Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks 90, Raptors 87: "Shump and Lin wouldn't let us lose."

Report: Florida State's Defensive Players Didn't Have Playbooks In 2009

Keep in mind that Nick Saban gives his defenders a 400+ page playbook.  Florida State's defenders didn't even have one last year.  FSU's defense was 92nd in the country last season.  The FSU release:

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - No unit on the Florida State football team is facing a steeper learning curve over 15 days of spring practice than the defense, which will be completely different under new coordinator Mark Stoops.

The switch from a predominantly man coverage team for the past quarter century under Mickey Andrews, to one that will play zone as its base will test all the defensive position segments. There's a need to learn both new terminology, as well as new techniques.

Photo Gallery: Spring Practice Day 2 - Offense | Defense

And there's also the matter of some take-home work that is completely foreign to veteran Seminole defenders.

"Right now we're focusing on executing; learning the new defense," said rising junior linebacker Nigel Bradham. "We just want to execute every play...

"We've got a playbook to take home now. We didn't have a playbook in the past. The scheme is totally different, but it's exciting. It's set up where you can make a lot more big hits and stuff like that. We're really excited about it and we're going to hit it running."

That's a notion that excites Bradham, who closed the 2009 season as the team's leading tackler with 93 stops. And he's not alone.

FSU's defensive players came off the field at the conclusion of Thursday's practice seemingly giddy with the early results. While Bradham's eyes lit up at the possibility of unleashing his 241 pounds on ball carriers, defensive end Markus White - who is known for his boundless energy - excitedly talked about dropping into pass coverage.

"(Tuesday) was a hesitating day, in my opinion," said White. "I wasn't confused on what to do. I was just confused on how to do it. Today, it felt like it was more on emotion and I could do whatever I wanted to do. As long as I'm having fun with it, then my motor is going to run, and that's how it was today. There was a little less hesitation today and tomorrow there's going to be a little less."

Co-dependency is critical to improving a defensive unit that ranked as one of the most porous in the nation last season. That means everyone must work together - perhaps even more so in the new scheme - to be most effective.

Rising sophomore defensive tackle Jacobbi McDaniel has already seen evidence that the coaches are emphasizing working side by side, especially up front.

"Last season there was very minimum work with defensive ends and defensive tackles together," said McDaniel, the leader in tackles among interior defensive linemen. "Now, we're working together. We're getting off the ball together, we're running plays together. Everybody is on the same page and that's a good thing."

The same is true in the secondary, where the bulk of the players are of the first- or second-year variety. Veteran cornerback Dionte Allen, with one career start under his belt, suddenly finds himself in a leadership role along with a couple of teammates, all of whom are trying to get a grasp on Stoops' coverage schemes. Allen said Stoops has shown great patience with his new charges after two days of practice, but he's anxious to step up and assert himself.

"(Ochuko) Jenije, Terrance (Parks) and me - we're the oldest - we've got to represent and lead by example," said Allen. "I look at it like I'm a senior instead of a redshirt junior. We've got new coaches now, so we're starting over. ...

"I think (the scheme) is a little better now because we're able to read (the receivers). Our position is already hard because we've got to come up and stop the run and defend the bomb. That's the number one thing he's been emphasizing to me and all the corners, to read (the receivers)."

Inexcusable.

Comment 389 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

does not compute

how does that even happen? doesn’t pop warner use play books?

by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 18, 2010 8:37 PM EDT reply actions  

We even had a crude playbook drawn up for defense when I played IM flag football at FSU.

I honestly think that all previous predictions of how much the defense is going to improve need to be tossed out the window in light of this. They might as well have had no instruction at all prior to a couple of days ago.

"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright

by O-Town Nole on Mar 18, 2010 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

appalled

the term that is a proper term to use here. just appalled

by fsunole2013 on Mar 18, 2010 8:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Seriously though, wtf???

Hope our D will be able to grasp our new scheme/coaching faster than expected. I’m sure we’ll see some confusion on the field come fall but I’m at a loss for words.

by CSI Nole on Mar 18, 2010 8:42 PM EDT reply actions  

i just

threw up in my mouth a little

by cdnole on Mar 18, 2010 8:43 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+2

How in the heck does….im sorry i just cant type anymore.

Thank God for the men and women who stand tall in the night to protect this great country we love so much

by NOLEcasterWX on Mar 18, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Strange

Even with it as a man coverage base I would expect them to send a small playbook home with some details written out.

by DrB on Mar 18, 2010 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow

I just don’t get it. So many questions running through my head that I almost can’t decide what to post. MA was one of the best in the country for years so how could he let it get that bad? Or was it so hard to get the coaches under him on the same page that he just gave up and tried to handle what was directly under his control? How do you let the D-line go an entire year without practicing together? How did we have a D1 staff that did less work than a HS staff?

by osceolafan850 on Mar 18, 2010 8:45 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Still

You can take the playbook from the previous season, get you tail to Kinko’s and get some made up for the new players coming in.

by PBD on Mar 19, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

a fine point. or at least delegate that task to T-Buck

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eww

It is unbelievable to me, that the coaches LITERALLY said ‘Go out and make a play.’ The guys playing corner must have had just as much prep as someone who went out and played 5 on 5 – “I got this guy!”

by LetsGoNoles on Mar 18, 2010 8:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

I always thought when we said they would say “go out and make a play”, we were exaggerating. Obviously not.

by NolenRyan on Mar 19, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am so confused

I don’t know whether to rec or flag this

"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett

by The Ryno and I Know on Mar 19, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO!

I rec’d it. I cannot allow Frank’s talent to go unnoticed.

by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

You think you're confused, how about me?

That is not a phrase I usually tell other men, except all those times I’ve mistakenly picked up a post-op TV.

Ooops, TMI.

>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em

by FrankDNole on Mar 19, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

The always provocative when he gets the chance FrankD strikes again

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tubby Sweetbundle, belated welcome to TN.

If you haven’t had the chance to do so already, you may want to take a few moments to check out the following links in order to have a better TN experience.

A) Welcome to TN Guide
2) FSU’s Recruiting Big Board
and
D) The Did You Know Guide to Better Using TN
 

 

>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em

by FrankDNole on Mar 19, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

How big are they?

Maybe they just downsized it tremendously the past few years and the players didn’t really call it a “playbook” since it wasn’t very thorough?

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't stop laughing at this comment

and also being so disgusted that this was par for the course
how in the hell can a dline NOT work together? Can you imagine the G’s and C not working with the T’s?
Blows my mind

by Cigar City Nole on Mar 18, 2010 9:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Or...

Phase 1: Go make a play

Phase 2: ????

Phase 3: Profit

"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright

by O-Town Nole on Mar 19, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with ricobert1

There has got to be much more to this story. I can’t believe that MA was a very good DC for all but the last 2 or 3 years of his career.

by Big Boss Mann on Mar 18, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's no way he had the time to properly

grieve and focus on how to move past that, with all his duties at FSU. No way.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

And it's not healthy, either.

Without football, his life will change drastically. I hope that he has a support system in place that is ready to help if need be. It’s kind of a scary situation. No telling what’s gone through his mind up until this point.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I suspect that getting back into football is his way of coping. I’m sure he’s not completely over it (can you ever get over that?) but going back to a familiar place and occupying your mind with something else is an effective coping mechanism for many people.

by evenflow58 on Mar 19, 2010 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Mickey is a "great guy"!

Mickey was ready to give it up after his son’s terrible death. Bobby convinced him to stay 2 more years, even when Mickey really didn’t want to in his heart. Then Bobby hires his good friend CTC (Mickey and Chuck have always pretty much agreed to disagree) Mickey somewhat stepped back. Chuck stepped up thinking he could pull off the coup (which obviously didn’t work.) and gain the support of the admin and boosters. If you have ever sat down and talked to Mickey, when he walks away you say to yourself, that’s the kind of guy I want my son to play for.

by Harleynole on Mar 19, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Mickey is a great person and was also one of the best defensive coaches of all time. The spread “gimmick” offense was created to beat MA’s defense. Mickey should have been aloud to retire when he felt the need to do so after the tragedy with his son. Instead he stayed on because of Bobby and I also believe he stayed on so that CTC would not be promoted to DC and for that I have to admire MA even more. To stick his neck out knowing that our defense would stink so that our program would not be turned over to Mr. Fancy shoes. I have nothing bad and never will say anything bad about MA. May he have a wonderful retirement and enjoy the extra time he will have with his wife and grand kids.

by BS37FSU on Mar 19, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

That sucks

He should’ve taken a year off, Bobby wouldn’t of replaced him.

by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:22 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yep. Just what I was thinking.

Tragic. Horribly tragic. That kind of thing NO man should experience. I have no idea how I might handle something like that myself. No idea…

I bleed Garnet and piss Gold.

by DutchFSU on Mar 19, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be honest

I thought we only ran 12 plays a game on defense. They always used that yellow book (bottom right) to call in plays and it only went up to 12. Apparently play 11 didnt work too well (pic taken during the USF game).

by egynole on Mar 19, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm hoping he was misquoted

because this makes no sense, no playbook? or may be they just didn’t care anymore.

I probably don't know Judo, but I have a black belt in crazy.

by malweka on Mar 18, 2010 8:48 PM EDT reply actions  

A positive,

The worst is behind us and hopefully it will never get that way again, accountability is the key. I also enjoy reading from multiple interviews with the players, that they GET IT. They realize what needs to be done. The talk about working together and leadership, shows how far the team has come in so short of time.

"FEAR is just the Opening ACT!!!" Coach Coley

by NOLE09JON on Mar 18, 2010 9:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Defensive tackles and Defensive ends rarely worked together?

WTF?!

There is no way that can be true. Little league coaches know better than that.

by Chris_Nee on Mar 18, 2010 9:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I was wondering the same thing

Cause during the games when they stunted in looked like the ends and tackles would guess who was going over or under and i wondered why they looked so funny. Now i know. SMH.

by Dizzim on Mar 18, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i was there

and baffled. the positioning of the d-ends was the craziest thing i’d ever seen…and lead to about 3 80 yard runs by dwyer.

by Snyde on Mar 19, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean you weren't a fan of the dive-bomb the center technique?

That was classic. Each of our DT’s was responsible for grabbing the center’s shoelaces on every play. Epic adjustment.

>>---l>

by DKfromVA on Mar 19, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Mickey said he called 3 plays that entire game

He said he called one twice and it gave up 14 points. So he called 2 for the majority of the game.

by 504Nole on Mar 19, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

He did?

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, if i remember correctly

In a post game interview Dekoda Watson said GT’s offense was the toughest he had ever faced and that he was confused for most of the game. They asked Mickey about the comment, and Mickey said he didn’t know what there was to be confused about because he only called 3 plays the whole game and he called one play twice and it gave up 14 points, so he essentially only called 2.
He kind of mentions calling one play that gave 14 points here:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeaXUzEkqvg&feature=channel

by 504Nole on Mar 19, 2010 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, don't you supposedly cover FSU athletics for a career?

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course I do

Doesn’t change the fact that I am appalled at what I heard from the players.

by Chris_Nee on Mar 18, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe if you weren't some

hack, a-hole, dumb***, clown, fraud, idiot, thief “journalist” you’d have gotten the story out first.

For reference.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

;)

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's just animal2005's Twitter transcript

from when he went nutso the other day. Those adjectives are his own.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

OH Man...I'll read it.

Evidently he deleted some of them, because all I was able to see was MattD’s rebuttles

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't be a whiny hater

Just because I score top interviews and information that allow me to make a high quality living as a well respected sports writer.

You should enter the drawing to be my intern for the summer. Do you know how to say, “Black, two sugars”?

by Chris_Nee on Mar 19, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're momma's so stupid she misspell your last name on your birth certificate.

It’s Knee, with a K. Unless you are a descendant of the Knights that say Ni, in which case she still misspelled it.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Plus she allegedly....

Brought a spoon to the Super Bowl.:)

by Scalpemall on Mar 21, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know where to start

How can you expect your players to succeed when they don’t have a playbook? How can a Coach, call himself a Coach if he doesn’t use the tools to make him and his players better? That is day one football. SMH at this. I can’t believe they let that happen. I wonder if Jimbo new that they didn’t have a playbook?

by Dizzim on Mar 18, 2010 9:03 PM EDT reply actions  

apparently Mickey previously used a playbook

I am stunned and horrified and very hopeful, because there is so much opportunity for improvement. Mickey’s prior playbook apparently was biased toward making plays…

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/11/04/andrews.retirement/index.html

by madridbend on Mar 18, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Inexcusable!

Its amazing how much money was wasted on the old Staff. We should hunt them down! Then Tar and Feather them.

by chipfsu30 on Mar 18, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Mickey had one bad year – when he had tried to retire for 2 plus years but stayed on for Bowden – it was time to let him go – but he does not desreve this critisism

by 93noleman on Mar 19, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kevin Steele took the playbook with him

Its hard to believe all the money wasted on Bobby’s salary the last 8 years. Hiring friends over qualified coaches. If only Sandy D’Alemberte let him resign. (battle to hire Jeff) Mickey should have been FSU head coach in 2001. It would have saved us a lot of money/heart ache over the years, no Jeff Bowden. However, Only after disaster can we be resurrected.

by chipfsu30 on Mar 19, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

You guys look at the pics?

Chris Thompson is thick.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 9:10 PM EDT reply actions  

SoCalNole, welcome to TN and thanks for joining and posting. Seems like every day we are getting more contingents from the west coast.

When you have some time, you may want to take a few moments to check out the following links to bring you up to date and make your visits here more enjoyable.

A) Welcome to TN Guide
2) FSU’s Recruiting Big Board
and
D) The Did You Know Guide to Better Using TN
 
Again welcome.

>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em

by FrankDNole on Mar 19, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just so you know

You may consider taking the “Recruiting big board” off. The link no longer works (until the 2011 one opens up, I’m sure).

by NolenRyan on Mar 19, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank You FrankDNole and TN

This is my favorite website. I have been jumping all over the internet trying to find any little tidbits about my Noles until I came across you all (saw some comments on Andrew Carter’s blog). Bud’s analysis is nothing short of amazing (was he in coaching?) and the comments by the fans are very insightful and humorous. All I can say is if you guys keep it going I am TN for life.

By the way, Bud should adjust his “closing the book on the 2009 FSU defense” post, and just have it link to the quote “We’ve got a playbook to take home now. We didn’t have a playbook in the past.” I think it sums everything up quite well.

by SoCalNole on Mar 19, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Much easier to understand

This is unbelievable. Then again, if your scheme is ‘look confused’, then I guess you shouldn’t be surprised when those are the results you get. Just terrible.

by paperjames on Mar 18, 2010 9:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't blame Mickey too much.

By all accounts he wanted out a few years ago. In the end, he gets credit (and blame) for the defense, and 2009 is no different. But even throughout the 2000’s, we always had good defenses, if not better, other than 2009.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 18, 2010 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Mickey gave up last couple years

you figure his family thing, not even being asked about being the next head coach, and the fact BB didn’t seem to have a problem phoning it in for a fat paycheck, I don’t blame him either.

by karmanole on Mar 18, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

He deserves a little blame

If he wasn’t mental or emotional aptitude to coach at a level even acceptable for Pop Warner league, then he should have at least attempted to resolve the issue with administration.

His employer for 20+ years, this program, and the FSU fans are far more important than the ego of Chuck the Chest, and his friendship with Coach Bowden. We deserved better.

It’s a crappy position he was put in. Nobody should be forced to carry the burden(s) he obviously was forced to carry, but there had to be other options. They may have not been easy, but they were there.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

far more then the school and us fans the most important people in this situation are the players. They deserve better, we deserve nothing! (I know what your saying though and agree with you 100% just wanted to be a player advocate on this one).

by DJ82585 on Mar 19, 2010 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hope Springs Eternal

With the time already spent under the new S&C staff, 13 more spring practices, and a whole summer to continue development, I think the defense is going to come together nicely by the fall (short of any big injuries).

I used to think this year’s defense would end up ranked in the 50-60 range, but the more we learn about the prior staff, the more I think last year’s results were a reflection of coaching not talent.

Do I think the new staff can coach and develop the existing talent? Yes I do.

Do I think the prior staff should be charged with theft of university funds? Yes I do.

by IAHNole on Mar 18, 2010 9:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Improvements

BTW, I think we’ll see huge improvements in special teams too.

A top 40 defense, top 25 special teams, and a top 10 offense equal a great first step toward returning to a championship level.

by IAHNole on Mar 18, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Special teams

Heck ya they are going to be better if for nothing else we are going to have linebackers on our coverage teams now instead of Dends and recievers. We will also have a compotent coach doin things with our guys and our Head coach is putting a huge emphasis on it.

by 21nole24 on Mar 18, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Jimbo has already said everyone will be available to play on Special teams.

Reid is the best return man in college football. I expect our special teams to be very good. Particularly with the emphasis on discipline with the new coaching staff.

Tools Whore

by Tyler on Mar 18, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm at a loss for words

No playbook? No wonder I about blew a heart valve watching the games last year.

by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

That CB blitz in game one

seemed to work okay, but I am not sure if they just did not try that in other games, or if it just did not seem like it because it got picked up by opponents who knew how to catch it. Reid is definitely someone how has to have all the guys occupied if he is going to make it to the QB.

by nolestuff on Mar 20, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

So...

it wasn’t entirely mangum’s fault for being so out of position?

by beezyfsu on Mar 18, 2010 9:53 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd say that is in question.

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 6:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I can't bang on 22 anymore

Don’t fault the student for failing a class if the teacher never gave notes on the testable material.

by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't blame Mangum regardless.

I mean, he wasn’t a great player by any means, but he’s not making the big bucks to win football games.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think you guys need to stop taking everything so literally

Unfortunately sometimes writers, who should know better, write things down knowing full well the person they are quoting might have said something somewhat tongue in cheek.

I doubt there was literally no defensive playbook.

by nolestuff on Mar 18, 2010 9:55 PM EDT reply actions  

straight from seminoles.com

“Florida State’s defensive players are getting a crash course in a completely new scheme under coordinator Mark Stoops. And like their offensive teammates, it comes with required reading from a playbook.”

sort of proves lack of playbook story is correct.

by beezyfsu on Mar 18, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps he meant to convey the idea that

Mickey didn’t require the players study said playbook as extensively as coach Stoops? The statement really never says “There was no playbook”.

However, Nigel’s comments “We didn’t have a playbook in the past”…could either mean:

1.) There was no playbook (which is what I take from it)
2.) There was no playbook that we were allowed to take home with us.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm thinking it was #2

2.) There was no playbook that we were allowed to take home with us.

CP7: Sliding is teh weak sauce

by stevegrizzle on Mar 19, 2010 4:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or are you HOPING it was number 2?

Seriously, the less instruction the team received last season, the more acceptable the defense that was fielded is. There’s no other way a unit with that much talent, regardless of how inexperienced could be that frickin bad.

by truenole87 on Mar 19, 2010 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

It doesnt matter to me who is at fault

Just from the way it was worded it seems like he was referring to no taking them home.

You on the other hand seem to need to justify last years results……..I think we both want a better team this year, but having a playbook last year or not is not going to be the deciding factor.

CP7: Sliding is teh weak sauce

by stevegrizzle on Mar 19, 2010 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's more than the playbook

The DTs and DEs only working together on a miminal basis? Seriously?

by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Isn't it possible

that he’s referring to the very recent past? Stoops was announced as DC months ago, and undoubtedly players have been told “we’re gonna do X and Y….” So, the players get excited about it, and start spring practice and get a new playbook…

Alternatively, there was a point last year where I recall one of the coaches (maybe Mickey) making a comment about wondering whether the scheme they had presented to the players was too complex, and that the players were more confused than prepared. So, perhaps at one point they literally threw out the playbook to try to simplify things…

Who knows…

What I do know is that an excited Nigel Bradham is a good thing for us!

by IndyFSUnole on Mar 19, 2010 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Even if it was a bit of an exaggeration

Do you really like what it has to mean? It means even is the statement wasn’t meant to be taken literally that the old playbook was so small and simple that when compared to Stoops’ book it was like having no book at all. Not something that should be going on at one of the most prestigious football programs in the nation.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 18, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

xavier rhodes sighting ^_^

question, who was the defensive player with dreads (not t.parks) i think he was number23?

"theres two types of people in this world, those who CARRY a spear and those who FEAR the spear"-James Coley

by jfree on Mar 18, 2010 10:14 PM EDT reply actions  

This has to be a joke or a misprint

A)this can not be real.
2)Someone please help me pick my jaw off the floor.
D)I’m logging out before i get sicker,I can’t believe this

by Mr.Wolf on Mar 18, 2010 11:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

April Fools is in 2 weeks. Think this story was published a little early. I don’t want to believe it. Has to be a sick joke.

by Pinto on Mar 18, 2010 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow it was worse than I thought last year.

I know for a fact that some high schools give defensive playbooks to their players. We are a division 1 school and didn’t give our kids playbooks last year? That is inexcusable on the coaches parts, and unfair to the players.

by fsunole23 on Mar 18, 2010 11:14 PM EDT reply actions  

WOW

I would like to say that I am shocked about this but Im not. I spent all last year wondering what the hell the D was doing and thinking that it made no sense, now I understand why.

by BhamSeminole on Mar 18, 2010 11:50 PM EDT reply actions  

You've all already said it...

but i’m shocked that I didn’t hear about any of this out before.

by CrimiNOLElawyer on Mar 18, 2010 11:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Unbelieveable

And Bobby basically begged him to come back last year. I don’t so much blame Mickey because of the family problems he had, but I blame Bobby because its the head coach’s job to make changes when a coach can no longer perform.

by Stevo0515 on Mar 19, 2010 12:45 AM EDT reply actions  

I heard Jimbo asked him back.

Because Bobby was going to promote Amato.

No idea if that’s true, but it’s something I’ve heard.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jimbo asked him back

I hadn’t heard that before.. That is interesting. For sure Andrews even after all that had happened to him personally is a better choice than CTC!

by Stevo0515 on Mar 19, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's already been said numerous times on this post...

but this enrages me. I’ve taken all the news about the lack of procedural efficiencies during the latter years of Bobby’s regime with a grain of salt, but this is the proverbial last straw. I am beyond happy that this team is "under new management,’ because situations like this are an affront and insult to the tradition of Florida State football, and the expectations of it’s fans. Not even the Bowdenistas can deny how terrible this is.

Inexcusable is an understatement.

by TheNole9Yards on Mar 19, 2010 12:52 AM EDT reply actions  

There again though

FSU fans only have the expectations because of guys like Bobby and Mickey.

Even if they stayed on a bit too long, there was never a promise that them leaving would have changed things.

Since some of you guys have a big hard on for Fisher, despite him having coached a down as a head coach yet, you should be happy that things worked out as they did, or else if Bowden had left several years ago FSU might have hired someone you did not like.

by nolestuff on Mar 19, 2010 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they would have hired someone who couldn't get the job done his ass woulda got fired. Just like OU did w/John Blake

And who did they replace him with? Bob Stoops. You don’t hang unto a coach just for the sake of it. Those who are afraid of change are doomed to accept mediocrity. Bobby and staff built the program for sure. But Bowden made it crumble when he tried to turn the program into an ATM machine for his family and friends. The previous staff couldn’t be expected to be able to compete in this new age of young,hungry sophisticated coaches

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 19, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

If BB would have left two years ago

We would have hired Jimbo – since he was named HCIW and all.

by Invictus13 on Mar 20, 2010 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

There’s absolutely no way to prove what another coach would’ve/wouldn’t have done with the exact same talent. He won 2, and we had an amazing run of top 5 finishes. Could we have won more? Probably. Should we have won more? That’s a very gutsy assumption to say unequivocally “yes”

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 20, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bad examples

Saban was energetic enough to actually get up off ass and actually recruit Marcel Dareus who in turn knocked McCoy out the NC game. Bama let up after the half but was the better team.

Texas hadn’t won a NC since 1970. The entire state is in debt to Mack Brown. They turned the tide in the Red River Rivalry by outrecruiting Oklahoma after the disasterous recruitment of Adrian Peterson.

OSU should be happy to have Tressell instead of underachieving with Cooper’s recruiting championship winning a**

USC won shares of two NC with Carroll and he revived the Trojans as a program that recruits itself. That program sucked for a 6-7 year period before Pete got there and hadn’t seriously contended for a NC in ages.

So while it’s very subjective to say whether or not a team, coach, or program SHOULD have more NC to it’s credit. The fact is, our two most hated rivals have won a total of three titles while Bowden was sleep at the wheel.No one can be happy with that. I’ll give punkass Miami 2001 because damnmit they had HORSES (Or as we say out here in SoCal, “Hogs”), but Meyer duplicated BB NC output in a damn 4 year period. But regardless of what anyone thinks, FSU’s failings as a program did a lot to create the circumstances that largely assisted UF in their run. As I’ve told many people: If your HC is being used by rivals coaches to persuade kids not to go to your program, then he needs to go. Some people need to stop living in the past and get up to speed in the new age of big boy football. BB couldn’t keep up. No 80 year old could ever be expected to

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with Nolestuff

And I think his examples are fine. Who else are you going to use? What other teams have really topped what we did while bridging the older era and he newer one? Osborne’s Nebraska dynasty (what, 3 NCs in 4 years?) – they lost seven straight bowl games before that NC run. Talk about choking. Meanwhile, we went undefeated in 14 consecutive bowls? Talk about NOT choking (beating teams like Nebraska, Auburn, Penn State, Texas A&M, Florida, Notre Dame, etc.). Did we lose some games we shouldn’t have? Yeah – and we DID choke against Miami several times. But, had we beaten them there is no guarantee our other games would have ended with the same results (I think our losses often motivated us).

As far as the other in-state NCs… UM has done a great job on one hand, but not always on the up-and-up (that eases the road to the NC). Until Meyer’s recent run, we had UF topped – and no doubt our own plummet aided UF’s two recent NCs (one less quality opponent, though they still got credit for beating one; easier recruiting road for them; etc.).

I also find the assertion that another coach would have done better than Bowden untenable. We had a GREAT run, and there are NO guarantees another coach could have won 3+ NCs.

That said, Bowden should have been released several years ago (as osceolafan850 says below).

by Invictus13 on Mar 20, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

The other schools have coaches who's tenures were a lot shorter than Bowden's

And their tenures existed in a different era of CFB. One that Bowden never properly adjusted to. All the fanbases of those teams mentioned expressed discontent at one time or another (Save for Bama) for the aforementioned coaches. But once again, those are all big money intitutions that took the proper steps to usher themselves forward into the present era . They are better compared with one another than to us we fell behind the evolutionary curve. OU did the same thing with Blake as UF did with Zook. They indentified the problem and eliminated it. Some people are stuck in FSU’s past

Miami could never duplicate their prior success due to resources. In the past, they were able to ride the talent oozing in their own backyard even though lmost every coach they’ve had has left for greener pastures. And no one is saying another coach could’ve done better than Bowden’s first 24 seasons, they are saying a lot of coaches could’ve done better than his last ten.

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to mention at lot of the teams mentioned have actually played each other in NC games

Carroll beat Stoops, Brown beat Carroll, Meyer beat Tressel and Stoops, Stoops and Brown play every year. Hell, they’ve all played one another, and all are good coaches, so it’ would be harder for anyone to assert any measure of dominance over their relatively short tenures compared to BB.

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

So FSU did not play good teams for national titles?

They had to play those Miami teams that won some years, they had to play Stoops OU team.

I think an 80 year old can still be a CEO type coach if he has the right younger guys under him. I think age probably did make it hard for Andrews and Amato, as their spots required actually physically showing players how to do things. There is no way age cannot start affecting that.

by nolestuff on Mar 20, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course we played good teams, thats not the point

We beat Miami when they had great players and went toe to toe with UF throughout the 90’s. But that era is over. Having a CEO type coach got used against us for way too many years in recruiting. You cannot possibly expect to be a big time program with that kind of setup. You’re just delaying ineviable change. A leader has to be a leader, not delegate. An 80 year old matching wits with Meyer or Saban? I’ll pass. We were just way overdue in regards to turning the page and trying to get acclimated to the present times

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but I was not arguing for Bowden staying at this point

I was just responding to Bud’s comments early that Bowden was a choker and that FSU would have won more titles without him.

by nolestuff on Mar 20, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to be too picky but...

One of the posts above says, “FSU would have had mor echampionships without Bowden choking against the good teams.” That implies that the dynasty years are the ones in question (plus other posts – on other threads, perhaps – have referenced the many losses to UM and the willingness to trade the 14 consecutive Top 5 finishes for one more championship). That’s what I’m responding to.

Trust me, I totally agree that the past ten years shouldn’t have been tolerated. Bowden should have been ousted some time ago. I’d LOVE for this to be Year 3 of the Jimbo Fisher era (I think by now everyone would know for sure if he is the answer, like many of us believe he is).

by Invictus13 on Mar 20, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another thought

Another reason I would argue against the statement that FSU would have more championships without Bowden is that during our dynasty years, multiple “major” championships (AP, forms of UPI/Coaches/etc., BCS; only counting different years) were awarded to: Miami (3), Nebraska (3), Florida State (2). Meanwhile, Notre Dame, Colorado, Georgia Tech, Washington, Alabama, Florida, Michigan, Tennessee, and Oklahoma each won one.

In other words, only Miami and Nebraska had more titles than we did (and Nebraska shared 2 of its 3). It’s difficult to argue that FSU would have had more than our two with someone else at the helm. It just seems highly unlikely, esp. considering that any title meant winning at least 2 of 3 against UM, UF and a Top 5 bowl opponent – plus going undefeated the rest of the way (often with a Notre Dame, Michigan, Auburn or other quality opponent on the schedule).

Again, I’ll take the two titles and the 14-year run of Top 5 finishes rather than gamble on winning more titles under someone else. Heck, we might not have won the two we have. (If I’ve misrepresented the statement about more titles without BB choking, my apologies – esp. since I’ve harped on it!)

by Invictus13 on Mar 22, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe should have as opposed to would have

Based on the ridiculous talent we had in 87-00. However, I’ve always thought that talent masked some rather average Xs and Os work, which I believe was our real Achilles heel back then. I mean, how often did you think ‘Boy, we sure outschemed the heck out of them’ after a big game? Maybe UF in ‘98? Probably a lot less often than you thought ’Wow, we got outcoached’.

Tough to play coulda, shoulda, woulda though. Like some others have said, so many variables and there are a lot of teams not named UF, LSU and USC that would love to have our ‘so-so’ record when chasing titles the last 20 years.

by BayNole9 on Mar 20, 2010 10:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Until recently

UF would have loved our title track record. And, I’m not saying that Meyer isn’t great at what he does, but he stumbled into a perfect storm: Zook left a stocked cupboard, and (more importantly) both FSU and UM have pretty much sucked since he’s been down here. He’s enjoyed basking in the sunshine as the lone superpower in a state that once supported three top 10 teams, and he benefited from the SEC’s reputation (though divisional rival UT has also been down during most of Meyer’s tenure).

I believe that Meyer will find NCs a lot harder to come by in the next few years. We’ll be good again very soon; Saban is a great SEC West foil; Tennessee has the opportunity to get good again; Meyer has his own health/mental/personal (whatever, since he’s not sharing much info) problems that he will have to keep in control.

Overall, I think UF will continue to be very good – but it will be much more difficult to win NCs in the near future. I don’t expect them to win two in three years or anything. That level of sustainability isn’t possible – not for USC, and not for UF.

by Invictus13 on Mar 21, 2010 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Completely the wrong way to look at it

Coaches should be fired when a pattern is evident that points to them not being able to win at an acceptable rate. You then hire a coach who you feel can get the job done. If he doesn’t win at an acceptable rate then you fire him. Holding on to a coach once he can no longer perform at the needed level weakens the the program. Knowing what we now know about the offensive coaches under JB and defensive staff that was replaced it is very hard to argue that any modern coaching staff would not have been a major upgrade in both recruiting and X and O coaching. We would then be sitting in year 3 of the new era instead of year 1 and be in a better position financially and on the field.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 20, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

All coaches are probably loyal

too much at some point our another, unless they are just complete Aholes, because they are humans and relationships unfortunately do factor in. Bobby was probably figuring Andrews could get out of his funk and get back to being a solid coach.

As many outside have pointed out though, when you force a legend out, you are taking a gamble then too, because if things do not improve, not only is the team still not on top, but then you also look like aholes for forcing a legend for nothing.

by nolestuff on Mar 20, 2010 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't saying Bobby was too loyal

I was saying the AD should have fired Bowden. Instead of trying to control the assistants and work around the problem (Bowden) for years, we would have been better off as a program if he was fired years ago. It would have also put us in a position to poach a coach from another program or the NFL instead of going with a rookie head coach. Not taking a shot at Jimbo, but the entire process was turned upset by not sacking up and firing Bowden earlier.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

That was one of the problems, though.

Any halfway competent coach could see how dated and ineffective Mickey’s schemes were. It wasn’t a question of Mickey getting back to being “solid”, as much as the fact that Mickey’s defense was completely and utterly ineffective.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 21, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mickey's Ds

were good just several years ago, so I think I agree with Bud that it is more so him checking out, than him suddenly not knowing how to coach.

As for not firing Bobby sooner, that would have looked even worse for FSU, had they fired Bowden any sooner. It is one thing for Larry Coker or Ron Zook, but had FSU not given Bowden a chance to correct things by changing his staff (which may have worked had the defense not started sliding as soon as the offense started going the other way).

by nolestuff on Mar 21, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is "several" years?

Modern offenses shred Mickey’s D. The defenses were good several years ago because

A.) It was closer to the year 2000, so we could still grab elite players because of our NC.
2.) The spread offense was in its initial stages, and wasn’t as employed as much as it is now
D.) The ACC wasn’t near as good as it is now. Plus, UF was struggling.
Thong Lace Panties) Our offense was so bad, that I think we didn’t focus on our defense much. I could be wrong, but I’m sure that they weren’t as good as we thought they were.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 21, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do not buy that it is just a matter of new coaching schemes

It was not just “modern” offenses that beat FSU recently though.

GT – Mickey’s old defenses did okay against some good option teams
Boston College – not a modern offense
USF – not a modern offense, granted the defense did not give up tons of points in the game, it still did not hold the opponents down enough with a first time QB
Clemson – I would hesitate to call their offense modern
West Virginia – defense did enough in that game, and that was a modern offense
UF – to be fair, the last couple of years Ponder has been hurt, thus the offense has kept going 3 and out, so neither side of the ball was helping the other, thus the avalanches

Also, during Mark Richt’s time Mickey had to face a pass heavy attack in practices with various formations, more than one legit threat at receiver, good running backs that could make big plays to keep defenses honest, as well as catch the ball out of the backfield, etc, so if anything he was ahead of the curve to some extent with facing “modern” offenses.

by nolestuff on Mar 21, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

GT's Flexbone is not old option stuff

BC and USF both run the zone read a bunch and beat us with that and Play-action off that.

UF’s offense had its best game of the year against a D1 team versus… FSU

West Virginia was killing his D until Devine and their QB got hurt.

We’ve written about this a bunch. If it wasn’t 2-back with immobile QB, FSU was in trouble.

I agree he did a great job for a good 10-year period in the late 80’s to early 90’s.

by Bud Elliott on Mar 21, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not all the old options teams were

the same as each other either. Nebraska passed the ball sometimes to keep teams honest. You would be pushing it to say GT’s offense is better than Nebraska or some of the other old teams. GT has the advantage of opponents not seeing it as much thes days.

So you are saying past teams did not have QBs that made reads? They did not run play action before 2005?

by nolestuff on Mar 21, 2010 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm saying the zone-read stuff was really not seen much in the last few decades until the early part of this decade

when it became en vogue to run it with the spread stuff. It is, of course, very old going back to the days of the single wing.

Georgia Tech’s offense is very different than Nebraska’s. PJ has incorporated run-and-shoot elements into his spread option game.

by Bud Elliott on Mar 21, 2010 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

What was enough time?

We were sliding from the 01 season to the 09 season. 4 or 5 years would have been enough IMO. That would have Bowden out after 05 or 06 and us 3 or 4 years into rebuilding. Long enough to know if the new coach was a dud or to be back among the elite. It is all in the past now, but the administration went above and beyond to try and give Bowden a chance, injurying the program in the process.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since the program was already doing poorly on offense

and had a similar record in 2006, how was it hurt any worse? Yes the defense has gone down, but the offense has gone up, so that is a push.

by nolestuff on Mar 21, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

BS

The offense only got better after Jimbo’s hire. Bobby hire (Jeffy) couldn’t do a damn thing with Boldin, Javon Walker, and Leon Washington. The defense got worse because of the coaches Bobby hired and there recruiting mistakes (Did BB make it to that in-home with Harvin?). Anybody who thinks Bowden shouldn’t have been gone years ago are at a serious logic deficit. Like I said previously, anytime programs are using your HC as way to persuade recruits to go elsewhere, he needs to go, YESTERDAY

by westcoastnolefan on Mar 21, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not only what Bud said but

It also let Florida get out to a massive lead in everything. There is a reason why the number of truly stud kids that start out as UF leans has gone up while the Nole leans are only legacy kids. With so many years of losing the amount of vocal FSU fans has shrunk, coinciding with a massive increase in UF fans so that for the first time in around 20 years there is clearly 1 major football program in the state.

If Bowden was cut loose sometime around the same time as Zook it is a completely different ballgame. The new FSU coach would have probably had less talent on hand than Meyer did because Zook was a better recruiter than the later Bowden. But if he was good, with the way the ACC has been lately FSU might have scored a few 1 loss seasons. If the switch was made early enough Harvin and both of the Pounceys might have been Noles. Imagine what a strong FSU and a rising Miami does for the ACC TV Contracts negotiations?

The game of what if is always dangerous, but I find it hard to believe a competent, not good just competent, staff would a much better record over the last 3 or 4 years. And even if they would not have been up to standard at least we would know and been able to replace them. One last what if though. Imagine if we canned Bowden early enough to hire Saban.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn Ya'll....

I kinda feel bad for treating Korey Mangum as my kick ball everytime some junk went bad on D. Now, I understand that he was the last line of something other than defending.

Sorry Korey.

by LincolnHighNole on Mar 19, 2010 1:30 AM EDT reply actions  

now lets be clear here:

its not ‘bashing’ him to tell the truth: he was the worst player in fsu history.

the fact that he was put in this position schematically is not his fault, nor is it his fault that was given starter minutes when he should be third team..

by 000111 on Mar 19, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's bashing him

To say he was the worst player in fsu history without putting a huge asterisk behind that statement for the reasons you gave.

by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

correct, and i think we all agree that mangum was just at the center

of a perfect shit-storm what was the fsu defense this year (players leaving, recruiting, coaching, infighting, retirements, more players leaving for rhodes scholarships) so he clearly isnt culpable for all of that – but the fact remains…

by 000111 on Mar 22, 2010 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Budd Thacker

may take a run at that title. Word is he tried to challenge Mangum as worst FSU player but could not compete because he was injured.

Enjoy a short and glorious future in WWE….

by BossNole on Mar 19, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

How is it fair to make that claim?

Defensive coaches that cared about teaching, scheming and recruiting would’ve had much better options instead of Mangum that he would’ve never seen the field and no one would’ve known who he was. Can you imagine that? In an alternate universe, FSU fans are asking each other who Corey Magnum is/was, because he only got special teams snaps in games against The Citadel, Western Carolina and UT-Chattanooga.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

so I did a little search for an fsu defensive playbook....

and on ebay I found someone supposedly selling an fsu defensive playbook for the 1998 season>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/FLORIDA-STATE-SEMINOLES-4-3-DEFENSE-PLAYBOOK!-*ANDREWS*_W0QQitemZ170459434645QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20100316?IMSfp=TL100316142007r20897

by phi*tau-nole on Mar 19, 2010 1:32 AM EDT reply actions  

It all makes sense now...

In order to have a playbook, someone has to make the plays. And the coaches repeatedly told the players to “go make plays.” So really its the players fault, specifically Mangum.

by mbr2318 on Mar 19, 2010 1:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm gonna go against the grain here....and declare this revelation to be GOOD news.

Think about. Think long and hard about our defense the past 2 years, especially ’09. Did the blitzes exhibit any semblance of a coordinated effort? Did the D-Line stunts appear orchestrated in any way? Did our potential 1st-round pick Patrick Robinson always seem confident in his responsibilities?
The answer to these queries is “No”.
What if these calamitous errors, these unadulterated mental collapses took place despite a 300-page playbook to reference? What would that say about the competency of the current defensive roster?
Nigel dropped a good news bomb on us today if you ignore the ugly tree and embrace the wondrous forest that lies ahead.

by The K-Man on Mar 19, 2010 1:58 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Think long and hard about our defense the past 2 years, especially ’09.

Do I have to?
Did the blitzes exhibit any semblance of a coordinated effort?
Zero

Did the D-Line stunts appear orchestrated in any way?

Does called often count?


Did our potential 1st-round pick Patrick Robinson always seem confident in his responsibilities?

No

What if these calamitous errors, these unadulterated mental collapses took place despite a 300-page playbook to reference? What would that say about the competency of the current defensive roster?

Fair point. But how far behind are these guys in understanding a defense and reading a playbook?

by Bud Elliott on Mar 19, 2010 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would venture to say not as far as they seem

I’m actually with K-Man on this one. Its obviously still an uphill battle and gonna be a tough road. But right now we have a bunch of kids that as far as scheme and understanding a play book are gonna be like Early Enrollee Freshman. The benefit is, that they are all acclimated to the speed and competition level they’ll be playing against.

by truenole87 on Mar 19, 2010 6:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree

I guess we won’t have to “unteach” a lot of things. They were never taught!

by NolenRyan on Mar 19, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree.

This means that the talented players that can learn well and quickly will excel in the coming season. It may skew the results positively. It also adds an advantage of surprise that no other team has. Those players coming in, (the few), who are already physically mature enough to contribute to a major college football team will be on the same or nearly the same footing as the upper classmen.

Luc and Williams are on a level playing field and that is a good thing for both depth and competition creating excellence. Harris will come in older and physically mature at CB and ready to start if he takes quickly to the playbook. The same applies to any other recruit. I wonder if our smart recruiters might have used this fact while speaking with some of our then defensive prospects.

by Nole75 on Mar 19, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

K-man...

That was beautiful…and from your mobile, no less. Impressive

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 12:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Excellent

I’m actually thrilled to hear this.

What has happened has happened, it feels good knowing what a disadvantage the players were at, as it bodes well for what will happen with a competent staff.

Speak softly, and carry a big Spear

by tdchrisdavis on Mar 19, 2010 2:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I feel the same - relieved.

This explains a lot., it gives me reason to think our defense can make an unprecedented year to year jump. If our offense keeps it together, we should be good.

by sonofagunn on Mar 19, 2010 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sound Logic

If we won half our games with half the team being coached, we should win all our games with the whole team being coached, right?

by NationWideNole on Mar 19, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good to know the Head Coach was keeping an eye on the other coaches

From 3 stories up it’s hard to see the kids not using a playbook.

by 93noles99 on Mar 19, 2010 6:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Fog

Sounds like the “tower” was up a little too high in the clouds. Kinda like Lando Calrisean’s(sp?) homeland.

by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:40 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Good stuff.

I was initially thinking of the Eye of Sauron in Lord of the Rings.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

This completely blows my assumptions of how far the defense can climb for the upcoming season.

When Raysn posted about the analysis of how many teams jumped a certain number of rankings on defense from one year to the next, I doubt too many teams had completely this level of crap happening.

Lets just hope the damage isn’t too great.

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 6:19 AM EDT reply actions  

any way to check

if any other team in the country was ‘coached’ without a playbook like our guys? i agree that this drastically changes the learning curve

by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 19, 2010 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure about that unless there are people close to the program.

I believe it was Central Michigan who jumped more than 40 spots and they also had a clean slate of defensive coaching.

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 7:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

mike leach

aside from this not being news, fsu’s defensive problems last year had nothing to do with the lack of a playbook. there are some coaches who believe, for various reasons, that their players will be better off without a playbook (like mike leach). it’s not unthinkable that a legendary coach might think he can get away without one. andrews’ defensive plan was always very simple anyway. you don’t need a playbook to tell you to start in a basic formation and then ‘go make plays’. the problem was that his plan wasn’t effective any more and, for reasons that have been well established, his heart just wasn’t in the game enough to make the necessary changes.

by humanbeing on Mar 19, 2010 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

What championship coach does that?

Leach is a well known nut who hasn’t even won a conference title. I also find it hard to believe his QB didn’t have a playbook to take home. You can boil down what a WR or RB does and in theory they could just remember their assignment and be fine, but the QB needs to know where everyone is on every play. No way you learn that in a pass heavy attack without studying a playbook.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 19, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

didn't mean to suggest that

it was a great idea for winning a championship, just that it’s not an insane idea. the unmitigated horror that some people here are expressing is just ridiculous. it’s not completely unheard of for a guy who has been extremely successful to think that he can do it without a playbook. there’s also a legendary (and championship) coach at a lower division too who’s never had a playbook. can’t recall his name right now, but he’s one of the winningest coaches in all of college ball at any level (more than Bowden and Paterno). maybe at st. john’s?

anyway, my point is that football doesn’t begin with a playbook. it begins with a plan. then that plan has to be communicated to the players. some rare coaches think they can communicate that plan without a playbook. personally, i think we’ll be much better off now that we have one, but lack of a playbook is no basis for moral outrage at the program.

i totally disagree with your dismissal of leach’s success. though as a head football coach he hasn’t been able to win the big one, he’s proven he has an exceptional offensive mind and used it to turn a perennial failure of a program into a perennial contender in a relatively short period of time. i’ll be very happy if our offense is as consistenly successful and exciting as his was at texas tech.

by humanbeing on Mar 19, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except

Given the results, it was clearly something our legendary coach(es) couldn’t do. So, yeah, some outrage would be in order. After the first half of the season, perhaps they should have caught on that things weren’t sinking in.

Although, didn’t I read the other day that MA said this team was one of the mentally slowest he had coached? Perhaps he didn’t think they could properly decipher a playbook?

by Invictus13 on Mar 19, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think it is insane

Looked at in a vacuum it may sound fine, especially at lower levels. But offenses have becoming more and more complex and defenses have done the same to keep up. Then you look at our defense where players obviously had no idea what their responsibilities were or how to attack the offense that they were facing week after week. Giving them playbooks might have helped them understand their roles better. It would have also helped the kids who were self motivated improve as they could have learned in their free time.

by osceolafan850 on Mar 19, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Study in their free time?

To learn more about plays? That’s what PS3 NCAA Football was for!

by Invictus13 on Mar 19, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice, I think this can springboard a lot of posts, possibly similar to the

“four factors of winning” in basketball. MattD or AbeFroman is obviously the best person to know about this, but I was thinking about taking the FEI rankings over time and try to identify similar characteristics between teams moving up, down, and staying the same.

I’m not schooled heavily in stats, but I’d imagine to do it right one would have to understand how to conduct the analysis with “statistically significant” measures. Maybe it can be more simple than I think though.

"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"

by FSUvaFan on Mar 19, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think a good comparison with our team would be Nebraska

Although we are probably a little further behind we probably also have more talent. A talented team completely new Defensive coaching staff and change of scheme went from 78th to 8th. Can only hope we get close to that type of improvement.

by BS37FSU on Mar 19, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll echo others.

This is, of course, appalling. But also exceptionally good news for the present. It means that proper coaching should — potentially, at least — be able to elevate our defense much faster than we might have feared before.

Especially when you pair it with proper S&C coaching.

Bud makes a fair point that these poor kids are now far behind in learning playbooks and fully grasping how to play real defense, but even taking that into account, this story suggests to me that our guys should be able to make up a lot of their potential very quickly by simply having access to competent coaching.

We’re still going to have a long way to go to get back to elite-level football, but get beyond the shock of the previous regime’s incompetence.

What this is is more low-hanging fruit to pick.

by Drew J Jones on Mar 19, 2010 7:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Poor Korey Mangum

Never thought I’d be saying that. But I also hate to think how bad we might have screwed up the NFL aspirations of Jamie Robinson and a couple of other guys. This looks like they were just running around out there chasing the ball last season. Wait a minute…. they were.

by so.fulnole on Mar 19, 2010 8:12 AM EDT reply actions  

The thing i find funny

is that this was released by FSU sports info and not by an independant journalist. Normally you’d try to hid your dirty laundry for a couple years.

by egynole on Mar 19, 2010 8:35 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

He’s also making it public now because he wants everyone to know that last years defense wasn’t a talent problem, it was a coaching problem. It also puts more pressure on the players to improve as a unit. Now that the defense has the tools to become better, it’s on them to perform.

by fsucosta on Mar 19, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just read the headline.
Take-Home Work

Defense excitedly tackles new scheme – with a playbook

It’s as if it were a gift. Like that pony little girls always ask for on their birthday, but this time they finally got the unthinkable – A PLAYBOOK.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just one more year

It's a beautiful day in Tallahassee

by RaysnNoles on Mar 19, 2010 9:12 AM EDT reply actions  

I hate those people...

they would’ve delayed this whole process ANOTHER 12 months!!

And who’s to say the same coaches would be available for us to hire NEXT December/January.

by Diablo_2 on Mar 19, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I was willing to give him one more year

if he was willing to just stand in his tower, sit in his office, stand 40 yards away from the line of scrimmage on game day and do nothing. If he let Fisher hire his own staff (I’d assume it’d be the same as it is now, just minus Craig). One last year. Absolutely zero control. Written into a contract. A farewell tour. That’s it.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't

Besides, didn’t he repeatedly say that he did NOT want a “farewell tour”? So… didn’t we kinda give him what he wanted? (Half-n-half: no final year, no dreaded farewell tour)

by Invictus13 on Mar 19, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

He said that, but the man would've soaked it up.

You know that. I know that. Everybody knows that.

That bridge has been crossed, though.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."

by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

They got that

About 4-5 more times than they should have…

by Invictus13 on Mar 19, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow.

I’m actually relieved to hear that we didn’t have a playbook at all, which helps explains the past two year’s defense, along with where Mickey’s priorities have been. But my question is, why didn’t we hear about this before??

by NoleTurbine on Mar 19, 2010 9:48 AM EDT reply actions  

And that’s why this site is free. Lack. Of. Thoroughness.

by evenflow58 on Mar 19, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

*facepalm*

Seriously? If it isn’t thorough enough for you, go throw away your money at Warchant.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."

by geoffissiffoeg on Mar 19, 2010 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

*facepalm*

Seriously? I couldn’t get the sarcasm there? lol

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."

by geoffissiffoeg on Mar 19, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's OK...happens all the time

I mean, can you imagine Bud’s equivalent at Alabama or Texas?

“So, did you guys get a playbook this year”

“Uhh yeah, we got it on National Signing Day”

“Oh. OK”

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions