What's So Great About Ponder?

My general impression from posts here and elsewhere is that people are enthusiastic about Christian Ponder. But by FSU standards, the numbers don't seem to support this enthusiasm. So can someone tell me what is so great about Ponder?
(This post should be a nice contrast to the Kool-Aid I offered in the Jermaine Thomas/Warrick Dunn comparison. It's also unlikely to be ripped-off by Fearthespear.com)
Long-time followers of Seminole pigskin will recognize one undeniable fact: We get more 'W's with 'W's. That is, we've won more games with Willis, Weldon, Ward, Weinke and Weatherford than with any 5 non-W quarterbacks. (I'd love to see someone check the numbers on this.) All the 'W's (except Drew) had 10 or more wins in a season. So when P-O-N-D-E-R becomes W-O-N-D-E-R, I'll look forward to 10 wins and an ACC championship. Unfortunately, he has yet to show any resemblance to the W-inners of the previous decades.
In what follows, I argue that Ponder is mediocre by FSU (and perhaps any) standards. My analysis of Ponder goes both vertical (comparing Ponder with other FSU signal callers in the last 20 years) and horizontal (comparison with 2008 ACC QBs). In either comparison, Ponder comes out average or worse. It is true that he compares well with fellow ACC signal-callers, but given the mediocre talent among ACC QBs, all that follows is that Ponder is above-average among mediocre colleagues. This may be obvious to some, but others may be like me -- optimistic prior to careful study of the numbers.
VERTICAL COMPARISON
The following charts show how Ponder compares to other (selected) successful Seminole QBs. Quarterbacks were selected by no scientific procedure. Mostly, they had gobs of passing yards. I simply took 12 (apparently) good years of FSU QB performance and compared them using various metrics. This may be a very bad way to do a comparison, but it's good (and interesting) enough for a Fanpost.
Pass Efficiency Rating
Quarterback/YR.
Pass Eff.
Pass Yds.
Tot. Yds.
TDs
Int.
Pass Att.
Comp.
Rix 2001
168.02
2734
3123
27
13
286
165
Weinke 2000
161.20
4167
4070
34
11
431
266
Ward 1993
160.60
3032
3371
31
13
380
264
Willis 1989
149.97
3124
3094
22
9
346
211
Busby 1997
147.38
3317
3301
27
10
390
235
Weldon 1991
145.48
2527
2497
22
8
313
189
Kanell 1995
144.66
2957
2916
32
13
402
257
Weinke 1999
142.70
3103
2994
25
14
377
232
Ward 1992
138.98
2647
3151
28
17
365
204
Kanell 1994
136.06
2781
2654
18
13
380
264
Ponder 2008
126.17
2006
2429
18
13
318
177
Weatherford 2005
120.79
3208
3180
21
18
469
276
Pass Efficiency = [ { (8.4 * yards) + (330 * touchdowns) - (200 * interceptions) + (100 * completions) } / attempts ]. This is the NCAA formula as far as I know.
Quarterback Score Per Play (QBSPP)
| Quarterback/YR. | QBSPP* | Plays | Int. | Total yds |
| Weinke 2000 | 5.1 | 461 | 11 | 4070 |
| Willis 1989 | 4.5 | 377 | 9 | 3094 |
| Rix 2001 | 4.1 | 385 | 13 | 3123 |
| Busby 1997 | 3.7 | 447 | 10 | 3301 |
| Ward 1993 | 3.7 | 445 | 13 | 3371 |
| Weldon 1991 | 3.4 | 351 | 8 | 2497 |
| Weinke 1999 | 3.3 | 408 | 14 | 2994 |
| Kanell 1995 | 3 | 421 | 13 | 2916 |
| Ward 1992 | 2.7 | 465 | 17 | 3151 |
| Kanell 1994 | 2.6 | 407 | 13 | 2654 |
| Weatherford 2005 | 1.9 | 536 | 18 | 3180 |
| Ponder 2008 | 1.7 | 437 | 13 | 2429 |
| AVG. | 3.3 | 428.33 | 12.67 | 3065.00 |
Quarterback score = (total yards-(3*total plays)-(30*turnovers))
QBSPP = Quarterback score/total plays
*I didn't have time to dig up the numbers on fumbles, so turnovers=interceptions.
For more on QBSPP, you can view Statistical Thinking in Sports, by Albert and Koning here. QBSPP is, I suppose, primarily an NFL metric. If you don't think it's a good metric for NCAA football, help me out by explaining why.
Yards Per Play (passing and rushing)
| Weinke 2000 | 8.83 |
| Willis 1989 | 8.21 |
| Rix 2001 | 8.11 |
| Ward 1993 | 7.58 |
| Busby 1997 | 7.38 |
| Weinke 1999 | 7.34 |
| Weldon 1991 | 7.11 |
| Kanell 1995 | 6.93 |
| Ward 1992 | 6.78 |
| Kanell 1994 | 6.52 |
| Weatherford 2005 | 5.93 |
| Ponder 2008 | 5.56 |
Total Offense per Game
| Quarterback/YR. | Tot Off/Gm |
| Weinke 2000 | 339.17 |
| Ward 1993 | 306.45 |
| Busby 1997 | 300.09 |
| Ward 1992 | 286.45 |
| Rix 2001 | 283.91 |
| Weinke 1999 | 272.18 |
| Kanell 1995 | 265.09 |
| Willis 1989 | 257.83 |
| Weatherford 2005 | 244.62 |
| Kanell 1994 | 241.27 |
| Weldon 1991 | 208.08 |
| Ponder 2008 | 186.85 |
| AVG. | 266.00 |
Conclusions from Vertical Analysis
What can we conclude from this? We can reasonably claim that Ponder doesn't stack up well to our best passers, historically. I suppose this should temper our expectations about the passing game in 2009, but not necessarily about wins. One huge difference between these QBs from the good (and not so good) ol' days and Ponder is that in the good ol' days, we were pass first, run second. Perhaps Ponder can function as a care-taker QB in the model of Trent Dilfer (a very mobile Dilfer), assuming our defense is up to par.
One interesting note is that while Weatherford, who won 8 games in 1995, is near the bottom along with Ponder in virtually all the above charts, Rix 2001, who also won just 8 games, comes in near the top in almost all of them. Why is this? We could blame it on the defense in 2001, who allowed 26.1 points per game. This number is almost 10 pts. above the average for the group, which is 17 points per game allowed. That is, all of the other QBs listed had a much better-performing defense backing them up. The best performance was, of course, the 1993 D which allowed 9.4 ppg. Last year, Ponder's defense allowed 20.2 ppg.
At the end of the day, these numbers concern me. None of the 10-win teams I looked at had a QB with a QBSPP lower than 2.5. I suspect that no 10-win FSU team in the last 20 years has had a QB with numbers like Ponder's. Unless Jermaine Thomas fulfills my prediction of a 1,000-yard season, we could be looking at 8 or fewer wins. Not only that, but even if Ponder cranks up his QBSPP to 3.0 or better, it will be in vain unless our defense can hold down opponents' scoring. Rix had a QBSPP of 4.1 in 2001, but the defense couldn't keep up.
HORIZONTAL COMPARISON
How does Ponder stack up to other ACC QBs based on 2008 stats? (These stats are from College Football Stats.)
Yards Per Game: #8
| Name | Team | Yr | Pos | G | Att | Comp | Pct. | Yards | Yards/Att | Int | TD | Rating | Att/G | Yards/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cullen Harper | Clemson | SR | QB | 13 | 360 | 221 | 61.4 | 2601 | 7.2 | 14 | 13 | 126.22 | 27.7 | 200.1 |
| 2 | Thaddeus Lewis | Duke | JR | QB | 11 | 361 | 224 | 62.0 | 2171 | 6.0 | 6 | 15 | 122.96 | 32.8 | 197.4 |
| 3 | Chris Turner | Maryland | JR | QB | 13 | 374 | 214 | 57.2 | 2516 | 6.7 | 11 | 13 | 119.32 | 28.8 | 193.5 |
| 4 | Marc Verica | Virginia | SO | QB | 11 | 354 | 226 | 63.8 | 2037 | 5.8 | 16 | 8 | 110.59 | 32.2 | 185.2 |
| 5 | Riley Skinner | Wk Forest | JR | QB | 13 | 363 | 232 | 63.9 | 2347 | 6.5 | 7 | 13 | 126.18 | 27.9 | 180.5 |
| 6 | Russell Wilson | NC State | FR | QB | 12 | 275 | 150 | 54.5 | 1955 | 7.1 | 1 | 17 | 133.94 | 22.9 | 162.9 |
| 7 | Chris Crane | BC | SR | QB | 11 | 307 | 169 | 55.0 | 1721 | 5.6 | 13 | 10 | 104.42 | 27.9 | 156.5 |
| 8 | Christian Ponder | FSU | SO | QB | 13 | 318 | 177 | 55.7 | 2006 | 6.3 | 13 | 14 | 115.00 | 24.5 | 154.3 |
| 9 | Robert Marve | Miami (Fl) | FR | QB | 11 | 213 | 116 | 54.5 | 1293 | 6.1 | 13 | 9 | 107.18 | 19.4 | 117.5 |
| 10 | Jacory Harris | Miami (Fl) | FR | QB | 13 | 194 | 118 | 60.8 | 1195 | 6.2 | 7 | 12 | 125.76 | 14.9 | 91.9 |
QB Rating: #6
| Name | Team | Yr | Pos | G | Att | Comp | Pct. | Yards | Yards/Att | Int | TD | Rating | Att/G | Yards/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Russell Wilson | NC State | FR | QB | 12 | 275 | 150 | 54.5 | 1955 | 7.1 | 1 | 17 | 133.94 | 22.9 | 162.9 |
| 2 | Cullen Harper | Clemson | SR | QB | 13 | 360 | 221 | 61.4 | 2601 | 7.2 | 14 | 13 | 126.22 | 27.7 | 200.1 |
| 3 | Riley Skinner | Wk Forest | JR | QB | 13 | 363 | 232 | 63.9 | 2347 | 6.5 | 7 | 13 | 126.18 | 27.9 | 180.5 |
| 4 | Thaddeus Lewis | Duke | JR | QB | 11 | 361 | 224 | 62.0 | 2171 | 6.0 | 6 | 15 | 122.96 | 32.8 | 197.4 |
| 5 | Chris Turner | Maryland | JR | QB | 13 | 374 | 214 | 57.2 | 2516 | 6.7 | 11 | 13 | 119.32 | 28.8 | 193.5 |
| 6 | Christian Ponder | FSU | SO | QB | 13 | 318 | 177 | 55.7 | 2006 | 6.3 | 13 | 14 | 115.00 | 24.5 | 154.3 |
| 7 | Marc Verica | Virginia | SO | QB | 11 | 354 | 226 | 63.8 | 2037 | 5.8 | 16 | 8 | 110.59 | 32.2 | 185.2 |
| 8 | Robert Marve | Miami (Fl) | FR | QB | 11 | 213 | 116 | 54.5 | 1293 | 6.1 | 13 | 9 | 107.18 | 19.4 | 117.5 |
| 9 | Chris Crane | BC | SR | QB | 11 | 307 | 169 | 55.0 | 1721 | 5.6 | 13 | 10 | 104.42 | 27.9 | 156.5 |
Yards Per Attempt: #5 (not too bad)
| Name | Team | Yr | Pos | G | Att | Comp | Pct. | Yards | Yards/Att | Int | TD | Rating | Att/G | Yards/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cullen Harper | Clemson | SR | QB | 13 | 360 | 221 | 61.4 | 2601 | 7.2 | 14 | 13 | 126.22 | 27.7 | 200.1 |
| 2 | Russell Wilson | NC State | FR | QB | 12 | 275 | 150 | 54.5 | 1955 | 7.1 | 1 | 17 | 133.94 | 22.9 | 162.9 |
| 3 | Chris Turner | Maryland | JR | QB | 13 | 374 | 214 | 57.2 | 2516 | 6.7 | 11 | 13 | 119.32 | 28.8 | 193.5 |
| 4 | Riley Skinner | Wk Forest | JR | QB | 13 | 363 | 232 | 63.9 | 2347 | 6.5 | 7 | 13 | 126.18 | 27.9 | 180.5 |
| 5 | Christian Ponder | FSU | SO | QB | 13 | 318 | 177 | 55.7 | 2006 | 6.3 | 13 | 14 | 115.00 | 24.5 | 154.3 |
| 6 | Robert Marve | Miami (Fl) | FR | QB | 11 | 213 | 116 | 54.5 | 1293 | 6.1 | 13 | 9 | 107.18 | 19.4 | 117.5 |
| 7 | Thaddeus Lewis | Duke | JR | QB | 11 | 361 | 224 | 62.0 | 2171 | 6.0 | 6 | 15 | 122.96 | 32.8 | 197.4 |
| 8 | Marc Verica | Virginia | SO | QB | 11 | 354 | 226 | 63.8 | 2037 | 5.8 | 16 | 8 | 110.59 | 32.2 | 185.2 |
| 9 | Chris Crane | BC | SR | QB | 11 | 307 | 169 | 55.0 | 1721 | 5.6 | 13 | 10 | 104.42 | 27.9 | 156.5 |
Total Offense Per Game: #5
| Name | Team | Yr | Pos | G | Rush Yards | Pass Yards | Plays | Total Yards | Yards/Play | Yards/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thaddeus Lewis | Duke | JR | QB | 11 | 96 | 2171 | 430 | 2267 | 5.3 | 206.1 |
| 2 | Russell Wilson | NC State | FR | QB | 12 | 388 | 1955 | 391 | 2343 | 6.0 | 195.3 |
| 3 | Riley Skinner | Wk Forest | JR | QB | 13 | 144 | 2347 | 467 | 2491 | 5.3 | 191.6 |
| 4 | Cullen Harper | Clemson | SR | QB | 13 | -140 | 2601 | 414 | 2461 | 5.9 | 189.3 |
| 5 | Christian Ponder | FSU | SO | QB | 13 | 423 | 2006 | 437 | 2429 | 5.6 | 186.8 |
| 6 | Chris Turner | Maryland | JR | QB | 13 | -154 | 2516 | 417 | 2362 | 5.7 | 181.7 |
| 7 | Marc Verica | Virginia | SO | QB | 11 | -71 | 2037 | 386 | 1966 | 5.1 | 178.7 |
| 8 | Chris Crane | BC | SR | QB | 11 | 225 | 1721 | 388 | 1946 | 5.0 | 176.9 |
| 9 | Tyrod Taylor | Va Tech | SO | QB | 12 | 738 | 1036 | 320 | 1774 | 5.5 | 147.8 |
| 10 | Josh Nesbitt | Ga Tech | SO | QB | 11 | 693 | 808 | 295 | 1501 | 5.1 | 136.5 |
(I didn't have room for the chart, but if you adjust the above numbers to "Total Offense Per Game vs. Winning Teams Only," Ponder drops to #7.) Interesting note: in both the Big 10 and SEC, five passers would have finished ahead of Lewis in Total Offense per game; in the Big 12, eleven QBs did better than Lewis. Even in the PAC-10 and Big East, 3 passers outperformed our best on this metric.
Rush Yards per Game among Running QBs: #3
| Name | Team | Yr | Pos | G | Att | Yards | Avg. | TD | Att/G | Yards/G | |
| 1 | Josh Nesbitt | Ga Tech | SO | QB | 11 | 172 | 693 | 4.03 | 7 | 15.64 | 63 |
| 2 | Tyrod Taylor | Va Tech | SO | QB | 12 | 147 | 738 | 5.02 | 7 | 12.25 | 61.5 |
| 3 | Christian Ponder | FSU | SO | QB | 13 | 119 | 423 | 3.55 | 4 | 9.15 | 32.54 |
| 4 | Russell Wilson | NC State | FR | QB | 12 | 116 | 388 | 3.34 | 4 | 9.67 | 32.33 |
| 5 | Chris Crane | BC | SR | QB | 11 | 81 | 225 | 2.78 | 7 | 7.36 | 20.45 |
I'll give Ponder a thumbs-up on this comparison, but it's a stretch to think that 32.54 YPG is significant in terms of winning games.
Finally, what about QBSPP among other ACC quarterbacks? Ponder comes in at #7 with a QBSPP of 1.67. The top score of 2.92 went to Russell Wilson.
Conclusions from Horizontal Analysis
Clearly Ponder compares better with other ACC QBS than he does with the FSU hall of fame, and this is no shock. But this may be due to mediocre quarterback play all around in the ACC. If so, then Ponder is just slightly above-average in a mediocre conference.
Some may argue that defenses in the ACC are better-than-average, which brings down QB numbers. If so, then this reflects better on Ponder. But I'm not sure I buy this line of argument. It seems very reasonable to think that the ACC is populated with average QBs. Here's one reason why: Matt Ryan. If QB mediocrity in the ACC was due to tough defensive play, then Ryan shouldn’t have had numbers too far beyond those of his counterparts. But Ryan blew the competition away. Ryan amassed 4507 total yards and 321.9 YPG in 2007. Cullen Harper came in second place with 2991 total yards and 230.1 YPG. It seems reasonable to conclude that Ryan was an elite QB in a crowd of unremarkable QBs. In 2008, the ACC had no elite QBs.
Top quarterbacks in other conferences had numbers (in 2008) far beyond those of their ACC counterparts. E.g., Colt McCoy had a QBSPP of 4.35, Mark Sanchez a 3.99, and Tebow (peace be upon him) had an eye-popping 4.71. (Note: Tebow was 4th in passing yards per game in the SEC.) My suspicion is that they would do just fine against ACC defenses. For instance, Tebow was able to match his season average of 7.2 yards per play against us last year; Stafford eclipsed his season avg. of 8 ypp against Tech with an impressive 9.1 ypp and almost 400 yds. passing; and John Parker Wilson beat his season avg. of 5.7 ypp with 5.9 against Clemson. (Anyone have numbers on how other elite QBs performed vs. ACC?)
Final Conclusions
Ponder is mediocre, by FSU (or any other) standards. If we are going to return to 10-win seasons and contenting regularly for the National Championship, then it won't be with Ponder-as-he-is or as-he-was-in-2008. In my amateur opinion, Ponder needs to be more efficient. If he can improve (1) average yards per rush attempt; and (2) average yards per completion, each by a full yard, we will win more games than we did last year. Both (1) and (2), but especially (1), should be helped significantly by a more experienced O-line this year (fewer sacks -- Ponder was sacked 19 times last year). But I will remain skeptical about our future until Ponder starts to resemble the QBs of old -- not in terms of yards, but at least in terms of efficiency. It will be interesting to see Ponder's numbers after the first few games.
If Ponder can improve his efficiency and lead us to an ACC Championship this year, then I will be the first to move that we change his name from Ponder to Wonder.
Here are my questions for you:
- Should we be excited about Ponder in 2009?
- If yes, then why? (Are there any metrics that make Ponder look better?)
- Why should we think that ACC defenses are tougher than those in other conferences?
- How can Jimbo help Ponder to improve efficiency?
0 recs |
126 comments
|
Comments
The thing is ...
for all the praise for the offensive line, it was pretty pathetic at protecting the passer. How much will Ponder’s performance improve with more time to plant his feet correctly and not so much throwing on the run?
I think that’s the big hope. That he’s learned and better protection from the line will lead to improvement.
by Wild@Heart Nole on Jul 30, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions
When I look at players
I try to compare stats/scouting. Ponder’s numbers have not been impressive, however he has shown flashes of great ability. It will be interesting to see how his accuracy imporoves from all the hard work her has (reportedly) been doing. That is where the improvement will/can/should come.
I am cautiously optomistic on Ponder.
I was at FSU when....
Wienke tossed all those INTs versus NC State. It sticks out in my mind as the worse QB performance that I ever watched in FSU history. It was as if he had a rare for of dyslexia that reversed the colors of the uniforms he saw, and he thought the DBs were open WRs for him to throw the ball to. After the game was over, I walked down to either the Chic-fil-a or Pizza Hut to grab a bite, and the mood on campus was the closest thing I have ever seen to a sudden death or injury. Nobody even made eye contact while walking, much less talked to each other. In the end the guy turned into a pretty good QB.
I think it is a bit unfair to compare Ponder, stat to stat, with other FSU QBs at the current time. Because people seem to take the other players’ best years and stick them against Ponder’s first. It may be a better comparison to look at the first years they started with the team. Even then Ponder is at a disadvantage. Not only has ACC football improved over the years, but our talent level has dropped and UF is currently going through its Golden Age of Football. With the exception of Ward, who would crush the ACC with his dual threat ability much worse than Wilson did last year, I don’t know if any FSU QB could have excelled if they were first time starters last year.
I don’t know if Ponder can get us to 10 wins this year, but I expect him to be better. A better O-line and the running game being the focus will open up space for the passing game. As long as he can cut down on the INTs without becoming completely conservative Ponder should be fine. He will probably never be an All-TIme Great, but it has been so long we don’t expect one to line up for us anymore. He should make a BCS Bowl before his time in Tally us up though.
i dont mind the chilis
although its the slowest chilis i’ve ever been to. and kinda sucks at getting orders right. My roommate last year ordered the same thing twice a week for the entire semester and they always screwed it up
I suppose what confuses me
is that people are absolutely convinced that Ponder is an improvement over Rix and Weatherford, or anyone since Weinke for that matter. But on what basis? As far as I’m concerned, Ponder is in the same class as those guys. At least he had one advantage, though: he didn’t have to start as a Freshman. That’s probably why he handles himself better.
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I will always argue
That Rix could have been a monster. His first year he put up some great numbers. You even hint to how great some of his stats were in the piece. I think if he would have had a stronger OC or Head Coach he may have turned out differently. Also the Defense had some problems at the time. Back to Ponder though.
I think part of the reason for the optimism is that this is Fisher’s first QB at FSU that he has had a chance to really coach up. We know Ponder has the physical talent to be a good QB. He also appears to have his head on straight and be coachable. So since we have faith in Jimbo we take Ponder’s traits and expect Jimbo to mold him into a quality QB.
by osceolafan850 on Jul 30, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Totally agree on Rix
Rix was a phenom as a Freshman. I always felt he was coached away from being Chris Rix, as they tried to make him Weinke… Have you ever seen a QB regress like he did? He could have been one of our best.
Agreed on Rix
I think alot of Rix’s problems also came from the fact that he would show a flash of greatness and then on the next play throw a stupid turnover. Also all of our GREAT QB’s played as Juniors and Seniors. They had a few years to develop where as Rix, and Drew got thrown in the Lion’s Den
Huked On Foniks Wurks Fer ME!!!!
by PanamaCityBeach-NOLE on Jul 30, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Rix
I just want to take this chance to vent a little on Chris Rix and our quarterback play over the last few years.
I enrolled at FSU the same year as Rix and that was about the first year I became a “True Nole”.
Watching his career made me want to stick very sharp objects in to my eyes over and over…one can aruge the whole OC problem, and I get that, but his play on the field drove me nuts…at least at the time. Since then, I’ve came to truly appreciate on thing about Rix. That guy played w/a lot of hear and a lot fire…something that this football team has lacked since he left. For that, I thank Chris Rix. As much as he drove me nuts, i still feel like he got a raw deal at FSU.
Team chemistry was a serious issue then.
Speed is a great asset; but it's greater when it's combined with quickness - and there's a big difference.
- Ty Cobb
I don’t disagree, I sat in class w/other players ripping into Rix. I didn’t know him peronsally; however, the heart that he played with, hasn’t been seen since.
Well said cousinjay.
Speed is a great asset; but it's greater when it's combined with quickness - and there's a big difference.
- Ty Cobb
I was FORTUNATE enough to start at FSU during the last two years of Rix. I wasn’t as heavily into FSU football as I am now, but back then I remember people screaming from the stands “YOU SUCK RIX.” He didn’t seem that bad to me. I say fortunate enough because he was the last one around for a 10 win season and the last to beat the crocs. So, yes, I consider myself lucky to have watched Rix. I feel bad for those that were only at FSU during the Drew era.
This is also the first year in some time
that there hasn’t been a question about who will be the starter.
Now, this could change if Ponder really sucks the first three games and of course, everyone will be calling for Manual to save us.
But I do think that fans are optimistic because there isn’t a question, there isn’t a realistic competition at the spot. We’re not debating racial nonsense (save WC, they love talking the race card over there). So, even if his Sophomore stats aren’t up to par with Charlie Ward and Chris Weinke’s senior years, we’re content with the QB spot and more concerned about the secondary and the linebackers.
Fair enough
Perhaps I shouldn’t have compared Ponder’s SO campaign against others’ SR seasons. But I did include several QB’s first seasons: Ward, Kanell and Willis. Granted, they were JRs or SRs. Still, Ponder’s efficiency numbers most resemble Weatherford’s as a FR. Scary.
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I think
This is the one caveat I have with this overall excellent article. Most on the FSU list were Jr or Sr. and/or already more than a year of the starting job, with very little QB controversy. I would say lets redo this article at the end of the season, and we will have a MUCH different viewpoint. Pass Pro last year was terrible, giving any QB happy feet especially a first year underclassmen starter.
I would also like to point out the Ponderwas easily the best UNDERCLASSMAN QB in the ACC last year behind Wilson who we all know is a beast. I believe we will see a drastic change in his play this year, 90% due to the dominating offensive line.
by freshcollegeboy on Jul 30, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions
If the fans call for EJ and jimbo dont think hes ready JIMBO wont start him
and I dont think jimbo will do that. Jimbo like ponder a lot from the looks and I think ponders stats will shine. EJ needs another year and some small time get his feet wet and make a splash in 2 more years.
Why is the sky blue? Because, God Loves the Infantry
other than an acc championship, the one thing I really want this season is Ponder’s play to allow for EJ to sit on the bench until the pressure’s off.
by NorthernHaze on Jul 30, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions
well ponder will start this year and most likely next
Why is the sky blue? Because, God Loves the Infantry
stats are ok to go by
but if you watched the games, you saw flashes of what we all hope he will be, very mobile with weapons around him to win, lets not forget last year was his first as a starter, and basically unexpected at that with weatherford as a senior, but now he has had a full spring as a starter under his belt and is about to have a full slate of 2-a-days as a starter, so to think he wont improve off last year is just very pessimistic….and lets not forget jimbo knows what hes doing….hes not gonna let a inadequate player run his offense.
Thoughts on Ponder
He’s a very smart guy with a lot of toughness and good athletic ability. Those tools make me optimistic in some ways. The line will have to improve in pass pro for him to improve his stats. I think the running game can help open up the passing game and create some big plays for him in our offense, but I think the problem with this year will be the wide receivers. I really think we’ll see a lot of missed routes and incompletions/interceptions created by receiver’s mistakes rather than Ponder’s. I don’t see much change in his passing numbers happening this year, and I think Jimbo will run him less because of how banged up he was by the end of last year.
Don't have time to craft the repsponse I want to craft right now, so here's some shotgun
I think you are way off on the ACC defenses. FSU’s defense was average last year in the ACC. The ACC produced more NFL defenders than any other conference over the last 5 years and had many this past season as well. Additionally, the advanced metrics like FEI show that the ACC’s defenses are exceptional, having 5 in the top 15. It’s widely accepted that the ACC is the best and most defensive conference, with multiple NFL defensive guys coaching in the league.
Also, Ponder had 12 picks, not 13. The one against Colorado was a scorer’s error. Ponder threw a ball, which was batted down, he caught it, and ran with it, then fumbled. The scorer put it as an interception.
Ponder played the hardest schedule FSU has ever played.
I think you should compare the ACC games to the ACC games.
I don’t think meaningful analysis can be made between the old teams and now. FSU beat up on bad teams in the 80’s and 90’s. The ’Noles played good teams for cred and a lot of very bad teams.
We need to remove plays that came in garbage time.
When looking at the rushing stats, we need to look at running plays only, without sacks.
I don’t like the use of total yards because I think it’s misleading.
Agree
Tough to compare a lot of this stuff. For one, a few of QBs on that list had Warrick Dunn in their backfield and we all know Antone Smith was no Warrick Dunn. How much of an affect did he have on the stats/performance of those QBs I don’t really know but I am sure it didn’t hurt. The difference in surrounding talent and schedule strength is enough for me to give Ponder a pass for last year especially considering a lot of those guys started their Jr/Sr years. Also I am not sure many of those guys had to deal with as much of the dysfunction in terms of coaching, and off the field issues (the WR suspensions) as Ponder had to last year. I guess we will know soon enough if Ponder is ready to take his game to the next level or if he is just all hype
"No, like I said, Woo peed on my rug" - The Dude
Some good thoughts here
Thanks FSUn. It sounds like you are right. What is your source for defensive rankings? Also, I’d like to eliminate sacks, but that takes more time and skill than I have. How big of a difference would that make in Ponder’s numbers?
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's a question . . .
If a conference has great defensive numbers and poor offensive numbers, how do we know whether this was due to good D or bad O? (or both) My first thought is to look at how they did against (good) non-conf. opponents. I mentioned 3 examples in my post, all of which seemed to favor the “Bad offense” theory. Any idea on an easy way to get that data?
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Brian does it all there. If you click on "articles- fremeau efficiency index"
You can see how he does it week by week.
He literally takes every game into account.
When Wake holds Ole Miss in check, that helps them. It’s way comprehensive and not perfect.
There's also some stuff I have at home that I can't access right now
that shows our offensive line, on passing downs (2nd and 7+/ 3rd & 5+) was 112th in the country.
Also
I want to say that this is one heelluvan effort and it does tell a story, I’m just not sure it tells the whole story.
Here's an article I posted after last season that goes through every INT and TD he had.
http://www.tomahawknation.com/2008/12/9/687897/ponder-better-or-worse-tha
"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"
“Ponder played the hardest schedule FSU has ever played”
Say what?!? Back that statement up please.
I wholeheartedly agree that FSU QB’s seem to come into their own in their JR and SR years.
Also QB numbers don’t take into consideration the defenses they play against. I like Ponder and I’ve watched enough FSU QB’s to think he will not be our problem this year. What worries me is depth at QB at LB and a green secondary.
We will need to be a productive run offense this year. To help the defense limit their time on the field.
"I am not now at all sure that the tendency to treat the whole thing as a kind of vast game is really good - certainly not for me who find that kind of thing only too fatally attractive." - J R R Tolkein
See http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/acc/florida_state/yearly_results.php?year=1980
year 1981 perhaps the toughest schedule ever played anywere by any team ever. The year before that in 1980 was the year Nebraska stood up and gave the team a standing O …I later found out they ALWAYS do that…nevertheless it’s still shows a lot of class
"I am not now at all sure that the tendency to treat the whole thing as a kind of vast game is really good - certainly not for me who find that kind of thing only too fatally attractive." - J R R Tolkein
Also
Our offensive line last year, in my opinion was “Above average pass blocking and brutal pass blocking.” We were not an above average overall line in my opinion. Teams consistently beat us to death without having to blitz.
Ponder
was only a first year starter behind the youngest o-line in the nation. 2 freshman tackles is FAR from ideal. He struggled in games in which the running game was also struggling (see BC, see Wake Forrest). Some of his interceptions could have been attributed to one of the laziest talents in history (Greg Carr). I count 3 off the top of my head that belong to Carr IMO. 1 int against Clemson in the end zone. A jump ball against BC and a “slant” that Carr cut short against Georgia Tech. Ponder also threw what is officially scored as an interception when he threw a pass against Colorado that was batted by a D-lineman, and caught by Ponder himself. Other picks include being hit on the arm while throwing out of his own end zone against Miami. Interceptions are the result of a play, but they don’t always tell the entire story. I’m not going to sit here and make the argument that Ponder was an efficient QB but I have no problem saying that his numbers were misleading and considering what he was given and the situations in which he played badly, i’d say he still has the opportunity to be a good QB. Remember despite all the things stacked against him he still led us to 9 wins. He played very well in the Maryland game, our receivers couldn’t catch a cold in the UF game and he showed improvement in the Champ Sports Bowl. He’s too smart and has too many tools for me to write him off just yet.
I'm not writing Ponder off
nor am I suggesting anyone else do so. I’m just saying that we ought to be skeptical rather than optimistic.
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
"our receivers couldn’t catch a cold in the UF game"
While I agree with your comments and think Ponder will come around, he made some bad throws in the UF game.
Later, we learned he was really banged up with hurt back, cracked ribs, etc…
He didn't play well, I don't dispute that
But the least the receivers could have done is catch the balls that hit them in the hand.
ADDITION: comparing Ponder only to other first-year starters at FSU
Can’t get the chart in, but here’s the scoop. (Also adjusted Ponder’s INTs to 12). Ponder still comes out next to last on QBSPP, with only Busby 2006 scoring worse. Ponder comes out 7th out of 9 on pass efficiency, 8th in Tot. Off per game, and last in YPP.
(Included: Willis 89, Weldon 91, Ward 92, Kanell 94, Busby 96, Weinke 98, Rix 01, Weatherford 05 and Ponder 08.)
Throw out the numbers because they mean absolutely nothing
I will start by saying Christian needs to be more accurate.
How does a quarterback become more accurate? Well you need a freshman line mostly that run blocked pretty well to provide better pass protection and I believe they will. Why because Trickett has been cap whipping for awhile since last year.
You need a quarterback with a year of experience under his belt and that = Ponder.
The only former FSU quarterbacks who could have done any better than Ponder last year might be Charlie Ward and Casey Weldon and maybe Rix. Why? because they are mobile. Behind our pass blocking last year I think Weinke, Peter Tom Willis, Kannell, Busby and the list goes on would have been murdered because they can’t move and not being able to move playing behind freshman who were vastly outweighed will get you killed.
The only real question is will the offensive line be able to protect Ponder this year? I think they can, lord I hope they can and Trickett is my crutch here. If anybody can have an oline ready to play it is him.
There won’t be as much pressure on Ponder to carry the team this year. I believe he is going to have a lot of fun watching the running game open up and it will happen with much better running backs suited to zone blocking than we had last year.
This will in turn force teams to move up into the box and open up passing routes for Ponder to exploit. When you can run you stay on the field and tire a defense, they get winded, they lose heart and a quarterback exploits them. I firmly believe this will be more the case this season.
Honestly nobody has seen enough of Ponder behind a line that actually pass blocks to judge him fairly. I will say he is one of the most intelligent quarterbacks we have had here. He has a strong arm and (JIMBO FISHER IS VERY HIGH ON HIM) He is not wrong too often.
Ponder is the best running quarterback here since Charlie ward. He had almost the number of yards on the ground as Jermaine Thomas did.
In the past I recall vividly and I have said this before, watching Ward, Peter Tom Willis and Busby and saying these guys are never going to be FSU quarterbacks. They don’t fit the mold. How wrong I was so I am not going to say that about Ponder at this point.
I will say again though Christian needs to be more accurate with the touch pass and the long ball.
I don't know if anyone expects the world of Ponder as is though
I just feel that our pass protection was bad enough to warrant a first year starter struggling. I understand completely the tendency to compare to other QB’s for greater understanding but I think certain things are always going to be variable and impossible to truly account for and calculate. I too agree that Ponder isn’t the best first year starter we’ve ever had but I’m an optimist in most things personally so I guess this is no different haha. I just think that our other QB’s had the benefit of playing for a better overall program than Ponder has and he’s forever going to be remembered as the “bridge QB” from mediocrity back to greatness. He has a very tall order on his plate.
Is FSU going to beat down Miami in the opener?
Yes they are? And if this season blows up then hey I will take my lumps. I may never be able to comment again here without derision but I don’t see that happening.
A prophet is never recognized in his own house! LOL
Ponder
It seems like yesterday Doc that Charlie Ward was transitioning from punter to QB. I remember him throwing so many pics i was yelling to get him out. How many did he have in his first couple of games? Ponder just needs a chance.With some blocking he will be a winner. As a running threat defenses will have to load the box. With protection if he stays in the pocket and our WR’s step up he will be fine.
Oh, so YOU were one of those
with the ‘Honk if you’ve intercepted Charlie" bumperstickers I saw around Tally in ’92! : )
I joke. But the same kind of myopia led people to leave threats and curses on Weinke’s answering machine in ’98.
The potential of those two guys was obvious early on.
Now, I don’t quite have that feeling with Ponder. But then, he’s spent a lot of time running for his life waiting for WR’s to get open. I think he’s probably comparable to a Danny MacManus, which would be enough if the team around performs.
Charlie went his whole JR year as an “I can’t bear to watch this” until quarter 4 of the UF-FSU game at the end of the season. He bever did shine…until they dropped the I formation and went totally shotgun.
To get the most from the people you have…you have to have the scheme that maximizes their talents.
"I am not now at all sure that the tendency to treat the whole thing as a kind of vast game is really good - certainly not for me who find that kind of thing only too fatally attractive." - J R R Tolkein
Obviously, something's flawed in the analysis
when Ponder is ranked lower than Weatherford.
I don’t recall one second of last season when I said to myself “man, I wish they’d put Weattherford in for Ponder.” : )
I remember it also Nole34
I kept asking people around me where did the get this i####### from. I was also saying maybe Weinke should have stuck with baseball his first year. I felt the tackle who busted up Kendra running him down from behind should be benched and never play another down.
Bud
I realize it is like Parcels say, you are what your record says you are.
I am simply trying to show why the statistics are what they are. The philosopher already knows what the mathematician seeks to prove.
Kindly no one take offense as my sense of humor is at times overly abundant especially with the season becoming near.
Where the program REALLY got hurt
was when Rix had to start as a Freshman. Remember the days when underclassmen never started? I think that’s an important thing. The 2 things Rix had going against him was not being given the time to develop and learn from the sideline, and the horrible play calling of Jeff Bowden. Had he had a decent OC, and started as a JR, he would probably have been the best QB we ever had. This is what I didn’t like about Ponder starting last year. Weatherford performed pretty well considering as a JR and there was NO reason not to let him start his senior year and give Ponder another year to develop. Hopefully we’re back on track now, and Ponder will do fine the next 2 years and Manuel will step in and be an amazing QB afterward
Couldn't Disagree More
Starting Drew would have meant another 7-6 year at best, and lots of people saying Jimbo was a mistake and was overrated (especially with LSU’s national championship the year after he left) and predicting a collapse this year. Discontent would be rampant. The thing with Drew was he failed under Jimbo, not just under Jeff. You’re not good if you do that. Meanwhile Christian Ponder, who had just as much time (and probably a lot less attention) with Jimbo, comes in and leads us to points, not punts. He was not great and probably never will be but all he has to do is play a little better this year than last and he will do what Rix and Weatherford never once did: improve from one year to the next. That’d be a breath of fresh air and it should happen automatically if the offensive line able to pass block. Here’s hoping. It does depend on that. Also, having Ponder start this first year against the toughest schedule in the nation is a recipe for disaster. And his first start would be against Miami on Labor Day in front of the whole nation. There is a miniscule chance he’d be productive in that scenario just from extreme nervousness, especially since he wasn’t against Wake Forest last year and that was after two easy warmup games. Meaning Miami would win and it might not even be close. E.J. would still have zero playing experience so putting him in likely wouldn’t help. Now, Christian will be much calmer, far less nervous, and will have plenty of confidence because he knows he owned them once already in their own the Dolphin’s stadium.
It was long ago and it's far away but it was so much better than it is today--Meatloaf
by CantwaitforJimbo on Jul 30, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Weatherford performed pretty well considering as a JR and there was NO reason not to let him start his senior year and give Ponder another year to develop.
No. Way. Drew was the king of inflated stats deflated success. His COMPLETION % on 3rd down was 10 points higher than Ponder’s, yet Ponder converted a higher % of 3rd downs into first downs! Why? Weatherford played like a wuss. He was selfish and not a team player. He would never gun it for the 1st down, but rather, simply dump it down and punt. Ponder wants to win and throws for the first downs.
I urge you to read this: http://fsuncensored.blogspot.com/2008/07/weatherford-report.html
touche'
very well written article! I had never seen drew’s stats laid out like that.
I’m still glad we have a chance to get away from starting underclassmen qbs
by garnetandgold on Jul 30, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
That is true
Rix could have been much better with guidance.
On the other hand last year was Christian’s 3rd year on campus and Tebow won the heisman his second year at Florida.
Tebow never started out being coached by a Jeff Bowden and had an offensive line protecting him.
Just listened to a Rix interview on garnet and great
He said that he didn’t get any guidance from Weinke.
yeah but
Tebow was a 5* #1 ranked record breaking recruit placed on this earth by the heavens above to act as a messiah to the jean shorts and socks with flip flops wearing virgins of the world.
Its just not a fair comparison
"No, like I said, Woo peed on my rug" - The Dude
While I'm hopeful that Ponder shows much improvement this year
I think it depends on our OLine giving him time to throw.
Really great write up, though. Since these are taking the best years of FSU’s best QB’s, and only Ponder’s first year, I’d love to see some stats showing how the above QBs improved during their time as a starter. Obviously, some only played 1 or 2 years, but I think this will be a better understanding of how Ponder compares, especially after his second year at the helms.
I admit it...
I started to cry when I began to read this. THERE IS NO HOPE. Haha. Then I decided to do just a little digging. Take a look at Colt McCoy. In 2007 he threw 22 TD’s and had 18 pics. What did the 2007 Horns have in common with the 2008 Noles? A very young Oline. Granted McCoy’s passer rating, and all other stats for that matter (except rushing), were still considerably higher than Ponder’s 08 season, but after just one year of cohesion and practice by the Texas Oline, there was an amazing improvement. Colt proceeded to throw for 34 Td’s and just 8 pics in 08. That is quite a turn around. Now, will we see Ponder throw half as many pics and 15-20 more TDs? Uhhh, probably not going to happen. But I think it is reasonable to expect better things from Wonder, I mean Ponder. He has the smarts and the athletic ability to be a more complete passer.
Note: I only looked at the Texas Oline and Colt maybe had many more receiving weapons around him in 08. That is for one of the better football analysts here to pick up and roll with.
Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.
I'd love to think
that Ponder will emerge like McCoy, but I doubt it. Following your lead, I also checked on Matt Ryan’s SO numbers. Sadly, they are much better than Ponder’s (QBSPP=3.28), but he didn’t start every game that year (split time with Porter). Can anyone find an elite QB who had SO numbers like Ponder’s?
by missourinole on Jul 30, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think anyone expects Ponder to be a top 10 draft choice or NFL rookie of the year.
What you’re asking for is similarity scores. I doubt you find one.
That said, after reading UNFNole’s piece, how many of the 13 (really 12) INT’s were his fault? I’ll say seven at the highest.
Perhaps nobody but me and Jimbo Fisher
Fisher is on record saying Ponder is the best quarterback he has ever coached.
by DocHoliday2 on Jul 30, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Carson Palmer?
I was under the impression that Carson Palmer’s numbers prior to his Sr year were bad to unspectacular. Granted his numbers were a result of rotating OCs every year until Carrol and Chow came to town. But realistically by his Sr Ponder should have the kind of line and WRs that he can toss a quick slant or out and let them take it for 20 yards to inflate his stats.
by osceolafan850 on Jul 31, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
My 2 cents...
Ponder has huge upside….
I really think this kid is going to be great this year.
- We already know he’s smart
- He’s fast on his feet
- This is no longer his first rodeo
- The line protecting him will be better
- The running game will be improved making the defense play more men in the box and giving our wr’s more room to get open
I think its also somewhat unfair comparing him to some of the best all time qb’s at FSU.
Those teams in the past (minus the Rix and Weatherford comparisons) gelled. They just knew they were going to win.
The teams Ponders been on so far are hoping to win. Also I think the league in general has become tougher. I know those are kind of lame excuses but they definately have an effect.
I think this kid is going to be a leader and I think his team mates believe in him which is huge.
Injury plays a factor
Remember that Ponder was hurt most of the year last season and he’s a tough guy so he played through (knowing Drew was behind him, eww!). He’ll be healthy this year and that experience is going to pay dividends.
Plus the competition with EJ back there will force him to step up or be sat down.
Ponder struggled against zone defenses bad last year throwing the ball. He needs to be able to learn to read a zone D. I’m sure Mickey doesn’t show him too much of that in practice so that could be a problem.
"finally healthy this year"
I think that’s the second most overused phrase on FSU message boards (behind “swagger”). Injuries are a part of sports and everybody has to deal with them. I don’t know what would lead us to believe Ponder won’t be just as banged up as last year, based on his reckless, fearless style of running.
Will E.J. relieve Christian on as many snaps as D’vo did last year? If not, you can’t predict that CP or any player will make it through the year unscathed.
How many optimistic baseball writers have typed these fateful words: “fans hope this is the year that J.D. Drew/Chipper Jones/Troy Glaus finally puts it all together for 162 games”
Not that these are equal comparisons, just sayin’"
by The K-Man on Jul 30, 2009 5:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
well Im going to give my .02$
question 1) HELL YA ITS FSU AND DOWN TO A WEEK BEFORE FALL BALL
OK my real anwser is yes but because Im a football fan more or less. I want to see if the team has improved and is still getting better. I want to see us win at least one more game than last year and a good bowl (THE OB BABY)
2)Ponder will be better at passing this year. I truely think you need to look at the O-line. you want to look at something try looking at the sakes the past noles got vs ponders Im guessing he got saked more. I know he could throw it away but sometimes he never had the time. Also Ponder was the man last year on 3rd and long last year mostly because he wanted to make the first down unlike Weatherford.
3) In the ACC teams dont drop b-ball scores in games like the big 12. and we did kinda good last year in our OOC games. other than UF but they smash everyone.
4)Jimbo what cant he do. The guy calls the plays and he sets people up. He calls plays that play to our Str. and the opp. weeknesses. UFS drops 8 in the box to stop the runs and play the others back we run the bubble it they man up beat them long take the extra guy out the box smash them in the mouth. Thats what we are going to try to make everyone else do play our ball not theres.
Ponder might not get us to an NC but you only look at the passing of him why not the running part. We wont the mimai game on his lags I thought
Why is the sky blue? Because, God Loves the Infantry
Excellent piece missourinole!
Speed is a great asset; but it's greater when it's combined with quickness - and there's a big difference.
- Ty Cobb
missouri, Nice job and thanks for giving me some info I will need for the Offensive Backfield Progression, Regression series. I hope you don't mind if I steal some of your work.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
He is a leader
Reasons why I like Ponder.
1. He is mature. This means I don’t have to hear about him doing the following.
A. Skipping class
B. Waking up late for exam
C. Parking in a handicap spot
D. Doing some bonehead thing off the field.
E. He isn’t gambling on games
2. He is a hard worker:
A. He wants to get better and refine his craft as a QB
B. He is a fast runner as evidence against Miami last year
C. He has gone through his growing pains and will be a better QB as a result.
D. He simply is the type of player and person who isn’t going to except last years results stat wise.
E. He has the respect of the team and coaches and will be our general that we haven’t had since Weinke this year.
Even with his sub-par numbers last year the team still went 9-4, and in reality should have been 10-3 if not for the fumble in the GT game last year.
lol don't get us started on the "should have won" thing against GT last year
But I agree with a lot of what you have said. I like him as a person and I think he has a lot of tools. QB’s just have to depend a lot on people around them to have the kind of stats we want to see, and that’s my concern for this year.
That's a popular debate.
For sake of this article, let me add these little tidbits.
If we were to win that game and go 10-3, Ponder wouldn’t be the reason we won.
What did he do in the 4th quarter to help us win?
A) He did complete a crucial, gutsy 4th down pass to Reed
but
2) Ponder lost a fumble after we’d seemingly taken momentum finally
D) He was on the bench when D’Vo hit Preston to give us new life
7) He merely handed the ball off to Jermaine on the fateful final drive
Yeah I'm with you
There is no way anyone can tell me that “we should have won that game.” Yes, Sims should have scored on the goal line. But in my mind, that does not in any way mean that we should have won. Nesbitt and co. were gashing us for 8+ a play before he was injured. We would’ve lost by 2-3 TD’s if he wasn’t out of the game. We were not the better team on the field that day and we showed no signs of actually adjusting on defense to slow them down. A series of unbelievably lucky, cataclysmic events led to us almost being able to steal it. Yeah, injuries are part of the game, but anyone who was really watching that game knows that we weren’t the better team.
True...
But isn’t football filled with things that shouldn’t have happened? Sure Nesbitt goes out, but you run that risk with that type of offense.
VT shouldn’t have won the ACC…They stumbled into it really.
It definitely is
And you play with/against what you’re given. But I just can’t stand it when people say “oh this should’ve been a 10-3 team last year” as if our talent/coaching level deserved to have that record. The one thing that stood out to me last year was that we won the games we should have won, and we lost the games we should have lost. Generally, when we played well, we won. When we played poorly, we lost. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that proven more true in a team’s season (or at least one of ours) than last year.
Yes
I think the point is that we received far more breaks than we gave and still lost.
Also, while you do run that risk, Nesbitt wasn’t taken out by us IIRC. He rolled his own ankle.
by Bud Elliott on Jul 31, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Football…nice game funny …shaped ball…bounces in odd ways…see Ole Miss vs UF…were it not “Superman’s” last game I would hold out more hope…but who can say?
"I am not now at all sure that the tendency to treat the whole thing as a kind of vast game is really good - certainly not for me who find that kind of thing only too fatally attractive." - J R R Tolkein
All true
However wasn’t the fumble a blindside hit? We can talk ball security, but there’s really no way to protect against that.
Also, he did make a crucial 3rd down pass out of his own endzone to get a drive started and kill some GTech momentum (remember, scrambling and then hitting Owens)?
by Bud Elliott on Jul 31, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
good point on the third down pass
I guess I’m just suggesting that our furious comeback wasn’t a Charlie Ward-type effort completely derailed by Sims’ fumble. We were more lucky than clutch to be in that situation.
by The K-Man on Jul 31, 2009 12:28 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Oh very true.
I am just saying sometimes the most important plays go unremembered.
by Bud Elliott on Jul 31, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Carson Palmer is a nice comparison
osceolafan85 brought this up. Palmer started his first full year as a RS SO after starting about half the games as a FR and a medical RS as a SO (so he’s unlike Ponder in that respect). In 2000 as a RS SO, his QBSPP was only 1.98, not much better than Ponder’s 1.7. His YPP was 6.1, just a bit better than Ponder’s 5.5. We all know how Palmer’s story turned out.
Hmm
From a situational standpoint, I like it.
From a tools standpoint, I do not, because Palmer has world class physical tools.
The QB I find most similar to Ponder is Okie State's Zac Robinson
Now obviously he plays Big 12 football (1/3RD the amount of 1st round defensive draft choices as the ACC), but they are similar stylistically.
You really think so?
I’ve been looking for a good comparison — I checked out Robinson’s numbers, and they are far superior to Ponder’s. I suppose some of that can be attributed to bad defenses. His QBSPP as a SO was 4.19 (Ponder 1.7). His ypp was 7.8 (Ponder 5.5), with 827 rush yards! His 2666 tot yds is close to Ponder’s 2429.
oops -- Robinson had 3493 tot yds as a SO
by missourinole on Jul 31, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
It really is true. Not just SEC rah rah stuff.
I mean the ACC has 3X as many 1st round defenders as the Big 12 over the last what, 5 years?
Also, look at the Big 12’s head coaches…
OKST
MISSOU
KANSAS
TTECH
TEXAS
BAYLOR
A&M
COLORADO
KSTATE
all have Offensive head coaches. I am unsure on Iowa state.
The field is smaller in the ACC. Guys do not run wide open.
Consider this...
FSU’s UNADJUSTED OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY: 54TH. ADJUSTED OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY: 15th.
BC’s "" "" "" 79th. " "" "" 39th.
Clemson’s "" "" "" 94th 53rd
UNC’s "" "" "" 67th to 25th!
Baylor’s: 19th to 30th
Missouri: 10th to 15th
For Defenses, it’s the opposite in the Big 12. They get a ratings BOOST because they do play some very talented offenses.
Okie State’s D: 97th to 77th
Missouri’s D 86th to 63rd
etc.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pkpk-Zkv_WsI4WkzBnfBKaw&gid=3
Just out of curiousity, why did they only count 11 games for FSU in the FEI rankings (7-4)?
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Playing style, yes
I think Ponder would do what Robinson did and Robinson would do what Ponder did if they switched teams.
Im going to run this into every thread
Ponder will get better the WR/TE/RB will get better when the o-line gets better. Ponder has great legs on him and can throw a good ball. I think he throws better however on the run. I love the moving pocket and think we should keep it in the playbooks. I think Jimbo needs to get some good trick plays. I want to run a few before we play WF only to make them play more honest. That was an evil thing they did last year. I respect it but hate it.
Why is the sky blue? Because, God Loves the Infantry
Hope, Maybe
There is no science or analysis behind my reasoning on this one. I am hoping that Ponder can have the same type of turn around as Colt McCoy. Their backgrounds are pretty similar, with both having sophomore seasons that weren’t to stellar. If Ponder can progress as much as McCoy we could have the next Seminole Great quarterback. This is just a hope and a dream though. Only the season will tell
Intangibles
That is what Ponder has. I think that is what Fisher sees in him. Leadership and nerve. Maybe not as much talent. But when was the last time that you felt like FSU had a chance to score a touchdown with three minutes left in the fourth quarter to come from behind and do it on a regular basis? Not since Richt left. I think Ponder could be a Brad Johnson type of QB but with mobility.
Posted too soon.
I didn’t happen ONCE from 2005 to 2007. There were no John Elway comebacks. None.
There weren’t even many dagger drives like Antone’s 4th TD in Miami.
They went 9-4, but the team showed some cajones that have been missing for a long time.
Could someone compare Ponder's sophmore #'s to JaMarcus Russel's...?
I have six locks on my door all in a row. When I go out, I only lock every other one. I figure no matter how long somebody stands there picking the locks, they are always locking three.
Elayne Boosler
Ponder v. Russell (as sophomores)
QBSPP Ponder 1.7 : Russell 2.24
YPG Ponder 186.8 : Russell 92.0
YPP Ponder 5.56 : Russell 6.0
It looks like Russell wins, when you take into consideration that he was splitting time with another QB all season. Ponder had 437 total plays to Russell’s 170. So Russell was far more efficient, but not great. Ponder ran better, whatever the reason. Ponder 3.55 yprush : Russell -1.58 yprush.
Ponder's bad habit of throwing off his back foot
Did anyone see evidence this spring if he curbed this at all? I know we weren’t the best at pass blocking last year but he even admitted this was a bad habit since his high school days.
by noles 4 life u dig? on Aug 4, 2009 2:22 PM EDT reply actions

by 

























