Report: Florida State's Defensive Players Didn't Have Playbooks In 2009
Keep in mind that Nick Saban gives his defenders a 400+ page playbook. Florida State's defenders didn't even have one last year. FSU's defense was 92nd in the country last season. The FSU release:
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - No unit on the Florida State football team is facing a steeper learning curve over 15 days of spring practice than the defense, which will be completely different under new coordinator Mark Stoops.
The switch from a predominantly man coverage team for the past quarter century under Mickey Andrews, to one that will play zone as its base will test all the defensive position segments. There's a need to learn both new terminology, as well as new techniques.
Photo Gallery: Spring Practice Day 2 - Offense | Defense
And there's also the matter of some take-home work that is completely foreign to veteran Seminole defenders.
"Right now we're focusing on executing; learning the new defense," said rising junior linebacker Nigel Bradham. "We just want to execute every play...
"We've got a playbook to take home now. We didn't have a playbook in the past. The scheme is totally different, but it's exciting. It's set up where you can make a lot more big hits and stuff like that. We're really excited about it and we're going to hit it running."
That's a notion that excites Bradham, who closed the 2009 season as the team's leading tackler with 93 stops. And he's not alone.
FSU's defensive players came off the field at the conclusion of Thursday's practice seemingly giddy with the early results. While Bradham's eyes lit up at the possibility of unleashing his 241 pounds on ball carriers, defensive end Markus White - who is known for his boundless energy - excitedly talked about dropping into pass coverage.
"(Tuesday) was a hesitating day, in my opinion," said White. "I wasn't confused on what to do. I was just confused on how to do it. Today, it felt like it was more on emotion and I could do whatever I wanted to do. As long as I'm having fun with it, then my motor is going to run, and that's how it was today. There was a little less hesitation today and tomorrow there's going to be a little less."
Co-dependency is critical to improving a defensive unit that ranked as one of the most porous in the nation last season. That means everyone must work together - perhaps even more so in the new scheme - to be most effective.
Rising sophomore defensive tackle Jacobbi McDaniel has already seen evidence that the coaches are emphasizing working side by side, especially up front.
"Last season there was very minimum work with defensive ends and defensive tackles together," said McDaniel, the leader in tackles among interior defensive linemen. "Now, we're working together. We're getting off the ball together, we're running plays together. Everybody is on the same page and that's a good thing."
The same is true in the secondary, where the bulk of the players are of the first- or second-year variety. Veteran cornerback Dionte Allen, with one career start under his belt, suddenly finds himself in a leadership role along with a couple of teammates, all of whom are trying to get a grasp on Stoops' coverage schemes. Allen said Stoops has shown great patience with his new charges after two days of practice, but he's anxious to step up and assert himself.
"(Ochuko) Jenije, Terrance (Parks) and me - we're the oldest - we've got to represent and lead by example," said Allen. "I look at it like I'm a senior instead of a redshirt junior. We've got new coaches now, so we're starting over. ...
"I think (the scheme) is a little better now because we're able to read (the receivers). Our position is already hard because we've got to come up and stop the run and defend the bomb. That's the number one thing he's been emphasizing to me and all the corners, to read (the receivers)."
Inexcusable.
389 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just when I think I'm finally over the last decade of incompetence.............
by Jonathan Loesche on Mar 18, 2010 8:37 PM EDT reply actions
does not compute
how does that even happen? doesn’t pop warner use play books?
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 18, 2010 8:37 PM EDT reply actions
We even had a crude playbook drawn up for defense when I played IM flag football at FSU.
I honestly think that all previous predictions of how much the defense is going to improve need to be tossed out the window in light of this. They might as well have had no instruction at all prior to a couple of days ago.
"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright
high school productions of "Cats" use playbooks.
And the 10th grade English teacher/Director isn’t getting paid $300k.
by The K-Man on Mar 19, 2010 1:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
Seriously though, wtf???
Hope our D will be able to grasp our new scheme/coaching faster than expected. I’m sure we’ll see some confusion on the field come fall but I’m at a loss for words.
+2
How in the heck does….im sorry i just cant type anymore.
Thank God for the men and women who stand tall in the night to protect this great country we love so much
by NOLEcasterWX on Mar 18, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Strange
Even with it as a man coverage base I would expect them to send a small playbook home with some details written out.
Wow
I just don’t get it. So many questions running through my head that I almost can’t decide what to post. MA was one of the best in the country for years so how could he let it get that bad? Or was it so hard to get the coaches under him on the same page that he just gave up and tried to handle what was directly under his control? How do you let the D-line go an entire year without practicing together? How did we have a D1 staff that did less work than a HS staff?
by osceolafan850 on Mar 18, 2010 8:45 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Doesn't that "no playbook for two years" thing fall into the timeframe with the loss of his son?
Just sayin.
I bleed Garnet and piss Gold.
Still
You can take the playbook from the previous season, get you tail to Kinko’s and get some made up for the new players coming in.
a fine point. or at least delegate that task to T-Buck
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
Eww
It is unbelievable to me, that the coaches LITERALLY said ‘Go out and make a play.’ The guys playing corner must have had just as much prep as someone who went out and played 5 on 5 – “I got this guy!”
I would like to hear from FSU players 5 & 10+ years ago in the program
and whether there has ever been a defensive playbook.
I have copies of the 99 and 03 playbooks
by Bud Elliott on Mar 18, 2010 8:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
What's Nigel referring to as a lack of playbook then?
Mickey just discarded it for the past few years or what?
by SeminoleSkins87 on Mar 18, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Think he got discouraged and said ''F this''
by Bud Elliott on Mar 18, 2010 8:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I can't think of any other explanation.
by Tubby Sweetbundle on Mar 18, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Dear God
What a screen name. Where did you come from?!?!
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions
And the picture to go with it?
Maybe we don’t want to know.
the illegitimate son of
tommy tuberville and dabo sweeney?
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 19, 2010 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
I think you have a pretty pussy.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
by FrankDNole on Mar 19, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
I am so confused
I don’t know whether to rec or flag this
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Mar 19, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions
LMAO!
I rec’d it. I cannot allow Frank’s talent to go unnoticed.
by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
You think you're confused, how about me?
That is not a phrase I usually tell other men, except all those times I’ve mistakenly picked up a post-op TV.
Ooops, TMI.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
The always provocative when he gets the chance FrankD strikes again
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
Tubby Sweetbundle, belated welcome to TN.
If you haven’t had the chance to do so already, you may want to take a few moments to check out the following links in order to have a better TN experience.
A) Welcome to TN Guide
2) FSU’s Recruiting Big Board
and
D) The Did You Know Guide to Better Using TN
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
How big are they?
Maybe they just downsized it tremendously the past few years and the players didn’t really call it a “playbook” since it wasn’t very thorough?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Playbook
Page 1: Make plays
Page 2: Run upfield as fast as possible
Page 3: Turn around and chase the guy who just ran past you
Page 4: Make plays
by osceolafan850 on Mar 18, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I can't stop laughing at this comment
and also being so disgusted that this was par for the course
how in the hell can a dline NOT work together? Can you imagine the G’s and C not working with the T’s?
Blows my mind
by Cigar City Nole on Mar 18, 2010 9:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
"try harder"
That is the secret audible
by osceolafan850 on Mar 19, 2010 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Or...
Phase 1: Go make a play
Phase 2: ????
Phase 3: Profit
"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright
I have the 98 playbook
Its only 129 pages.
by BhamSeminole on Mar 19, 2010 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Bud
would love to get a copy if you somehow come across a Stoops play book…
by BhamSeminole on Mar 18, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
When did Mark Stoops coach at OU?
or are you talking about his brothers?
I agree with ricobert1
There has got to be much more to this story. I can’t believe that MA was a very good DC for all but the last 2 or 3 years of his career.
by Big Boss Mann on Mar 18, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
His son blew his head off in his backyard
His priorities changed and he mentally checked out.
by Bud Elliott on Mar 18, 2010 11:22 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
There's no way he had the time to properly
grieve and focus on how to move past that, with all his duties at FSU. No way.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions
And it's not healthy, either.
Without football, his life will change drastically. I hope that he has a support system in place that is ready to help if need be. It’s kind of a scary situation. No telling what’s gone through his mind up until this point.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Terribly sad
Mickey is a great guy. Have my pic of him and I displayed proudly.
by Bud Elliott on Mar 19, 2010 12:43 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Mickey is a "great guy"!
Mickey was ready to give it up after his son’s terrible death. Bobby convinced him to stay 2 more years, even when Mickey really didn’t want to in his heart. Then Bobby hires his good friend CTC (Mickey and Chuck have always pretty much agreed to disagree) Mickey somewhat stepped back. Chuck stepped up thinking he could pull off the coup (which obviously didn’t work.) and gain the support of the admin and boosters. If you have ever sat down and talked to Mickey, when he walks away you say to yourself, that’s the kind of guy I want my son to play for.
by Harleynole on Mar 19, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Mickey is a great person and was also one of the best defensive coaches of all time. The spread “gimmick” offense was created to beat MA’s defense. Mickey should have been aloud to retire when he felt the need to do so after the tragedy with his son. Instead he stayed on because of Bobby and I also believe he stayed on so that CTC would not be promoted to DC and for that I have to admire MA even more. To stick his neck out knowing that our defense would stink so that our program would not be turned over to Mr. Fancy shoes. I have nothing bad and never will say anything bad about MA. May he have a wonderful retirement and enjoy the extra time he will have with his wife and grand kids.
That sucks
He should’ve taken a year off, Bobby wouldn’t of replaced him.
by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:22 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yep. Just what I was thinking.
Tragic. Horribly tragic. That kind of thing NO man should experience. I have no idea how I might handle something like that myself. No idea…
I bleed Garnet and piss Gold.
To be honest
I thought we only ran 12 plays a game on defense. They always used that yellow book (bottom right) to call in plays and it only went up to 12. Apparently play 11 didnt work too well (pic taken during the USF game).
I'm hoping he was misquoted
because this makes no sense, no playbook? or may be they just didn’t care anymore.
I probably don't know Judo, but I have a black belt in crazy.
A positive,
The worst is behind us and hopefully it will never get that way again, accountability is the key. I also enjoy reading from multiple interviews with the players, that they GET IT. They realize what needs to be done. The talk about working together and leadership, shows how far the team has come in so short of time.
"FEAR is just the Opening ACT!!!" Coach Coley
Defensive tackles and Defensive ends rarely worked together?
WTF?!
There is no way that can be true. Little league coaches know better than that.
I was wondering the same thing
Cause during the games when they stunted in looked like the ends and tackles would guess who was going over or under and i wondered why they looked so funny. Now i know. SMH.
i was there
and baffled. the positioning of the d-ends was the craziest thing i’d ever seen…and lead to about 3 80 yard runs by dwyer.
You mean you weren't a fan of the dive-bomb the center technique?
That was classic. Each of our DT’s was responsible for grabbing the center’s shoelaces on every play. Epic adjustment.
>>---l>
Mickey said he called 3 plays that entire game
He said he called one twice and it gave up 14 points. So he called 2 for the majority of the game.
He did?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Yeah, if i remember correctly
In a post game interview Dekoda Watson said GT’s offense was the toughest he had ever faced and that he was confused for most of the game. They asked Mickey about the comment, and Mickey said he didn’t know what there was to be confused about because he only called 3 plays the whole game and he called one play twice and it gave up 14 points, so he essentially only called 2.
He kind of mentions calling one play that gave 14 points here:
Dude, don't you supposedly cover FSU athletics for a career?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
ha ha
caught out of character
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 18, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course I do
Doesn’t change the fact that I am appalled at what I heard from the players.
Maybe if you weren't some
hack, a-hole, dumb***, clown, fraud, idiot, thief “journalist” you’d have gotten the story out first.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
trick, it's not nice to post stuff that you need level 8 security clearance to view.
Is it worth signing up to read?
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
It's just animal2005's Twitter transcript
from when he went nutso the other day. Those adjectives are his own.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
OH Man...I'll read it.
Evidently he deleted some of them, because all I was able to see was MattD’s rebuttles
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't be a whiny hater
Just because I score top interviews and information that allow me to make a high quality living as a well respected sports writer.
You should enter the drawing to be my intern for the summer. Do you know how to say, “Black, two sugars”?
You're momma's so stupid she misspell your last name on your birth certificate.
It’s Knee, with a K. Unless you are a descendant of the Knights that say Ni, in which case she still misspelled it.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
by tricknole on Mar 19, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't know where to start
How can you expect your players to succeed when they don’t have a playbook? How can a Coach, call himself a Coach if he doesn’t use the tools to make him and his players better? That is day one football. SMH at this. I can’t believe they let that happen. I wonder if Jimbo new that they didn’t have a playbook?
apparently Mickey previously used a playbook
I am stunned and horrified and very hopeful, because there is so much opportunity for improvement. Mickey’s prior playbook apparently was biased toward making plays…
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/11/04/andrews.retirement/index.html
Inexcusable!
Its amazing how much money was wasted on the old Staff. We should hunt them down! Then Tar and Feather them.
by chipfsu30 on Mar 18, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Mickey had one bad year – when he had tried to retire for 2 plus years but stayed on for Bowden – it was time to let him go – but he does not desreve this critisism
Kevin Steele took the playbook with him
Its hard to believe all the money wasted on Bobby’s salary the last 8 years. Hiring friends over qualified coaches. If only Sandy D’Alemberte let him resign. (battle to hire Jeff) Mickey should have been FSU head coach in 2001. It would have saved us a lot of money/heart ache over the years, no Jeff Bowden. However, Only after disaster can we be resurrected.
You guys look at the pics?
Chris Thompson is thick.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Look at the second paragraph in the shaded portion up top
You’ll see where it says: Photo Gallery
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 19, 2010 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions
SoCalNole, welcome to TN and thanks for joining and posting. Seems like every day we are getting more contingents from the west coast.
When you have some time, you may want to take a few moments to check out the following links to bring you up to date and make your visits here more enjoyable.
A) Welcome to TN Guide
2) FSU’s Recruiting Big Board
and
D) The Did You Know Guide to Better Using TN
Again welcome.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Just so you know
You may consider taking the “Recruiting big board” off. The link no longer works (until the 2011 one opens up, I’m sure).
Consider replacing it with
the History of A) 2) D)
You must not have read, or you must have forgotten that the history of A) 2) D) is already included, in-depth (with link), as the last entry in D),
The Did You Know Guide to Better Using TN
That OK though, no action will be taken against you at this time.
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
Why not?
When I joined I was hazed! Fire ants Frank! I remember he fire ants!
by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions
He's been around for awhile and besides, we have some history and on another site we tagged team and tortured trolls. Call it professional courtesy.
In your case, we had a meeting and we all decided we didn’t like you.
j/k
>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em
I was here before the Welcome Guide
so no, I did not read it.
Thank You FrankDNole and TN
This is my favorite website. I have been jumping all over the internet trying to find any little tidbits about my Noles until I came across you all (saw some comments on Andrew Carter’s blog). Bud’s analysis is nothing short of amazing (was he in coaching?) and the comments by the fans are very insightful and humorous. All I can say is if you guys keep it going I am TN for life.
By the way, Bud should adjust his “closing the book on the 2009 FSU defense” post, and just have it link to the quote “We’ve got a playbook to take home now. We didn’t have a playbook in the past.” I think it sums everything up quite well.
Much easier to understand
This is unbelievable. Then again, if your scheme is ‘look confused’, then I guess you shouldn’t be surprised when those are the results you get. Just terrible.
I can't blame Mickey too much.
By all accounts he wanted out a few years ago. In the end, he gets credit (and blame) for the defense, and 2009 is no different. But even throughout the 2000’s, we always had good defenses, if not better, other than 2009.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I think Mickey gave up last couple years
you figure his family thing, not even being asked about being the next head coach, and the fact BB didn’t seem to have a problem phoning it in for a fat paycheck, I don’t blame him either.
He deserves a little blame
If he wasn’t mental or emotional aptitude to coach at a level even acceptable for Pop Warner league, then he should have at least attempted to resolve the issue with administration.
His employer for 20+ years, this program, and the FSU fans are far more important than the ego of Chuck the Chest, and his friendship with Coach Bowden. We deserved better.
It’s a crappy position he was put in. Nobody should be forced to carry the burden(s) he obviously was forced to carry, but there had to be other options. They may have not been easy, but they were there.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions
far more then the school and us fans the most important people in this situation are the players. They deserve better, we deserve nothing! (I know what your saying though and agree with you 100% just wanted to be a player advocate on this one).
Right. By the "program" I meant all those involved with FSU football
From Christian Ponder to Jimbo Fisher to groundskeeping crew…
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Hope Springs Eternal
With the time already spent under the new S&C staff, 13 more spring practices, and a whole summer to continue development, I think the defense is going to come together nicely by the fall (short of any big injuries).
I used to think this year’s defense would end up ranked in the 50-60 range, but the more we learn about the prior staff, the more I think last year’s results were a reflection of coaching not talent.
Do I think the new staff can coach and develop the existing talent? Yes I do.
Do I think the prior staff should be charged with theft of university funds? Yes I do.
Improvements
BTW, I think we’ll see huge improvements in special teams too.
A top 40 defense, top 25 special teams, and a top 10 offense equal a great first step toward returning to a championship level.
Special teams
Heck ya they are going to be better if for nothing else we are going to have linebackers on our coverage teams now instead of Dends and recievers. We will also have a compotent coach doin things with our guys and our Head coach is putting a huge emphasis on it.
Yeah, Jimbo has already said everyone will be available to play on Special teams.
Reid is the best return man in college football. I expect our special teams to be very good. Particularly with the emphasis on discipline with the new coaching staff.
Tools Whore
The fact that our guys will now be blitzing to create one free Blitzer to the qb instead of everyone blitzing to sac the qb. That is one of the flaws to not having a playbook people not understanding that sometimes your only job is to occupy a blocker. When we do our run fits everyone can make the tackle if they beat there guy, but the design is to have one free guy to make that tackle. It was so sad watching our guys take improper run fits and stunts to the wrong shoulders of guys.
by 21nole24 on Mar 18, 2010 9:23 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
I'm at a loss for words
No playbook? No wonder I about blew a heart valve watching the games last year.
by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
That CB blitz in game one
seemed to work okay, but I am not sure if they just did not try that in other games, or if it just did not seem like it because it got picked up by opponents who knew how to catch it. Reid is definitely someone how has to have all the guys occupied if he is going to make it to the QB.
So...
it wasn’t entirely mangum’s fault for being so out of position?
no..it was still his fault
plenty of fault to go around…
I'd say that is in question.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
I can't bang on 22 anymore
Don’t fault the student for failing a class if the teacher never gave notes on the testable material.
by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't blame Mangum regardless.
I mean, he wasn’t a great player by any means, but he’s not making the big bucks to win football games.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I think you guys need to stop taking everything so literally
Unfortunately sometimes writers, who should know better, write things down knowing full well the person they are quoting might have said something somewhat tongue in cheek.
I doubt there was literally no defensive playbook.
straight from seminoles.com
“Florida State’s defensive players are getting a crash course in a completely new scheme under coordinator Mark Stoops. And like their offensive teammates, it comes with required reading from a playbook.”
sort of proves lack of playbook story is correct.
Perhaps he meant to convey the idea that
Mickey didn’t require the players study said playbook as extensively as coach Stoops? The statement really never says “There was no playbook”.
However, Nigel’s comments “We didn’t have a playbook in the past”…could either mean:
1.) There was no playbook (which is what I take from it)
2.) There was no playbook that we were allowed to take home with us.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm thinking it was #2
2.) There was no playbook that we were allowed to take home with us.
CP7: Sliding is teh weak sauce
by stevegrizzle on Mar 19, 2010 4:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Or are you HOPING it was number 2?
Seriously, the less instruction the team received last season, the more acceptable the defense that was fielded is. There’s no other way a unit with that much talent, regardless of how inexperienced could be that frickin bad.
It doesnt matter to me who is at fault
Just from the way it was worded it seems like he was referring to no taking them home.
You on the other hand seem to need to justify last years results……..I think we both want a better team this year, but having a playbook last year or not is not going to be the deciding factor.
CP7: Sliding is teh weak sauce
by stevegrizzle on Mar 19, 2010 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions
It's more than the playbook
The DTs and DEs only working together on a miminal basis? Seriously?
by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Isn't it possible
that he’s referring to the very recent past? Stoops was announced as DC months ago, and undoubtedly players have been told “we’re gonna do X and Y….” So, the players get excited about it, and start spring practice and get a new playbook…
Alternatively, there was a point last year where I recall one of the coaches (maybe Mickey) making a comment about wondering whether the scheme they had presented to the players was too complex, and that the players were more confused than prepared. So, perhaps at one point they literally threw out the playbook to try to simplify things…
Who knows…
What I do know is that an excited Nigel Bradham is a good thing for us!
Even if it was a bit of an exaggeration
Do you really like what it has to mean? It means even is the statement wasn’t meant to be taken literally that the old playbook was so small and simple that when compared to Stoops’ book it was like having no book at all. Not something that should be going on at one of the most prestigious football programs in the nation.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 18, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
xavier rhodes sighting ^_^
question, who was the defensive player with dreads (not t.parks) i think he was number23?
"theres two types of people in this world, those who CARRY a spear and those who FEAR the spear"-James Coley
I wish Bradham, McDaniel and White would quit bashing the old coaches... just let it go and move on.
/Gripper
I bet ol' Grip's face is red on this one.
Hard to defend the prior staff with this little nugget of info…
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 18, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions
This has to be a joke or a misprint
A)this can not be real.
2)Someone please help me pick my jaw off the floor.
D)I’m logging out before i get sicker,I can’t believe this
Wow it was worse than I thought last year.
I know for a fact that some high schools give defensive playbooks to their players. We are a division 1 school and didn’t give our kids playbooks last year? That is inexcusable on the coaches parts, and unfair to the players.
WOW
I would like to say that I am shocked about this but Im not. I spent all last year wondering what the hell the D was doing and thinking that it made no sense, now I understand why.
You've all already said it...
but i’m shocked that I didn’t hear about any of this out before.
by CrimiNOLElawyer on Mar 18, 2010 11:56 PM EDT reply actions
Unbelieveable
And Bobby basically begged him to come back last year. I don’t so much blame Mickey because of the family problems he had, but I blame Bobby because its the head coach’s job to make changes when a coach can no longer perform.
I heard Jimbo asked him back.
Because Bobby was going to promote Amato.
No idea if that’s true, but it’s something I’ve heard.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Jimbo asked him back
I hadn’t heard that before.. That is interesting. For sure Andrews even after all that had happened to him personally is a better choice than CTC!
It's already been said numerous times on this post...
but this enrages me. I’ve taken all the news about the lack of procedural efficiencies during the latter years of Bobby’s regime with a grain of salt, but this is the proverbial last straw. I am beyond happy that this team is "under new management,’ because situations like this are an affront and insult to the tradition of Florida State football, and the expectations of it’s fans. Not even the Bowdenistas can deny how terrible this is.
Inexcusable is an understatement.
There again though
FSU fans only have the expectations because of guys like Bobby and Mickey.
Even if they stayed on a bit too long, there was never a promise that them leaving would have changed things.
Since some of you guys have a big hard on for Fisher, despite him having coached a down as a head coach yet, you should be happy that things worked out as they did, or else if Bowden had left several years ago FSU might have hired someone you did not like.
If they would have hired someone who couldn't get the job done his ass woulda got fired. Just like OU did w/John Blake
And who did they replace him with? Bob Stoops. You don’t hang unto a coach just for the sake of it. Those who are afraid of change are doomed to accept mediocrity. Bobby and staff built the program for sure. But Bowden made it crumble when he tried to turn the program into an ATM machine for his family and friends. The previous staff couldn’t be expected to be able to compete in this new age of young,hungry sophisticated coaches
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 19, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
If BB would have left two years ago
We would have hired Jimbo – since he was named HCIW and all.
FSU would have had mor echampionships without Bowden choking against the good teams.
by Bud Elliott on Mar 20, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
well Bud, then the majority of big time coaches must be chokers
Bob Stoops won a national title early on with Oklahoma, and is a very good coach, but you could also call him a choker.
Steve Spurrier won many SEC titles, and one national title, but he lost in his other title appearance and missed out on getting into more national title games, by losing to FSU, so I guess he is a choker.
Had Texas not lost McCoy, Saban could easily be 1 for 2 in title games. Of course had he stayed at LSU I think he might have had 3 by now, who knows.
That leads to Mack Brown. He had been great for Texas, except they only have that one national title under him.
Jim Tressell, like Stoops, got his program into one of the top teams again quickly, won a national title, but since then must be a choker.
Peter Carroll not winning more national titles would have had you running him out of town too, had you been a USC fan.
When top teams play, sometimes luck is involved unfortunately. Now that whole food poisoning story I heard when FSU played UF…I have never seen anything legit to back that up. However I do think Chris Weinke against Tennessee would have been huge. I find it hard to blame Bowden and his staff for that one. Had Richt, who had been a good hire for Bowden most of his time at FSU, focused more on preparing for Oklahoma, that too may have been a victory. Many of the Miami losses were close. I know, like Jimmy Johnson said, if FSU was better, they would been up by enough it would not have come down to field goals. Then again had FSU been up by more in those games, then it would have meant Miami would have looked over ranked, which they were not. Both had really good teams, and unfortunately only one can win. Oh, and back in 1980 FSU had no business even being as close as it was to almost defeating Oklahoma. That would have been impressive back then.
by nolestuff on Mar 20, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd
There’s absolutely no way to prove what another coach would’ve/wouldn’t have done with the exact same talent. He won 2, and we had an amazing run of top 5 finishes. Could we have won more? Probably. Should we have won more? That’s a very gutsy assumption to say unequivocally “yes”
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 20, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Bad examples
Saban was energetic enough to actually get up off ass and actually recruit Marcel Dareus who in turn knocked McCoy out the NC game. Bama let up after the half but was the better team.
Texas hadn’t won a NC since 1970. The entire state is in debt to Mack Brown. They turned the tide in the Red River Rivalry by outrecruiting Oklahoma after the disasterous recruitment of Adrian Peterson.
OSU should be happy to have Tressell instead of underachieving with Cooper’s recruiting championship winning a**
USC won shares of two NC with Carroll and he revived the Trojans as a program that recruits itself. That program sucked for a 6-7 year period before Pete got there and hadn’t seriously contended for a NC in ages.
So while it’s very subjective to say whether or not a team, coach, or program SHOULD have more NC to it’s credit. The fact is, our two most hated rivals have won a total of three titles while Bowden was sleep at the wheel.No one can be happy with that. I’ll give punkass Miami 2001 because damnmit they had HORSES (Or as we say out here in SoCal, “Hogs”), but Meyer duplicated BB NC output in a damn 4 year period. But regardless of what anyone thinks, FSU’s failings as a program did a lot to create the circumstances that largely assisted UF in their run. As I’ve told many people: If your HC is being used by rivals coaches to persuade kids not to go to your program, then he needs to go. Some people need to stop living in the past and get up to speed in the new age of big boy football. BB couldn’t keep up. No 80 year old could ever be expected to
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with Nolestuff
And I think his examples are fine. Who else are you going to use? What other teams have really topped what we did while bridging the older era and he newer one? Osborne’s Nebraska dynasty (what, 3 NCs in 4 years?) – they lost seven straight bowl games before that NC run. Talk about choking. Meanwhile, we went undefeated in 14 consecutive bowls? Talk about NOT choking (beating teams like Nebraska, Auburn, Penn State, Texas A&M, Florida, Notre Dame, etc.). Did we lose some games we shouldn’t have? Yeah – and we DID choke against Miami several times. But, had we beaten them there is no guarantee our other games would have ended with the same results (I think our losses often motivated us).
As far as the other in-state NCs… UM has done a great job on one hand, but not always on the up-and-up (that eases the road to the NC). Until Meyer’s recent run, we had UF topped – and no doubt our own plummet aided UF’s two recent NCs (one less quality opponent, though they still got credit for beating one; easier recruiting road for them; etc.).
I also find the assertion that another coach would have done better than Bowden untenable. We had a GREAT run, and there are NO guarantees another coach could have won 3+ NCs.
That said, Bowden should have been released several years ago (as osceolafan850 says below).
The other schools have coaches who's tenures were a lot shorter than Bowden's
And their tenures existed in a different era of CFB. One that Bowden never properly adjusted to. All the fanbases of those teams mentioned expressed discontent at one time or another (Save for Bama) for the aforementioned coaches. But once again, those are all big money intitutions that took the proper steps to usher themselves forward into the present era . They are better compared with one another than to us we fell behind the evolutionary curve. OU did the same thing with Blake as UF did with Zook. They indentified the problem and eliminated it. Some people are stuck in FSU’s past
Miami could never duplicate their prior success due to resources. In the past, they were able to ride the talent oozing in their own backyard even though lmost every coach they’ve had has left for greener pastures. And no one is saying another coach could’ve done better than Bowden’s first 24 seasons, they are saying a lot of coaches could’ve done better than his last ten.
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Not to mention at lot of the teams mentioned have actually played each other in NC games
Carroll beat Stoops, Brown beat Carroll, Meyer beat Tressel and Stoops, Stoops and Brown play every year. Hell, they’ve all played one another, and all are good coaches, so it’ would be harder for anyone to assert any measure of dominance over their relatively short tenures compared to BB.
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions
So FSU did not play good teams for national titles?
They had to play those Miami teams that won some years, they had to play Stoops OU team.
I think an 80 year old can still be a CEO type coach if he has the right younger guys under him. I think age probably did make it hard for Andrews and Amato, as their spots required actually physically showing players how to do things. There is no way age cannot start affecting that.
Of course we played good teams, thats not the point
We beat Miami when they had great players and went toe to toe with UF throughout the 90’s. But that era is over. Having a CEO type coach got used against us for way too many years in recruiting. You cannot possibly expect to be a big time program with that kind of setup. You’re just delaying ineviable change. A leader has to be a leader, not delegate. An 80 year old matching wits with Meyer or Saban? I’ll pass. We were just way overdue in regards to turning the page and trying to get acclimated to the present times
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 20, 2010 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, but I was not arguing for Bowden staying at this point
I was just responding to Bud’s comments early that Bowden was a choker and that FSU would have won more titles without him.
Not to be too picky but...
One of the posts above says, “FSU would have had mor echampionships without Bowden choking against the good teams.” That implies that the dynasty years are the ones in question (plus other posts – on other threads, perhaps – have referenced the many losses to UM and the willingness to trade the 14 consecutive Top 5 finishes for one more championship). That’s what I’m responding to.
Trust me, I totally agree that the past ten years shouldn’t have been tolerated. Bowden should have been ousted some time ago. I’d LOVE for this to be Year 3 of the Jimbo Fisher era (I think by now everyone would know for sure if he is the answer, like many of us believe he is).
Another thought
Another reason I would argue against the statement that FSU would have more championships without Bowden is that during our dynasty years, multiple “major” championships (AP, forms of UPI/Coaches/etc., BCS; only counting different years) were awarded to: Miami (3), Nebraska (3), Florida State (2). Meanwhile, Notre Dame, Colorado, Georgia Tech, Washington, Alabama, Florida, Michigan, Tennessee, and Oklahoma each won one.
In other words, only Miami and Nebraska had more titles than we did (and Nebraska shared 2 of its 3). It’s difficult to argue that FSU would have had more than our two with someone else at the helm. It just seems highly unlikely, esp. considering that any title meant winning at least 2 of 3 against UM, UF and a Top 5 bowl opponent – plus going undefeated the rest of the way (often with a Notre Dame, Michigan, Auburn or other quality opponent on the schedule).
Again, I’ll take the two titles and the 14-year run of Top 5 finishes rather than gamble on winning more titles under someone else. Heck, we might not have won the two we have. (If I’ve misrepresented the statement about more titles without BB choking, my apologies – esp. since I’ve harped on it!)
Maybe should have as opposed to would have
Based on the ridiculous talent we had in 87-00. However, I’ve always thought that talent masked some rather average Xs and Os work, which I believe was our real Achilles heel back then. I mean, how often did you think ‘Boy, we sure outschemed the heck out of them’ after a big game? Maybe UF in ‘98? Probably a lot less often than you thought ’Wow, we got outcoached’.
Tough to play coulda, shoulda, woulda though. Like some others have said, so many variables and there are a lot of teams not named UF, LSU and USC that would love to have our ‘so-so’ record when chasing titles the last 20 years.
by BayNole9 on Mar 20, 2010 10:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Until recently
UF would have loved our title track record. And, I’m not saying that Meyer isn’t great at what he does, but he stumbled into a perfect storm: Zook left a stocked cupboard, and (more importantly) both FSU and UM have pretty much sucked since he’s been down here. He’s enjoyed basking in the sunshine as the lone superpower in a state that once supported three top 10 teams, and he benefited from the SEC’s reputation (though divisional rival UT has also been down during most of Meyer’s tenure).
I believe that Meyer will find NCs a lot harder to come by in the next few years. We’ll be good again very soon; Saban is a great SEC West foil; Tennessee has the opportunity to get good again; Meyer has his own health/mental/personal (whatever, since he’s not sharing much info) problems that he will have to keep in control.
Overall, I think UF will continue to be very good – but it will be much more difficult to win NCs in the near future. I don’t expect them to win two in three years or anything. That level of sustainability isn’t possible – not for USC, and not for UF.
Completely the wrong way to look at it
Coaches should be fired when a pattern is evident that points to them not being able to win at an acceptable rate. You then hire a coach who you feel can get the job done. If he doesn’t win at an acceptable rate then you fire him. Holding on to a coach once he can no longer perform at the needed level weakens the the program. Knowing what we now know about the offensive coaches under JB and defensive staff that was replaced it is very hard to argue that any modern coaching staff would not have been a major upgrade in both recruiting and X and O coaching. We would then be sitting in year 3 of the new era instead of year 1 and be in a better position financially and on the field.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 20, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
All coaches are probably loyal
too much at some point our another, unless they are just complete Aholes, because they are humans and relationships unfortunately do factor in. Bobby was probably figuring Andrews could get out of his funk and get back to being a solid coach.
As many outside have pointed out though, when you force a legend out, you are taking a gamble then too, because if things do not improve, not only is the team still not on top, but then you also look like aholes for forcing a legend for nothing.
I wasn't saying Bobby was too loyal
I was saying the AD should have fired Bowden. Instead of trying to control the assistants and work around the problem (Bowden) for years, we would have been better off as a program if he was fired years ago. It would have also put us in a position to poach a coach from another program or the NFL instead of going with a rookie head coach. Not taking a shot at Jimbo, but the entire process was turned upset by not sacking up and firing Bowden earlier.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions
That was one of the problems, though.
Any halfway competent coach could see how dated and ineffective Mickey’s schemes were. It wasn’t a question of Mickey getting back to being “solid”, as much as the fact that Mickey’s defense was completely and utterly ineffective.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 21, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Mickey's Ds
were good just several years ago, so I think I agree with Bud that it is more so him checking out, than him suddenly not knowing how to coach.
As for not firing Bobby sooner, that would have looked even worse for FSU, had they fired Bowden any sooner. It is one thing for Larry Coker or Ron Zook, but had FSU not given Bowden a chance to correct things by changing his staff (which may have worked had the defense not started sliding as soon as the offense started going the other way).
What is "several" years?
Modern offenses shred Mickey’s D. The defenses were good several years ago because
A.) It was closer to the year 2000, so we could still grab elite players because of our NC.
2.) The spread offense was in its initial stages, and wasn’t as employed as much as it is now
D.) The ACC wasn’t near as good as it is now. Plus, UF was struggling.
Thong Lace Panties) Our offense was so bad, that I think we didn’t focus on our defense much. I could be wrong, but I’m sure that they weren’t as good as we thought they were.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 21, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I do not buy that it is just a matter of new coaching schemes
It was not just “modern” offenses that beat FSU recently though.
GT – Mickey’s old defenses did okay against some good option teams
Boston College – not a modern offense
USF – not a modern offense, granted the defense did not give up tons of points in the game, it still did not hold the opponents down enough with a first time QB
Clemson – I would hesitate to call their offense modern
West Virginia – defense did enough in that game, and that was a modern offense
UF – to be fair, the last couple of years Ponder has been hurt, thus the offense has kept going 3 and out, so neither side of the ball was helping the other, thus the avalanches
Also, during Mark Richt’s time Mickey had to face a pass heavy attack in practices with various formations, more than one legit threat at receiver, good running backs that could make big plays to keep defenses honest, as well as catch the ball out of the backfield, etc, so if anything he was ahead of the curve to some extent with facing “modern” offenses.
GT's Flexbone is not old option stuff
BC and USF both run the zone read a bunch and beat us with that and Play-action off that.
UF’s offense had its best game of the year against a D1 team versus… FSU
West Virginia was killing his D until Devine and their QB got hurt.
We’ve written about this a bunch. If it wasn’t 2-back with immobile QB, FSU was in trouble.
I agree he did a great job for a good 10-year period in the late 80’s to early 90’s.
Not all the old options teams were
the same as each other either. Nebraska passed the ball sometimes to keep teams honest. You would be pushing it to say GT’s offense is better than Nebraska or some of the other old teams. GT has the advantage of opponents not seeing it as much thes days.
So you are saying past teams did not have QBs that made reads? They did not run play action before 2005?
I'm saying the zone-read stuff was really not seen much in the last few decades until the early part of this decade
when it became en vogue to run it with the spread stuff. It is, of course, very old going back to the days of the single wing.
Georgia Tech’s offense is very different than Nebraska’s. PJ has incorporated run-and-shoot elements into his spread option game.
What was enough time?
We were sliding from the 01 season to the 09 season. 4 or 5 years would have been enough IMO. That would have Bowden out after 05 or 06 and us 3 or 4 years into rebuilding. Long enough to know if the new coach was a dud or to be back among the elite. It is all in the past now, but the administration went above and beyond to try and give Bowden a chance, injurying the program in the process.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Since the program was already doing poorly on offense
and had a similar record in 2006, how was it hurt any worse? Yes the defense has gone down, but the offense has gone up, so that is a push.
BS
The offense only got better after Jimbo’s hire. Bobby hire (Jeffy) couldn’t do a damn thing with Boldin, Javon Walker, and Leon Washington. The defense got worse because of the coaches Bobby hired and there recruiting mistakes (Did BB make it to that in-home with Harvin?). Anybody who thinks Bowden shouldn’t have been gone years ago are at a serious logic deficit. Like I said previously, anytime programs are using your HC as way to persuade recruits to go elsewhere, he needs to go, YESTERDAY
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 21, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Someone on TN mentioned that Bobby supposedly missed it
I threw that comment out there so someone else with more knowlegde of the situation could expound on the details, if it is indeed true. My apologies
by westcoastnolefan on Mar 21, 2010 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Not only what Bud said but
It also let Florida get out to a massive lead in everything. There is a reason why the number of truly stud kids that start out as UF leans has gone up while the Nole leans are only legacy kids. With so many years of losing the amount of vocal FSU fans has shrunk, coinciding with a massive increase in UF fans so that for the first time in around 20 years there is clearly 1 major football program in the state.
If Bowden was cut loose sometime around the same time as Zook it is a completely different ballgame. The new FSU coach would have probably had less talent on hand than Meyer did because Zook was a better recruiter than the later Bowden. But if he was good, with the way the ACC has been lately FSU might have scored a few 1 loss seasons. If the switch was made early enough Harvin and both of the Pounceys might have been Noles. Imagine what a strong FSU and a rising Miami does for the ACC TV Contracts negotiations?
The game of what if is always dangerous, but I find it hard to believe a competent, not good just competent, staff would a much better record over the last 3 or 4 years. And even if they would not have been up to standard at least we would know and been able to replace them. One last what if though. Imagine if we canned Bowden early enough to hire Saban.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 21, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Damn Ya'll....
I kinda feel bad for treating Korey Mangum as my kick ball everytime some junk went bad on D. Now, I understand that he was the last line of something other than defending.
Sorry Korey.
by LincolnHighNole on Mar 19, 2010 1:30 AM EDT reply actions
Yeah...I'm through Mangum bashing. Forever.
Not fair.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions
now lets be clear here:
its not ‘bashing’ him to tell the truth: he was the worst player in fsu history.
the fact that he was put in this position schematically is not his fault, nor is it his fault that was given starter minutes when he should be third team..
It's bashing him
To say he was the worst player in fsu history without putting a huge asterisk behind that statement for the reasons you gave.
by Jamil Dawson on Mar 19, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
correct, and i think we all agree that mangum was just at the center
of a perfect shit-storm what was the fsu defense this year (players leaving, recruiting, coaching, infighting, retirements, more players leaving for rhodes scholarships) so he clearly isnt culpable for all of that – but the fact remains…
Budd Thacker
may take a run at that title. Word is he tried to challenge Mangum as worst FSU player but could not compete because he was injured.
Enjoy a short and glorious future in WWE….
by BossNole on Mar 19, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
How is it fair to make that claim?
Defensive coaches that cared about teaching, scheming and recruiting would’ve had much better options instead of Mangum that he would’ve never seen the field and no one would’ve known who he was. Can you imagine that? In an alternate universe, FSU fans are asking each other who Corey Magnum is/was, because he only got special teams snaps in games against The Citadel, Western Carolina and UT-Chattanooga.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
so I did a little search for an fsu defensive playbook....
and on ebay I found someone supposedly selling an fsu defensive playbook for the 1998 season>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/FLORIDA-STATE-SEMINOLES-4-3-DEFENSE-PLAYBOOK!-*ANDREWS*_W0QQitemZ170459434645QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20100316?IMSfp=TL100316142007r20897
I'm gonna try to sell the 2009 defensive playbook on the eBay
How much you guys think I’ll get for 100 blank pages of paper?
by Pinto on Mar 19, 2010 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I did...
Then I wondered…“why would any coach who is coaching after 2001 need this?”
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions
It all makes sense now...
In order to have a playbook, someone has to make the plays. And the coaches repeatedly told the players to “go make plays.” So really its the players fault, specifically Mangum.
I'm gonna go against the grain here....and declare this revelation to be GOOD news.
Think about. Think long and hard about our defense the past 2 years, especially ’09. Did the blitzes exhibit any semblance of a coordinated effort? Did the D-Line stunts appear orchestrated in any way? Did our potential 1st-round pick Patrick Robinson always seem confident in his responsibilities?
The answer to these queries is “No”.
What if these calamitous errors, these unadulterated mental collapses took place despite a 300-page playbook to reference? What would that say about the competency of the current defensive roster?
Nigel dropped a good news bomb on us today if you ignore the ugly tree and embrace the wondrous forest that lies ahead.
by The K-Man on Mar 19, 2010 1:58 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Think long and hard about our defense the past 2 years, especially ’09.
Do I have to?
Did the blitzes exhibit any semblance of a coordinated effort?
Zero
Did the D-Line stunts appear orchestrated in any way?
Does called often count?
Did our potential 1st-round pick Patrick Robinson always seem confident in his responsibilities?
No
What if these calamitous errors, these unadulterated mental collapses took place despite a 300-page playbook to reference? What would that say about the competency of the current defensive roster?
Fair point. But how far behind are these guys in understanding a defense and reading a playbook?
I would venture to say not as far as they seem
I’m actually with K-Man on this one. Its obviously still an uphill battle and gonna be a tough road. But right now we have a bunch of kids that as far as scheme and understanding a play book are gonna be like Early Enrollee Freshman. The benefit is, that they are all acclimated to the speed and competition level they’ll be playing against.
I agree.
This means that the talented players that can learn well and quickly will excel in the coming season. It may skew the results positively. It also adds an advantage of surprise that no other team has. Those players coming in, (the few), who are already physically mature enough to contribute to a major college football team will be on the same or nearly the same footing as the upper classmen.
Luc and Williams are on a level playing field and that is a good thing for both depth and competition creating excellence. Harris will come in older and physically mature at CB and ready to start if he takes quickly to the playbook. The same applies to any other recruit. I wonder if our smart recruiters might have used this fact while speaking with some of our then defensive prospects.
and no wonder G5 wasn't learning his role in the base defense. How could he.
A) Make Plays
2) Get the Ball
D)Why the F&*% did you get burned
K-man...
That was beautiful…and from your mobile, no less. Impressive
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 12:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Excellent
I’m actually thrilled to hear this.
What has happened has happened, it feels good knowing what a disadvantage the players were at, as it bodes well for what will happen with a competent staff.
Speak softly, and carry a big Spear
I feel the same - relieved.
This explains a lot., it gives me reason to think our defense can make an unprecedented year to year jump. If our offense keeps it together, we should be good.
Sound Logic
If we won half our games with half the team being coached, we should win all our games with the whole team being coached, right?
by NationWideNole on Mar 19, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good to know the Head Coach was keeping an eye on the other coaches
From 3 stories up it’s hard to see the kids not using a playbook.
Fog
Sounds like the “tower” was up a little too high in the clouds. Kinda like Lando Calrisean’s(sp?) homeland.
by NoleySmokes on Mar 19, 2010 7:40 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Good stuff.
I was initially thinking of the Eye of Sauron in Lord of the Rings.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
This completely blows my assumptions of how far the defense can climb for the upcoming season.
When Raysn posted about the analysis of how many teams jumped a certain number of rankings on defense from one year to the next, I doubt too many teams had completely this level of crap happening.
Lets just hope the damage isn’t too great.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
any way to check
if any other team in the country was ‘coached’ without a playbook like our guys? i agree that this drastically changes the learning curve
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 19, 2010 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Not sure about that unless there are people close to the program.
I believe it was Central Michigan who jumped more than 40 spots and they also had a clean slate of defensive coaching.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
mike leach
aside from this not being news, fsu’s defensive problems last year had nothing to do with the lack of a playbook. there are some coaches who believe, for various reasons, that their players will be better off without a playbook (like mike leach). it’s not unthinkable that a legendary coach might think he can get away without one. andrews’ defensive plan was always very simple anyway. you don’t need a playbook to tell you to start in a basic formation and then ‘go make plays’. the problem was that his plan wasn’t effective any more and, for reasons that have been well established, his heart just wasn’t in the game enough to make the necessary changes.
i thought
Bud said we used 100+ page playbooks in previous years. Should still make a huge difference to have some coordinated direction.
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Mar 19, 2010 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions
What championship coach does that?
Leach is a well known nut who hasn’t even won a conference title. I also find it hard to believe his QB didn’t have a playbook to take home. You can boil down what a WR or RB does and in theory they could just remember their assignment and be fine, but the QB needs to know where everyone is on every play. No way you learn that in a pass heavy attack without studying a playbook.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 19, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions
didn't mean to suggest that
it was a great idea for winning a championship, just that it’s not an insane idea. the unmitigated horror that some people here are expressing is just ridiculous. it’s not completely unheard of for a guy who has been extremely successful to think that he can do it without a playbook. there’s also a legendary (and championship) coach at a lower division too who’s never had a playbook. can’t recall his name right now, but he’s one of the winningest coaches in all of college ball at any level (more than Bowden and Paterno). maybe at st. john’s?
anyway, my point is that football doesn’t begin with a playbook. it begins with a plan. then that plan has to be communicated to the players. some rare coaches think they can communicate that plan without a playbook. personally, i think we’ll be much better off now that we have one, but lack of a playbook is no basis for moral outrage at the program.
i totally disagree with your dismissal of leach’s success. though as a head football coach he hasn’t been able to win the big one, he’s proven he has an exceptional offensive mind and used it to turn a perennial failure of a program into a perennial contender in a relatively short period of time. i’ll be very happy if our offense is as consistenly successful and exciting as his was at texas tech.
Except
Given the results, it was clearly something our legendary coach(es) couldn’t do. So, yeah, some outrage would be in order. After the first half of the season, perhaps they should have caught on that things weren’t sinking in.
Although, didn’t I read the other day that MA said this team was one of the mentally slowest he had coached? Perhaps he didn’t think they could properly decipher a playbook?
I think it is insane
Looked at in a vacuum it may sound fine, especially at lower levels. But offenses have becoming more and more complex and defenses have done the same to keep up. Then you look at our defense where players obviously had no idea what their responsibilities were or how to attack the offense that they were facing week after week. Giving them playbooks might have helped them understand their roles better. It would have also helped the kids who were self motivated improve as they could have learned in their free time.
by osceolafan850 on Mar 19, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Study in their free time?
To learn more about plays? That’s what PS3 NCAA Football was for!
Mike Leach? An offensive coach, doesn't use a playbook? I find that hard to believe.
maybe he doesn’t script plays for the game, but…
Really? well those 8 plays seem to work pretty well.
by willdabeast on Mar 19, 2010 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
It's a lot more simple but not as simple as it sounds... all adjustable pass routes to counter all possible senarios.
Pretty easy to learn, but covers all possible outcomes kinda thing.
Yeah, right!
RaysnNoles interesting post on defensive rankings and possible ideas for trend analysis
http://www.tomahawknation.com/2009/12/29/1224049/why-im-realistic-about-next-years
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
Here is the link to the post RaysnNoles produced that I am referring to
http://www.tomahawknation.com/2009/12/29/1224049/why-im-realistic-about-next-years
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
Thanks
I am working on some adjustments.
by Bud Elliott on Mar 19, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice, I think this can springboard a lot of posts, possibly similar to the
“four factors of winning” in basketball. MattD or AbeFroman is obviously the best person to know about this, but I was thinking about taking the FEI rankings over time and try to identify similar characteristics between teams moving up, down, and staying the same.
I’m not schooled heavily in stats, but I’d imagine to do it right one would have to understand how to conduct the analysis with “statistically significant” measures. Maybe it can be more simple than I think though.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
not really schooled at all in stats besides sampling techniques for auditing, and even that uses tables.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
I think a good comparison with our team would be Nebraska
Although we are probably a little further behind we probably also have more talent. A talented team completely new Defensive coaching staff and change of scheme went from 78th to 8th. Can only hope we get close to that type of improvement.
Now we need to find ways to corroborate this, other than thinking the results on the field prove it.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life...no one gets to the Father but through Me"
I'll echo others.
This is, of course, appalling. But also exceptionally good news for the present. It means that proper coaching should — potentially, at least — be able to elevate our defense much faster than we might have feared before.
Especially when you pair it with proper S&C coaching.
Bud makes a fair point that these poor kids are now far behind in learning playbooks and fully grasping how to play real defense, but even taking that into account, this story suggests to me that our guys should be able to make up a lot of their potential very quickly by simply having access to competent coaching.
We’re still going to have a long way to go to get back to elite-level football, but get beyond the shock of the previous regime’s incompetence.
What this is is more low-hanging fruit to pick.
Poor Korey Mangum
Never thought I’d be saying that. But I also hate to think how bad we might have screwed up the NFL aspirations of Jamie Robinson and a couple of other guys. This looks like they were just running around out there chasing the ball last season. Wait a minute…. they were.
The thing i find funny
is that this was released by FSU sports info and not by an independant journalist. Normally you’d try to hid your dirty laundry for a couple years.
by egynole on Mar 19, 2010 8:35 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I think Fisher wants everyone to be clear- even you Mr. Gripper- just how much work has to be done to get the defense even close to respectable.
Absolutely, a brilliant political move by CJF
Make sure everyone knows the real starting point from which to judge your tenure
Just read the headline.
Take-Home Work
Defense excitedly tackles new scheme – with a playbook
It’s as if it were a gift. Like that pony little girls always ask for on their birthday, but this time they finally got the unthinkable – A PLAYBOOK.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I hate those people...
they would’ve delayed this whole process ANOTHER 12 months!!
And who’s to say the same coaches would be available for us to hire NEXT December/January.
by Diablo_2 on Mar 19, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was willing to give him one more year
if he was willing to just stand in his tower, sit in his office, stand 40 yards away from the line of scrimmage on game day and do nothing. If he let Fisher hire his own staff (I’d assume it’d be the same as it is now, just minus Craig). One last year. Absolutely zero control. Written into a contract. A farewell tour. That’s it.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I wasn't
Besides, didn’t he repeatedly say that he did NOT want a “farewell tour”? So… didn’t we kinda give him what he wanted? (Half-n-half: no final year, no dreaded farewell tour)
He said that, but the man would've soaked it up.
You know that. I know that. Everybody knows that.
That bridge has been crossed, though.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
They got that
About 4-5 more times than they should have…
Wow.
I’m actually relieved to hear that we didn’t have a playbook at all, which helps explains the past two year’s defense, along with where Mickey’s priorities have been. But my question is, why didn’t we hear about this before??
I didn't think to ask "were you given playbooks this year?"
by Bud Elliott on Mar 19, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
And nobody in their right mind would blame you for not asking
Hell, I didnt see any of TOS ask either.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 1:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Seriously though...who thinks "I should probably ask them if they have a playbook this year"
I mean, its risking being insulting!
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions
*facepalm*
Seriously? If it isn’t thorough enough for you, go throw away your money at Warchant.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."
by geoffissiffoeg on Mar 19, 2010 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I think you're misunderstanding the conversation.
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions
*facepalm*
Seriously? I couldn’t get the sarcasm there? lol
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."
by geoffissiffoeg on Mar 19, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
It's OK...happens all the time
I mean, can you imagine Bud’s equivalent at Alabama or Texas?
“So, did you guys get a playbook this year”
“Uhh yeah, we got it on National Signing Day”
“Oh. OK”
by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 19, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions

by 