Monday Morning Tomahawks 07.20.10: How did Vegas see the 'Noles in previous years?
- Mark Schlabach is an excellent writer for ESPN, and I think he is correct if his evaluation is one of quality, rather than of record:
- Everyone now expects Kyle Parker to turn pro in baseball and not play football. Decision should be announced tomorrow.
- The Boston College guys sit down with the crew from FootballOutsiders, who are quickly becoming the best in the business and in the minds of some have eclipsed Phil Steele. Our interview with them will come soon:
- Jim Young at the ACC Sports Journal breaks down UNC's DT depth in case Marvin Austin is suspended. A friend of mine says McAdoo will not be suspended, but the analysis is spot on other than that.
Brad: What are your expectation for Florida State and first year head coach Jimbo Fisher??
Mark Schlabach (4:02 PM) I think if the defense is better, Noles can win nine or 10 games. Should be very good on offense. Defense has to be much better.
Schlabach needs to take a look at the 'Noles schedule.
BCI: One of BC's strongest Divisional competitors, Florida State, is considered by many to be the preseason favorite to win the Atlantic Division. Yet FO predicts only a 6-6 (5-3) season for the 'Noles in Jimbo Fisher's first season. (You must not want to sell a lot of almanacs ranking FSU so low. Just kidding!) Why such a discrepancy between what FO predicts and pretty much everyone else?Check out the Q&A.
FO: Most people assume that Florida State will undergo an immediate defensive turnaround in 2010 under Jimbo Fisher, and while that is certainly possible, our projections aren't built to account for coaching changes just yet, not until we figure out the best way to approach it. And since the largest portion of our projections comes from recent history … well, recent history hasn't been as kind to Florida State as the past 25 years have. They have recruited well, and that helps them out a bit, but with a brutal schedule (they're projected to go just 1-3 out of conference) and no actual proof that a turnaround is on its way, the FO projections are going to take the conservative route.
Finally, in light of the Vegas lines that came out yesterday (8 wins for the 'Noles with a slight lean to the under) think it is important to take a look at what Vegas pegged FSU for last season.
In 2009, FSU was coming off a bowl win over Wisconsin. People massively overrate bowl results. I find them to be less meaningful than any other game played during the year because teams often have differing motivations. But the public puts a lot of stock in them because it is the public. Anyway, FSU was a top-15 team going into 2009 following that win and the "9-4" season that included two wins over D1-AA teams. Knowing that, people were not happy when Vegas put out this projection:
8 wins +160 Over -200 under (translation: the 'Noles are not very likely to win 8 games. Wagering on the 'Noles to win fewer than 8 games offered only a 50% return on investment.)
But I said "I think this is a good number. I don't see the 'Noles winning more than 8 games this year with their suspect defense and brutal schedule. They could, but it's not likely." I had the 'Noles pegged for 7.3 wins because I didn't think the team was very good. As it turned out, they were even worse than I thought and many in the media who predicted a return to glory for FSU had egg on their faces.
This year, at one book, FSU's number sits at 8 but it looks to be a "true" 8 rather than a disguised 7.5 to trap bettors. At another book, FSU is projected to win 7.5 games, but the shade is to the over! To me, those lines are dead on as I currently project FSU will go 8-4 with a better chance at 7-5 than 9-4. I have this feeling that 'Nole fans will again be disappointed as they again will fail to account for schedule when predicting the season. FSU will improve a lot this year according to everyone around the program. But to measure progress you must remember where this team is improving from: FSU doesn't even have a winning record in the ACC over the last 4 years! FSU has lost 20 games in the last 4 years. It just had the the 7th worst major-conference defense!
Improving to 8 wins after falling to unimaginable depths thanks to Bobby Bowden is a major accomplishment. Perhaps FSU can be in contention for the division in the final week. Or finish the season ranked. Those would be good steps in the first year of rebuilding. It is fine to drink the kool-aid, but only if knowledge and understanding of the schedule and recognition of the starting point are mixed in. Otherwise, 'Nole fans are foolishly setting themselves up for disappointment.
231 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Does 7.3 account for Parker-less Clemson and Austin & Crew-less UNC?
Those two factors combined have got to be worth +0.5 games, if not more
7.3 is for last year
8 is for this year and yes it does account for those two. I would have us finishing 3rd in the division if Clemson had Parker.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Gotcha, 8 wins makes more sense - don't know why I confused those #'s.
And agree with FrankD below, this at least should be MMT: Tuesday Edition.
MMT's is a catch-all, if you will, and not day specific, despite the name.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
I think its a play on Monday Morning Quarterback
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
It's not that simple. Most likely to win between 7 and 9.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
We had some pure luck with some of the games last year (minus Ponder getting hurt in the Clemson game)
If that lucks runs over to this season, then I would say 9 wins. But 8 wins sounds most likely.
"FEAR is just the Opening ACT!!!" Coach Coley
Which games?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Jax State was awful.
How close were we to losing that? Genuine question, not rhetorical, cause I’ve blocked the memory. But we were very very close to losing and should’ve.
3 fumbles to 1 didn't help our cause.
It shouldn’t even have been that close, but considering adverse weather conditions, this is a viable explanation to me, as to how a mediocre team (FSU) might stumble against an elite lower division team. (Remember that Jax State had LSU’s top offensive player and one of Florida’s best defensive players on their squad last year.)
Bigger point being that we had about 2 days of prep
Played on a Monday against UM, rained all week and we don’t have an indoor place to practice.
>>---l>
But how were we "lucky" to win it?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Given that we were less than a minute away from losing it, I'd say we were lucky to wallk away with the W.
Whatever the reasons were for the position we were in with one minute to go, we were losing. We happened to score a TD (missed the XP), and then get another quick D TD (missed XP) to make it look… uh… reasonable? Given the conditions, though, we could’ve easily fumbled on that last 9-play scoring drive (heck we would do it enough a couple weeks later against USF, in better weather).
One could argue that unlucky/unfortunate conditions had led to our position with a minute to go, but that doesn’t mean we weren’t lucky that things came together in the last couple minutes.
I don't think putting a good final few minutes together is "luck".
Perrilloux fumbling the ball while cocking his arm back to pass – withOUT being hit – and FSU recovering it deep inside JSU territory would be luck. But making plays is not luck.
I don’t recall much “luck” actually happening last year. I understand that “We were lucky to win” is just a saying, but I was under the impression that NOLE09JON meant the type of luck I described as opposed to a general sense of relief type luck.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Monday Morning Tomahawks? Now you're just f#cking with us.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
1-3 OOC?
I wonder what they’re seeing out of BYU that projects them over us in Tallahassee. Just the fact that it’s a week after Oklahoma?
Remember what happened last season
After we went halfway across the country to play an OOC game, and then returned home to play another OOC game on the eve of conference play beginning?
>>---l>
The fact that BYU has been the better team over the last 2, 3, 4 years
Can’t look solely at last year’s game.
Though I admit I do have FSU at a win probability of 82% there.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
I don't understand this statement.
You argue not to base expectations for the BYU game on last year but defend FO by stating they look at the last 2-4 years.
Then say you have FSU as a heavy favorite.
I agree we beat BYU heavily but got confused by your reasoning here.
I am saying they are smarter than me and aren't going to use one game to judge a program
Heck, why not judge us off USF or Jax State?
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Accidentally hit enter
But was gonna say we are playing nearly the same team as last year minus some of their best offensive weapons. Even accounting for a slight improvement in defense, their offensive performance has to slip right?
by Ryan Cardone on Jul 20, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Let me clarify my understanding of your stance above:
You are explaining their predictions but don’t necessarily agree with them, as it pertains to FSU.
You feel that we beat BYU pretty handily.
Pretty much
I think our fans are going to struggle with these predictions because we might have a legit argument for outperforming the projection (every team THINKS they have one).
Brian said the 5 teams they are most uncomfortable with the projections are
Clemson, Washington, FSU, Michigan
and Tennessee
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
I understand that.
My hangup is I see NO WAY we don’t run over BYU. I think we win with a similar score to last year based on their loses offensively.
BYU played a really poor game last year and we played a great one
I do not think we could duplicate that performance if we tried. Just a perfect set of factors aligning.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed.
BYU last year was no where close to the blowout many of our fans perceive. We lucked out with an early turnover on a BYU scoring drive, and a PI pick-6.
Either of those don’t happen/get called back and we are in another close shootout.
Results vs process at its finest.
BYU had 9YPP against us last year!
Are these BYU and FSU teams different? Yes
However, was last year’s performance duplicated in any other game (+5 TO yet the team avg. 9YPP)? Doubtful
While the game was awesome, looking behind the final score showed that was truly a lightning in a bottle type game.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I see Hall and our lack of defense as BYU's advantages from last year.
Both of those advantages are gone.
We roll ’em legitimately this year.
Most people forget 2 important things about last years game:
1. BYU had a +5 Turnover Margin.
2. FSU had only 40 more total yards than BYU.
I do think we will win this year b/c the loss of Hall and Unga and it’s a home game, but BYU won’t have a +5 Turnover Margin this year.
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
The +5 is why I clarify "*legitimately* this year"
We will beat them just as soundly this year, without the gifts.
I also think if environment actually plays any factor, Florida heat + humidity in mid-September >>>>>>> any perceived altitude advantages they held last year. By the 4th quarter those guys will hardly be able to stand up.
Re *legit*, OK
BYU is an older, very disciplined and well coached team… which typically translates as more consistent and not reliant on any particular players.
This year’s game in Doak kicks off at 3:30… brutal… for the Cougars… and me (I’ll be there)!
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
I will be too
There should be a rule, No games before 6 PM at Doak in the month of September.
Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.
by onebarrelrum on Jul 20, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Starting QB threw 10 passes last season.
This will be his 3rd game of year, after home game vs. Washington, and then @ Air Force.
I really think they are going to crash hard.
I know it's counterintuitive but
a new QB doesn’t have a significant deleterious effect on a team’s outcome probably because you can coach around these changes.
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
Exactly
Seriously, did any other team face a similar situation last year, whereby…
Talent of both teams equal + the better program of the two playing at home + team traveling across country + home team nets 9YPP and equals total yardage of lesser opponent + -5TO for the better team program at home?
No way that happens more than 3-4 times a year, amongst top 50 programs.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Bingo. Scoreboard not reflective of how the game was played.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Its Buds unicorn
I cant figure it out either. He is usually very logical, I think he just doesnt want to step on any toes.
We beat them by 22pts =/= 82%
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
It's about how you predict
See DK below
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Bud, Ill give you BYU even money for 500 and 4.5 to 1
Take?
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
opps didnt write that correctly
BYU and 4.5/1 for 500?
I dont think you would want that bet
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess it would be 5.25-1 to get the proper odds.
but the point remains the same
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
So if you win I give you $500 and if I win you give me 2625?
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
no points just odds, to account for you proportional win shares
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Well since those are the exact odds I think, I would need more than that
Example: if I thought a team was going to win by 3, why would I bet on a line of 3?
Need to see value.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions
2700 for 500?
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Im not actually going to bet with you as it would be to hard to collect either way but I'm making a point
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
lol damnit
I don’t see the point. You offered me to give the exact odds that I think happen.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I would take this bet in a heart beat if I knew i could get paid
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
The point was I didnt really think you would put your money where your mouth was with your 82%
but i guess you do. I dont understand why you would put a team at 82% that you expect to win by 22. I guess we just have to agree to disagree
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I'll take 3000 and we have a deal
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I would take this bet in a heart beat if I knew i could get paid
replied on wrong place
FSU Football: United We Stand
by stevegrizzle on Jul 20, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
FO is using a formula
It makes sense to base a formula around previous outcomes. We, on the other hand, aren’t using a formula to create our expectations.
>>---l>
I'm with you Sam
Formulas are good and all.
But what good does it do to look at FSU’s offense over the last 4 years, when last year’s offensive stats overrides the previous years (at least in my mind)
Their predictions are noteworthy because they went 16-3 last year and base it upon sound science
Let it be known, though, that most (if not all) of us believe that FO’s predictions for FSU will be incorrect because they can’t account for the coaching stuff.
>>---l>
So are we saying
they did predict to 16-3?
Or did they retro-predict to 16-3? Big difference in my book.
If FootballOutsiders
readily admit that their system doesn’t account for coaching changes, then how is their 6-6 prediction relevant? And a 1-3 OOC record means we lose to BYU? I’m not sure if their predicting mechanism is very credible…
They killed the predictions last year...
16 right, 3 wrong is pretty nasty.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
They didn't predict those.
It’s my understanding that they took last season’s data and then made a formula to predict last season’s results. They got 16 right. There was no predicting involved at all. I doubt very much they get 16/20 right this year unless they tweak their formula again AFTER the season to “retro-predict” the 2010 season.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I bet they will again do very well
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
What would you call "very well"?
I would assume they’ll do better than 50% on their predictions, but I don’t think they sniff the 80% retro-predictions of last year.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
12 of 20 which is quite good
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I would be happy winning more times than not against Vegas.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
How would you propose accounting for coaching changes?
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
1 win increase in prediction
for every 4.5 years gone by that the head coach should have been shown the door?
Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.
by onebarrelrum on Jul 20, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
not sure, but they're basically saying, "we don't know what to make of FSU, so we'll err on the side of caution"
They have FSU with the 52nd best defense before any coaching change considerations.
If I am looking for a team to outperform or underperform a FOCFA projection I want factors that even if realized, cannot be quantified. Here, I think very few people realize (not even sure I fully understand it) the non-talent, non-numerical changes that the program went through by jettisoning Bowden and his guys. The best job any fired coach has picked up is Colorado State! Nobody else received a D1 job of any type.
I think FSU’s D will improve more than the 52 mark and will be a great example for 2011 of how the projections cannot account for certain things
-Defensive coordinator missing practice time because his son committed suicide in his front yard and now has to take care of that son’s kids
-Family friend with no experience coaching defensive ends
-A certain coach who got in fist fights with a coach who was not white starting a certain player (a walk on!) to goad the offensive staff.
-A LB coach who was mailing it in the previous season getting cancer
-A senile head coach who was fine with cancelling practice if the aforementioned defensive assistants felt like doing so.
-Complete lack of a weight program, training table, or training discipline.
There has literally never, other than Baylor Basketball, been a coaching change like this.
I am expecting anywhere from 32nd to 47th for the defense (not in the top 25% of NCAA defenses, but in the upper half of the next quadrant).
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agree. There is no precedent for our situation.
Which is why it irks me when people talk dogmatically about what our defense MIGHT be capable of.
The fact that there is no precedent is one reason people use "MIGHT"
The assumption is that there should be a huge leap, BUT we’re just not sure how big that leap actually will be. And, I’d rather be pessimistic and be mightily pleased with the results, than optimistic and disappointed yet again.
Anyway, that’s probably one reason some people say “might.”
Exactly.
The wide locus of influence the terrible coaches had, with depth of negative effect on the players, while all the while still having talented players waiting in que this year has got to be an anomaly in waiting.
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
Bingo.
“We don’t know how to quantify the difference between no coaching one year and good coaching the next, so we’ll just ignore that critical factor.”
Bring back Peter Tom- a true Nole!
by PeachTreeNole on Jul 20, 2010 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
This is a great question
Extremely difficult to answer. Which is why I want to jump on it, LOL.
I think you have to factor in, somewhat subjectively, what you think the changes are worth. Over the years, there have been so very many close losses where poor clock and game management, I thought, ended up hurting the FSU team. I can go back to the FSU/UF game in 1979 when Coach Bowden was calling the plays and point to the end of the first half where wasted timeouts nearly cost the Noles a TD right before the half.
That said, my guess is, a more organized, quicker thinking sideline is going to pay dividends for FSU almost immediately. I hope (and somewhat expect) to have a much smarter football team pretty quickly. One that will recognize situations better, one that won’t panic like agains um in 1991 and rush a field goal on third down, etc.
Guys that are strictly objective become “football accountants,” as opposed to true evaluators, seems to me.
There are times when throwing the ball deep on 3rd and six inches might be a great play and yet, objectively running the QB sneak is probably the thing to do, every time.
One aspect I want to see on defense is the understanding that there are different levels of success in stopping your opponent. It seemed like our feeling was, “if they don’t score this drive, the defense won.” And that’s not always so. If your opponent starts out on their five and gets three first downs such that they punt from, say their own 40, I don’t call that a defensive win, not really.
That’s where I think we improve very quickly. And that’s where I think we can win some close ones that we’ve let get away in the past. At least, I hope so.
I agree with that
I just don’t think it is not smart to try and insert values for coaching changes.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
But you have to. Somehow
Because if you don’t think it matters, well, then there’s no need to make a change, is there? Yet, many thought we had to make a change.
This is where the money is made, seems to me, for the evaluators. Figuring out what’s truly artistic and what’s crap.
Disagree. When doing a national projection of all 120 go with a weighted average of what the program has done over the past few years
Wanna give teams with a coaching change a bump while teams with stability do not get one? How much? All the same value? More harm than good IMO
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it depends.....
If you’re going to do projections, it seems to me that it would be the evaluator’s “job” to evaluate the change and the value of same. Would it be tough? Sure.
I wouldn’t give every change a bump up. I might give some a bump down.
For example, I’m going to give USC a bump down, in going from Pete to Lane.
Ironically enough, I think I also give Tennessee a bump down, just for the outrage, bad karma of it all and think that losing Monte was a big loss for them.
Over the years, I’ve seen some evaluators provide “intangible grades.” And this is one of them, I think. Like home field advantage. Or weather (which may really play a roll in the BYU game, for example.)
I think the job is to be as accurate as possible
FO thinks they can best accomplish that with their system, and presumably that there’s no way to give a proper formulaic adjustment for the non-tangible stuff.
They also think it typically doesn’t matter much.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough
Makes ’em sound like they wear pocket protectors, though ;-)
Where do you go a “football slide rule” anyway?
Do you think that in Vegas, the odds makers don't factor it in?
The impact of coaching changes: USC, UT, FSU, etc…
Analogously, we know that at least some of the FO numbers assign some relevance to home-field advantage. I’ve never dug deep into it enough to figure out how they do that, but I can ask the same questions about how home field advantage is factored— do all teams get the same bump? Is playing at Duke as big of a disadvantage as playing at Michigan (both had the same record last year)? Do you use long term data for that or short term— playing at Cincinatti last year wasn’t an easy win, but historically it is, etc…
I don’t know as much about predicting football outcomes, but in predicting other outcomes I have found that typically decisions must be made about how to weight various contributing factors, and those decisions are often made subjectively, without a perfectly solid foundation.
by IndyFSUnole on Jul 20, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
These are all good questions
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Rec'd
Solely for the excellent back-handed compliment comparing Michigan to Duke. Bravo
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I will ask them to the FO guys
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
I know that Phil Steele applies the same adjustment to all home teams except
except VTech and Oregon (and maybe one other). I think all schools get +3 for home field advantage, but VTech and Oregon get more, +4(?).
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
Phil ought to go to a Vanderbilt home game...
I worked at Vandy for a while (it’s a great place, incidentally)… their home football games are generally at lease half filled with the opposing team’s fans, sometimes more. I went to a Vandy-Alabama game once that seemed to be about 75% ’bama fans— of the perhaps 20,000 people at the game.
The idea that the Vandy team gets the same kind of boost playing at home that a big time program with 100,000 in the stands— doesn’t seem to be rooted in too much common sense.
Not sure...
In fact, I don’t know the complete explanation for the additional bump to these schools. Seems like since tOSU, Michigan, PSU stadiums are so large (they have more screaming mouths) they’d be louder or as loud as VTech & Oregon. (I’ll research it more….)
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
Michigan isn't that loud.
From what I’ve heard. Never had a night game for one (but I believe that’s changing this year, to the chagrin of some of their fans, for some unknown reason) but it’s a big bowl like ours, maybe more bowl-like, even.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Guess that's a better way of describing it.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Here's an article that shows VTech and Oregon as #1 & #2
toughest places to play, but doesn’t cite why, e.g., best home record, noise, etc.
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
Um... his magazine says much different
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Much different numbers than that. You have the magazine right?
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Yeah
I’ll take a look. Guess my memory is failing me about VTech, Oregon, etc. Come to think of it, HFA may even need to include considerations like night game, Thursday game, etc. Sorry for the misinfo—apologies to TN!
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
That's a good question
and I’m not sure if I could come up with anything. But this is why I don’t think a formula for predicting success should be given heavy consideration.
For the record, I’m certainly not trying to advocate the consideration of the ‘hunger’ or ‘mentality’ of players, either. I think that is vastly overrated in a fan’s mind.
Also,
it seems that a prediction of 6-6 without considering a massive coaching overhaul is lacking a quality or two.
I asked you above
how would you account for that. Seems to be the most accurate way is not to guess at it.
It probably does not have much impact most times.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Most times I can see it not having a large impact.
So that’s a fair point.
I guess I just don’t like formulas, same with voting patterns or predicting conflicts and crap.
I hate Poli-Sci…
I honestly don't know how you account for things.
But to me, something could be said for the weight gains….Something to the effect of a projected weight would be extremely relevant to rushing data. They could clearly look at last years size and see the increase of size and bump up rushing defense based on increase of size of the front 7. That doesn’t seem like a difficult way to quantify S/C coaching is just whats the size before/after? what does the new weight tend to lend itself to? In your size matters articles you show us every time how small FSU was and now your chart of FSU’s front 7 featuring grown ass men we are projected to be an average of 102 pounds bigger. I feel that the increase of size for us can be quantified in a prediction formula.
Team GOLD
And the title is really meant to say
Something to the effect of I dont know the best methods of accounting certain things about coaching changes. Its not well I don’t know what you do, but this is what I do.
Team GOLD
Oklahoma will be favored by double digits in all games except Texas and Missouri
They are favored by 12 over FSU.
Ohio State is favored by 8 over Miami.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Sportsbook
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
No I think OU wins 42-28
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
(sigh) Damn.
I really miss teams crappin their pants when they saw us on the schedule, ESPECIALLY if they had to come into Doak. I get that it’s not gonna be a magical turnaround, since it’s been a decade of shootin ourselves in the foot, but hopefully we atleast look competitive against OK and beat Miami, and maybe just keep it close against UF. Hard not to get excited, but there really is a copious amount of work to do to get this program back to prominence.
I doubt we beat Miami
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Dang Bud.
What do you think loses it for us? Not being able to stop Jacory or Ponder not being able to move the ball enough? Or just a sloppy combo of both and we get trounced?
I think Miami is a better team and the game is in Miami
Miami’s offense closer to our offense than our defense is to theirs.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Damn you for making sense
Maybe we should resort to sabotage, send some “agents” down to Coral Gables…entice them with “gold chains”, luxury cars and large amounts of straight up “scrilla.”
by Chief03 on Jul 20, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd for scrilla
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Such an objective answer, LOL
When is the last UM/FSU game where, the team you thought would win, won?
For me, it’s 2004. And that one, if FSU is smarter, FSU wins. So, then I have to go back to 2002 when the team I thought would win, won. And in that one, again, FSU “had” it and gave it away.
The last time that the time that I thought would win, won, in this series was 2001. That’s how crazy it’s been.
For a long time, both teams had losing records against the other at home. Absolutely bizarre.
2008 but before then 2005
I agree the game is often not as expected but we should still go with who we think will win.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: your 2008 prediction,
Did the “process” bear out what you expected, or just the final outcome? Did you think we would rush for 300+?
In hindsight, the game reminded me of Jimbo’s last crack at UM (while at LSU), but going into that, it was a complete shock to see what we were accomplishing.
Just the final outcome. No way did I see it going down like it did.
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
You thought we'd win in 08 and 05?
Wow, I didn’t. 2008 is down there, they are coming off a stinging loss to UNC. First time we play them in the pro stadium. And it was the first time that we see Ponder really show his wheels. That first option, he was just the energizer bunny. I kept waiting for someone in orange to catch him. It was surreal.
Then, in 2005, first time that W’ford ever started a game. And he’s going to beat Miami? And that was a talented Miami team. They went up to Blacksburg and stomped Tech and I just though, “crap, we finally beat these guys and now, they’re going to murder us in the ACC title game. That’s just perfect!”
So, you got me on those two. I didn’t see either one of those coming.
I believe in being objective, for the most part. It’s just that in that series, objectivity would have gotten me toasted in Vegas. So I look for the weird. Like, more TDs by UM tackles than running backs, LOL.
Miami had a frosh QB as well coming into our stadium
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought Kyle Wright was a soph in 2005
He certainly played better than our frosh that night….
As much as anything, 2005 might have just been “our turn.” Because I suspect we lose in OT, just like in 2004.
But there was the definite air of “here we go AGAIN” when Wright kept hitting, the, what position did Olson play? Oh yeah. Tight End.
Mickey Andrews still wonders what those offensive linemen were doing catching the ball like that
And the TE throwback remains an indefensible play.
>>---l>
And Antone definitely fumbled going into the end zone
That could have been a brutal game had we lost.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Didn't the ball cross the line before he lost possession though?
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
IIRC
He fumbled on two of his three TDs. The first one was a legit TD, the second one was reveiwed and it certainly looked like the ball was out before it crossed the GL.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Que es IIRC?
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
if i recall correctly
It has creeped up a lot the last few weeks
by freshcollegeboy on Jul 20, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm glad someone came up with IIRC, because it always takes me a second or two more
to actually type out, “If I recall correctly.”
Isn't it really cool.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
If I really cared.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
Interstate Insurance Receivership Compact
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
If it really counts.
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
It Is Really Cabbage
Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.
by onebarrelrum on Jul 20, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
IBYRIC
I believe you recall incorrectly.
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
wait... IBYRC
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
No... IBYRI
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
LOL great get on the TDs by tackles. That was an insane game
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
It was one of the most frustrating wins I've ever witnessed
And yet, because of how it all played out, it made for a very sweet one.
If you know some history of the series, it’s just filled with that kind of wackiness but it never went our way, not in the end, anyway. So, to tease them like that was, well, wonderful.
Getting out of the parking lot was an adventure, afterwards, that’s for sure! My poor father couldn’t keep the rain off his glasses to see where we were parked. And I was preoccupied with not drowning!
Injuriesh
I haven’t thought carefully about this, but I keep wondering whether any of us on TN properly takes into account the possibility of injuries when making our predictions. For example, what would you predict if I told you that Ponder would re-injure his shoulder in the OU game and be lost for the season, and that Wake Forest would chop block Hudson in the 4th game and tear his ACL? I haven’t thought enough about it to put a (subjective) probability on these events (and I certainly haven’t done the work to come up with a frequentist estimate), but I don’t think that these events are all that unlikely and I have the feeling that most (all?) TNers are not factoring such things into their predictions.
I guess my point is that a lot of bad things that can happen carry non-negligible probabilities, and I’m not sure we can do a very good job of accounting for them. Maybe it all balances out because the same bad things can happen to other teams, but this must depend a lot on how much your prediction rests on the performance of a single player, or even just a few players. We do at least have a decent (maybe great?) backup QB, for example, but is he ready to replace Ponder this year without a significant drop-off?
Of course that is part of why process and system is so important: hopefully one thing that you are doing is reducing your susceptibility to a single point of failure. But are we there yet?
Meanwhile, quite honestly, I’ll be over here guzzling the cool aid regardless of our record: after all those years of Bowden-led incompetence, it will be a relief just to have a team that doesn’t regularly draw delay of game penalties on what should be routine offensive play calls, field goal attempts, and so forth.
Can't account for catastrophic injuries. Have to assume those are spread around equally.
If your team gets hit, you understand it throws everything out… unless you’ve got some ideas about how to integrate dummy variables into a prediction model? :)
No problem
It’s easy to put dummy variables in. The problem is that the model just gets too darn (family site?) complicated to deal with because you have to account for too many contingencies (e.g., in which game does Ponder get injured?; how many game does he miss, and which ones?).
So, I’m not arguing that we should all be working this out mathematically, I’m just saying that when we assign a win probability to the BYU game, we should at least mentally take into account the chance that Ponder might not be playing in that game. For example.
And I'm arguing that it is simply understood that catastrophic injuries are ignored (for both sides) in all predictions.
You could throw in a dummy variable, but there’s no sense in ending all of these comments with an asterisk “*Assuming Ponder, Hudson, McDaniel, and Dawkins play at least 90% of regular season games, otherwise predictions discounted 50%.”
Plus, factor in the catastrophic injury variable for the opponents, too
If brantley gets hurt the week before we play uf, I think our chances go up. Etc. ad nauseum. It’s best to ignore those possibilities, as there is no way to account for them (realistically).
Shouldn't you expect, on average, injuries for you and your opponents to balance out?
You can’t predict an injury, so how can you account for that with your season predictions?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Yes, I think you can expect a likelihood of injury at a position
e.g.., OL & DL most likely, etc. But these are just probabilities, and for FSU an injury at RB wouldn’t hurt as much as an injury at Safety.
p.s. Ponder won’t be making any tackles in 2010.
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
But you can't predict at which position.
So you can’t predict which player. And you definitely can’t then predict the impact said injury would have. Do I expect injuries? Yes. Can I even begin to factor those into my season projections? Hell no.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Certainly that's done on a game by game basis.
I was talking about a pre-season prediction.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Right
I think it’s fine to have pre-season predictions that are adjusted accordingly upon injuries occurring. I don’t think it needs to be factored into a pre-season prediction when we adjust them before each game anyway. Just my .02.
>>---l>
Yep
And that’s why depth “dude, they’ve had four of the sickest defensive classes in a row” makes UF/OU/OSU and the like have higher win probabilities against their competition.
Same with FSU vs. Wake/MD
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Any injuries to our secondary, esp. Safeties, will be catastrophic.
Deonte Allen who has a good chance to start, for example, is already prone to injury.
Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....
I think DL would be worse
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Definitely DL would be worse
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Order of catastrophic injury magnitude and its negative impact on season:
Ponder
McDaniel/Dawkins
McCray
Hudson
Who did I miss?
I wouldn't put Ponder first.
I think EJ should be good enough to likely win the games we should win and still lose the games we should lose.
I think Dawkins going down might have the most impact. A guy who is more than capable of starting anywhere along the line, imo, and the entire DL is lacking in experienced/quality depth.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
Certainly the dropoff isn't as severe at QB,
but I think the fact that the ball passes through the QB’s hands on half of the game’s possessions puts him over the top.
But maybe it’s still even from that standpoint… but then I’ll go on to say from a intangible/leadership/psychological standpoint, Ponder is pretty doggone important.
Did Ponder's absence cause us to lose any games we shouldn't won last year?
Granted, there were only 3 games, but still.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
We almost lost to Maryland...
Turning it around, which games would we have certainly lost without him? Take UNC off the books, for sure. Wasn’t every game we played a shootout?
So we didn't lose any games with Manuel that we would've won with Ponder.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
No
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
That's a non-argument based on 3 games against a random selection of teams last season.
I understand and agree EJ is a very good backup, but that particular metric has little value in predicting who is most valuable to the team in 2010.
I explained who I thought might be the biggest loss if an injury so struck.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I know. Just took that last comment as if you were saying,
“Case settled,” and it annoyed me.
I recognize the legitimacy of the argument, that’s why I had 3 DTs at 2a, 2b, and 3.
FSU must win a game they are not supposed to this year to truly be on the upswing. Although Bowden did a terrible job the last few years, he built FSU on winning games they were not supposed to win. If you want to attract recruits, you better win one of those games you are supposed to lose or the recruits will look away. Jimbo better get to coaching. No excuses. If he can’t BYU this year he may not be the answer. You can’t recruit good players by not winning at least one big game. What ever the odds say, if you look at the history of college football, programs making a comeback do something well they are not supposed to do to spark interest. Time to beat the odds or FSU will never be back.
www.fireJimboifwedontbeatafavoredteam.com
>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
by FrankDNole on Jul 20, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I think winning games FSU should win would be a good start
USF…
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yes!
I agree that winning the should-win games is the first step. Winning a should-have-lost game is a nice second step.
USF
I was impressed with USF’s defense last year, but I’m still pissed at how we gave that game away. Freshman quaterback no less.
by SeminoleMike on Jul 20, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
With Bowden the last ten years, for every game FSU beat a better opponent they would lose to 3 lesser opponents. Think. Wake Forest. South Florida. Maryland. NC State.
The joys of having an undisciplined team.
by freshcollegeboy on Jul 20, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Definitely not 3.
But maybe a 1:1 ratio.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
fair enough
I guess it just seemed that way because it drove me so crazy
by freshcollegeboy on Jul 20, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
FSU wont be "back" to having ACC championships handed to us until UF goes on serious probation
noles, marlins, phins
by NorthernHaze on Jul 20, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Nobody gets handed championships.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
I'm missing the correlation between UF and an ACC Championship
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
in-state recruiting
noles, marlins, phins
by NorthernHaze on Jul 20, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Dear 1993,
Your comments and insight are found to be quite valuable. I suppose I did not truly realize the importance of winning as a College Football Coach. Since arriving in Tallahassee, I have been helping my wife shop for draperies, compare paint chips, and choose between a subway tile or metalic backsplash in the kitchen. But, I promise you from this day forward, I will be coaching. Yessir, no more browsing at Ikea; no more antiquing; no more shopping for new crown moulding. Instead, I will assume the position in the tower and in the golf cart.
Again, I cannot thank you enough for expressing to me the importance of coaching as a college football coach. I can honestly say now, “I get it.”
Warmest Regards,
Jimbo
If you can predict injuries then you need to work on predicting things that will save the planet
Just my take
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I predict a 10 win season will lower the global temperature by .001 degrees.
Christian Ponder: Your favorite quarterback's favorite quarterback.
by Jamil Dawson on Jul 20, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I would imagine its more than prediciting injuries, if you could predict injuries, you would also then need to asses the effect the player, position, amount of snaps he plays, etc. has on the outcome of a game.
So take an entire roster, go through the impossible step of figuring out a probability that any single one will get injured, for every team that you face including yours, (for how many snaps also, and how far into the schedule?), figure out how to weight each position, according to how much they play as well as the individual impact of that position compared to others, …
Sorry, the Mountain Dew and work is getting to me. Its fun to think of all the possibilities… kind of helps me to appreciate the complexities of the game.
Grace I call Your name, Oh won’t Your smile fall over me, I’m cracked and dry on hands and knees, Oh sweet grace rain down on me I need You grace
-Phil Wickham
This is a good point... if you look at a basic formula for risk as a product of liklihood and impact,
you would find that teams with greater depth have reduced their overall risk to injury.
% of injury = P
Impact of injury = I
Risk= R
P * I = R
Let’s assume that liklihood of injuries is the same across the board from team to team. (I realize this is not correct, as teams may reduce injuries through proper training and coaching, play on more forgiving surfaces and play less in the rain. However, P is likely to have a tighter standard deviation than I) The main variable becomes impact. This could be expressed in several ways:
A) Depth at Positions
2) Cross Training
D) Offensive Diversity
(probably many more)
If you have greater depth at positions, you can lessen the overall impact of the injury. If running back A is injured, can running back B perform at an adequate level?
If you have sufficient cross training, can you supplement bad depth in one area with good depth from another? For example, if your team has inconsistent LB depth (3 upperclassmen at SLB, 1 MLB and 2 @ WLB), and lose your starting MLB, can the 2nd string SLB take his place? Have you established any flexibility prior to the injury, or is that player learning his position all in a week? Or are you starting the Freshman MLB in his place (no depth)?
And finally, do you play a style of offense that is easily disrupted with an injury to a key player? If your whole strategy is built around the passing ability of your QB, but the backup is primarily a runner, how resilient are you to an injury? Is your whole passing game relying on one receiver (Georgia Tech?)
So, there is a way to assess teams’ abilities to mitigate against the loss of players due to injury.
Those recruits can change their mind. They haven’t signed anything. I’m just saying if we go 7-5 or 6-6 like some people think we will not sign a good class.
I don't disagree that a poor season would have some sort of impact
But our coaches are really good with building relationships and showing these kids the direction in which our program is headed. I hope we don’t go 6-6 or 7-5, but I’m more concerned with seeing strides made on the field and having a chance to win the Atlantic. That’s priority #1. Or 1 and 1a.
>>---l>
Exactly DK
Think Alabama 2007, from 7-6 to 12-2. Saban and staff preached player commitment to a system which would eventually bring results.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
We went 6-6 LAST YEAR
5-6 against Division I. I think we signed a decent class.
FSU has not been a relevent team in nearly a decade. Jimbo wont and can’t change that overnight.
by freshcollegeboy on Jul 20, 2010 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn't say overnight
We’re on the same page collegeboy. If you check my win shares for this season it was 6.7 pre-Parker and Austin impacts.
I was making a comment that even a 6-6 season in 2010 doesn’t completely ruin the foundation for long-term success, as I stated that Bama accepted failure in short-term because the coaches/players were focused on the necessary changes that would produce success in the long(er) term.
"I got a PBS mind in an MTV world"...Jimmy Buffett
by The Ryno and I Know on Jul 20, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm checking out. Great discussion today and I hope it continues!
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
2009 Season
Many people are predicating the 2010 on last season. Throw it out I say. Yes, 7-6 but there were only 2 games that we got ‘beat’ or would even stand a chance to lose with this staff.
Miami – A dropped pass that should have been caught = w. One play.
USF – Anomaly; no one could/would predict nor expect another loss like that with this staff and 4 turnovers and a few really bad calls sprinkled in. Coaches fighting, etc…Anomaly.
BC – Decent red-zone blocking (we now have) and we should have won at BC. Fixed after Trick fixed the backs and effectively replaced D Carter.
GT – We win with a top 75 defense and/or forcing one punt. 35 pts in 1st half. Tell me we wouldn’t win that same game again.
Clemson – Tougher to call but how many times do you lose a top QB? 50/50
fu – Loss is a loss, especially with a bu QB and no defense
My point is, we were close to, or should have reasonably won 4 out of the 6 games and corrections have been made that would have done just that. Yes, then again, we should have lost to Maryland and JSU. But again, that shouldn’t have been the case. We could have EASILY been 11-2 with a decent defense. We should have only had 2 losses last season.
Wait, what is my point?
Assuming the corrections have been made (coaches, strength, conditioning, nutrition, added weight, depth, favorable ACC schedule. etc…
I see possible losses to OU, Miami and UF. At worst 9-3. This season, we don’t lose at home to CU without Parker, to BC at home with our speed and offense/SpcTeams, NC State with 10 days to prepare nor NC with same prep and at home and with Austin + others being out. No one else can beat us unless with give it away via turnovers.
We have a top offense.
We have perhaps the best Special Teams in the country.
We will have a vastly improved defense.
We now have a fully functional, capable, upgraded staff overall.
Favorable home schedule.
9-3
by Blazenole on Jul 20, 2010 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Welcome to TN
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
by Bud Elliott on Jul 20, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
SMH
Christian Ponder: Your favorite quarterback's favorite quarterback.
by Jamil Dawson on Jul 20, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Someone once pointed out the several games that we barely WON
They kind of counterbalance the several that we barely lost. Lots of our games could’ve gone either way; plus, we can’t assume we’ll beat X just because we beat them last year (though in most cases I think we will improve more than our opponents from last year…).
Are you assuming our opponents won't make any adjustments/improve?
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
Duh
This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
Well in that case I might agree with him
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
Don't agree with the "analysis" of those 6 games you mentioned,
but at least you only said 9-3 instead of 11-1 or something like that.
9-3 isn’t out of the realm of possibility at all.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
"Trick is right."
"Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed."
And how can you saw our D is vastly improved?
Haven’t played a single down and have only had 15 practices learning a completley new scheme.
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
Maybe I should have asked what his defenition of vast is then
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
Latest rumors now have Kyle Parker signing but still playing out his senior year at Clemson
Hopefully we will know for sure by Thursday’s prediction special
Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!
Was talking with a few of my sources,
and after discussing this with blaze and a few others, I have reached a conclusion. Are you ready?
FSU is losing one game, one this year. Unfortunately, its going to be BC, but we are winning everything else. BC is only going to win because Ponder is going to get hurt in the 2nd half. Im tellin you folks, this insider stuff is gold. Put the mortgage payment on it. Oh, and UF loses by 2.5 touchdowns. Enjoy your day.
Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole

by 



























