Jimbo Fisher Not Replacing The Legend Version Of Bowden At Florida State
[Editor's Note: It is not my contention that Bobby Bowden isn't a legend. He clearly is. I am simply stating that Jimbo Fisher isn't replacing the legend version of Bowden, on the field or off. It would be a different story if Fisher was replacing a legend who bowed out in his prime, like Ray Perkins (Bear Bryant), Fred Akers (Darrell Royal), Earle Bruce (Woody Hayes), Ron Zook (Spurrier), Frank Solich (Tom Osborne), Bill Guthrie (Dean Smith), Mike Davis (Bobby Knight), Lloyd Carr (Bo Schembechler), or Dennis Erickson (Jimmy Johnson) did. There isn't an analogous situation to Bowden's because no school has ever let a coach stay around for 8 years after he started to go downhill. I do find Arkansas an interesting comparison, as Broyles finished with 5 washed-up seasons, and his second to last year was a promising mirage, much like Bowden's 2008. ]
I've been waiting to write this piece since January. I knew the time would come when some beat guy or columnist would get lazy and write the "following a legend" piece. It took four months but Caulton Tudor of the Raleigh News & Observer finally did it, mailing in his Sunday column "Clock Ticking On Noles' Fisher". At least Tudor is an out-of-state writer. Perhaps he can be forgiven for not paying attention to the subject of his article.
If Tudor had taken the time to think about the piece, he would've scrapped the idea. Because any logical person can see that Jimbo Fisher isn't replacing a legend at Florida State. Not in 2010. Not after an embarrassing cheating scandal and being unable to win the ACC for a half decade. Not after a decade in which the 'Noles went 5-15 against the Gators and Hurricanes. The article would be appropriate if Fisher was replacing Bowden in 2000 and not 2010. But the only thing legendary about the coach Fisher is replacing in the year 2010 is the unprecedented record of nepotism, coaching futility, and wasted talent. let's take a look at what Tudor has to say and why his argument is ill-fitting and contradicts itself.
If history repeats itself, and it often does in college sports, John James "Jimbo" Fisher is getting paid a fortune to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Those who study history will tell you that situations with a lot of common factors often produce similar results. As I said above, it would make sense to for Tudor to consider what the commonalities are between the "history" and Florida State's situation. Instead, he just skips over that and references the "fortune" FSU is supposedly paying Fisher. Fisher's contract is both irrelevant and not in the upper echelon of college coaches.
That's the way it generally pans out for coaches who replace legends. It's also a pattern Fisher understood when he agreed to follow Bobby Bowden on Florida State football's hot seat. "But it's not easy to win anywhere or under any circumstances," Fisher said when the decision basically was made by the school for Bowden to step down after the 2009 season. That's true enough. It's also important to point out that if Fisher is in the wrong place at the wrong time, he's at least there with the right team.
The right team could probably also be said as "the right place" and would definitely make sense as "the right time," so I don't really understand his point. Unless it is filler. Then it makes sense that Tudor's half-baked idea shouldn't be turned into a column and he has to fill it with mindless drivel like the above quote.
Additionally, after almost an entire decade of futility during which the 'Noles sent 5-16 against UF & Miami, how can the author argue that it is the wrong time?
By almost any definition directly related to personnel, depth, talent or scheduling, Fisher's first Seminole team is better equipped to win big than any FSU team since at least 2004 and possibly 2001.
While grooming for the job as offensive coordinator the past three seasons, Fisher also groomed redshirt junior Christian Ponder to be the quarterback entrusted with getting the team back into the national top 10.
Now this is just lazy journalism. No team that played a schedule as difficult as Florida State's ended up in the top 10. So the scheduling, which should again be one of the 10 toughest in the country including 6 bowl teams plus Oklahoma and Florida, is certainly not "better equipped to win big since 2001." Fisher did demolish the rotting house that was the Florida State offense and build it into one of the best attacks in the country. As Corey Clark of the Tallahassee Democrat recently noted on twitter, the cupboard was quite bare when Fisher arrived at Florida State. None of the players former offensive coordinator Jeff Bowden (Bobby's controversial son) left for Fisher have been drafted in three years. Florida State was stale in early 2007 when Fisher arrived, and had Jimbo not come when he did, it would likely be completely rotten today.
With 22 career starts, Ponder will be the centerpiece of the ACC's most experienced offensive team, a unit that includes nine other starters and three NFL interior line prospects.
It should be pointed out that the previous staff thought of Ponder as a throwaway player and told Fisher he was crazy when he arrived and said "that's my quarterback." So excuse me if I'm slow to credit the previous staff for a player that they regarded as a kid who was recruited primarily because his dad played for Bowden in the early 80s. Additionally, FSU does not have three NFL interior line prospects. Rodney Hudson will be an early-round pick, but McMahon is unlikely to be drafted and Spurlock isn't even receiving all-conference honors yet. An exterior lineman, Andrew Datko, is considered a nice NFL prospect.
The defense is less established, but there's a veteran defensive front, and Bowden spent much of his final two years rededicated to recruiting.
Here, the author seems to be making stuff up as he goes. The defense isn't just less established, it was the 2nd worst major conference defense in the entire country. The defense is now learning a new scheme.
Also, Bowden did not spend "much of his final two years rededicated to recruiting." Nothing could be further from the truth. Bowden was barely involved and did not even know the names of most of FSU's targets. What Tudor wrote is the exact opposite of true, but writing that fiction does help to prop up his story that Fisher has a very tough act to follow and that Bowden set the program up to be successful going forward in his final two years.
To his credit, Fisher readily admits that many of the right parts are in place. Then again, what's the use in poor-mouthing your team when the world knows you're on a time clock from the opening kickoff?
Huh? This doesn't make any sense. There would absolutely be use in saying that the team is a long ways off and that it will take several recruiting cycles before it is ready to compete for the conference title. Why? It would help to buy the time that Tudor claims Fisher does not have. Also, "time clock" seems silly. What else would the clock be doing?.
In 34 seasons at FSU, Bowden went 316-97-4. In three of his final four seasons, though, the Seminoles finished no better than 7-6 overall.
That record was accumulated when FSU played in a much worse ACC. Bowden has a losing record against both the Gators and the Canes. He posted a 14-21 record against Miami and 4 of the 10 wins came when Miami was docked 24 'ships. He was also 17-18-1 against UF and the 1987 1988 1989 and 1990 wins came when UF was under major probation with scholarship reductions. That's 31-39-1 (44%) against Florida State's two major rivals. 8 more losses than wins.
Fisher isn't likely to see Miami or UF lose 20+ scholarships any time soon. He won't have the enormous recruiting advantage Bowden had. Fans do, however, expect the results they think they remember Bowden having (those results would obviously be better than what Bobby actually accomplished against FSU's rivals). But what are facts to get in the way of a cliche Sunday column?
Two or three of those 7-6 finishes won't buy Fisher 34 years of job security. They'll buy him an exit ticket and likely will turn the Seminoles football job into a walking wasp's nest for a few years to come.
This doesn't make any sense. The writer claims Fisher is immediately on the hot seat, but then says that he won't have much job security with two or three seasons of 7-6? FSU fans expect much more than 21-18 over his first three seasons. Tudor needs to make up his mind. If Fisher is truly on the hot seat as he claims, he needs to make a claim like "Fisher has three years to win the ACC or he'll find himself on his way out of town."
By going the coach-in-waiting route, Florida State gambled in the biggest possible way by never opening the door to other interested job candidates. It could turn out to be a mistake that haunts both parties long after Bowden's national championships fade from public memory.
Except its geriatric coach and rotting program needed someone to baby sit it until it got its act together. And it needed it badly in 2007. Without Fisher to save FSU over the last three years, the program would have likely posted back-to-back losing seasons, if not back-to-back-to-back.
And if the Fisher era doesn't get off to a sweet start, it'll likely have a sour ending.
And end it with a lame line like that.
It is hard to follow a legend. Apparently it's just harder to determine if that is actually happening.
277 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, is this what journalism looks like these days...
I like the style of being able to back up what you are writing much better.
Actually, journalism has always had a lazy element
But, until the web and sites like TN, there has been no real outlet beyond writing letters to the editor. However, nowadays, if you are going to put an article out there with your name on it, you better spend at LEAST a half an hour reading about your subject, instead of recycling a garbage pail of cliches like this writer did.
Guys like this are doomed and will be shed by newspapers like dead skin. At least if the newspaper wants to stay in business. That’s why I come here first for news on FSU.
Sheriff Branford: The fact that you are a sheriff is not germane to the situation.
Buford T. Justice: The god damn Germans got nothin' to do with it!
Are you sure you didn't get this Tudor article off of Bleacher Report?
I go there for a laugh all the time… the best are the guys that write on the Gators, mainly Jim Folsom who has never used one shred of data or evidence in any of his articles.
I have banned bleacher report articles here
unless one of the editors review them, haha. They are just consistently awful.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
This should be e-mailed to this guy.
If I were him and this was e-mailed to me, I would find a new job.
Well done. It all needed to be said.
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
Good stuff...
Bud, great responses to that article.
You said yourself the guy is an out of state journalist – maybe this is really the perception out there? Not saying his location excuses the lack of fact checking and analysis.
Anyways, would it be good to post a link to your response as a comment on his original article?
It very well could be the perception out there
But who drives those perceptions? Guys like Tudor?
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Tudor is...
One of the top ACC columnists. His voice is taken as gospel by thousands who don’t know any better.
by Sabon on Apr 26, 2010 7:49 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
http://www.scrippsnews.com/content/tudor-ousting-qb-tough-around-acc
Here he describes how Ponder is facing stiff competition for his job……or rather just omiting Ponder and Jacory from the clear #1 starters. Anything he writes I take with a grain of salt.
Team GOLD
Tudor is a horrible writer but he is considered a great columnist in these parts
This market doesn’t know football, college football in praticular so many will read this article and take Tudor’s word to heart. The Charlotte Observer is my local paper and I’ve read many of his poor articles. They always lack factual information and the guy never knows what he is talking about even when he is writing about his own school (UNC). I’ve mentioned before what a joke the Observer sports section is and what do you expect when Tudor is your best columnist.
Big Fan of Big Spear Diplomacy
I worked In sports at the observer
Back in the mid-90s before moving online (and being called a traitor). The beginning of the end was upon them back then, but many chose to ignore it. Newspapers are too far gone now.
by Sabon on Apr 26, 2010 1:27 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Just sad
Why do so many people act as if the last 10 years never happened?
Currently Playing: God of War III
PS3 ID: Nole1021
by Jonathan Loesche on Apr 26, 2010 7:50 AM EDT reply actions
because we were just 1 player away
It’s not fair to hold FSU accountable under those unavoidable circumstances.
by The K-Man on Apr 26, 2010 7:26 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
you must be new here...
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Apr 26, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Great stuff as always
Charlotte Observer is my local paper and was disgusted to read this garbage article.
Mind if I post a link to your piece on the Observer site?
I agree
I agree with you about the article (He’s just filling up space) I do give Fisher credit though. He knows that these types of comparisons will come up. Pretty quickly folks will remember the glory days much better than the mediocrity at the end. Also, the “Head Coach in Waiting” situation had to be difficult. I give him credit for being brave enough to step into that. He must really want to be at FSU and he must really feel that he can be successful here. (Lucky for us!)
This is why the newspaper industry is going the way of the dinosaurs, neanderthals, and cassette players.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
Wow, what a terrible article
Has this guy (the Charlotte Observer reporter) even watched a FSU game the last 10 years? Nice response Bud, we need to keep pointing out stuff like this because unfortunately there are still some FSU fans that feel this way too.
Posted response
I posted a response to the on-line version at the Raleigh News and Observer site. The article was also posted at the Charlotte Observer’s site as well. The News and Observer site encourages you to contact the author at: caultontudor@newsobserver.com
article
Great article on the hater out there. However, when reading this I sort of felt sorry for Cris Rix, Weatherford, Lee, and other Qb’s who sis not get a fair coaching staff. It was apparent during Rix’s sophomore season that he didn’t get better, nor did Weatherford. The talent was there, coaching was not. I have told my friends for years just by watching Rix’s mechanics and a others. Oh what could have been if not for nepotism and complacency.
Watching the draft this year made me feel the same
Every player that signed on the dotted line assumed he would get the proper training to get better if not elite and move on to the NFL. Instead, most got worst while watching the other teams that vied for them produce great player after great player.
UM & UF
I never took the time to check our record against UM & UF in the 2000s. 5-16 is just Cleveland Browns like awful. Yeesh
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Apr 26, 2010 9:39 AM EDT reply actions
I think everyone here is forgetting some things.
Being that we have such a unbelievable source of fact based information on our program, we are able to rationally see the real FSU through its lost decade until now and beyond.
However, that is not what most people want to read. They love the sensationalism of random inflammatory statements, or the quoting of extremely slanted stats with no context. There is a large majority of college football fans that just want to hear what they want to hear. I was on a plane trip to San Diego and sat next to a guy that blasted FSU for letting Bowden go and hoped we lose every game for 10 years and the stadium would crumble and blah blah blah……so I ask, who do you pull for MINNESOTA. I asked why he hated FSU so much and he said that we ruined a legend’s career…..not Bowden himself but FSU and its fans.
I hope that everyone doesn’t believe this will go away once newspapers go away, it will only transition to the internet where every tom, dick and harry can make ridiculous statements or blogs similiar to the article.
Winning will cure everything, or at least give them a real reason to hate us.
I say to hell with every fan of Bobby that doesnt root for FSU first.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
You are dead on talking about Sensationalism
Take a look at this article. It calls for an investigation into Coach Fisher’s role in booting Bowden out.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/325355-is-florida-state-the-next-tennessee#
(sorry if this is a repost)
Sheriff Branford: The fact that you are a sheriff is not germane to the situation.
Buford T. Justice: The god damn Germans got nothin' to do with it!
Now THAT article is a load of crap
"Bring back Fred Rouse--a true Nole"
by Randall W. Spetman on Apr 26, 2010 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the Bleacher Report story is kind of ironic
Because it talks about Fulmer being pushed out, but I heard he was part of why Johnny Majors or whatever his name was (too lazy to look it up) was forced out.
For all we know Fisher could have egged on forcing Bowden out behind closed doors. I do not want to believe that, but there is always that chance. I think all big time coaches have some devious nature in them somewhere, even Bowden. Mark Richt does not seem to, but that is probably why he does not go all the way.
I hope that he is driven enough to have wanted Bowden out
for he realized that despite all the successes he had with the offense, the team performance was inappropriately being attributed to him despite being 4th in command.
I agree about Richt. He doesn’t have that Saban/ Meyer in him.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
So true.
I had a friend on Facebook who posted a status calling for Jimbo’s head and saying he wanted Jimbo out because he obviously wasn’t the answer. Mind you, this is after the defense gave up yet another TD. I pointed out to him that Jimbo had very little responsibility over the whole team (if any at all) and was in charge of offense and not defense. He couldn’t man up and respond to me, he just deleted his status.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."
by geoffissiffoeg on Apr 27, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, when people who do not wear G&G glasses
talk about big games, the way some here do when criticizing Bowden, they sometimes see that Fisher has not been great in them either. Now that is not me personally, because I think not having Ponder hurt us in both the past two UF games, but in the USF game, which ironically was one of the games where the defense gave up less than 20 points, the offense only got 7. They also looked at the J State game and how the offense was only responsive in parts of the Clemson and BC games.
I am not saying that I want Fisher out. I like him. I just think, as some are saying people are Bowdenites, there are many on here who seem to worship Jimbo Fisher as a god, though he has yet to coach a down in a true game as a head coach yet. We have to wait and see. All the excitement over off season changes? That happens every year at programs all over. Just when FSU went away from 5 am practices, Notre Dame started doing them under Brian Kelly..and ND fans love it.
The defense is less established, but there’s a veteran defensive front, and Bowden spent much of his final two years rededicated to recruiting.
I dont care that you already highlighted this; it needed to be done again. Your entire article could have been posting this, and picking it apart for DAYS. Instead, you obliterated everything.
Its funny, reading his article gave me the opposite reaction of what he probably wanted. Did anyone else feel like we dodged a bullet? I mean, I think we all know how good Jimbo is, but do we know how incredibly lucky we are? IMO, e only reason we got Jimbo is because the administration thought he would be another lackey since he had Bowden ties. Similarly, we took some legacy kid, who lets be real here, they didnt care if he panned out; some kid named Ponder.
So we hire some flunky, and it turns out to be gold. Wow, the steaming pile of crap our team might be if we didnt get incredibly lucky. That revelation is alarming. We could be in a worse position, with no hope for the future. Thank God for Jimbo Fisher.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
by Miaminole on Apr 26, 2010 9:44 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I love Jimbo & think he is off to a fantastic start...
That said, Jimbo & Stoops are both replacing the biggest legend at their 2 spots in CFB history.
GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!
I think the context of the word "legend" is throwing some people
“Legend” denotes success. Neither Bobby nor Mickey were having any of that at the time in which they were replaced. They were surely legends in their day, but it hasn’t been their day in a while.
>>---l>
I'm confused...
Are you saying you cannot be a legend if you are not as successful in your final years as you were in previous years?
Bobby Bowden is certainly a legend, with no other qualifications. Same for Mickey Andrews. There is no need to qualify that by saying, “…but the game passed them by and they sucked in their final years.”
No one says, “Willie Mays is a legend, but he really sucked hard in his final 5 years.” They just say, “Willie Mays is a legend.”
by coonhound on Apr 26, 2010 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Poorly worded
No doubt they will both be admired as legends in history, but replacing a legend, in the context in which this was written, implies that Jimbo is replacing somebody who was having great success. That’s how it seems to me, at least. I think he’s using the term legend to base his argument that Jimbo will be on the hot seat if he doesn’t have success. This doesn’t work, though, because Bobby hadn’t had success in quite a while. It makes it seem like FSU fans are so used to the success that Bowden had brought of late that Jimbo will face enormous pressure. This just isn’t true. I’m definitely having problems wording this the way I want to, but this writer can’t use the term “legend” to set up an argument that Fisher needs to have immediate success, even though Bobby and Mickey will certainly be remembered as such.
>>---l>
by DKfromVA on Apr 26, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
EJ's response to his own role in 2010 Offense: "You still haven't seen what all (Ponder) can do."
I'll agree that the author is off-base using the myth that legend-following is a recipe for failure.
Each of those examples require individual assessment to understand all of the factors involved. In our case, you are correct, FSU fans will afford Fisher more time and opportunity than they would have if he followed Bowden in 2001. Improving on 7-6 is easier than 12-1.
I also think failure needs to be defined.
Some of the guys that followed legendary figures did quite well but nothing was going to be good enough. Guthrie, Solich, and Perkins immediately come to mind.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Because your argument is based on semantics (Bobby is or isn’t a legend, Jimbo is or isn’t replacing that legend, etc.) your wording is everything. That was my disappointment with your response. I won’t defend the quality of the Observer article, because it is not very good, but I don’t think you effectively refute him with your current attack.
The fact is, as DKfromVA said, that Bobby is a legend. Late performance notwithstanding, Bobby is FSU football. Jimbo is his heir and his replacement, and Jimbo will be under undue pressure to win which could in fact lead to a revolving door at that job. Your argument as I have read it is that none of that pressure is due to the fact that he is directly following Bobby, and that may be so to a point, but surely you cede that he will in fact be under a microscope? So, if I am understanding your article correctly you contend not that there will be pressure but why. OK, but the Boosters and money interests managed to force out the one man who is responsible for the entire program, and all the cash it brings in. If Bobby Bowden, the Legend, is not safe from a callous boot to the ass, what chance has the peon who follows him? That seems to be the nature of the shadow cast by Bobby, not phantom performance in recent years.
Bobby isnt FSU football. FSU football is FSU football.
Bowden was a big part of it.
but surely you cede that he will in fact be under a microscope?
Yes, he will obviously be under a microscope.
His argument isn’t based on semantics. The entire “following a legend” concept is based on following guys who were coaching at a legendary level or had very recently done so when they retired. And that doesn’t apply to Bowden.
OK, but the Boosters and money interests managed to force out the one man who is responsible for the entire program, and all the cash it brings in
Bowden wasn’t bringing in the cash. And he’s not the one man responsible for the entire program. Seriously, you don’t think that most other good coaches could do what he did given the situation in which he found himself?
If Bobby Bowden, the Legend, is not safe from a callous boot to the ass, what chance has the peon who follows him?
Bobby Bowden the cantankerous, nepotous, senile old man booted Bobby the legend.
The entire "following a legend" concept is based on following guys who were coaching at a legendary level or had very recently done so when they retired.
Show me that definition in the article. The fact is that following Bobby does present unique challenges based on his tenure alone, not to mention the fact that his legacy is literally untouchable. A legend is history and tradition, not just excellence. Of course following excellence is hard, and of course no one would ever argue that Bobby has been excellent of late, not even someone living in Charlotte. I thought that article was flat and uninspired, but if you are going to wait around for three months to rip it, at least hit it where it hurts without fiddling with definitions.
And Bobby Bowden IS FSU football. Or should I post our record against UF before he showed up?
Bobby Bowden is NOT FSU football
He played a large role in building it when he came into a wonderful set of circumstances. One man is not larger than a program on which people’s livelihoods depend.
>>---l>
It's obviously implied.
Why is it tough to follow them? Because it is difficult to maintain the standard they set. If that standard has changed because the program changed, it is different. Just because the author doesn’t show that he does or does not understand the definition does not mean I don’t understand where it came from.
Nobody cares if you’re following a has-been. 2-10 against our rivals the last 6 years…
And Bobby is not FSU football. Research the dynamics of the state at the time he came and I think you might be surprised.
Also, I think by saying "Bobby Bowden IS FSU football", you're discounting
all future coaches/players. Sure, Bobby was a legend, but I plan to be dialed into FSU football for about 50 more years.
"Bring back Fred Rouse--a true Nole"
by Randall W. Spetman on Apr 26, 2010 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions
And someone else would have invented the light bulb...
…if Edison hadn’t done it. I’m not impressed. Randall’s point is well taken that it is time to look to the future, I just prefer not to shit on the past in the process.
I don't think saying that the success in the 90's was gift-wrapped for Bobby is shitting on the past
They had two major programs nearby that were in major trouble for various reasons (UGA and UF) and FSU had insane recruiting haul after insane recruiting haul.
Then Miami got crushed by the sanctions. In the 90’s Bobby had to fight 1 program (Miami or UF at different times). In a state like Florida, that is an enormous advantage that only an idiot could screw up.
But the teams of equal talent usually got the best of us it seemed.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You can have the last word after this...
but I would have us all ask ourselves one question: Would we care at all about Florida State Football if not for Bobby Bowden? My answer is no, because it’s not about the 90’s. That was the reward for 20 years of grinding (and you can’t tell me that “any idiot” could have dominated that decade more than any other school ever dominated any other decade in the history of the sport; not USC, not Bama, not Army or Navy or Notre Dame back in the Stone Age, not anybody) and building rivalries and gaining respect and recognition. I wouldn’t have even gone to (or heard of) FSU if not for Bobby. So cough up all the facts, figures, trends and analyses you want. For me there is no quantifying his value to that program, unless you simply say 1/1.
Would we care at all about Florida State Football if not for Bobby Bowden?
Easily. To think that other good coaches couldn’t have done as well or better than Bowden did with what we had here is in my opinion, foolish.
Also, he won 2 championships in 30+ years. Meyer has 2 in what, 13 years? Saban has 2 in 20? FSU routinely chocked when it played someone with equal talent.
I would care
I’m a Florida State fan. I don’t cheer for FSU basketball because of Bobby. Or baseball, or women’s tennis, or the track team, etc. Sure BB is the only coach I really remember, but I bled Garnet and Gold before the dynasty started (back when we always lost – in the rain, ala Hemingway – to uf).
Heck, I didn’t pay attention to things like “coaches” until I got older and the dynasty was under way – my favorite USFL team was the Tampa Bay Bandits (coached by one, ack!, Steve Spurrier… not that I had any point of reference for him at that time). I cheered for the team. I had favorite players. The love for Bowden came later – the love for FSU was always first and foremost.
The best 2 coaches, IMO, in Florida college football
Johnson and Meyer. Then Bobby, then Steve.
Johnson and Meyer owned Bowden. Because they had talent and they could coach up that talent and manage a game.
No credit
for the decades of building a program from nothing? Your prerogative of course…
Bleeding My Own Blood on The Fourth Seminole War
I called him a legend.
His career accomplishments are legendary.
If you want to get into how he did it, I’ll discuss the enormous advantages he had throughout the dynasty (and why you won’t see another dynasty like that barring 2 schools in one location going on major probation again).
Losing record against our big rivals. 8 games under 500. How many legends have done that?
Bear
Had a whole region to recruit from, including a farm system of which Bobby was once a part. Bowden didn’t even have a whole state, so excuse me if improving our overall winning percentage against our rivals by a couple hundred points isn’t enough. While establishing a dynasty, as you say, the likes of which we will never see again. And he was right at .500 against Florida. He beat Spurrier 31-31 in 1994 and everyone knows it.
Bleeding My Own Blood on The Fourth Seminole War
Bowden had half of Florida and a large part of Georgia
His advantages were enormous and he had a LOSING record against our rivals. 8 more losses against them than wins. Academic and NCAA scandals.
The bear was in the 1970s.
And he was right at .500 against Florida. He beat Spurrier 31-31 in 1994 and everyone knows it.
No, that stuff doesn’t fly here. The 1st quarter points matter as much as the last quarter points.
Thanks, guys
No, that stuff doesn’t fly here.
I guess I should have read the charter.
Anyways baseball is on. You fellas try not to throw a brick through the Bobby window in the Doak, ok? It’s been fun
Bleeding My Own Blood on The Fourth Seminole War
If we entertain stuff like that
then we open it up to Gators talking about the swindle in the swamp, etc.
I see you still haven’t figured out why he is 8 games under 500 against our rivals and SIXTEEN more losses than wins when our rivals were not on probation.
I encourage you to stay. We can probably both learn something from each other.
Never fear...
Haha. Don’t worry I’ll be back another day, I just see this going all night if I don’t nip it in the bud eventually.
I understand he wasn’t all that good against our rivals, but he was far better than anything that predated him. Like I said, for me he is FSU football. Is he the best coach in the history of the sport? Probably not. Probably not even in the history of the state, especially to hear you tell it. I don’t dispute that point. The point I dispute is someone else automatically would have stepped in and run the show as admirably as he did , and could have drug the program kicking and screaming out of obscurity. But we both appreciate the legacy that is Bobby Bowden, regardless of the lens through which we view it, so for tonight, I take my leave. I’ll see you around though. By the way, is there any way to link this thread?
Bleeding My Own Blood on The Fourth Seminole War
You can link the article and the comments will show up
Several things changed with FSU to allow it to become what it did
Enormous growth in the state’s population (more recruits means more schools get talent)<<<<— this is the most important.
2 of our 3 major recruiting rivals being down for long stretches of time (half decade) allowing the already enlarged pool of talent to become an even larger available pool.
New coach.
Judging by the results obtained by the other schools during the same time period (Miami 5 championships, UF 3 while playing in a much tougher league, FSU 2), I have to believe the first 2 factors were much more important than the latter.
PHATTY ROB..
I have a site where people like you run rampent in the wind like ginger kids in Colorado. You are welcome in my house anytime. Your logic and intelligence is a refreshing breath of fresh air here.
It is safe to assume that you also like Mike Martin, The announcing skills of William Floyd, and actually think Chris Rix was a good QB.
My type of guy.
Reading my posts is a privilege and I will ban anyone who disagrees with me from the Internet for life.
Your comment about Rix is annoying
Rix would have been one of our best ever if he had been coached by Jimbo. But he had NO coaching. His talent, which was considerable, was squandered. Look at his skillset…he was essentially the same player as Ponder…just 6 or 7 years too early. And as far as his character, well it was fine. As I’ve said before, he had maturity and decision making issues.
Anybody notice that the numerous bonehead off field issues began to diminish considerably when Jimbo came aboard? What if Rix had shown up the same time as Ponder?
Rix was cheated out of an award winning career due to the circumstances he enrolled into. It is to his credit that he perservered and finished his schooling given the amount of scapegoating he had to endure. While he is certainly responsible for his own actions, the true failure lies with Jeff, Bobby, and the revolving door of offensive hacks who allegedly coached, and more importantly, “mentored” him.
Slow down there champ
While i will agree that Rix was cheated, lets not go over the ledge here. He was an idiot. Dont degrade the intelligence that Ponder has by saying the ONLY difference was coaching.
I want to make clear though, Rix did not get a fair shake. This is something he has in common with just about every other player in the past 10 years.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
Your points are fair
and while Rix doesn’t compare to Ponder intelectually, I also didn’t compare them that way. It doesn’t take a genius to be a very good QB, and Rix was smart enough. He also did some idiotic things, but he was not an idiot. He was immature. He needed a mentor and never had one. As far as I know, he has now matured and is making good decisions and staying out of trouble. My only point. Physically, it seems to me he had nearly the exact set of tools as Ponder
Anyway, Miami, I like you so don’t beat me up too much at once.
It is hard to compare
Though I think Rix had bad coaching, like Miami said, he was not Christian Ponder so we cannot just assume he would have been better.
The last QBs that floundered under Dickey did not turn around under FIsher. Fisher tried a year with Weatherford, but I think no one was going to get greatness from him, and Xavier Lee was just not mentally able to focus and take advantage of his abilities.
Likewise, along with Bowden having new offensive coaches in the early part of the decade, he had to deal with Jared Jones throwing up the experienced QB system, had to deal with Rix’s off field issues, the race issue in the locker room where the team was divided over him and McPherson, McPherson’s off field issues and then being booted, Wyatt Sexson showing some promise, then coming down with Lyme Disease, then starting again with freshmen.
QB is a big need so after their near perfect QB system some of what happened to Bowden’s teams did seem like bad luck finally catching up.
Fair enough
he def needed a mentor, and he was a nice enough kid, BUT, he was not the brightest bulb. I went to school when he was there, and shared a few classes.
And to your point, I might argue his physical talents were better, maybe not accuracy, but his arm was insane. Also, he had to deal with a mutiny when (help me out here someone) he had WRs throwing the game.
So while I understand what you are saying, I dont think Rix could ever be the QB Ponder is, although that is a tough ceiling. I do agree he could have been upper echelon.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
Heh heh
I understand your complaint, but one could also ask how many of BB’s losses against the rivals came when their rosters were suped up from the things that put them on probation in the first place… in those years, wouldn’t he have been playing with less talent (as they were while on probation)?
BB got credit
For the 23-17 follow-up victory.
LOL
I’m not comfortable saying that meyer “owned” Bowden – it wasn’t even close to a level playing field (through Bowden’s own fault, of course…). I would have liked to see meyer play a much better FSU team. Oh, hey, if his mental state holds up, I’ll get to see that one day very soon!
Now you are also discounting Snellenberger
Johnson and Erickson followed his ground work did they not?
Let me add my voice to those who say NO
Bobby Bowden is NOT Florida State football. He played a big part in making us a nationally competitive team, but the team existed way before he got here and will continue long after he has left (and died).
But, as Bud says above, other good coaches could have made FSU relevant. We’re in Florida (with the recruiting that comes with it), and our dynasty started a few years after uf had been put on probation – and UM followed shortly thereafter. That’s a recipe for success here.
I’ll give BB credit for 14 Top 5 finishes because he WAS the man at the top (i.e., he ultimately was responsible for the good hires, the recruiting, etc.), and I’m not saying anyone else would have matched that. But, considering the success UM and uf have had in the last 25 years, and even USF’s relative meteoric rise to decency (and a BCS conference), FSU would have gotten good without Bowden.
This.
While I won’t discount what he did in the 90s (I understand the whys and hows, but I think the achievements are still worth noting), what Bobby did in the 80s to get the program to a level where it could take advantage of the situation they were presented with is the real shining star of his tenure.
Bring back Jeff Bowden...as a pińata.
by TheNole9Yards on Apr 27, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Not so sure about your comparisons
In terms of legends leaving at the top of their games, my recall is as follows:
Bear left after the 1982 season. Last time he’d won an SEC title was 79.
Hayes wasn’t at the top of his game, not if his last game was the Gator Bowl. Ironically, Earle Bruce would go undefeated in his first year (1979) and have a shot at the national title.
Royal wasn’t at the top of his game in 76. Texas won five games, if I recall. And Akers had the Horns playing for the national title in 77.
Mike Davis didn’t replace John Wooden, Gene Bartow did. Bartow won the national title in his first year, 1975. Davis replaced Bobby Knight, would beat defending national champ Duke (who had all their players back, mind you) to go to the Final Four and lost the title game to Maryland.
I think that Coach Fisher is going to do a fine job. I really do. But it reads as if you’re backtracking, such that if things don’t go swimmingly, you’ve got an out to save face.
The heat will be on, not just for results. But aslo in terms of how Coach Fisher goes about his business, handles the media and boosters, etc. But so far as results go, reality is, many, many coaches have had monster seasons right out of the gate. The ones you named certainly did, as did Meyer, Stoops, Carroll, Saban, Lou Holtz, the list actually goes on and on.
The schedule is managable from a conference perspective. The toughest divisional game “should” be at home against Clemson. And there’s a good chance they’ll be replacing their QB as Parker is expected by many to be drafted high enough in June to warrant taking the money and running.
We’ll see what happens. No matter what, it’s an exciting and interesting time to be a Nole.
I looked at most of the comparisons
none of them had been sliding for 8 years and most had one or two down years.
Mike Davis is a typo, now corrected. In know some people who know Gene Bartow and did not mean to type Wooden.
And the important thing here is not that the replacement coaches failed or succeeded, it’s the difficult of the situations they inherited.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Each situation is certainly different BUT
Who knows how long Bear would have slid, had he lived long enough? Remember, he died right after his last game. You really think they wouldn’t have allowed him to continue going to the Liberty Bowl? Of course they would have.
Ohio State HAD to can Hayes, but without him punching Bauman, again, he stays on. And they were sliding, as well. Ohio State was not going to get rid of Woody Hayes, sans the sucker punch.
There’s no perfect comparison, obviously. But, again, one would have a diffcult time convincing me that FSU should not be the favorite in the division, this year. And that’s based upon schedule, as well as, returning players, including a QB that’s been through the wars.
Without going through all the progams, I find it tough to believe that Oklahoma was in a better position for Bob Stoops in 1999, than FSU will be for Coach Fisher in 2010. That said, I recognize that some years, things just break right and some years, things just break.
A team that physically whipped the 'Noles (BC) returns 18 starters
and gets to play both Duke and UVA from the coastal (we play Mia, UNC, UVA). They basically have a half-game advantage because of their coastal draw.
I’ll get to the OU thing later on. I do have some thoughts on that.
I agree about Hayes and the Bear. But it still stands that they did have a coaching change when the coach was still winning at an impressive clip.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Not to nitpick
Because BC did ‘Out-Grown Ass Man’ the Noles….but the G5 dropped INT, the Goal Line Stand, a Missed FG and 4 plays inside the 30 at the end of the game and the difference was 27-21?
Yes, BC just ran the entire 3rd and halfway through the 4th but I contend we win that game 7 times out of 10 with a different coaching staff.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Apr 26, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
If one would like a suitable comparison...
I would choose Vince Dooley. The end of his career looked much like like that of Bowden’s.
by mountain renegade on Apr 26, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Woody Hayes
He swore he did not hit that Clemson player lol
I read Bo Schembeckler's biography one week
and in it Bo said when he talked to Hayes the week after the incident Woody swore he did not hit the player, but Bo said he saw it for himself on the tape.
Speaking of typos...
Bill Guthridge replaced Dean Smith…not Bill Guthrie. :-)
Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
The questions that I don't want to get into today but that many qill ask, is
whether the programs of the guys you listed were better equipped to succeed early.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
You speak of Florida's situation in recruiting
Do you not think that coaches taking over for the University of Texas, The Ohio State University, Miami (following Snellengerberger), were not in good positions? What about USC? Aren’t they supposed to attract the big talent out west? Yet they seemed to fade from the spotlight some before Pete Carrol revived them. I know you did a piece logically explaining why there is no reason for big programs to ever go into a slump, but logical or not, it happens. I think if anything it illustrates that a few small things quickly snowball and that it is easier to fall than rise.
Indeed I do
I generally think Mack Brown is an average coach in a great situation. He should be dominating the game at a better clip. They play very soft and he is extremely loyal to some very average or poor offensive coaches.
If you have a T1 program (Texas, USC, UF), and it takes you more than a few years to dominate, you have a problem.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
US hired Paul Hackett
Who was their “Zooker”. Bob Stoops has probably always been much superior to Mack Brown as a coach. However, the Red River Rivalry began to swing when Texas fortified their recruiting efforts and stopped losing the Adrian Petersons and Tommie Harris’ to OU. Basically, they ‘Did what they had to do" in order to secure the talent :-) I know that OU was able to get Jamarkus McFarland. But only after a recruiting ’dirtfest’ that folks are still complaining about
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 26, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
OU
still seems to get plenty of talent looking at this past draft.
Big game Bob has not seemed any better than Bowden in big games the last few times.
Mack Brown, though in a good situation, did beat a USC team that was favored, and should get a pass for his most recent title game. The year before he was not in the title game b/c of weak scheduling (why elsewhere I was saying sometimes weak scheduling does come back to haunt if you have one loss).
USC's defense couldn't stop anyone in 2005 quiet as kept (ND, Fresno State, etc). The 04' USC team was much better
Maulauga and Cushing were freshmen starters and Rivers was a sophomore at the time. And Brown did not suddenly become a better coach. Statewide pressure (Many Texans wanted Brown fired prior to 05’) stemming from repeated ass kickings to OU led UT and Brown to get it in gear and do whatever needed to be done in order to stop losing recruiting battles to OU. Once the tide in recruiting turned, so did the Red River Rivalry itself
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 28, 2010 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Westcoast, again I point out the recent draft
Texas may have improved itself in recruiting, but that did not stop OU from still pulling in their own haul. Both had tons of talent, so you cannot just say Texas out talented OU.
I can think of one coaching situation like Bowden's
I can think of an analogous situation to Bowden’s. It is Denny Crum at Louisville. He was allowed to coach basketball for years after his prime (his decline came with the addition of the 3 point line.)
It worked out pretty well since he was followed by Rick Pitino. The one difference is everyone at UL knew Crum was well past his prime.
All the rational people around FSU knew that about Bobby
Good comparison, from what I know of it.
>>---l>
Now that is a good one
1995-1996 Louisville 22-12 10-4 T-3rd NCAA Sweet 16
1996-1997 Louisville 26-9 9-5 T-5th NCAA Elite 8
1997-1998 Louisville 12-20 9-5 5th (American) -
1998-1999 Louisville 19-11 11-5 2nd (American) NCAA 1st Round
1999-2000 Louisville 19-12 10-6 2nd (American) NCAA 1st Round
2000-2001 Louisville 12-19 8-8 5th (American) -
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
I noticed that similarity too...
Before Jimbo was signed as the HC in waiting, the thought crossed my mind that Spurrier might be the football version of Rick Pitino— leave for the pros, fail miserably, and then return to college to coach the team that had previously been a main rival.
Also, it would give him a chance to finally win in Tallahassee….
by IndyFSUnole on Apr 26, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Never woulda happened
Spurrier played for uf, won a Heisman there. Pitino played at UMass or something. SOS would never have been a candidate for a HC position at FSU (nor would he have applied… unless it was to sabotage us, lol).
Coach in Waiting argument is silly
I really don’t understand what Tudor is talking about here. How is “going the coach-in-waiting route” such a huge gamble? Any coach can come in and flop. Do you think anyone thought Charlie Weis was going to flop at Notre Dame? How about Spurrier and Holtz at South Carolina? Bowden Jr. looked like a sure thing to Clemson to help them own the ACC. Franchionne at Alabama looked great until everyone realized (including him) he was not the right fit. Does anyone really know if Kiffin will suceed at USC or Tuberville at Texas Tech? You don’t know if a coach with a proven track record in one location can make it work in another.
Imagine if we had not had Coach Fisher on board to begin resuscitating the program when he did. We would have had two losing seasons before the administration would have pulled the program away from Bowden and hired a new coach. Two more years of sliding into mediocrity and leaving the cupboard bare for Bowden’s successor. We would have to hire a true marquee name to get talent to quickly come back to FSU and that would have been very expensive. And then, it could have been a flop.
Instead, Coach Fisher hits the ground running and picks up the #6 recruiting class in the nation. He pulls the trigger on firing/hiring coaches he needs. He knows what to expect from the players on the roster and where he needs to recruit. He knows the lay of the land with the boosters. Hell, he knows his way around town!
So, while the coach in waiting may present its own set of problems, it is not the deal with the devil Tudor would have us believe.
Sheriff Branford: The fact that you are a sheriff is not germane to the situation.
Buford T. Justice: The god damn Germans got nothin' to do with it!
Ron Simmons Helps Me
Sum up my opinion of this article Bud…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9K8txc4MMk
CEO of ScalpEm.com
by NoleCC on Apr 26, 2010 10:22 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Being in Charlotte,
This man can probably get away with such glaring errors in his writing. The local seminoles will just be giddy to have an FSU article to read, and this amateur will live to see another day. I would recommend keeping an eye on this Tudor fellow and I’ll suggest applying the appropriate amount of pressure when the next opportunity rolls around. Hopefully his editors will take wind of the comments section and he will be held ACCOUNTABLE for his job performance. You couldn’t miss the irony if your name was Tudor…
As long as he writes on Carolina or Duke or State, I think he'll remain employed.
I know this is not an article most wanted to read. I’m just amazed that in an era when writers are being laid off left and right that sportswriters think fans will continue to accept the same cliched stories.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Just take a look at ESPN...
the masses have judged and ruled in favor of vanilla-no thought journalism. If the big boys are seeing success with poor journalistic practices, then the small-timers are going to follow suit. Just look at the OTL Fred Rouse story and the funny statistics in reference to Tim Tebow National Championships at QB. I am incredibly tired of being treated like a moron by these supposed news agencies and I’m overjoyed that you called this guy out.
by Caveman Mafia on Apr 26, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Unfortunately the real story
that should have been written (i.e. the pernicious impact of nepotism, a lazy and mostly incompetent friends-of-Bobby coaching staff and an administration that couldn’t make a tough decision) requires some thought and a set of balls. The only media outlet that has nailed it consistently is TN.
Fantasic read...
The preface needed to be added, glad you did…
"If lessons were learned in defeat, our team is getting a great education." -Murray Warmath
You FJM'd That Article
I miss FireJoeMorgan
by andrewjmelnick on Apr 26, 2010 11:19 AM EDT reply actions
Nice article Bud
It is not something most of us don’t already know but I never get tired of hearing it. It is good to keep focused on the things “really were” while moving towards the season. I am frankly looking for some revenge this. season.
Quite frankly the last thing I expect is for Fisher to fail. All that is needed is a defense and could someone please tell me exactly what coach could have put together a better defensive staff, strength and conditioning coach than what Fisher has now? Let me help you out not many.
The 1.8 million are so Fisher is paid is not a fortune by today’s standards. We must consider BB was paid 2.5 million for failing. That is a small fortune for doing nothing but call parity. I don’t think you will ever hear Fisher babbling about parity.
There are of course some good young coaches around like Sarkisian over in Washington but I doubt any of them are more media savy than Fisher. He handles himself very well from a public relations stand point as well. Of course southerners are not supposed to talk that fast. He is an enigma in that area.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis
Ann say hello to the grand kids
And yet....
You say BC physically whipped FSU, in the pouring rain and yet, if 5 holds onto a gift wrapped pick, FSU probably wins the game.
You also fail to mention that BC’s third coastal opponent is Virginia Tech. I submit that by getting to play BC, at home, in mid-October when it could be 90 degrees, at least makes up for getting to play Duke if you’re BC.
Is it your position that in 2010, the favorite in our division should be BC? Really?
I have to agree BC is favorite in our division
ACC schedule for BC is a lot easier than ours.
we get @UM, Clem and UNC back to back
BC plays VT and Clem at Home, no UNC, no Miami, No GT.
their only tough road game is at Doak where they have won every game since they joined the ACC.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
I predict they go no worst than 6-2 in the ACC
FSU needs to beat BC at home and hope not to loose more than 2 ACC games but I could see us loose any of the UNC, Clem, BC, Miami games. So again I like our chances but BC certainly has an easier road with only 3 games I can see them loosing @FSU or home to VT / Clemson.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
Bottom line
We can’t lose to anybody in our division and expect to go to the ACCCG. 2 conference losses against UM and UNC is all we can afford.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Not true
I know you weren’t being absolutist in your statement, but there many scenarios in which we can lose to someone in our division and still reach ACCG. I think we’re all shooting for 6-2 with at least a win over BC included, to ensure the chance at reaching the title game.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Apr 26, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
You're right.
I just don’t want to test any of them out.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
You mention schedule... Have looked LOOKED at the comparisons?!
BC has 4 gimme wins, and I literally mean silver platter in Maryland,@ Wake Forest, @ Duke, and Virginia.
They play VT AND Clemson at home
They play us and NCST on the road. that is it!
FSU, however, also plays Maryland, Wake Forest, and Virginia, and NCST.
replaces Va Tech with North Carolina (edge Va Tech)
replace Duke with @Miami (huge edge Miami)
Throw in the fact that all of BC’s tough games are in ACC play (They play Notre Dame, whoopee)
And FSU doesn’t even play their top 2 games in conference (@Oklahoma and Florida).
Remember a tie could come down to overall record (edge BC obviously)
BC is the clear favorite, Really?
by freshcollegeboy on Apr 26, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
They play VT every year.
it is their assigned rival.
I don’t like the one-play away analysis. If BC recovers that fumnle on the punt, they win by 14+. So often we focus on the final plays but all plays determine the result.
Fair point about the heat, though what of the letdown factor post Miami?
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 11:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Is the bye before or after UM?
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Apr 26, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Neither
It’s after BC and before our Thursday night game @ NC St.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions
There better not be a letdown factor post Miami
Not to a team that we have yet to beat in Tallahassee since joining the ACC. That’s on the coaching staff!
IF FSU is beat up against BC, that’s one thing. But seriously, to suggest that BC “should” be better than FSU in 2010 is an idea that I can’t get on board with. The better team doesn’t always win, of course.
But tell me, who on BC of those 18 returning starters would you rather have than the FSU player that plays in the corresponding position? Somebody up front on offense but no skill folks, I don’t think. And shouldn’t Hudson and Datko be better than any of their linemen? We say we have the best OL coach in the country, right?
Rick Pitino thinks that pressure is a good thing. It makes us work hard. I’m of the belief that the pressure is on for this one. As well it should be.
It's just reality with our schedule strength.
you play a schedule like FSU is slated to play and you will have letdowns.

But tell me, who on BC of those 18 returning starters would you rather have than the FSU player that plays in the corresponding position? Somebody up front on offense but no skill folks, I don’t think. And shouldn’t Hudson and Datko be better than any of their linemen? We say we have the best OL coach in the country, right?
It doesn’t really work like that. BC’s defense has played together as a unit and grown up in the system. We’re going to have major growing pains on defense even though we will be better.
As for the offensive linemen, Castonzo is better than Datko, Hudson is better than Claiborne. McMahon is better than their center. We don’t know how Zebrie will return from his hip surgery.
Now that Pat Ruel is gone I believe e have the best OL coach in the country, yes.
Giggle
I notice that the five toughest schedules you list are all SEC teams. How is it they can all play each other and yet, all have the toughest schedules, I wonder?
Let’s look at LSU, for example. They are rated the fourth toughest schedule in the country last year and lost three games. But the reality is, two of those losses were to probably the two best teams in the country and certainly, two of the three best.
We’re talking one game here. BC. Again, this is a game, sans injuries, FSU “should” win. The irony is, in the three years that Coach Fisher has been year, the one time FSU has beaten BC was the time that we most likely should have lost.
This idea that BC’s defense has played together is intriguing to me, in that they’ve got all these starters back, meaning by definition they were young last year. They’ve had different defensive coordinators the last two seasons. And they were missing their best defender last year. Take the position that due to his return, that BC should be better, perhaps. Although I struggle to see it, with him returning from cancer.
If we have better people. And we have better coaches. We certainly should win the game. I don’t care how old they are. Or aren’t.
I notice that the five toughest schedules you list are all SEC teams. How is it they can all play each other and yet, all have the toughest schedules, I wonder?
I’m not sure what you’re asking or if that was rhetorical.
Let’s look at LSU, for example. They are rated the fourth toughest schedule in the country last year and lost three games. But the reality is, two of those losses were to probably the two best teams in the country and certainly, two of the three best.
Ok?
We’re talking one game here. BC. Again, this is a game, sans injuries, FSU "should" win. The irony is, in the three years that Coach Fisher has been year, the one time FSU has beaten BC was the time that we most likely should have lost.
Games are not played in a vacuum. The battle of attrition is cumulative and real and many people more famous than me have discussed the problem with getting up for games and how teams can’t go it more than 5 or 6 times per season. It’s not getting up for the game, but getting up for the week.
This idea that BC’s defense has played together is intriguing to me, in that they’ve got all these starters back, meaning by definition they were young last year. They’ve had different defensive coordinators the last two seasons. And they were missing their best defender last year. Take the position that due to his return, that BC should be better, perhaps. Although I struggle to see it, with him returning from cancer.
It’s not just that. It is that even the backups have had 1, 2, or 3 years learning the system. FSU’s starters and backups will have 30 practices in the system entering the season.
If we have better people. And we have better coaches. We certainly should win the game. I don’t care how old they are. Or aren’t.
We definitely do not have better defensive players, right now. Our defensive players are more physically talented, but even the veterans are quite unseasoned. BC is one of the best 10 defenses in the country. Their players are talented and they play very well as they understand the system and have grown within the system for a few years before they step in. Or in the case of Keulchy (Frosh AA linebacker), they give him a very limited role and let the vets around him take on a larger role.
You mentioned you discuss OU later
There is one thing that stands out here. This is the difference maker for the entire season. If somehow FSU can go out to Norman and pull this off, Jimbo’s stock soars. The key boards of clueless sports writers would fall silent.
The outcome of the Oklahoma game is the difference between a good season and a mega season.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis
Ann say hello to the grand kids
To the national media, yes the OU game is important
Personally, I don’t put much weight into it at all.
>>---l>
Why not? Just curious
To be honest, I’d almost be surprised if we didn’t get rolled by them. They are absolutely built to beat us considering it’s the second game of the year and it’ll be the first time our new coverage schemes will see a significant test
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 26, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll be interested in it as I'm watching it
But I’m really focused on the ACC next year. I want to win the division first and foremost. That’s going to be my success barometer for this team next season. I don’t think the OU game is a good indicator of future success because we aren’t going to be playing dumb OOC games like that in the future. I know our fans are going to be far too pumped up for it, as some have already called it the marquee game of our season, which is ridiculous.
>>---l>
Agreed
I want to make the ACCG. I want to beat OU but if we don’t our realistic goals are still in place.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
It’s early, it’s OOC… we could get crushed and still have a very successful season. Or, we could win and still have the season go “plop.”
But, I am very interested in seeing how we compete against them. They’ve been successful for 10 years now, so it should be an indication of how far we have to go (or how close we already are).
I thought on discussing OU, Bud meant
I thought he meant he was going to discuss the situation where Stoops was able to win the national title in his second year there. And OU had really hit close to the bottom under John Blake and then, the one year under Howard Schnellenberger and his bottle.
That’s not to say that I think that FSU could or should compete for a national title in 2011. But it’s been done numerous times before. And by schools that were in bad shape before the new staffs came in.
Again, pressure is a good thing. The pressure of a mortgage makes people go to work every day. This is the job our head coach wanted. If he doesn’t embrace the pressure of it, then we hired the wrong dude. I hope he wants the alums, boosters, fans, and students to have high expectations.
In view of what has transpired is there reason to believe otherwise?
Bring back Peter Tom Willis
Ann say hello to the grand kids
It appears to me
It appears to me, that Bud doesn’t want the pressure of expecting to win the division. Why? I couldn’t say. But again, it certainly appears as if he believes the team to beat in the division is not FSU but rather BC. I don’t see it.
Not if we have a first round QB. And not if the staff is all we’re told it is.
Again, spit happens. And if Ponder goes down. Or Hudson. Etc. well, I can excuse that. But I see no VALID reason to believe that FSU shouldn’t be the favorite to win the division. Now, winning the title game? That’s another animal.
I'll put pressure on them to do what they should do.
It appears to me, that Bud doesn’t want the pressure of expecting to win the division. Why? I couldn’t say. But again, it certainly appears as if he believes the team to beat in the division is not FSU but rather BC. I don’t see it.
And I said that Clemson should be favored to win it last year. http://www.tomahawknation.com/2009/6/4/898182/tomahawk-nation-presents-for
The defensive turnaround you are expecting is unrealistic, either because you’re not grasping how bad the defense was last year, or because you don’t understand that things do not turn around overnight.
The Oklahoma situation
John Blake was a terrible coach, but the one thing he did do was bring in a very good recruiting class in his final year, like J.T. Thatcher, Josh Norman, Roy Williams and Rocky Calmus.
Stoops arrived at OU at the perfect time.
One important thing to remember is that there was, at the time, conventional wisdom that you can’t throw it on the plains. Big 12 teams were three yards and a cloud of dust.
Bob Stoops, when he went to Oklahoma from the U of Florida, hired Mike Leach as his offensive coordinator. Why? Well as defensive coordinator with Florida, Stoops said that they only team that had an incommensurate level of success against them was Kentucky. Stoops noted that UF’s talent level was far superior, yet stopping Kentucky was maddening for Stoops. So Stoops said: I want that.— Chris Brown 2009
-
OU had a few year jump on the rest of the league because they had no idea how to defend it. It seems crazy now because the entire Big12 chucks it all over the yard.
Additionally, OU’s rivals were not in great shape. Texas was losing 4 games a year against a pathetic schedule. Nebraska was on the way down (though they did play for the championship a few years after stoops took over).
Contrast that to UF, which unlike Texas, capitalized on FSU being down in recruiting, etc.
In 2000, Nebraska was ranked number one when they played OU
And in 2001, they played UM for the national title.
Agreed that Blake was a horrible coach. He’s now the DL coach for UNC, so we get to see what he’s made of Marvin Austin.
But OU wasn’t this massively talented bunch when they beat us in the Orange Bowl. Again, they really didn’t have any players that FSU would have traded for, head to head, I don’t think.
And Nebraska was already on the way down.
Blake is a great recruiter and OU had a lot of talent he brought in in his final year(s).
I’d have to look at the rosters to compare our OB team to theirs.
Arrived at the perfect time
The same can be said for urban meyer at uf. Zook was a buffer between the “legend” Steve Spurrier and meyer; Zook brought in some great recruiting classes; FSU and UM were down; etc.
urban reached uf at the perfect time for success.
Question
A lot has been made (and rightly so) about Jimbo’s changes to the support staff, particularly the nutritionists. Does anyone know what the other ACC programs have been doing in the past – do many of them have nutritionists already or is that something that mainly the “big boys” have?
I know we’re playing catch-up in regards to USC, uf, Bama, etc., but have our ACC opponents also had this edge on us (or can we expect them to adopt the model rather quickly now that we have)? Thanks in advance for any info…
I can't answer your question
But I can be impressed by not using caps for uf. I, too, shall refrain from giving them proper noun status. Thank you I13.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
LOL
Yeah, I started doing that pretty recently. I don’t capitalize uf OR urban meyer, heh heh.
meyer tries to demean FSU a bit by referring to us as “the school out west” (unoriginal, mimicking of OSU fans calling Michigan The School Up North) – so, I’ve decided to diss them in a very minor way by withholding capital letters.
Well that was a butt kicking....
almost feel sorry for the author… almost.
This line was so strange to me: " It could turn out to be a mistake that haunts both parties long after Bowden’s national championships fade from public memory."
I was at FSU from ‘97-’00 so I was there for the last NC, along with the two other NC games that they lost… Those games have damn near faded from my memory given the results of the last 10 years so I’m betting they’ve certainly faded from the public memory already.
The defense gets play books now… that alone should earn Coach Fisher a contract extension…
Caulton Tudor...you just got PWNED.
He will never know what gr8 pwnage truly is, but then again he probably doesn’t understand new media and will be in total shock when it takes away his dinosaur media (aka…newspaper) job.
Then again, maybe he will be retired when that happens.
Also, being from NC myself I get a good laugh from a grown man being named Caulton… not Carlton, but CAULTON. Ha ha ha! You know his momma called him Cawlton.
While I agree with most of Bud's counterpoints to this fluff piece, Tudor makes a valid point in that
Fisher’s fate will be among the closely watched and discussed college football topics this season and beyond.
Unfortunately, that scrutiny will come from writers and analyst who have an outsiders perspective and who lack a true understanding of the events that have transpired for the past 8 years, and really don’t have a clue to the extent of the damage done and the stagnant position taken by the previous coaching staff which led to our irrelevance in the CFB world.
Even more unfortunate, some of the scrutiny will also come from our own fellow Noles who will never accept the fact that the time for Bobby’s resignation was a couple of years past due, and will always believe that Bowden was treated unfairly when he was given his ultimatum, which fortunately for us, his ego did not allow him to accept.
That is why whenever I am presented the opportunity, I will always debate with anyone who states that Bobby was forced out. I will counter that he RESIGNED when faced with a stripped down Head Coach position, which he declined, and again which was the best possible outcome of a sorry situation that our program was faced with. However I will not beat my head against a wall trying to make these “fans” understand my POV, because it simply isn’t worth my time or effort.
Lastly, I REC coonhound’s post above where he argues that what makes a legend is his whole entire body of work (paraphrased).
Bobby Bowden is certainly a legend, with no other qualifications. Same for Mickey Andrews. There is no need to qualify that by saying, "…but the game passed them by and they sucked in their final years."
That is the only exception I have with this rebuttal to this so called “article” by Tudor, being that Bud’s POV is that Fisher was not replacing a legend due to the last few “lost” years. But this is not point I wish to debate, because we are all entitled to our own opinions as to whether or not this was the case, and not really an issue in the grand scheme of things. At this point, I just want to keep moving forward, without rehashing the past.
But make no mistake about it, our very own Bowdenista’s and uninformed fans and Boosters will unfairly have Fisher on the hot seat for the immediate future. This is unfortunate and I know most of us are hoping Jimbo has our Noles coming out on a roll, and our W/L record improves yearly, so that we can slowly but surely shut done these idiots once and for all.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
by FrankDNole on Apr 26, 2010 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
No Frank
It will be fair for people to watch closely and expect things to improve quickly under Fisher, otherwise that shoots down the whole point in not keeping Bowden another year.
Next years win total should not be used as a litmus test to guage whether FSU was prudent in forcing out Bowden
Anyone who subscribes to that line of thinking is an A-HOLE!!! One thing that would have settled all of these mini debates is if Jimbo was given the keys much earlier. It pains me to think about where the program would possibly be right now had that taken place
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 26, 2010 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Jimbo is basically tearing down and having to rebuild our program from scratch.
Very little of the practices and procedures from the prior regime are still in place. I know I don’t have to give examples of what I mean, since you and most others reading this appear to be a informed Noles.
Therefore putting Fisher on a short term hot seat, IMO, is unfair. While we have not had a losing season in 34 years(?) [discounting the seasons with vacated wins], three 7-6 seasons in 4 years justifies not putting our new coach immediately into the pressure cooker, even though we are FSU and we expect immediate results. Nevertheless, I am confident our W/L record will start improving immediately and this will not even be an issue.
We all want FSU to improve quickly under Fisher and it is perfectly fine for people to “watch our program closely” (I know I will be), however that has absolutely nothing to do with Bowden’s resignation and whether or not he should have been allowed one more year. I think most people know that it was past due, and there are signs that even the Bowdenites are starting to recognize Jimbo’s changes as positive, as they view all these changes through their stained-glass Garnet and Gold spectacles.
Anyone who doesn’t agree that after only 4 months we are already an improved program, that it appears we are running on all cylinders, that our coaching and support staff has been tremendously upgraded, and that the effects of the dysfunction that have festered in our once program are starting to dissipate, are not being honest with themselves.
I am willing to give Jimbo 4-5 years to make us a relevant and consistent top 5 team (possibly a NC contender) before I start questioning whether he was the right choice for the job. Regardless of whether he turns out to be the answer or not, the “whole point in not keeping Bowden another year” is moot.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
One more year was not going to kill the program
Its not like it was teetering on non-existence other than in the eyes of some impatient fans who were only expecting more because of Bowden’s previous success.
Thought I think it is fair Fisher or any coach get about 4 years, these days coaches do not get what I consider fair…unless they coach Colorado where they have no money to change things haha!
Saban, Stoops, Meyers, etc have turned teams around so quickly that it is becoming an expectation.
As for changes, last year there was an article about how FSU changed its practice and tempos. There are similar articles every year to get fans hyped.
What would have been the point in stagnating in our own awfulness for another year?
True change comes from the top. Why would we want to spend another year with an arm tied behind our back? Plus, our recruiting was AWFUL until he left.
>>---l>
Not kill the program
But it woulda made me lose my stomach.
While you're entitled to your opinion, I won't allow myself to get dragged into this debate any further, others can if they care to.
However, I will end my comments with,
One more year was not going to kill the program
Correct, our program will never die, but one more year would have set us back another 2-3 years from where we are now.
Also, if you really believe that the changes Fisher has made so far are just PR or coachspeak as you implied,
As for changes, last year there was an article about how FSU changed its practice and tempos. There are similar articles every year to get fans hyped.
I am just speechless.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
You guys blow some things out of proportion
Set it back another 2-3 years?
Okay, so the point was made that both Urban Meyers and Bob Stoops walked into programs still loaded with talent.
What about Nebraska though? The fact they have improved their record is not so impressive to me, but the fact that their defense, which was about as bad in Callahan’s last year as FSU was this past year, was now one of the best. The fact that the defense proved it not just against some of their weak opponents, but against some good opponents like Texas and Arizona.
If people say anyone can come in and do what Bowden did in the past due to the talent in Florida, then they should also believe things can turn around quickly at FSU as well due to the talent in the state.
Things are not going to turn instantly, but they will get going faster than the four years some are saying. Even if Bowden had stayed another year, it would not take long to turn things around. It is college football, not quantum physics.
I disagree
You need to read the article on front page about what it takes to get to championship level. We’re not in the situation of the programs you mentioned. This isn’t a team loaded with talent and a monopoly on Florida’s recruits. Why did Nebraska improve so much on defense? They brought in a great defensive HEAD coach. Real change happens at the top. Bowden staying would have tempered the amount of change that could happen, and there was no reason that he should be allowed to hamstring this program anymore.
>>---l>
He was killing the program exponentially every year he was here
Recruiting was 4oth the day he retired.
Nebraska had Suh (#2 overall pick) and has 2 first rounders next year in Awakuamura and Crick. To say Nebraska did not have defensive talent is incorrect, and they still only improved to 73rd in his first year.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
It did not appear Nebraska had talent
So who is to say FSU does not have hidden gems that Stoops will turn around as Pelini did at Nebraska?
Oh, and the fact Nebraska went from 73 to so high in one year shows it does not have to be a tedious process..you proved my point!
You misunderstood
Oh, and the fact Nebraska went from 73 to so high in one year shows it does not have to be a tedious process..you proved my point!
They went TO 73rd in the first year. I’m sure we’ll make substantial improvements in the 2nd year and if we manage to snag a dominant genetic freak like Suh (get lucky) we could be top 5.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 29, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd like to introduce Tudor to an idea
It’s called a “clear line of thinking” and I believe it could help him greatly.
Outside of Bud’s surgical dismantling of this article, there were a couple of things that stood out to me as completely contradictory, and borderline nonsensical.
In one breath he tells us that Jimbo is in the wrong place at the wrong time. Which, in essence, is a gross generalization that everything is going to work against him. Why not try something like, “Fisher finds himself in the unenviable position of creating a new dynamic, a new era at one of the most established programs not only in college football’s current landscape, but also in it’s lore. A program who’s inclusion in that lore has waned as of late.” Because something like lends credence to what he is (in a wholly ineffective manner) trying to say. But no, we are left to understand that Fisher is in a black hole in Tallahassee; the worst place at the worst time.
Even better is that, not more than one sentence later, we are told Jimbo is in that horrid place with the right team.
What are you trying to say, Caulton? That Jimbo is stuck with a team that will facilitate the inevitable doom that he has inherited? Or does he have a group strong enough to withstand the wrong place and time and come out with honor? You’re ambiguity has us on the edge of our seats!
But wait, Tudor has answered this question!
By almost any definition directly related to personnel, depth, talent or scheduling, Fisher’s first Seminole team is better equipped to win big than any FSU team since at least 2004 and possibly 2001.
I get it, so Jimbo has a team with capable talent, a plethora of depth, and such a favorable schedule that, with their powers combined Captain Planet style (if Tudor can live in a fantasy world, so can I), they can surpass the 2001 squad.
Wow. With being surrounded by such a splendid environment, Jimbo really is in the wrong place at the wrong time. I mean who would want to follow up a decade of futility with the opportunity to be instantly relevant on the national stage again? Because that is what Tudor is trying to sell.
One on hand, Jimbo is in near dire straits. On the other, he’s in a fantastic position to rise like a phoenix and point the way Shangri-La through his power and majesty. All purple prose and hyperbole aside, I find it hard to take any reporter seriously when their article reads like a transcript of a Reading Rainbow book report. It’s one thing to try to make a point, and another to dance around it with gross generalizations and matter-of-fact opinions that bare very little weight with the topic.
I hope if someone else tackles this subject they do it with logic and clarity. And, you know, some semblance of journalistic ability.
Bring back Jeff Bowden...as a pińata.
by TheNole9Yards on Apr 26, 2010 1:16 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
Something that no one outside our ranks will understand
is that there is no precedent for the FSU situation from which to draw comparisons.
Bobby is a legend, but a large part of that was the situation he found himself in at FSU— not his brilliant X&O mind. He’s no better coach than Tommy, Terry, and probably Jeff— except he has a presonality. I will always wonder what his tenure would have been if uf and miami had not given us a decade of favors.
Each of the legendary coaches you mentioned were students of the game who put in good teaching and process for their times. Bowden simply did not undertand the X&O’s nor the process required to win today—nor did the pedestrian buddies with which Bowden surrounded himself.
Fisher is on a completely different level. Most of the coaches you listed were followed by yeoman coaches who were nothing special and previously had achieved little. Fisher is just the opposite.
Moreover, the coaching on the D side under our legend was not sliding— it was horrendous, nonexistant. The new staff is a tremendous improvement over the former in every respect— again, something that the successors to other “legends” were not able to enjoy.
Yes, legends are usually replaced with yeoman stand-ins who fail to turn things around. But Fisher had already rennovated part of the team over the last 3 years, and the D has already improved, from recruiting to teaching. In fact, as we know, every process in the program has been examined and improved.
Over the next couple of years, a lot of people will be surprised with FSU’s resurgance and will assume Fisher has broken the pattern. But those of us close to the program will know, he was never in it.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Apr 26, 2010 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
That is a little harsh on Bowden from 1979-2000. The bowl wins say he was doing something right – even if you are going to nit pick over the UF and UM wins
Sure, but you see with Meyer right now what happens when the state's other two programs just screw around or lose scholarships to probation
or you could say that Meyer isn't that great of a coach because he is just benefiting from UM and FSU being down and destorying themselves.
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
Except
That he has had great results EVERYWHERE he’s been. That type of consistency deserves some credit. Perhaps he leaned a lot on some long-time assistants. We’ll see how the next few years pan out, since he’s hired several new coaches the last couple years. But I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt for now – he’s earned that. (Of course, he’s also earned lifelong ridicule for his behavior, so feel free to take some pot shots at urbie!)
All great coaches rely on hiring great assistants
That was one of the best things about Bobby Bowden often times (some exceptions this decade..though he did bring in Fisher, Dawsey and Trickett) and Kevin Steele, who some argue was not so good and others say was really good…anyways that is here nor there..
Pete Carroll, Steve Spurrier, etc. That is part of being a winning head coach is good assistants.
I'll give you up until about 1981 when George Henashaw was here.
After that, our bowl record was due to the fact that were often matched up against less talented teams, because we had choked against miami and were not playing in the NC game. Like most of the wins during “the dynasty”, those wins were not due to X&O brilliance but depth.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Apr 26, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Fiesta
Maybe in his later years, but how old are you and how closely have YOU followed college football?
Bobby was not always a CEO style coach, or just some guy with a personality. He used to be more hands on, used to surround himself with good coaching talent and he used to be considered a good offensive mind. Bobby was not only a student of the game, but of military history and strategy. I recommend you read, “The Bowden Way.” If he himself had kept following what he laid out in it, the team would not have slid as much. I will readily admit he lost track of his own rules of thumb. I think age will do that to most anyone. Had Jim Gladden stayed around he would have been better than Jody Allen, but with his age I imagine Gladden would have not been able to keep up with the latest trends and plain out just not been physically capable of demonstrating on the field what to do.
He was pretty creative for a period of time on offense
and he made a great hire in Mickey Andrews.
I will always fault him for the way he managed the big games (we didn’t need to be kicking wide rights) and for his reputation as a riverboat gambler, he often failed to take the favorable gambles but foolishly tried for longshots.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Let's just say I've followed FSU "closely" since 1985...
when I attended law school, after some time off.
I say that just to dynamite your apparent assumption that only young pups don’t worship Bowden’s greatness in the past. I saw the emperor’s birthday suit by the early 90’s. Bud’s comments below about Bowden taking foolish gambles is spot on. For example, did you happen to see the 1990 Auburn game? Having played poorly and without discipline (a Bowden hallmark), not to mention lack of adjustments and poor scheme, Bowden tried to “recapture momentum” with a fumblerooski— right when when everybody inside and outside the stadium was expecting it. The DT had only to fall on the ball to seal the deal. I’ve been around, and my opinion is not recent.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Apr 27, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I think this could be applied to a few of our former coaches as well, including Bobby
but with his age I imagine Gladden would have not been able to keep up with the latest trends and plain out just not been physically capable of demonstrating on the field what to do
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
Frank, that is what I am saying
Of course with age their abilities diminish. For those that argue that Bowden never was good is just ludicrous in my mind. Bobby Bowden and Bobby Cox, some will say, both should have won more titles, but only a small percent of overall people would argue that both were less than great because of how they handled some big situations.
As to Bud, as I pointed out to counter in another thread, if losing big games/titles means someone is too much of a gambler, a choker, what have you then, Bob Stoops, Pete Carrol,etc, etc could be considered those things. Saban would be one for two in national title games if not for some giant fluke in this last one.
Except Bama physically dominated Texas and the Horns had some breaks as well.
Bama played not to lose in the second half and it showed.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 28, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
We will have to agree to disagree on that game
I think Texas’s D, which looked focused, yet in a wild reckless manner, to start the game, went to very bland calls once they knew their offense was not going to be able to take risks on the other side of things.
In the brief bit Colt was in, Texas moved the ball with ease, including running the ball, due to the threat of the pass. Once that was gone and that QB with almost no experience (less than the Rooster) had to play, of course Bama could load the box and look dominant.
The constant 3 and outs by the UT offense most of the game kept the UT defense on the field longer than they were used to and that helped allow Bama to wear them out with running plays, but if UT’s regular offense had been in effect UT would have used more clock, allowed the defense to rest more, scored more points likely and thus made Bama not be able to just pound the ball, but try to pass more (which they showed early they could not do that well when needed).
I think Texas’s D, which looked focused, yet in a wild reckless manner, to start the game, went to very bland calls once they knew their offense was not going to be able to take risks on the other side of things.
Huh? if anything they went more aggressive to try and force the issue because they knew their offense couldn’t do much.
Bama ran for almost 300 yards on those guys. Texas got blown off the ball.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
When the team was fired up early on they seemed
easily able to get in the backfield of Bama. I am not saying McCoy being hurt should have stopped that, but they did not seem to blitz the same, and I am sure the mental deflation got in the heads of the players (defensive players or not, you know knowing McCoy was hurt had to have affected them).
I also say, again, had Texas had McCoy and done better on offense, it would have definitely kept their defense off the field and thus helped the defense. You mentioned Arizona’s defense looking bad in their bowl game for the exact same reason.
Also
just watching the replay reminded me of something else…all the pass interference Alabama got away with. Two were right in a row, and the replay of the second one, with the official right there, had the announcers biting their tongues from flat out calling it BS.
The game was called very loose on both ends, to be sure.
But I don’t remember McCoy moving the ball much before he was hurt. (26 yards on 5 plays).
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 29, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Bama was up 24-6 at half and the game was over. They played to let Texas run clock and keep everything in front of them.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 29, 2010 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Whatever Jimbo accomplishes this season
Will be directly a result of his own recruiting and hiring of assistants when he was OC. There would certainly be no logical room for optimism if the current staff had been left to run the show the last three years. This is something that seems to fly over the heads of various so called sports writers. This kind of pap is another reason among many as to why newspapers are falling on hard times. Why would anybody pay money to read this kind of tripe.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis
Ann say hello to the grand kids
Good writeup but
mentioning our tough schedule and trying to qualify us losing next year isn’t a sound football argument. I’m not a fan of this ‘our schedule is hard, expecting to win is illogical!’ theme tomahawk nation is running with as of late. I mean I understand a brutal schedule is tough to get through but IMO thats what differentiates the Gators from the Noles right now. They win regardless of who they play, we don’t. I realize your attitudes don’t reflect that of the actual team’s and you’re downplaying success for ‘reasonable expectations’ purposes but throughout the history of competition, participants/leaders/fans of winning teams always have the same attitude: losing is unacceptable. Period. UF? We should expect to win (you don’t lose to UF 7 years in a row, that should be unacceptable regardless of situation). OU? We should expect to win (who took our last National Title away from us?). If anyone says ‘oh thats unreasonable’, the last I checked ‘fan’ was short for ‘fanatic’ and competitive fanatics aren’t known to settle on any reason involving losing; thats called an excuse. When Jimbo says ‘I think we can get this turned around rather quickly’ he doesn’t mean in 4 years, he means within 2. He knows what he has, he has them ‘buying in’/getting the right guys recruited, etc. All I’m saying is I’m expecting a great year next season and any Nole fan who doesn’t or is fine with losing to UF/OU is more a statistician, less a fan IMO
We should expect to beat OU because they beat us for the National Title in 2001?
The Gators win in many cases BECAUSE of who they play.
I don't think you understand the difference between expect and hope.
by MattDNole on Apr 26, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
the former is based on the intellect, the latter on the heart.
nm
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Apr 26, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
There are blind homer fans and then there are analytical fans
Most around here prefer to be the latter. Personally, I like to understand what’s going on with the team and break down the process of winning. It’s not for everybody.
>>---l>
I mean I understand a brutal schedule is tough to get through but IMO thats what differentiates the Gators from the Noles right now. They win regardless of who they play, we don’t
Except their schedule was 54th last year. Ours was 6th. The teams playing those top 10 schedules just don’t win it.
This rah-rah stuff sounds good in theory but the practical results just show it to be wrong. Of course everyone wants and expects to win.
But Bud, what about what the homer SEC fans say?
No matter what I say to them, they will just say despite OOC games, UF had it worse because the so mightly SEC.
Does UF play itself?
Did it schedule Alabama?
I’m not afraid to call out the SEC. Tell them their conference is top heavy and that Bama and Florida don’t face themselves.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Have you dealth with SEC fans before?
They still believe their midlevel teams can beat our top teams (GT letting UGA beat them and Clemson letting Carolina beat them last year helps them boast such *)
I live in SEC country.
Tell them we beat them the year before. Nice streak of one, eh?
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 28, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
We are obviously both FSU fans, but I want to point out that Fisher’s take on coaching is the exact opposite of your point. No FSU fan would be in their right mind to believe that losing is acceptable. However, there is a level of realism that needs to be intertwined with your view. If we lose to OU and uf (this caps thing should really become a trend) this year, would your solution be to say “losing is unacceptable, fire Fisher”? I think not. Fisher’s motto is process, not results. In other words, if you implement the process correctly, the results will follow.
I think our goal as a program should be to become nationally relevant for decades to come, not just for one season. This is what focusing on the process will bring. Teams that hire/fire with the mentality of “losing is unacceptable” are placing themselves at a disadvantage. While we should always take a cue from Eddie Murphy and ask “what have you done for me lately?,” we also need to be asking ourselves if we have the right coach going forward into the future, and I think we all can agree that we do, regardless of the results of this season.
I won’t go into the scheduling issue that other posters have cited. That point is enough in itself, but I just want to point out that one can be a “fan” and still have reasonable expectations. In fact, such expectations are essential to making smart staff decisions.
I would also like to point out that I wish the university and fans had more of a “losing is unacceptable” mentality over the last decade with Bowden. However, I think application of your principle should have been “the process you are currently using is unacceptable,” not just “losing is unacceptable.”
There are plenty of sites full of stuff like this
UF? We should expect to win (you don’t lose to UF 7 years in a row, that should be unacceptable regardless of situation). OU? We should expect to win (who took our last National Title away from us?). If anyone says ‘oh thats unreasonable’, the last I checked ‘fan’ was short for ‘fanatic’ and competitive fanatics aren’t known to settle on any reason involving losing; thats called an excuse. When Jimbo says ‘I think we can get this turned around rather quickly’ he doesn’t mean in 4 years, he means within 2. He knows what he has, he has them ‘buying in’/getting the right guys recruited, etc. All I’m saying is I’m expecting a great year next season and any Nole fan who doesn’t or is fine with losing to UF/OU is more a statistician, less a fan IMO
And they don’t get any hits or membership.
There is a difference between wanting to win and expecting to win.
You’re less of a fan if you don’t want to win or don’t root for them to win.
Agreed
I doubt that anyone on this site doesn’t want or root for us to win OU and uf. There is just a level of rationality that TN has as well. Similarly, I also doubt that Fisher instills the idea that losing is acceptable in the players. While I’m sure he would sugar coat a loss after-the-fact, I bet the coaches are doing everything they can to place FSU in the best position possible to win.
Losing is not acceptable
I agree. But I am willing to give Fisher a bit of a leash. Ideally, we will not have another 7-6 (or worse) season, but even if we do I will be looking at other things (partly due to where we’re coming from and our schedule’s difficulty) – are we noticeably improving in ways that will likely lead to positive results in 2011 and after? If so, I won’t be too upset by another 7-6 (it’s the cost of waiting so long to act properly).
I think Fisher will build us into a team that can meet and beat any team we might come across, but I don’t expect it this year. I also don’t think we’ll be 7-6 this year (but I’m not holding my breath for more than 9 wins either).
By all means cheer for FSU to win every game. Go to the games and make some noise. Donate money. Do your part. But don’t “expect” that Fisher will be able to go 14-0 in his first year so much that you are extra critical just because we lose a game. We don’t have all the tools in place – yet. But we will.
Compare our OOC schedules and results to uf's
They schedule automatic wins. Just look at meyer’s tenure. They play me and you while FSU is out in Provo, Norman, and Boulder. You can only expect college kids to get up for 5-6 games not 10-12. There’s a reason Jimbo wants to change our schedule. Our schedule is stupid.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but since the media builds up the SEC hype
Florida can lose one or two game and still make a national title game.
FSU, the next couple of years would likely have to go undefeated to make a national title. If they build up a good rep and start off ranked near the top in one or two years, then they might, and it is a big might, be able to lose a game and get a title shot.
Just remember what loses did to USC though. They were well covered in the media, in a conference that got more respect than the ACC lately, but since it was not the SEC or Big 12, one loss killed them.
Exactly right
another area in which we’re likely fighting a losing battle.
Shouldn’t we play to maximize the results within our given situation?
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
By some chance FSU loses an ACC game though
Having a couple of good OOC games on the schedule might be what they need to overcome.
Having cupcakes, and ACC means you better not slip up.
A couple? We won't be a one-loss team with a couple.
Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Apr 28, 2010 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions
USC lost at inopportune times to inferior opponents
You cannot lose to Oregon State, Stanford, and UCLA on the season final weekend and expect to be given breaks. Especially when east coast based media (That doesn’t give a damn about CFB anyway quiet as kept) rips your conference apart every sunday morning despite having fallen asleep prior to it’s games.
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 26, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions
But did they do that because they were getting up for non-conference games?
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I have to wonder if Bobby Butler's kid Bryce
is still happy he traveled 2000 miles to play for a “more stable coaching staff” than at FSU.
Schadenfreude.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Apr 27, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Brice might be passed up by two freshman this year (Prater and Woods)
If he can’t leapfrog Ausberry on the depth chart, he has indeed wasted his time.
by westcoastnolefan on Apr 28, 2010 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions
I consistently post at
www.thebestdamnpoll.com and would like to link this article. Would that be ok?
This is very well done, and I’m amazed how many folks draw conclusions based on cliche’ instead of researching their subjects. I CONSTANTLY see this: “FSU will be horrible next year because their offensive line is garbage and Ponder won’t have time to ….”
I’m amazed at how people still think this is 2007.
A Texan humbles himself before God; there the list ends. - Gen. S. Houston
You're always free to link us up
Please don’t copy more than a paragraph or two of the article this size if you plan to copy any of it.
Who in their right mind thinks the OLine is awful? Please just stay here and forget wherever you’re posting.
The guys at
thebestdamnpoll don’t. (not the mods) I’m speaking of ill-informed posters in general. I frequent this site more than any other, but like a veriety of information to keep my proverbial “ear to the ground.”
Plus, I LOVE to talk with gators about FSU football (I know, I’m sadistic) and I can’t do that here.
Sometimes I simply need my “college football overall” fix. If I’m not the ambassador for FSU on some of these sites, there wouldn’t be one. FSUTampa and CTSA are the only other Noles over at thebestdamnpoll in a very Gator-centric forum.
A Texan humbles himself before God; there the list ends. - Gen. S. Houston
I don't know where to begin my reply so I'll just post a new comment
I’m a competitive person so expecting to win is the winning attitude, hoping to win is simply what the loser did. I believe the difference between an Alabama now and an Alabama 2 years ago is that when they walk into a game, they KNOW they will win, not just hope it happens. Their process and time spent in preparation added to their ability to out perform opponents means that their mentality is simple: they will obliterate you on that field and there is not a thing even God’s second son Tim Tebow can do to stop it. The only problem I have with saying ‘well logically we’ll lose a few games next year’ is that although true, not walking into every game prepared to see FSU blow the other team out takes away from being a fan IMO. I’m not saying ‘oh if we don’t win a NC in 2 years Fisher is a bust!’ since that is illogical for any fan, I’m only saying that to not at the beginning of every season believe that FSU can do it is just as foolish. I understand most of you guys are trying to utilize logic to analyze FSU football and I respect that, I just never liked the people who’ll say ‘Oh there’s no way we beat Florida next week’ since stats/logic would state we shouldn’t
I think it important
to remember, speaking of Bama, that the Noles beat them two years ago … and look how far they’ve come.
A Texan humbles himself before God; there the list ends. - Gen. S. Houston
I believe the difference between an Alabama now and an Alabama 2 years ago is that when they walk into a game, they KNOW they will win, not just hope it happens
You seem to think that they win because they believe that and not because it is accurate. Alabama believes that because of what they have done and they play well because of what they do, not because they believe that.
The only problem I have with saying ‘well logically we’ll lose a few games next year’ is that although true, not walking into every game prepared to see FSU blow the other team out takes away from being a fan IMO.
Prepared? What do you have to be prepared for?
I said we could beat UF and gave us a 4% chance to do so last year. This year, a 35% chance, roughly.
There are some who are not sure FSU won't be favored by the Florida game
FSU does and will have a better offense than UF, better quarterback, better offensive line and better running backs and receivers.
The game will be in Doak and Uf will have a new quarterback as well as newcomers in many positions. They won’t have as much experience.
FSU has most certainly a new defensive scheme to put in but it should know the ropes by season’s end. I say a 50-50 chance anyway.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis
Ann say hello to the grand kids
Nobody who I trust or respect, at this point
I know some guys who play for a living and at this point they would scoff at that.
But
uf’s new starters will have just as much time to adjust as our defense will to our new scheme. They were too far ahead for me to predict that we’ll beat them until I see both teams perform on the field.
And UF's new starters have had at least 1 and probably 2 or 3 full seasons in their scheme
They’ve practiced it every day. Internalized its nuances. Etc.
Ours have not.
“Their process and time spent in preparation added to their ability to out perform opponents” aka coaching and recruiting. I clearly stated why they believe they’ll win in my response
Believe me, I want the players to fully believe we'll win
But it’s like you’re saying that what we analyze and predict has a bearing on that.
>>---l>
Another difference in 07 Bama and the current edition is they are loaded now.
Saban built a championship team the smart way: he scheduled well and recruited better.
Everyone here will cheer for FSU to win but to think we’re the best team in the country when we’re obviously not seems foolish to me. The team isn’t ready yet. I wish they were and I give everything I can to the cause but I don’t like lying to myself. That’s the second sign of insanity.
"Remember, what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Except for Herpes. That s#!t will come back with you."
by Jamil Dawson on Apr 26, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I was simply commenting on the timeline ...
it’s important to keep it in mind. Especially when the present head coach is a protege’ of Saban’s.
A Texan humbles himself before God; there the list ends. - Gen. S. Houston
Jay, do you want to be our NFL draft guy?
You mentioned you track that stuff.
What do you think of this very preliminary top 64
1) QB Jake Locker, Washington
2) OT Gabe Carimi, Wisconsin
3) WR A.J. Green, Georgia
6) DE Adrian Clayborn, Iowa
9) QB Andrew Luck, Stanford
13) DT Allen Bailey, Miami
8) DE Greg Romeus, Pittsburgh
10) CB Patrick Patterson, LSU
5) SS DeAndre McDaniel, Clemson
18) DE Robert Quinn, North Carolina
12) QB Christian Ponder, Florida State
7) CB Ras-I Dowling, Virginia
4) FS Rahim Moore, UCLA
14) OLB Bruce Carter, North Carolina
15) QB Ryan Mallett, Arkansas
16) WR Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh
27) WR Julio Jones, Alabama
21) DT Marvin Austin, North Carolina
50) MLB Don’ta Hightower, Alabama
17) OLB Von Miller, Texas A&M
24) WR Michael Floyd, Notre Dame
11) RB Ryan Williams, Virginia Tech
19) OT Joseph Barksdale, LSU
20) OT Nate Solder, Colorado
22) FS Deunta Williams, North Carolina
23) OLB Travis Lewis, Oklahoma
25) DE Cameron Heyward, Ohio State
26) DT Jared Crick, Nebraska
34) CB Aaron Williams, Texas
29) CB Brandon Harris, Miami
30) MLB Greg Jones, Michigan State
43) DE Marcel Dareus, Alabama
31) RB Mark Ingram, Alabama
38) OG/OC Stefen Wisniewski, Penn State
28) CB Prince Amukamara, Nebraska
33) TE Kyle Rudolph, Notre Dame
35) CB Curtis Brown, Texas
36) DT Jerrell Powe, Mississippi
46) OC Kristofer O’Dowd, USC
47) OG Rodney Hudson, Florida State
32) OG Mike Pouncey, Florida
39) MLB Quan Sturdivant, North Carolina
40) QB Pat Devlin, Delaware
41) WR Terrance Tolliver, LSU
42) DE Nick Perry, USC
44) QB Nick Foles, Arizona
45) DT Jurrell Casey, USC
48) DE DaQuan Bowers, Clemson
55) OT Anthony Castonzo, Boston College
51) DT Jerel Worthy, Michigan State
53) RB DeMarco Murray, Oklahoma
54) FS Will Hill, Florida
56) OG John Moffitt, Wisconsin
57) WR Austin Pettis, Boise State
58) RB Evan Royster, Penn State
59) OG Chris Jacobson, Pittsburgh
60) DT Mike Martin, Michigan
61) FS Quinton Carter, Oklahoma
62) WR Ryan Broyles, Oklahoma
49) OLB Mark Herzlich, Boston College
63) RB Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh
64) CB Rashad Carmichael, Virginia Tech
52) FS Rashad Hall, Clemson
37) CB Janoris Jenkins, Florida
I don’t think we’re the best team in the country yet and don’t think we’ll go undefeated next year or anything, but to rule that out before a season even starts seems even more foolish to me. Football isn’t played on paper and my only point was that writing off losing multiple games cause our schedule is hard months before the season is kind of like preparing excuses before you’ve attempted to do a task. Idk it just doesn’t sit right with me.
Okay
Pretend you are a Duke fan.
What will your (football) team’s record be in 2010?
Well Duke is on the rise (for Duke) and I don’t predict records before the season, hence this whole argument. As a Duke fan I wouldn’t expect to win every game, however, due to the prestige of the football program. As a Nole fan watching us vastly underachieve for 10 years now and watching Saban turn around Bama in 2 years without being ‘head coach in waiting’ beforehand tells me that my ceiling on expectations for FSU should be as high as FSU pushes them and not any lower. Our resources/location/talent level/coaching staff is all too high for us to not improve.
I definitely think
That we will improve. It’s the reason I can’t wait for the season to start!
Prestige doesn't win games, play on the field does
Don’t expect our prestige to win us any games. You think our play on the field will win 12 ballgames?
Saban is the best college coach ever. There has never been anyone as good as him, IMO. If you expect results like he got, you’re going to be sad.
No kidding
Prestige does recruit kids however. Kids go to UF/FSU/USC etc, not Duke/Virginia because of the football prestige of the programs. Duke can’t stand toe to toe with FSU talent wise, and could only overcome that with superior coaching/preparation and FSU playing a horrible, horrible game. Its a different caliber of team.
Obviously
but we are talking about this year, and expecting the results you are entertaining against the schedule we face is not only unrealistic, it is absurd.
How does schedule matter
If you just said we need to take it a game at a time? How can you be the best if you haven’t beaten the best? A college playoff would handle this issue better but that an entirely different issue…
Because of the cumulative battle of attrition
A team that will win 80% of the time in each of its games only wins 9 or 10 games.
We’re far less than that.
You need to have the FREE wins to win 10 games. I mean free, like North Texas where you can half-ass your prep even though the coaches are telling you they are good because you know the opponent truly sucks.
We didn’t buy our three free wins. We bought one. Adjust your expectations accordingly.
Yes
And you know uf spends the whole two weeks before they play us preparing for US – they don’t spend any real time on preparing for FIU or whatever cupcake they play the week before they play us. Meanwhile, we need to prepare for a conference game to keep hopes alive for the ACC CG (or bowl eligibility, in some years…).
You're damn right they do and we better start doing that soon
Spetman needs to get on board and cancel that USF game.
And if we can’t afford to buy wins (not 1AA teams for more than one), we need to all adjust our expectations downward or someone here needs to make a lot of cash.
You can't expect Saban results
The guy is an absolute freak
EJ's response to his own role in 2010 Offense: "You still haven't seen what all (Ponder) can do."
Here's why it's not foolish, but rather appropriate
If we go 9-3 next year, the appropriate reaction based on new schemes and where this team is at and where it came from should be elation. 8-4 should show that the team is on the right track.
But if you seriously entertain the possibility that FSU could do undefeated, you diminish it’s relatively sizable potential accomplishments.
This idea that football isn’t played on paper is a silly sports cliche. FSU plays many teams that are as good or better than it is.
If this was the NFL, the schedule argument would make less sense. But schedule is everything in college football because we’re not all running the same race but we are expecting or entertaining the idea that we can achieve the same results despite running different races.
by Bud Elliott on Apr 26, 2010 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
9-3 would be great if I felt we will continue to improve
And I don’t think it diminishes the accomplishments at all, I just don’t think we can start appreciating 3 losses before the season is played. Football isn’t played on paper, its not a cliche its a fact. Boise State isn’t supposed to beat an Oklahoma and Utah isn’t supposed to take out Alabama. This is college football, determining wins/losses isn’t based so much on who you play but how you play them
Again, I wouldn't want the players thinking as we do
But why is it wrong for us to be realistic in our expectations?
>>---l>
Boise State only has to play one game
give them a schedule where they face the cumulative battle of attrition (like ours) and they aren’t there because they lose 4 or 5 games.
It is ALL about how many games you play in which you have a realistic opportunity to lose. It is about who you play not how you play them.
I would argue
That early in the Lost Decade one of our main problems was that the players (and coaches?) EXPECTED to win. We didn’t prepare enough, we didn’t play with enough heart. I can’t tell you how many times I looked at our sidelines and thought, “Why doesn’t someone go over there and start slapping players or something? We need to get mad and fired up instead of passively looking on and wondering why the scoreboard doesn’t read 70-7 yet.”
I want us to get to the point where we can reasonably feel like we are fully prepared, very talented, and can/will beat anyone – but I don’t want overconfidence to replace preparation. I think a winning attitude comes out in practice, and not just when you walk onto the field.
Thats different
That’s expecting to have someone give you a win, I’m talking about expecting to go out and take a win. Huge difference. Preparation/talent level both apply to the expectation to take a win, while only prestige and past honors apply to expecting to be given a win.
Okay
Yes (I think someone else acknowledged this) – I want the team to have the mentality that they are playing to win. Every game.
But, as a fan, I see several possible/probable stumbling blocks. Rationally, I don’t think we’ll win every game this year. But I darn sure will cheer for that!
It is more important that they think they can win IN every game
They don’t have to think they will go undefeated. They just have to go into every game thinking they will win.
As a fan all you need to is cheer for the ’Noles.
That sums up my thoughts
Rather well. Thanks!
There was already one coach
replacing Bobby “The Legend”. It was Bobby. Damn shame he tarnished his legacy with nepotism and by staying around a game that had passed him by.
you've made it quite clear that this man is an idiot
but i love it when you pour salt in his wounds (probably cerebral)…
Also, “time clock” seems silly. What else would the clock be doing?.
by DownByTheRiverWalkinOnWater on Apr 26, 2010 9:59 PM EDT reply actions
Unfortunately the national perception is that Jimbo Fisher is "following a legend"
I run into it on message boards all the time. It’s become a college football cliche.
The fact is, Bobby Bowden followed his own legend.

Ponder lacks arm strength? Think again.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
The "following the legend" hype
will last until we resume national prominence. Until then it’s and easy story for lazy writers.
Bobby Bowden was not too different people though
So regardless of how well he did his job at the end, he either is or is not a legend, and most say he is a legend.
Great job
Bud-best thing Ive read all year, it completely, gets you off the hook for the racist comments from a couple weeks ago.
Just joking.
by Carryingaspearorrunningfromit on Apr 27, 2010 10:12 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Related to this thread, but off topic
That picture of Jimbo is tripping me out. Is the pen flying out of his hands, is he performing magic? Also, the contrast with the pen makes his finger look effing huge.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole
Look closely
I believe his fore and middle finger are crossed. That’s how he’s holding the pen.

by 



























