games (5 pts or less) should be consistent with your overall willing %)
Sat Nov 15 (128) Jacksonville W, 59-57 69 Away 1-0
Tue Nov 18 (110) La Salle W, 65-61 71 Away 2-0
Thu Nov 20 (251) Stetson W, 79-77 73 Home 3-0
Sat Nov 29 (31) California W, 80-77 78 Neutral 7-0
Sun Dec 7 (41) Florida W, 57-55 64 Home 8-1
Sat Dec 13 (254) Georgia St. W, 62-57 54 Away 9-1

Sat Jan 17 (66) Maryland W, 76-73 78 OT Home 15-3 2-1
Wed Jan 28 (2) North Carolina L, 80-77 77 Home 16-5 3-3
Thu Feb 5 (101) Georgia Tech W, 62-58 71 Home 17-5 4-3
Sat Feb 7 (13) Clemson W, 65-61 66 Away 18-5 5-3
Sat Feb 21 (77) Virginia Tech W, 67-65 62 Away 21-6 8-4

We 6-0 in close non-conference games. We should be 4-2 or 5-1 (adjusting slightly for competition).
We are 4-1 in close conference games. We should be 3-2.
10-1 in close games isn’t realistic. This team has improved, however, and I am glad we have been lucky so far.

by Bud Elliott on Feb 22, 2009 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't intend to blow off luck completely

It just seems to me that if I had a choice between good skill and good luck, overwhelmingly I would choose skill-luck tends to run out at inopportune times

by realnole1128 on Feb 22, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

It takes a lot of skill to get to 21-6 overall

we agree there.

Also… 4 of our close games were before thanksgiving. This team has improved significantly.

by Bud Elliott on Feb 22, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a formula

Definitely not absurd in my opinion. Similar to baseball. When most of your wins are very close, you’re somewhat lucky. Bounce here, bounce there. There’s no way to consistently win close games. Formula based on how much you outscore your opponent by,

by Bud Elliott on Feb 22, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we can be realistic

And say that we finish in the top 4 in conf. Improbable at #1, Carolina would have to lose 2/3 vs GT, VT, and Duke, while we win out. If 2-3 is more likely, and it is, it would probably best for Duke to win vs Wake as Wake should win out -NC ST, @UVA,MD, CLEM afterwards,while Duke has @MD, @VT, (go)FSU, and @UNC, and Clemson has @GT, VT, @FSU, UVA, and @WFU—-Looking at this, we can probably afford to lose(not saying we will) to Duke and still be 2nd, no worse than 3rd, if everything else works in our favor

by realnole1128 on Feb 22, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Tomahawk Nation, your home for no-holds-barred analysis of FSU Athletics. Remember the Community Guidelines.
Start posting about the Seminoles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
FSU Football WX Outlook
Seminole_small
Continuing the Zone Discussion: An Amateurs Breakdown
_1_small
Ongoing Discussion Thread #30
Greg_reid_small
2011 Recruiting Discussion Thread #9

Recent FanPosts

Th_theuez_small
If Boise State played an ACC Schedule...
Small
My own personal Urban Meyer story
Th_theuez_small
It's finally time for the ACC to take center stage.
29seminoles
Tomahawk Nation Pick'em Get in today!
Small
My Take on JWJ
Small
Lack of attendance part 2
Laughing-man_small
2010 TN T-Shirts?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Utah wide receiver Jereme Brooks (85) celebrates a touchdown with teammates during the first half of an NCAA college football game against Pittsburgh on Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson)

No. 15 Pittsburgh Rallies In Fourth Quarter, But Loses To Utah In Overtime, 27-24

HONOLULU - SEPTEMBER 2:  Ronald Johnson #83 of the University of Southern California Trojans runs in for a touchdown against Corey Nielsen #8 of the University of Hawaii Warriors during first half action at Aloha Stadium September 2 2010 in Honolulu Hawaii. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images)

Lane Kiffin Is Victorious In Debut, No. 14 USC Wins In A Shootout At Hawaii, 49-36

South Carolina quarterback Stephen Garcia, left, celebrates a first-quarter touchdown with South Carolina tackle Kyle Nunn, center, and South Carolina guard Rokevious Watkins, right, during the first half of their NCAA college football game against Southern Mississippi, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, at Williams-Brice Stadium, in Columbia, S.C.  (AP Photo/Brett Flashnick) link

South Carolina Rolls Over Southern Miss, Wins 41-13

More from SBNation.com >


Chiefs

Img_4552_small TrueCubbie

29seminoles Bud Elliott

Editors

Miller_small basaltrock

446905_small nolesblogger

Small Fsued

Doak_1968_small pbysh

Small CaStauch

Vacation_013_small MattDNole

Mickey_a_small FSUSOM

Frank_the_tank_small DKfromVA

Peter_ernie_small The K-Man

_1_small FrankDNole

Robbowtiedrink_small ricobert1

Florida-county-map_small SWFLNole.

Highlife_small fsu44

Moderators

Peter_warrick_small TRMNole

Seminoleswag_small NoleLaw