Tomahawk Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Astros' fans react to Oswalt trade

Preview and Game Thread: Florida State Seminoles vs Miami Hurricanes, 12pm EST

Florida St. Seminoles at Miami Hurricanes, Mar 6, 2010 12:00 PM EST


And then there was one. In the regular season finale, the Seminoles head to Miami to take on the Hurricanes and continue their winning ways. While it wasn't pretty against the Demon Deacons, the Seminoles took care of business and kept pace in the ACC standings. With a win today and a Clemson loss on Sunday, Florida State will finish third in the ACC.


Floridatstaelogo2_medium

vs


Modernumlogo_medium

 

Game Time: 12:00pm EST

Opponent's Site: Seventh Floor Blog

Television: ESPN2

Live Stats: scacchoops.com

Star-divide

In a season that had a lot of up and downs for the Seminoles, they can end the season on a high note with a two game winning streak and the possibility of finishing third in the standings. While it may not seem that this team should finish third in the conference, they have battled their way through a highly unpredictable, volatile ACC conference schedule and are in position to win 10 conference games for the second season in a row. It may not have been the prettiest basketball and was maddening to watch at times, the Seminoles got the job done when they needed to. Clearly, there were a few games that Semionles' fans want back, ones that even a modest field goal percentage might have resulted in a win. Despite all of the questions, broken remotes and gray hairs, the Seminoles are in position to make their second straight NCAA tournament appearance.

Today, the Noles head into Leonard Hamilton's old stomping ground to take on a very underachieving Miami Hurricanes team. Miami currently sits at 4-11 in the ACC and tied for last place with NC State. Since the Semionles last played the Hurricanes, Miami has only won two games: Georgia Tech and Virginia. Their four losses in the interim were to Clemson by 8, Duke by 7, NC State by 5 and UNC by 7. These are not blow out losses by any means. The Hurricanes did get walked over by a number of teams at the beginning of the season, but they seemed to have settled into being competitive.

They currently rank 60th in the Pomeroy rankings, which ranks as third worst in the conference. In fact, no team in the ACC ranks worse than 78th in the standings, meaning 12% of the top 100 teams in the country are from the ACC. Of the top 6 conferences ranked by Pomeroy, only the ACC and Big 12 have all of their teams in the top 100. As it stands, Miami has the 53rd offensive efficiency and the 79th defensive efficiency. These are not terrible numbers by any means.

Here are the rest of the Hurricanes' stats:

Raw Tempo: 67.3 poss/40 min  National Rank=178
Adj Tempo: 66.8 poss/40 min National Rank=203

Offense Defense
Raw Efficiency : 106.1 ( 90) 96.3 ( 78)
Adj Efficiency : 110.4 ( 53) 95.3 ( 79)

Effective FG% : 52.8 ( 42) 46.4 ( 68)
Turnover Pct. : 21.7 (238) 20.3 (188)
Off. Rebound% : 35.4 ( 77) 31.0 ( 96)
Free Throw Rate: 36.8 (193) 36.4 (143)

3-Point FG% : 35.8 (100) 32.9 (111)
2-Point FG% : 52.2 ( 30) 44.8 ( 65)
Free Throw Pct.: 65.1 (284) 70.4 (254)
Block Pct. : 9.4 (192) 12.4 ( 39)
Steal Pct. : 10.8 (273) 10.6 (101)

3PA/FGA : 37.7 ( 58) 34.3 (239)
A/FGM : 55.4 (122) 56.7 (252)

If you have been following along for the entire season, you will recognize that this pattern plays directly to the strengths of the Seminoles. Miami turns the ball over almost as many times as the Seminoles, they don't shoot the ball well from the free throw line and they don't generate turnovers. Florida State forces turnovers, will drive that eFG% down and prevent Miami from getting to the line, making what few times they get to the line less damaging.

Lineups (From Seminoles.com):

PROBABLE STARTERS FOR FLORIDA STATE
F #31 Chris Singleton (10.7 ppg, 7.4 rpg; 10 pts and 3 stls vs., Miami, Feb. 6, 2010)
F #42 Ryan Reid (7.0 ppg, 4.2 rpg; 11 pts and 4 rebs vs. Miami, March 8, 2008)
C #32 Solomon Alabi (11.8 ppg, 2.4 bpg; 0 pts and 9 rebs vs. Miami, Jan., 21, 2009)
G #21 Michael Snaer (9.0 ppg, 2.6 rpg; 9 pts and 1 reb vs. Miami, Feb. 6, 2010)
G #22 Derwin Kitchen (8.5 ppg, 4.0 apg; 13 pts and 2 asts vs. Miami, Feb. 18, 2009)

F #21 Dwayne Collins (12.0 ppg, 7.8 rpg; 10 pts and 11 rebs vs. Florida State, Jan. 21, 2009)
C #45 Julian Gamble (3.3 ppg, 2.6 rpg; 9 pts and 3 rebs vs. Florida State, Feb. 6. 2010)
G #1 Durand Scott (9.7 ppg, 3.6 apg; 9 pts and 2 ats vs. Florida State, Feb. 6, 2010)
G #23 James Dews (11.8 ppg, 2.9 rpg; 19 pts and 7 rebs vs. Florida State, Feb. 18, 2009)
G #25 Garrius Adams (4.2 ppg, 2.2 rpg; 5 pts and 3 rebs vs. Florida State, Feb. 6, 2010)

This is a game that Florida State needs to exploit Miami's relative lack of size up front but account for the Hurricanes' speedy guard play. This is a formula that Florida State has become quite comfortable with as the season has gone on. With no players over 6'9, the Hurricanes have a significant front court advantage. Dwayne Collins is continuing to have an excellent season. Florida State will have to keep an eye on the likes of Malcom Grant, Adrian Thomas and James Dews. There are the Hurricanes three point threats and it would not be wise to let these three get comfortable from outside.

Four Factors and Other Stats:

 

 



PPGFG%FT%3P%RPGORPGDRPGAPGTPGSPGBPGFPG
Florida-state FSU 69.3 45.6 64.9 33.4 38.2 12.7 25.6 14.0 16.7 8.5 6.4 17.8
Miami-fl MIAMI 72.5 46.3 66.1 36.6 36.3 12.0 24.3 14.4 14.5 7.2 4.4 17.3
Florida-state FSU Opponents 60.2 37.1 66.1 32.8 33.0 12.6 20.4 9.7 16.3 8.0 2.3 18.9
Miami-fl MIAMI Opponents 64.5 40.4 70.5 33.0 32.9 11.3 21.6 12.6 13.9 7.3 3.1 17.7

 



POSPPGPPPFLR%EffeFG%TS%FTR2P%FTP%3P%OR%DR%A%A/TT%S%B%
FSU 1985.0 68.4 1.01 52.8 101.3 50.9 53.7 39.6 54.9 20.1 24.9 38.4 66.9 56.5 0.84 24.3 12.4 11.5
MIAMI 1949.0 67.2 1.08 53.9 107.9 53.2 55.6 37.0 49.6 18.7 31.7 35.8 68.3 56.3 1.0 21.6 10.8 8.0
FSU Opponents 1985.0 68.4 0.88 46.2 88.0 42.9 46.6 33.1 47.1 20.3 32.6 33.1 61.6 46.9 0.6 23.8 11.7 4.3
MIAMI Opponents 1949.0 67.2 0.96 48.7 96.0 46.2 50.2 35.6 49.3 21.4 29.3 31.7 64.2 56.8 0.91 20.6 10.8 5.7

 

All tables from Statsheet.com

Prediction: Florida State 71 Miami 63

Game Time: 12 pm EST

Opponent's Site: Seventh Floor Blog

Television: ESPN2

Live Stats: scacchoops.com

Random Fact From Seminoles.com

FLORIDA STATE'S RECENT 3-POINT FIELD GOAL DEFENSE
Florida State's defense limited Wake Forest to .273 shooting from the 3-point line in its four-point win over the Deacons on Wednesday night. The Seminoles limited Wake Forest to three made shots from the bonusphere - with only one coming in the second half. It marked the fifth time in the last five games that's Florida State's defense has limited its opponent to .353 shooting from long range or lower.

0 recs  |  Comment 717 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

So if we lose this game do you think we need one tournament win to get in or do you think this is all for seeding now?

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 8:33 AM EST reply actions  

IMHO

It’s all about seeding now. But if we lose today and lose the first next week, how are we going to do squat in the tourney?

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Over in the post-game thread after the Wake Forest victory, TrickNole posted a link to a site

(RPIForecast), that calculates our chances to make the Dance at 99.2%, so it appears CelticPride is right here: its just for seeding from here on out.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. It's all about seeding.

I was asked to write a piece for the guys over at Rush the Court.net to ‘make our case’ about why FSU should be in the tournament. It’s pretty clear that the Noles should be in.

www.Tomahawknation.com

by TrueCubbie on Mar 6, 2010 10:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Strangely enough,

If we lose, we want Clemson to win. That combined with a VATech loss gets us the four seed (and a bye) in the ACC tourney. If all three of us lose, I think we get hurt in the tie breaker b/c of two losses to Clemson

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 9:34 AM EST reply actions  

I want a VT win and Clemson loss

combined with an FSU win gets us the 3 seed and turns VT into a top 50 win for us.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

No

I believe if VATech, Clemson and us all win, we would get stuck with the 5 seed b/c we lose a three way tie-breaker. Now Clemson plays @Wake and VATech plays @GaTech so a loss by one of them is definitely possible.

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

That is my interpretation of it as well. Need to look at it again, but we need either Clemson or VTech to lose.

Preferably, it would be nice to have Clemson lose and VTech win, then we get the 3 seed. But at this point, I’ll take the bye.

www.Tomahawknation.com

by TrueCubbie on Mar 6, 2010 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Yep, if we win AND Georgia Tech beats Virginia Tech today, we have a bye locked

up, just undetermined until Sunday as to #3 or #4.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Yuuuuup.

GNO/Trick, remember that you guys owe me a TN TShirt each (one white one red) if FSU, GT, and Wake when.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

there are Tomahawk Nation t-shirts?

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah! Or at least, there's gonna be...

Should be one of the fanshots, regarding the TN logo. Evidently K-man’s (I think it was him) wife put together some stuff…They look GOOD

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha, WIFE. I love it.

>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em

by FrankDNole on Mar 6, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes. I keep calling her his fiance, but damn, you married him.

I can only pray he reads this.

>-----:----:------>Spear 'em then Scalp 'em

by FrankDNole on Mar 6, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

What if Clemson AND VT lose?

Are we #3 then? This is so confusing. I don’t see why VT should be ahead of us in anyway now, even if they win, we beat them head to head.

by NoleFrenzy on Mar 6, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

We are also #3 if Clemson loses but VT wins.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

VT beat Clemson, but Clemson is ahead of them.

It’s just the way of the tiebreak.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

so, by my scribbles I wrote down yesterday, we no longer have a chance

at the #6 seed.

Scenario 1: GTech and Wake win: #3 seed.

Scenario 2: GTech and Clemson win: #4 seed

Scenario 3: VaTech and Wake win: #3 seed.

Scenario 4: VaTech and Clemson win: #5 seed

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Looks good.

SCENARIO 3, REPRESENT!!!

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait, we have the head-to-head win over VT

Don’t we have the #4 seed locked up, even if they win?

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Let me revise that.

No, if we get stuck in a 3way tiebreak with VT and CU, we finish 3rd. We’d be 1-2 vs those two, CU would be 2-1 and VT would be 1-1. We’d have the worst %.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

the best part of my day tomorrow (or monday), whenever the

next ESPN Bubble Watch comes out, is going to be seeing the FSU logo in the “Lock” column.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Pointspread I saw has the Noles favored by 1 1/2 points. Seems a little low.

Total 128 1/2.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 11:29 AM EST reply actions  

Pomeroy has us winning by 2

I hope we take this game by the scruff of the neck and shake it (like a polaroid picture)

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

put the hammer down on this Dance ticket.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Woah...That Pomeroy number wasn't 60% earlier in the week, was it?

I think it’s gone down some…I thought it was hovering around 72 or so IIRC

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

That was the Wake %.

Miami was 55/56% the past week or two, I thought. Maybe as high as 59% yesterday.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Deckerhoff on FSU radio broadcast just said Dwayne Collins is out, will not dress.

Canes leading scorer & rebounder.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 11:53 AM EST reply actions  

Wow

25% of their offense runs through him…
Will be second game in a row that FSU holds opponent top scorer to 0 pt.s :)

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

That's huge...

Not to sound like a presumptions jerk, but what’s the over/under on how many points the Canes will score?

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

63 1/2 for miami. once I head Collins was out, I told my brother, The Gambler, to put

$$$ down on FSU -1 1/2.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If they score more than 50 now

I’ll be disappointed.

Yes, 50 is the new 60.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

lol. thats a good one

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I know, I thought the same thing too.

Offense needs to tighten up. Defense is playing good. We can’t afford to let Miami shoot this poorly and hang around.

by TCHOP561 on Mar 6, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I haven't gotten a chance to see the tip of the last couple of games...

On a side note, it has to suuuuck for our players to be down in Miami on a gorgeous Saturday, just to turn around and come straight back to Tally.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

that shot of the water going into the last break was incredible

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I was actually shocked both times

Its supposed to hit 50 degrees in Boston today aka I am going outside in f’ing shorts!

by BostonNole on Mar 6, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear ya. 40 degrees in Cleveland.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait, Cleveland's on the water.

And occasionally it burns.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it's pretty simple what Dayton needs to do.

Win their next 4.

Home vs SLU tonight (blowout city, they’ll win by 18+, calling it)
1st round A10T (which are at host sites, this one would be in Dayton vs the 11 seed or something)
2nd round A10T in Atlantic City vs Xavier
3rd round (semifinals) A10T vs likely Richmond
Sets up an A10T Finals vs likely Temple, can lose that, but winning would be a damn sweet way to punch your ticket.

Go 4-0 before losing to Temple in the Finals and they get an 11 seed probably. Beat Temple and they may even get a 9. I don’t think they win their next 4.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

No...Minute

Seemed like it took FOREVER, but the consensus is that they’ll make it.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree with that.

Unless other bubble teams just fall apart. Who was discussing it?

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

it aint Miami, thats for sure! spent 2/3 of my life in ohio, 1/3 in florida

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm 1/3 carpetbagger

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

these overhead shots of miami are killing me though

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

GT (VT win).

That way we want Wake to beat Clemson and we would get the 3 seed.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

If GT wins today, though,

root for Clemson tomorrow.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

Also, root for Marquette over ND today. And Mercer over who they play in the ASunT.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I always root for ND to lose

Is there a particular reason why i should hope they lose ?

by TCHOP561 on Mar 6, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Marquette is a top 50 RPI win for us if they win today.

Same reason I want VT to win (and because a VT win is our ONLY hope for a 3 seed).

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

we're gonna have to take opposite sides on the GaTech-VaTech game, then

Trick. Maybe I am more conservative, but I want the bye wrapped up today. As I said, we win and GaTech wins, we have our bye, even if it is a #4. Don’t want to tempt the basketball gods and push for a #3.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

How's it tempting anyone?

If GT wins today, I switch to rooting for Clemson tomorrow. Pretty simple.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

But it's cool if you differ.

That’s what I want. I speak for myself.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Im saying if VaTech wins today, the possibility of the #5 seed

still exists for us. GaTech wins, we end up with no worse than a #4. I’ll take that deal

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I know what you're saying.

I want 3rd. All it comes down to. lol

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

the real nice thing about the #3 is the 9pm start time.

GaTech wins tonight, Wake tomorrow, we got the 3, as I see it. Right?

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

That would do it.

I want VT to win due to the RPI top 50 win it would give us. But I’m not picky. That’s just the perfect scenario.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree about your perfect scenario. No doubt

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

WVU will win that game.

They’re good, man. Very well coached.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate Huggins.

Fwiw, most of the state of Ohio that has a say in the matter hates him, too.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah and I can understand why after the debocale (sp) in Cincy.

But I like his intensity and his X-O’s and his demand he puts on his players. I just think he is old school, and I respect that.

by BostonNole on Mar 6, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Great coach.

Can’t really deny that. Just didn’t make many friends. Or, didn’t keep those he made.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Just saw the "if the season ended today" thing

and I know we want the bye but to play Miami and then vt wouldnt be bad

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

yea i know we would play duke

but it wouldnt be till the semis. I would rather get there than bow out early to clemson or wake

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

not at all and im not suggesting that

but what if the standings remained the same after this weekend

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right.

We don’t need to lose to Miami to finish 5th.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

look i dont know if your being sarcastic or not

but all i was doing was making an observation on how i would rather play UM & VT than Wake or CU off the bat

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

No, you're right.

We can beat Miami and still finish 5th, setting up the rematch. The scenario had slipped my mind earlier.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

i just thought it almost looked more appealing to be in the 5th spot rather than the 3 where CU will face most likely Wake, Maryland, and possibly Duke.
 Seemed a lot less likely to make it from that spot rather than ours right now

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

What you say makes sense.

I initially thought to get that we’d have to lose, and I’d just rather win now and set up a harder tournament then lose and set up an easier. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

yea

we agree on each account i think, there is no way you should ever intentionally throw a game

by PJVNolefan on Mar 6, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Evidently there was a memo sent out that Luke Loucks was one of our scoring threats.

“If they can get some outside shooting from Dulkys and Loucks, they will be a very hard team to beat”

Uhhh….How about Dulkys and ANYONE!?!

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

Gibson 3! LOL

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

nice dish

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:27 PM EST reply actions  

theres another water shot

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:33 PM EST reply actions  

foul? looked like a walk

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:42 PM EST reply actions  

singleton: King of the Missed Bunny Shots

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:45 PM EST reply actions  

great way to end the half, Loucks!

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

Loucks actually got a little ups in him.

He could’ve dunked that one. Should’ve.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

man, you aint kidding. 22 points

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice end to the half!!!

Loucks steal and layup! 30-22 HT score

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 12:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

10 TO / 9 A

Not awful. We are moving the ball on offense, just still some boneheaded TOs.

I was really hoping we had turned the corner a few games ago, where our TO% was hovering just below 20% (rather than the seasonal average of >25%)

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

Yup. Couldn't have said it better myself.

However, for how long have we IDed T/O’s as one of the largest achilles heels of FSU basketball. I’m as optimistic as the next guy, but I can’t say I’’m surprised we came out like this.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Having said that, if we don't cut our TO% down this 2nd half

This is going to be one of those vomitous 1-point losses for us.

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

luckily

we win most of our close games due to our D

by freshcollegeboy on Mar 6, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Sadly

we’re in most of our close games due to our O.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

My co-worker just asked about FSU basketball and Ham and that’s what I told him. We are in most every game good or bad.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

Coworker not a college hoops fan? Not an FSU fan? What’s their story?

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Holy Crap!

You mean there are people out there who dont follow FSU athletics?!?!

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I know, what the heck is wrong with these Richmonders?

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

Some are more egregious than others. Like standing on the baseline and receiving a pass. I don’t mind aggressive TOs, I guess it is what I’m saying.

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Right.

I was talking about most our TOs being boneheaded/non-aggressive.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I've taken it upon myself to grossly overhype Miller.

Have only seen youtube highlights, so this is more an opinion based on others’ write-ups than any firsthand knowledge…. but I firmly believe he is going to be the best 5-star in the Hamilton era… even though, at present, he’s still a 4-star by rivals. (So, basically saying his press clippings are more impressive than any of his predecessors’.)

by arrdub on Mar 6, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You know, Kitchen should actually be playing the 3

Good rebounder, good shooter / slasher, a little taller than most 2 G

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

10 point lead

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:16 PM EST reply actions  

nice ball movement! reid for 2

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:16 PM EST reply actions  

Reid!

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

Ian Miller

A – Scouts and Rivals list him as a 4 star guy
2 – His counting report says passing and being a true PG are his biggest weaknesses
D – There were at least 4 other guys from NC ranked higher than him

I’ve never seen him play, so I really don’t know anything more about him than what I read.

by BostonNole on Mar 6, 2010 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

“Good Things Happen”

In the final minutes of United Faith’s 84-74 win over The Greenfield School in the N.C. Independent 1A state championship Saturday, one of the three game officials walked over to press row and told N.C. recruiting analyst Mike Talbott that he had just seen the best player in North Carolina.

He told Talbott that he had seen all of the state’s top players, but pointed over at United Faith senior Ian Miller and said “he’s the best.”


I’m not arguing.

A year ago, Miller finished his junior year with a 40-foot dagger of a 3-point shot to beat John Wall and Raleigh Word of God. Saturday, he hit another buzzer-beating 3, at the end of the third quarter, and was virtually untouchable all game.

Miller, who signed with Florida State, had 33 points, 10 assists and four rebounds. He had alley-oop dunks and 3-point shots. He put on about as good a big-game performance as I’ve ever seen.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

What does FL look like?

I think i need to see more outside views

by TCHOP561 on Mar 6, 2010 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

thats my house. you like?

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Gibson, Gibson, Gibson.

Playing better than Alabi the last few weeks.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:29 PM EST reply actions  

Right...

I really think that if we can find someone to handle the ball and make at least halfway decent decisions, we can cut down a percentage of those….

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Snaer has impressed me more and more with his distribution. Plus I think if Loucks can knock down the outside shot he’ll be a better PG than Kitchen.

I don’t expect our offense to be much better next year though. I think the issue is more coaching than players. I hope I’m wrong though.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

DEEEEEP 3!

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:31 PM EST reply actions  

HAHA

I know you might question my sexuality after the Gus Johnson comment….. but I’m not THAT bad am I? HAHA

by BostonNole on Mar 6, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

10 of 20 from 3

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

9-16

He was wrong.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

DULKYYYYYYYYS!!!!!!!!!!!!

have we really hit 11 threes?

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

Yup...

I am more lenient on the kid than most, but he’s GOT to get tougher if he’s gonna help out.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

officially pissed

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

Stupid shots.

Stupid turnovers. Zero leadership.

by Legal_Seminole on Mar 6, 2010 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

I really thought miami was going to pack it in a few minutes ago

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Right...and I know there's a lotta Ham haters around

But turnovers and dumb crap have done us in this game. I don’t think you can blame him.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 1:48 PM EST reply actions  

I dunno...

Today, the offense is shooting well, they’re running plays…

Case in Point, Alabi jumps on someone’s back with 4 fouls…I can’t blame coach Hamilton for that!

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

You can't blame Hamilton for that.

But the consistently poor judgement and decisions by our players you can blame Hamilton for.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Isn't that what always does us in?

Even in some of our “close wins”?
We play like this nearly every game.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

And that’s really the problem. It’s a coaching problem when it’s a season long issue. I still believe we spend about 50% of our practice time on defense and rebounding, free throw shooting, and offense get the remaining 50%. That’s not neccessarily a bad thing but you need a better offensive teacher if you are going to do that.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I would just like to be consistently good on offense.

Not great, just good. These spurts of awful play sprinkled in with few minute stretches of great play just isn’t conducive to winning basketball.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Miami has caught fire

We’ve missed some good shots and they’ve hit a lot of ft’s

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 1:51 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

terrible jnump ball call

And Soloman then commits a stupid over the back

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 1:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

3 minute ballgame

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:53 PM EST reply actions  

Another undisciplined performance

Why didn’t Ham call a dang TO to slow the canes rally?
Very annoying. Not the stuff of a tourney team.

by mudra on Mar 6, 2010 1:54 PM EST reply actions  

talk about a clutch 3

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:56 PM EST reply actions  

i guess we gotta win with D again

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:58 PM EST reply actions  

open three for miami doesnt fall. thank you basketball gods

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 1:59 PM EST reply actions  

wow wow wow

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

GOD I love our Freshman STUD!

Misses a shot, then gets the damn ball back!

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

They've got heart and they've got talent.

Just don’t have the system to maximize results.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

you gotta be kidding me

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

After he messed up doing that the last 3 possesions?

I love Snaer, I just think at that juncture – that wasn’t a good play call.

by BostonNole on Mar 6, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

It was either him or Loucks doing that play

I’m just saying you have your defender to your right & driving to the left of the basket, you have to go to the left hand. That was on Snaer, completely. But I still like the idea of slashing to the basket, potentially drawing a foul, with one of your best slashers.

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure, sure

But isn’t that what the ISO play is about?

by ricobert1 on Mar 6, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think what's being ignored is that

A) Snaer is a freshman. He’s clutch, but he’s a freshman
2) That’s the 3rd consecutive offensive possession which he had the ball in his hands.
D) Boston is right, if you are going to give it to the freshman, give him an out. Everyone else was just chillin.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Closing my eyes....

Seriously. Am just going to listen and do my breathing exercises.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

Rookie Moves.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Mar 6, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

did we win? what happened? where am I.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

That almost looked like a goaltend

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Mar 6, 2010 2:07 PM EST reply actions  

JK it was them who hit it.

Horray for watchign slow illegal feeds.

"I have come that you may have life, and life to the max"

by UNFNOLE on Mar 6, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

what year is it?

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:08 PM EST reply actions  

i need a zen moment

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:08 PM EST reply actions  

That's not the scheme.

It might be coaching but it’s not scheme.

We had 2 steps OOB
2 tie ups
and 3 bad bounce passes into the paint (2 weren’t horrible Alabi needs to catch them).

by Bud Elliott on Mar 6, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

What you said mad sense.

Decent scheme, horribly inconsistent execution.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I said it wrong

It’s execution. The game plan was fine. Frustrated with the offensive execution. That is what drives me nuts about Hamilton. Maybe it’s not his fault but I doubt it. It seems to be a constant issue.

by mudra on Mar 6, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I really don't understand how you can blame Hamilton...

How are we to know that the same stuff we run on offense doesn’t work well in practice, against lesser opponents, etc, but when they get in a game situation, they shat the bed?

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s Ham’s MO. Good defense, middling offense. Builds a good program base but is not likely to top it off, at least he hasn’t done that at any of his stops.

By your arguement we don’t know that that stuff is working in practice and you can hide a lot of flaws when you can out athlete other teams.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Right, and we don't know.

But schematically, it looked there was at least an objective to accomplish, at times.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll agree with that.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Didn't he win the Big East and get Elite 8 (or at least S16) at UM?

And jumped to NBA at their peak? Can’t say he’s always topped out.

by arrdub on Mar 6, 2010 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he got to the Sweet 16. I don’t consider one year of a deep tournament run to be great. It’s something to be admired and something neither Miami nor us have seen in a while but it’s still just 1 year.

by evenflow58 on Mar 7, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

With that said,

how frequently would we have to make it to the Sweet Sixteen for you to feel satisified? Like once every 2 years, 5 years, 10 years?

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 7, 2010 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

If he won the Big East, and made a deep tournament run, that's topping it off.

And doing that at Miami is a borderline miracle. He left while they were on top.

If you spin your perception the other way, there is no reason to believe that a program he’s built will reverse course and deteriorate, either. Simple fact is that no one has seen how far he can take a program; he’s made a leap to the next step after each stop on the way.

Enjoying watching Wake seal this right now. #3 seed!!!!

by arrdub on Mar 7, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

There's definitely only so far Hamilton can take us.

Not sure how far that is. But our offense has regressed the last 5 years, at least according to Pomeroy, despite our defense improving. I can’t blame that on personnel, either. As I said, it’s over the past 5 years and many players have come and gone.

While I think Hamilton vastly underachieves in regards to the talent that’s on the floor, I’m fairly pleased with where we are currently at.

We should have 3 NCAAT appearances in the past 4 years. In 2007 the selection committee refused to take Douglas’ injury into account. We were 8-5 in ACC play with him (including ACCT) and 0-5 without. Three of those 5 losses were single digit losses. (We should actually have 4 NCAAT appearances in the past 5 years if Hamilton didn’t schedule the 306th ooc schedule in 2006 when we went 9-7 in conference also.)

We’ve won OVER 20 games 4 times in the last 5 years. Won 19 or more in 6 of the last 7. I won’t touch on our PATHETIC showing in the NIT. We’ve won the 3rd most ACC games over the last 4 or 5 years (no great years, unfortunately, just solid/good years). He’s put together seasons consisting of our 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th most ACC wins in school history. Only those Douglas, Sura, Dobard, Cassell, Ward, etc. teams had better seasons.

Great recruiter. Doesn’t bring in the best recruits, but considering the lack of tradition, our horrible recent history and the lack of a good game day atmosphere, he’s consistently brought in top 25 type classes.

Players seem to improve during their careers. He’s has 2 ACC POY Runner Ups. He gets players drafted (2 first rounders and 3 second rounders in the last 6 drafts). Is only poised to increase that number.

It just seems his teams rarely reach their potential. The results are definitely better. I think that’s almost entirely due to better players, not because he’s maximizing his given talent pool. This is the part that irks me. Many FSU basketball fans just look at the results I listed and think Hamilton is awesome and untouchable. I wouldn’t fire him, but he needs to show improved PROCESS. You know, that thing Fisher keeps talking about in regards to the football team. He wants results, but knows you can’t get them consistently without a solid process. I just fail to see improvement in process from Hamilton’s clubs. It seems like while it’s not ok for football to have poor process, it’s ok for Hamilton.

I’m not sure what he has to do to correct that but he has to do something. All 3 of our assistants actually seem like they’re pretty good at their jobs. Their resumes/experience is hard to knock. I’m not talking about that fluff stuff that Seminoles.com used word for word in all 3 of their bios, either, but their actual past work experience.

If Hamilton can’t improve our offense, and correct the seemingly multitude of dumb mistakes we make, there’s no reason to expect us to get past the 1st or 2nd round in the NCAAT.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 7, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we struggle with placement or spacing. A good deal of our TOs seem to come from a player slashing to the basket but with no out. Either he doesn’t know where everybody is supposed to be or people are not where they are supposed to be. Other than Kitchen hesitatin on most every pass or shot that’s about all I would change. We are very good at playing an inside out game when we spread the floor but you need more variety in your sets than just running that.

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was 92-93.

Weren’t in the ACC back then.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

That loss still hurts…We had a good chance to go 11-5, and we blew it.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll take the NC State loss as delivered from the basketball gods. The clemson lost is

the most angering. CS with two FT’s inside of two minutes to take a 5 point lead, misses them both.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

The final few minutes of each half we really screwed the pooch.

But we should not have lost that game. We held Clemson to 29 points in 34 minutes of play (outside of the end of each half) and lost.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

After a very late night...

I woke up in time to see the last two minutes of the game. The two things that stood out to me:

- 10-18 3-point shooting (and still only pulled a one point win)
- the major discrepancy on free throws taken

So I’m left wondering it the refs were favoring Miami throughout or if Miami was just more aggressive throughout the game?

by TheNole9Yards on Mar 6, 2010 2:25 PM EST reply actions  

Anyone know warchant's espn360 code?

footballboard@comcast.net
warchant

Is supposedly the goods but it’s not working.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

They'll be burning couches in Margantown tonight.

Which I suppose is preferable to burning cars in College Park.

"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright

by O-Town Nole on Mar 6, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

*Morgantown*

"The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't me." - Steven Wright

by O-Town Nole on Mar 6, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way guys

WVU wins over Villanova…

Never doubt Huggy bear…They’re an elite 8 team if I’ve ever seen one!

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

Kansas, Kentucky, Duke, Syracuse

Ohio St, West Virginia…

Maybe Vandy/KSU

Hard to say until we see the brackets….really no good teams out west outside of Kansas/KSU, etc. Gonna be a little weird.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:52 PM EST reply actions  

For now...

OSU
WVU
Cuse
UK
KU
A10 team (Temple or Xavier)
KSU or Baylor
And ??? for my 8th, maybe Vandy or UNM

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

oooooh. New Mexico

Big fan of Steve Alford. They get hot, and they could go far.

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I just really get impressed with WVU because of their mental toughness.

Down by a handful to one of the best teams in the country, and they fight back and WIN

by Randall W. Spetman on Mar 6, 2010 2:56 PM EST reply actions  

Geez, just went to another FSU site's basketball board.

Bunch of pansy * apologists starting 30 new threads to call each other out. And they’re all so ill-informed.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

Anybody know why Kitchen only logged 17 min? I can’t say I can much argue with the games that Loucks and Dulkys played.

Players Min FG 3P FT Rebounds PF A TO B S Pts
M. Snaer 33 2-8 1-3 0-0 1 3 4 2 8 6 0 0 5
D. Dulkys 27 4-7 3-6 2-2 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 13
L. Loucks 25 5-7 3-5 0-0 0 2 2 2 4 1 0 1 13
D. Kitchen 17 1-4 1-1 0-0 3 3 6 2 2 2 1 0 3

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

Sorry for the formatting. Can we ask for the ability to do limited HTML in comments, like tables and such, in the next survey?

by evenflow58 on Mar 6, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Marquette already screws my perfect scenario.

ND just punched their ticket for good. One less bubble spot for teams (cough uf cough).

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 6, 2010 4:43 PM EST reply actions  

allright Trick. VaTech beats GaTech, 88-82. You damn well better be right about that

“Perfect Scenario,” of yours. We are all Demon Deacons fans now. A #3 seed if Wake wins, a #5 if Clemson wins. Lets make it more exciting, shall we? KenPom has it as basically a 50/50 proposition.

Go WF!!!

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

and if I looking at it right, if Wake wins and we get the #3, we'll get the winner of the

NCState-Clemson game, which would appear to be the #6-#11 match-up.

All is not lost; the unconquerable will/And courage never to submit or yield.

by GoNolzOhio on Mar 6, 2010 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't get to see this game.

Glad to see we pulled it out. It sounds like it was a pretty ugly game to watch, and we were semi lucky to escape with a win. Now it’s on to the ACC tourney where we need to make a deep run in to give our guys confidence heading into the big dance!

by fsunole23 on Mar 6, 2010 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

Actually, I felt as if Miami was darn lucky to be that close at the end.

We shot .500 from the floor and 10-18 from 3. They took 22 ft’s to our 8. That, the 17-9 turnover differential and some pretty lucky Miami shots kept them in the game.

It’s an ACC road game. You should expect the refs to be in Miami’s pocket.

by CelticPride on Mar 6, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I still don't understand

why FSU doesn’t get the home-court advantage other teams get in the ACC. Do we not pay the officials enough? Is there an unofficial tip-jar that we’re missing?

by CelticPride on Mar 7, 2010 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know our foul/ft rate compared to our opponents at home and on the road,

but I do know that when you have a soft center and your 6’9" forward that prefers the perimeter, you aren’t going to get as many calls as you would expect simply due to the nature of those two players.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 7, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe, but that doesn't account for our opponent. Even with Singleton/Alabi's issues,

We’re still a lot more of an “inside” team than most. As far as I’ve been aware, we typically lead our opponents in points in the paint.

In general, we don’t seem to get the kind of favoritism other teams get at home. I always thought it had something to do with us paying our ACC dues, and Tobacco Road teams getting the payment… but 20 years and no significant variance whether we’re facing UNC, Clemson, or UMd, leaves me thinking officials just don’t like Hamilton.

(And, yes, I am aware I am refuting your point and making generalities without any data to back it up. Hopefully MattD isn’t patrolling this post any longer.)

by arrdub on Mar 7, 2010 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

As I said, I don't know the rates for us and other ACC teams, home or away.

I just know we should have less fouls called on our opponents than expected due to our personnel. Don’t really need to foul Alabi if you’ve bodied him out of his comfort area in the paint or if he holds the ball low and you or your teammate get your hands on it. Gibson is also a finesse big man and Reid usually gets played man up, so I’d think he’d be less likely to get fouled than if a 2nd defender came over to hack at his shot.

Have we paid our ACC dues? And what are our ACC dues? If it’s relatively consistently being good and making it to the NCAAT, we haven’t paid our dues. I think, if we were to do that consistently, and get some players with the mentality to attack the glass, we’d see more fouls called. And if we don’t, like we see during football season, then screw it.

"Trick is right."

by tricknole on Mar 7, 2010 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Just watched the replay

Great great game by Loucks. I think he has improved more than any other player this season besides Snaer.

by EngineerNole on Mar 7, 2010 5:38 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to Tomahawk Nation, your home for no-holds-barred analysis of FSU Athletics. Remember the Community Guidelines.
Start posting about the Seminoles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Greg_reid_small
2011 Recruiting Discussion Thread #6
Small
7 Ways To Help the Christian Ponder for Heisman Campaign
_1_small
Ongoing Discussion Thread #27
Greg_reid_small
2011 Recruiting Discussion Thread #5 [closed]

Recent FanPosts

Byu_121_small
Twin Cities MN Seminole Club
Small
anthony rabasa (de) miami columbus commits to the IRISH..
Small
Historical FSU videos on Youtube
Small
My thoughts on Nigel Carr
Ponder_small
2010 ACC Football Kickoff
Fmnole_small
2010 Expectations: Kool Aid Immersion or Intangible-based Perfect Storm?
Small
All Aboard the Seminole Hype Train
Pvic_small
NG or 1-Tech play will make or break our defense next year.
Small
Using FEI to predict FSU's Win Total

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +14 updates

QB Jeremiah Masoli Headed To Ole Miss After Being Dismissed From Oregon

Photo

With Apologies To Randy Edsall, The Big East Remains Mostly Harmless

FILE -- This is an Oct. 18, 2008 file photo showing Connecticut corner back Jasper Howard (6) trying to get the crowd into the game during the fourth quarter of an NCAA college football game against Rutgers, in Piscataway, N.J.   Jasper Howard had his little sisters' names tatooed on his chest. His friends say it was a constant reminder of why he was at U Conn _ to provide his family with a better life than the one he had in Miami's Little Haiti. (AP Photo/Mel Evans, File) link

In Defense Of Big East Football

More from SBNation.com >


Chiefs

Img_4552_small TrueCubbie

29seminoles Bud Elliott

Editors

Miller_small basaltrock

446905_small nolesblogger

Small Fsued

Doak_1968_small pbysh

Small CaStauch

Vacation_013_small MattDNole

Mickey_a_small FSUSOM

Frank_the_tank_small DKfromVA

Peter_ernie_small The K-Man

_1_small FrankDNole

P06830wfpfi_small ricobert1

Florida-county-map_small SWFLNole.

Highlife_small fsu44

Moderators

Peter_warrick_small TRMNole

Seminoleswag_small NoleLaw