Thinking about thoughts, fourth downs, and the nature of evidence
"A very good examination of human rationality and risk aversion in the decision making process."
9 months ago
Bud Elliott
18 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Interesting... people often forget a few factors though
high success rate average on 4th doesn’t take into consideration situational strategies and game flow.
e.g. a team defends 4th and 2 differently with their back to wall on their half of the 50yrd line. or in the middle of a close game, than when they have to defend one last play in the ball game against a team that doesn’t need to score.
In the end these factors should be considered, along with defensive tendency (situationaly), and the difference in the odds if you punt and defend.
Yeah, right!
I think a lot of FSUn’s statistics take a variety of these variables in consideration, including time last in the half/game, field position, point differential, etc.
Actually, I think FSUn posted a link to a thesis some kid from somewhere like Stanford did on this exact issue, and more specifically how does risk-aversion effect the decision.
Has anyone considered that the real coaching error by Bellichek
…was not giving up the immediate touchdown to allow your offense to go back out there and try for the GW FG?
interesting take
I think the article states that teams score a touchdown approximately 50 percent of the time when faced with the situation the Colts had after NE failed to convert.
I think the team specific adjustments (most notably peyton manning in the 2 minute drill) made the decision to go for it that much stronger.
Would have had about 1:51 or so left on ensuing kickoff
albeit, with no timeouts. Still I think that’s enough time to go 30-45 yards to setup the FG. This would’ve been the BALLSIEST move ever.
Wouldn't the NFL sh*t if one of the teams did a "gator flop" to let the other team score. I think all hell would break loose at NFL headquarters.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Not at all
In fact, it happened in the Green-Bay v. Denver super bowl.
Definitely strategic. Teams also take intentional safeties.
Exactly!
Wasn’t it NE that hiked the ball literally into the goal post to force a safety? What game was that?
While not as obvious
that actually happened this past weekend. They tried to let MJD score a TD. The coaches were told not to tackle him at all. The story became famous because MJD pulled a Westbrook. So yeah, it def still happens.
All of you are correct that it has and does happen, I just think the uptight NFL probably doesn't ike it, even though they have never made an issue of it. And yes it is good strategy sometimes not to let a punt get blocked and take the safety.
I am also sure they were not too happy, although nothing was said here either, with the apologies to the fantasy football players for downing it at the one yard line.
They are always so cognizant of the gambling implications that you know it has to be a concern, although I have never seen any that can be even be considered in any way improper.
I always just think of the original gator flop when all the players just fell down to the ground against UM to let Reeves get a passing record. SCUMBAGS. But it would be cool if Noles did it, because I know we wouldn’t flop, we would just be playing our base defense.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Also if I remember correctly, Holmgren admitted he thought it was 1st down when it was actually second down,
and that he might not have called it if he realized it was 2nd. Regardless, irrelevant and probably the right call anyway because there were less than 2 minutes to go, just like in the example above.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
I agree about the gambling implications
but you’re so seriously questioned here. The whole team would need to be in on it I would suepect.
I think we are lucky, you more so than me, that the NFL has always been pretty clean.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Thanks for posting this
I’ve been arguing that going for it was the right call, both statistically, and intuitively (trying to deny Manning a chance to win the game).
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
