Florida State Basketball Roundtable 02.01.2010
Starting a new feature here on Tomahawk Nation. Let us know if you enjoy the basketball roundtable. Today we ask questions of Norcal_Nole and Celtic Pride.
1. After their disappointing (but expected) loss to Duke, the 'Noles pulled out a victory against Boston College. The reasonable goal for this team seems to be a 9-7 finish in conference; a finish that will lock up an NCAA berth and a bye for the ACC tournament. The 1-1 week kept FSU on pace, but did it feel like the team took a step back? Or was it simply a case of "get the road split" and get back home?
NCN: 1-1 was not a step back. The Seminole D got torched in Maryland and at home against NCST and since then have been playing with passion and direction. Facing two very good offenses this week could easily have gone the other way, and had we played poorly on the defensive end - even if we still split the games 1-1 - then that would have been a step back. Finishing with 9 or 10 ACC wins will only be accomplished through exceptional defense and it seems that Ham has got a lot of the help issues worked out.
CP: First off, we're 2-2 in the ACC on the road. No team in the ACC has a winning road record. Only the disappointing home loss to NC St keeps this from being a fabulous season start. Another point is we've never beaten BC in Boston before. So I don't think of this as just another split. Despite losing to Duke by 14, we had it closed down to 4 (with possession) in the fourth quarter before they put us away with a run. Even the announcers were discussing FSU shots that looked like they were going to go in, but didn't. I guess I'm a glass half-full guy about the Noles right now.
2. The two areas in which FSU has always struggled under Leonard Hamilton are turnovers on offense and defensive rebounding. Duke and Boston College are two of the best offensive rebounding teams in the country. FSU held both to right about their season lows in offensive rebounding. This comes on the heels of two horrendous rebounding games against Maryland and NC State. Has FSU turned this around? Is it too early to tell? If they have, what are they doing differently?
NCN: Because of the way our bigs attack the shooter we're always going to have issues with allowing offensive rebounds. We routinely have two guys going for the block (as opposed to staying on the ground, finding their man, and boxing out), and just the shear presence of our bigs mean that teams are going to try and beat us with the 3 or a deep mid-level game which leads to long rebounds off misses. However, we just limited two good teams to bad nights - so how did we do it? First, the Duke game was very physical, and any time the refs allow us to play that physical we can better use our athletic ability to get to the ball. Second, Kitchen is one of the best rebounding guards around and for whatever reason he brought a high level of intensity to both games. Against Duke and BC he simply out-worked their guards for several balls. Third, our perimeter defense showed up, and rather than flying by the shooters and ending up in press row our guys were able to get in their face and then following the shot they were in perfect position to keep the guards from coming in and snagging those long rebounds. And finally, Chris Singleton played like a man.
CP: The defensive rebounding has always been a problem based on the style of man-to-man defense we play. With shot blockers coming off of their men to challenge shots rather than box their own men out. I can live with it b/c we're a tough team to score on. There's no denying that the defense works. It's the best in the country.
3. FSU needed to go 1-1 in the @ Duke, @ BC stretch and the 'Noles have similar stretches coming up. Over the next 14 days FSU hosts Maryland Thursday, Miami on Saturday, travels to Clemson next Wednesday and then hosts BC next Sunday. 2-2 here keeps the Noles on pace for 9-7. They FSU travels @ Virginia and @ UNC. Much like last week, if FSU can split that road double, they'll remain on pace. FSU finishes with Clemson and Wake at home before traveling to face Miami in the season finale, a team that might be quitting on its season. 2-1 in the final 3 along with the 2-2 and 1-1 in the aforementioned stretches puts FSU at 9-7 on the year in conference play. Can FSU pull this off? What stretch will be toughest?
NCN: We can pull it off, and I think we will. At the absolute worst we have to split the the next two (Mary, Miami). No game is a gimme for anyone in the ACC this year but the Maryland game is a toss up, and the Miami game we simply need to win. Following that is the four game stretch that may very well decide our season: @Clem, BC, @UVA, @UNC. Regardless of how those games play out, if we have a winning record after the UNC game then we'll finish with home games against Clem and Wake, and then go on the road against Miami. At this point in the season you certainly hope that our guys understand the level of commitment required to finish these 5 weeks and enter the ACC tourney with only seeding to be decided.CP: We must defend our house!!! Pomeroy actually has us slated to go 10-6 in conference based on Sunday's standings (9-7 as of Monday). The only games they think we're going to lose are @Clemson and @UNC (and this is a coin-flip game). But it also has vs UMD, @UVA, and @Mia as virtual coin-flip victories.
Seriously, each home game is winnable and if we win them, we go over .500 in the ACC. Our schedule is very favorable b/c we don't have UNC or Duke at home this year.
4. FSU has the best defense in the country. But its offense is outside the top 100 and even worse to watch. Over its last 4 games, FSU has turned the ball over 80 times in only 272 possessions! Quite literally, FSU fails to get a shot off in more than 29% of its possessions. That's like fumbling 3 or 4 snaps per football game. A t 333rd nationally in turnover rate, only 14 teams take worse care of the basketball. They are Mississippi Valley St. (SWAC), Albany (AE), Louisiana Monroe (SB), North Florida (ASun), South Carolina Upstate (ASun), New Orleans Gardner Webb (BSth), Chicago St. (GWC), Bryant (NEC), Winston Salem St. (ind), Texas A&M Corpus Chris (Slnd), North Dakota (GWC), Southern Utah (Sum), Alcorn St. (SWAC). I've never even heard of most of those schools. This must stop. From here on out, FSU needs to turn the ball over less than 25% of the time. That's still a horrible goal, but it's a big improvement. Can they do it? How would you improve FSU's offense?
NCN: The fact that 25% seems a reasonable goal tells you everything you need to know about our offense, but how do we improve? 1. Push the ball after made baskets. UNC routinely gets the ball across the timeline in under three seconds after a made basket, and while we're not going to achieve that level of success we need to stop allowing teams to set up their press while we dally around waiting for a ref to pick up the ball and hand it to our inbounder. 2. Bench Terrance Shannon. He'll be valuable for us down the road, but currently in ACC play he's averaging a turnover or offensive foul every 1.5 minutes. 3. Identify more opportunities where we can utilize a three guard set. Ham has done a great job bringing Snaer along, and now he can be trusted with more minutes. Some ACC teams are too athletic for Loucks and here would be an opportunity for Snaer to steal some minutes. 4. We can drink more, and pray. Every night it seems someone new is willing to step up and be the guy to commit five turnovers. And that simply has to stop, but will it? Will Snaer stop taking two steps before putting the ball on the floor? Will Gibson and Alabi actually take angles when they're showing on a screen rather than just stepping out and ramming into someone? Will Reid stop his once a game Isiah Thomas impersonation? The offensive goal for our team is to not screw everything up, but will we actually achieve that goal?
CP: The offense needs to run through Alabi. He needs to touch the ball at least 2 out of every three times down the floor - even if he passes right back out. But the turnovers come from all over the place. We need to stop the moving picks. We need to stop stepping on the baseline. We need to avoid having Ryan Reid dribble the ball. I'd seriously have the guys run cone-drills. Singleton for all his basketball skills and athletic prowess is not a particularly good dribbler.
Thanks again to Norcal_Nole and Celtic Pride for their answers!
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
College Basketball
Has two halves and not four quarters.
Yes I know
But each half could be treated as two quarters and thus you would have four quarters.
Are you just nit-picking or did you really have a hard time understanding what was said?
To me
It undermines your credibility as a writer when you state something that is obviously incorrect – whether knowingly or not. As an “expert” who is writing this piece you should not assume that everyone will understand what you meant.
How is it "obviously incorrect?"
I agree that a reference to the “last quarter” might have been ideal, but if anyone gets out of sorts over that statement then they would probably prefer grading essays to reading a sports blog.
And… if a reader doesn’t know if there are official “halves” or “quarters” in a college basketball game, why will it worry them at all? They’ll understand he was referencing the last 4th of the game, right? Will they be terribly disappointed if somewhere down the road they find out the players didn’t shoot on the other basket for the last 10 minutes?
Great read
The last response about running the ball through Alabi should be in all caps. Maybe Ham will hear it then! I know moving the ball around creates open shots but when the ball is being turned over almost a 3rd of the time, drop it in the paint. If they commit to the double kick it out to the open man and take the shot. Simple basketball. SIMPLE!!
we suck at entry passes though
its simple strategy, but for our team its not simple execution.
its got to start somewhere
And hell Alabi is the best bet right now IMO. And IF we are gonna go anywhere in the tourney we have got to establish the man in the paint
i agree.
its just not as simple though. If we had great passers on this team and good ball movement we could say that its simple to just give him the ball. we dont so its not simple. he is our best player and we should feed him though.
Afrim!
Get the guy the ball and if you cant pass it to him or catch it when he passes it to you rid the pine! Get someone in that can.
Great article
Our need for better dribbling is exacerbated by our lack of a game-to-game PG. But your elite programs (Georgetown, Duke come to mind) regularly have 3 guys on the court who are at least average to above-average dribblers. At this point, it’s too much to expect Singleton to become a “Point Forward” but better dribbling from him would be appreciated and show up in the A/TO ratios.
singleton was a center in high school
i was talking to coach hamilton about a week ago, and he brought up the fact that singleton was a post player in high school and is learning to be a perimeter player in college. now it could be argued that he isn’t proving to be an incredibly quick study learning the skills of a perimeter player (shooting the 3 and handling the ball), but he’s getting better i’d say.
by Ryan1DB on Feb 1, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Scheduling matters
Sucks that we have to play Miami (2/6) with only 1 full day rest from UMD at home (2/4). Miami plays WF tomorrow (2/2), and will have had 3 days rest before their Saturday HOME game against us. Ugh…
This falls into the FSU and Duke getting effed on the "rest"...
It’s definitely needs to be looked at. This conference is too tight for certain teams to continually have the cards stacked against them.
by Randall W. Spetman on Feb 1, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
Would be interesting to see a trend analysis for this.
If FSU just happens to have a rough road this year, fair enough… but if we’re consistently drawing the short stick, well then we’ve got a beef.
Since the 05-06 season
We’ve played:
24 times in which we’ve had the advantage
20 times in which we’ve had the disadvantage, and
27 times where all things were equal.
No, I've only looked at FSU
I might have a few past years saved on my computer but I’d have to look around.
In any event, it looks like things are going pretty evenly for us.
+4, net of favorable/unfavorable over the last 5 years. Can’t complain, just a bad year in the cycle for us, and it looks like we’ll come out of it OK (i.e., probably won’t cost us a tourney appearance) so far.
Can we please not use Durham excuses?
its sickening… you want to win in march you better be able to win on 48hrs rest. I understand in the pre-season tournys, 3 games in 3 days is a lot. 2 games in 48hrs? Give me a break.
Our team is young
from the viewpoint of the entire season we are doing amazing. If we win these two games this week we’re in great position to get the tourny bid.
Defensive development
Defensive coaching and development in a man to man scheme is vastly overrated, imho. We know ham can recruit excellent athletes, and you don’t need to be an excellent basketball player to be an excellent defender. Demercy got minutes on defense for his athleticism and hustle, not because of his development. Hey you- alabi- block that guys shot if he comes within reach. Its almost like that simpsons episode where mr. Burns gets all the mlb players to play softball for the nuke plant. Mr. Burns- “hey you- strawberry- go hit a homerun” Strawberry- “sure thing skip”
by fsu44 on Feb 1, 2010 2:04 PM EST via mobile reply actions
disagree entirely
if defense was such an easy tool to gain then we’d have more great defensive teams.
I’ve watched a lot of basketball and this team is one of the best defensive teams i’ve seen.
They are also the longest team in college basketball.
You don’t teach height or athleticism.
It is possible to be extremely efficient on offense while playing with below average athletes, e.g., classic Princeton teams. It is very difficult to be efficient on defense in modern basketball without excellent athletes.
I’m not saying he is a bad defensive coach. In fact, I think Ham is an excellent defensive coach. I’m simply saying its much easier to develop athletes into strong defensive players than it is to take athletes and turn them into complete basketball players.
We are one of the best defensive teams in the country, but at any given time, we have 3 guys on the court who (slight exaggeration) can barely dribble the basketball, and often times, look completely clueless as to what they are trying to achieve on the offensive end.
by fsu44 on Feb 1, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
FSU is 9th in effective height
The defensive rankings for the 10 tallest teams are:
16
36
72
104
71
191
89
17
1 (FSU)
19
by norcal_nole on Feb 1, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
http://ww.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=82
Courtesy of Ken Pomeroy:
It should be no surprise that a team’s average height does correlate to its offensive and defensive prowess. On the offensive side, average height has a correlation coefficient of .27 to adjusted efficiency, and on the defensive side it’s .38. For those new to correlation, a value of 1 would mean that variation in height would explain all the variation in efficiency. A correlation coefficient of zero means that the two values are entirely unrelated. So in layman’s terms, there’s a relationship between height and efficiency on both ends of the floor, but it’s not very strong. In addition, the relationship between height and efficiency is stronger on the defensive end.
This analysis gets a little more sophisticated if we break down height by position. For the purposes of quickly analyzing 341 teams, I’m deriving average height by position by assuming that the "tallest" 20 percent of player-minutes are being used at center, the next tallest 20 percent of minutes at power forward, etc. Obviously this does not always match reality, but in order to process this much data, it’s not feasible for me to sort out all of the Pat Calatheses of the nation and put them in their proper position.
It turns out this endeavor is worthy of the effort, because there is a much better relationship between most tempo-free team stats and height if we ignore the shortest 60 percent of player-minutes. Here are the categories that have the strongest relationship to effective height:
1. Block Pct. .486
2. 2-pt% defense .478
3. eFG% defense .451
4. adjusted defensive efficiency .420
There are a couple points worth making here. First, defensive stats have a much better correlation with height than their offensive counterparts. Second, the only stat I adjust for competition right now is efficiency. Presumably, we could squeeze out a slightly better relationship to height by adjusting the top three metrics for the quality of the opponent.
disagree
Even in man-to-man, you have to make switches at times.
Toney Douglas developed into, IMHO, the best face defender FSU has ever seen at the PG position. He bought into Ham’s aggressive man-to-man principles, and you can see it in is steals per game (based on minutes/game played) average jump from his Sophomore to Junior year: 1.2 to 2.6.
steals per game is a horrible stat
it doesn’t signify defensive prowess at all.
a better thing to look at is opponent field goal percentage.
please enlighten us why steals per game
from your PG and lock-down defender assigned to the other team’s best scorer / ball-handler is a waste of a statistic.
its a statistic for gamblers
if you gamble a lot you might average a lot of steals but you might also put yourself out of position and allow your opponent to have an open path to the basket.
Compare it to a DB and interceptions. Is the best db the one that gets the most interceptions? Possibly. But if that DB gambles a lot and gets burned several times in coverage then he’s not a very good defensive player.
That's a great analogy
I see the value of opponent field goal percentage (although, even this stat is only valid in a man-to-man no-switching defense). Toney did gamble a lot, and won quite a bit.
But you won’t attribute over a 2:1 jump S/G to defensive principles taught such as tenacity? Keeping your head up?
How about this. Look at his player fouls per game, and Steals per game:
Yr PF/G
So. – 1.8
Ju. – 2.5
Sr. – 2.1
Yr S/G
So. – 1.2
Ju. – 2.6
Sr. – 1.8
Here’s a ratio of S/G to PF/G
Yr S/G : PF/G
So. – +0.67 (1.2 / 1.8)
Jr. – +1.04 (2.5 / 2.6)
Sr. – +0.86 (1.8 / 2.1)
The notable increase in PF/game from So. to Ju. year mirrors his steal totals, indicating a growing “gambler” style play. His S/G dropped his senior year, but at the benefit of almost 1/2 PF less per game. So there’s decent evidence just in those two stat trends that he improved in wisdom defensively. I have to attribute at least part of that to Ham.
Interesting numbers
But picking the best defender in the ACC last season is kind of stacking the deck :)
I did want to point out that the “defensive principles” you mentioned were taught were “tenacity” and “keeping your head up”.
So basically, play hard and make sure you are paying attention. Maybe it is just hard to express on a message board the intricacies of good defensive coaching, but at least as you described it, it doesn’t seem overly complicated.
Maybe the real challenge then
is getting the kids to buy into it. For every Tony Douglas, there’s a Casaan Breeden.
more to it than that
you have to learn footwork and how to keep your body and hands vertical to not commit unnecessary fouls. Attack the ball, not the player. SA & CS have bought into this extremely well and even XG has improved alot from the first of the yr. For footwork DD has made huge strides and MS has seemingly bought into from the start. I think Ham is as good as anyone in the country at teaching these fundamentals.
On top of that you have to impose spacing and understanding what is going on around you to know the right time to help. Ham’s base system in this regard is excellent and I love the philosophy of never giving up the easy shot. In spite of the ORs, which are the tradeoff, it still wears teams down both physically and psychologically. One reason we are so good at the end of games.
Ham’s deficit on D this yr is being slow in recognizing how the O philosophy has changed throughout the league. It has gone from a slashers/creators league to a shooters league in one yr. Teams are working their O inside out to get treys. They get good spacing so that we help down (as if SA needs it) and can’t get back out to contest the 3. The top 8 or so ACC teams all have 3 guys that can bury open 3s on any given night (hopefully not all 3 on the night we play them), so you have to identify these guys and not help off them at the beginning of the game. From there you find which one is gonna be hot and guard him all over the court. the cold ones you might be able to help off some in the 2nd half. Sometimes that guy is obvious as a Scheyer or Delaney. sometimes it’s an Oliver or Woods (although I’m pretty certain Woods is gonna be an obvious one before his career is over).
MD is a good example. People think that Vazquez beat us in the first game, but it was Hayes that beat us. He’s 5/6 from treyland. You contest those so that he misses 2 or 3 and we’re in a road game down to wire with a chance to win. vazquez will get his. You just let DD & MS make it as tough as possible for him. Wed night DK/LL or whoever simply cannot help off Hayes and let him heat up. Unfortunately, I don’t have confidence that Ham will gameplan in this way. He’ll make the adjustment at halftime when we’re down by 7.
agreed
CHam’s strategy is obvious. Saggy, but aggressive m-m and dare the opponent to beat you with the jump shot. It is painful to watch when the opponent is lighting you up, but there is a reason this team is in the top5 for defense.
yes, they collapse just a bit too much. and yes, this results in open looks from the perimeter and also all those offensive rebounds. but again, defense is not their issue.
I agree
Keep playing great D, limit the TO’s, start making FT’s and for goodness sake…make a trey or two to keep teams honest. If FSU can some threes, then Alabi won’t see as many double teams.
Gripper
Dulkys breaking his funk would be nice
Snaer and Singleton taking it to the rack would also help. I think DK has the ability to do this as well, but playing PG has made him too timid.
25% TO
That is reasonable to expect, but anything less and you are digging yourself a deep hole trying to win games.
I like the three gaurd set for the sake of ball handling and think that will be the only way Dulkys gets open set for threes. It would also help with spacing in the paint too, but could hurt entry passes.
Also, didn’t know UM has three days rest before us. They rain threes all day long
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Feb 1, 2010 2:13 PM EST reply actions
I think you are missing one important stat
With DeMercy leaving, we will fall to the bottom of the league on breakaway missed dunks…..how could Hamilton let this happen.
I kid I kid
I actually liked the guy….really played as hard as he could out there, actually wish some other players would try as hard.
double empty-handed crashes to the offensive glass
Will also suffer immensely.
by The K-Man on Feb 1, 2010 3:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
unfortunate he could give us one last shimmy in the BC game
in my top 5 for FSU basketball hilarity
I also liked what I read about
getting the ball to Alabi more. FSU should grind more inside. If we stopped heaving 3’s and started making free throws, we could do some damage. I really feel FSU cant shoot the ball outside 12ft. Take it to the rim, and make the other team pay by hitting the freebies…..as someone else said “simple basketball”
"You're either carrying a spear, or running from it"
by BigSpearDiplomacy on Feb 1, 2010 3:53 PM EST reply actions
my biggest issues with CHam and FSU is...
They seem to be stuck in position thinking, instead of skill sets. To me, this is why they struggle with lineups and players get lost on the bench. CHam doesnt exploit what he has enough, imho.
Singleton and Loucks (BC game aside) are the only two who seem to be able to and look to feed the post. You want to get Alabi touches? These two need to touch it on the perimeter. Loucks does not need to be the “PG” for this to happen.
When you have to put Loucks at the PG to spell DK, put Gibson in the game. This is an auto double-sub. Alabi cannot catch the ball in transition, nor would he be able since he more than likely is trailing the play. Give Loucks options when he presses the ball.
Once DK brings it up, let the kid out of the PG role. The supposed motion offense they run doesnt need a PG anyway in the half court. Let the kid goto the wing and the short corner, where he is effective. If you do this, dont make Reid handle it at the top. Just dont.
Gibson is not much of a true center, but certainly excels against less physical defenders. With Gibson, add the predator or Shannon. If the defense wants to body Gibson, let your bangers have at it against a smaller defender. If not, let Gibson do his thing. Let the smaller guy play the “5”, press your advantages…
Give Dulkys a screen once in a blue moon, see how that works.
Its too frustrating to continue, but completely unrelated: Get some freaking inbounds plays. You take it out 10, 12 times from under there each game? Convert half of those, there is 10, 12 pts. It adds up!
issues are even...
goodness, i need a beer.
agreed
the motion O is great w/ an experienced team that understands spacing and also “when he does this than I do this and I’m likely to get a layup, open 3 or putback”. These guys are far away from that point. Of course, the only way for them to get there is to keep doing it, but that doesn’t mean that you can’t run specific plays at times. I would script plays like in FB for the beginning of games for this team. For example, you always want to try and pound it to SA, but I’d run at least a couple of set pick plays for treys for DD as you suggest in the first player rotation. That does two things. He’s still a streak shooter so it gets him involved early so that he may heat up but at worst you know that he may not be on tonite so you go in other directions. Likewise, I get CS a few clear out dribble drives in the beginning. This does the same thing. Get him involved & see if he has it tonite. You don’t end up w/ his first shot in the 2nd half like the other night. MS the same thing when he comes in. I’d do both for him: a dribble drive & a trey to get some idea of where he will be most effective.
Yes
The way we get Dulkys the ball is completely haphazard. If we are going to shoot any threes, it should be Dulkys doing it and he should be getting free off screens. Other teams have no problem getting set for a clean look at three, while Dulkys has trouble even getting open.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Feb 2, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions
FYI-It appears the first ESPN Bubble Watch of the year is out, and Lunardi's new
Bracketology (Noles a #7 seed in Buffalo!). Bubble Watch argues not a lot of meat to the FSU resume, and so they need some work (clearly):
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bubblewatch?id=99
There is no way to peace; peace is the way.
I feel like I am too late to get in the discussion above, but a couple things...
I really like the idea of this article. I would definitely like to see more. It’s a good way to showcase the readers and spur discussion. I think it would be a good idea to involve more readers in the roundtable, but edit out the redundant answers. That way we’ll have more original answers and more guys will be involved. That’s it. Great questions FSUn and good job NorCal and Celtic.
Process > Results

by 






























