Tomahawk Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

2010 Expectations: Kool Aid Immersion or Intangible-based Perfect Storm?

Okay, we've been warned. Expectations and goals are (or certainly should be) completely different animals. We have learned here and elsewhere how to apply (statistical) expectation to our difficult 2010 schedule and, any way you slice it, we know that we ought to reasonably expect to win 7, 8, or 9 games. Vegas agrees. Heck, I agree. But something keeps nagging at me; a voice that whispers (unreasonably), "we're going to do better." You may now be hearing the same message despite your reasonable nature. I admit it; my naggingly hopeful and optimistic  voice does not offend or concern me. I can live with whatever happens, right or wrong, because I KNOW that processes (there's that Saban-Fisher word again) are in place that guarantee huge improvement in the team I root for over time. But I have had to ask myself, why does that voice persist so brazenly. I think I know the answer; FSU's fame, fortune and future sit atop a magnificent crest of intangibles--a perfect storm of good news for FSU--that seems to scream at reasoned expectation, "Shut up and sit down."  So a question for you guys, has there ever been another NCAA football team that has had so many intangibles (see list below)  working in concert to shock the reasoning world? (None of the listed symptoms are the product of my insight, my purpose is to recite them to explain (not justify) many of our seemingly "unreasonable" expectations.

 

  1. It's the defense that was broken, not the offense, and defenses are easier to fix.
  2. Lack of talent cannot nearly account for last year's dismal numbers, so coaching was overwhelmingly responsible for our standing in the NCAA stats. (Unprecedented in degree.)
  3. All those bad coaches are gone! (Rare.)
  4. The new coaches have brought with them a new, modern scheme. (Unprecedented in degree-- you have to be way out of date to change so radically to the plus side.)
  5. We were woefully small on the defensive side last year, suddenly, thanks to better nutrition and conditioning we are good-sized. (Relatively unprecedented.)
  6. Considering 2, 3 and 4 above, we have the rare scenario of a bunch of good athletes who are physically bigger and stronger who have been deeply embarrassed and want desperately to show the world. (Unprecedented. How often are really good collections of jocks absolutely humiliated then given the tools for redemption?) 
  7. Because the D was sooo bad, our offense was actually undervalued--a decent D will give the O more chances, etc.

 

I cannot recall a program being so blessed with intangibles to juice up a turnaround. Can you? Have I misstated something? Missed something? I would not bet on our winning ten games, but because of the perfect storm of intangibles in Tallahassee I would also not bet against it. TN warned us last year that the D would be bad and I did not believe it. Turns out, TN was right and yet wrong, our D wasn't bad, it was abominable. The staff here saw it coming and so I am very respectful of the intelligence and wisdom at this site.  Nonetheless, I am thoroughly convinced that we are going to see the best FSU football since 1999. Whether or not that shows up as wins beyond reasonable expectations is another matter. I don;t care. The anticipated improved product, fueled by excellent coaching and phenomenal intangibles, will be good enough for me.

We are back on the path.

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Convinced?

“You’re convinced they’re going to be better than our 2000 team?”

No. Maybe I over-reached a bit. I’m not sorry, though. It got me a cat car. The 2000 team was a very good team, but the bowl game left a permanent bad taste in my mouth.

fm

Dogs bark in the night but the caravan moves on.

by fmnole on Jul 24, 2010 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do not think we will be better than

2000-2005.

But I do think we will be better than 2006-2009, all of which I think are about the same (yes I know we were 9-4 in 2008). Considerably better

This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.

Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on Jul 24, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wrote a fanpost on this about 2-3 months ago

I agree with you that FSU 2010 will be a unique circumstance with the level of available talent and the number of improvements made this offseason.
It’s easy to expect only slight improvement when you think about the changes individually, and likely too easy to expect great improvement when you see them all in one place.

by stilts on Jul 24, 2010 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Great Points..

I like your points and i think you are right.. The D will definatly be better this year and in retrospect getting the ball back into the hands of CP7 and letting him sail one to Fortson to make a catch for the books. Or running the reverse to Reed for a touchdonw from the 25 yard line. I definatly see BETTER execution on both sides of the ball and i know that Jimbo will make sure of that. I see one of Jimbo’s biggest expectations is getting W’s. I remember Jimbo saying that wants to give G5 some playing time on offense, cant wait for that.. I think that FSU has alot of things in place to be very successful. It feels good to have a team where EVERYONE is on the same page. Funny that you say that this team might be better than 1999 because they will look or be nothing like that team. Because we are FSU of 2010!!!!!

by TrueSeminole2010 on Jul 24, 2010 5:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I have been thinking the same thing

Though realistically the 8 or 9 win season would be great, I just have this odd feeling that we are going to surprise even the most optimistic of predictions for this year.

by randlieb on Jul 24, 2010 6:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Super Bowl Champions?!

Cuz one guy is already predicting us to be in the National Title Game… can we go farther than that prediction?

by freshcollegeboy on Jul 24, 2010 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

oooops...poor choice of words there!

Just think we are going to surprise a lot of people out there (and here).

by randlieb on Jul 25, 2010 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ahhh....the koolaid, the koolaid...

I have the same feelings, just like romance..you see the reality, and you feel guilty for being realistic, but you want it to happen so badly that maybe it will work. Damed anticipation, let the season begin….lol

by Yolonole on Jul 24, 2010 7:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I am not going to try and predict the future.....

I am just hoping that FSU will win every game that I go to this year. Have plans to attend 9-10 games….not including ACCCG or a Bowl Appearance. Go Noles!

We've got to fight, fight, fight for F.S.U. / We've got to scalp 'em Seminoles / We've got to win, win, win, win, win this game / And roll on down and make those goals / For F.S.U. is on the warpath now / And at the battles end she's great / So fight, fight, fight, fight for victory / The Seminoles of Florida State / F-L-O-R-I-D-A S-T-A-T-E / Florida State, Florida State, Florida State!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

by Dcubbienole on Jul 25, 2010 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I'll Just say this

We had an average D last year we would have straight KILLED NC State. I re-watched that game last night. over 1100 hundred yards combined. The defense was absolutely atrocious. FSU offense, after the first series, looked unstoppable. FSU has an 11 play TD drive, NC State, 1 play 80 yard TD. FSU has a 8,9 play drive NC State 2,3 plays for TD. My good Lord. I know NC State had a good O last year but dang. A mediocre D against that team with that good of an offense should surrender what? 21? 28 points at the most? It was so frustrating to watch. This year we beat teams like NC State 45-28, I will be extremely happy (instead of having all 165 lbs of Bert Read on a reverse near the goal line for the go ahead score with 1:30 or so left. YIKES.).

Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.

by onebarrelrum on Jul 25, 2010 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I was there

I remember how excited I was…to barely pull of a win to NC State at home.

by NolenRyan on Jul 26, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

What if NC State had played average defense?

I got caught up in that, “If we’d played average offense….”. Fortunately, offense isn’t a problem anymore. Y’all will be hell this year, compared to the past few. Just remember though, you have to crawl before you can walk. As hard as it is to believe, no one on your roster knows what it’s like to win consistently. I’m not bashing, I’m speaking from experience.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Like I said

Beating NC State 45-28 would be crawling before we walk in my opinion. And I would be happy with it.

Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.

by onebarrelrum on Jul 27, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Beat me to the punch... Hawaiian Punch?

I was going to post something similar in regards to the intangibles that ARE in our favor…. One more that I find worthy of mention is this….

Our schedule is tough, everyone says so, the experts agree, and in reality it IS a tough schedule… However….
Our toughest conference games are at home. The game @ Miami has historically been a game where home field advantage means little.
The game @ Oklahoma is a “win-win” for us all around. We get them early, before there is much for them to prepare for, we’ll have all the emotional advantages… AND… In OOSNC games (that’s “out of state non-conference”), including bowl games we’re 57-10 since 1990… including wins at USC, BYU, Notre Dame, Colorado, etc… .Bottom line, this is the type of game we have historically played well in (sod game?).
But even if we lose the game, if we play well, we’ll still get respect by the “pundits” if we keep it close.

For bad teams, they want the Dukes, Marylands, Virginias, etc. as home games hoping to steal a win at home. For the better teams, we want “winnable” road games to get the best record. Getting UNC, Clemson, BC, BYU and Florida at home is MUCH better than having them on the road like we had last year… The schedule sets up for a possible MNC THIS YEAR… Senior QB, an offense that CAN “outscore” other teams regardless of defense play.

The schedule being “hard” also helps a hungry team stay focused week to week in practice. I look at the UF 2006 season as one where the difficulty of the schedule helped them be in the position to play for the championship.

So… when considering the “strength of schedule” … remember that it may not be QUITE as hard as it looks at first glance.

by burkenole on Jul 25, 2010 5:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Going back to 1990 does nothing to help us now

The schedule being "hard" also helps a hungry team stay focused week to week in practice

It does the exact opposite, it allows them less time to recover

Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!

by RaysnNoles on Jul 25, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Recovery" is a time issue...

Suggesting that playing a hard schedule gives less time to recover shows the attitude that some teams are “taken lighter” than others, which sets up the upset possibility. Take a look at our schedule… we don’t have a “killer streak” of all our tough games or back to back tough road games… but also nobody to “take lightly”

The only place you can say we really have “back to back” really tough games would be UNC and Clemson, both at home, then a road game against the likely worst team in our division.

I’m more worried about road upsets @ NC State, Virginia and Maryland than losing at home to UNC or Clemson.

That being said, there is no game other than Samford that is a sure-thing.. Thus we have a lower chance of complacency.

by burkenole on Jul 26, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

It builds up over the course of a season

You can’t look at it in only a 2 week segment

Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!

by RaysnNoles on Jul 26, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

True.

You do still have the week to recover, but when your starters are in ‘til the very end of about every game during a brutal schedule of close games, those 4th quarter hits line up. That’s what most people overlook. Why do you think we were so beat up after out first four games last year?

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

No different this year

You have a brutal schedule leading up to the FSU matchup

Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!

by RaysnNoles on Jul 27, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

That has to be the toughest schedule of games and they are all on the road

Ouch

Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!

by RaysnNoles on Jul 27, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know.

If we can pull out a win at OSU ( my gut tells me, we’re gonna shock ALOT of people), we’ll make a legitimate run at the MNC. At the very least, I expect to be in the ACCCG. I don’t see VaTech beating us at home after the beating we took in Blacksburg last year (ask GaTech about payback in Miami). UNC has no offense, and will probably be short on defense. Clamson loses 80% of their offense by Spiller being gone (he beat us single handedly last year).

I hope we face you in the ACCCG Even IF we lose, we may get an at large against the Gators. Nothin would be better than Florida finishing the year with back to back losses to y’all and then us. That would put a damper on their recruiting.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

UM loses the 2 bookend games.

Not a burn, just a prediction.

Although I would enjoy watching Allan Bailey smash “the human hype machine” Terrell Pryor a couple of times.

Oderint Dum Metuant

by DRusso97 on Jul 27, 2010 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

YES

Wants to live in a world where Batting Average goes the way of the Dodo!

by RaysnNoles on Jul 27, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not expecting it.

Then again, I really don’t know what to expect. I just have a gut feeling that we’ll beat OSU. Terrett Pryor really hasn’t impressed me. He had the good bowl game other than that, he couldn’t hit sand if he fell off a camel. Everyone remembers our beat up defense from the second half of last year. We’re a good 8 deep on the D Line this year. it’s been a long time since we’ve had any depth.

I wouldn’t expect anyone to go through those four games undefeated.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we lose one of the middle two.

Recent history says expect to lose one of the games we shouldn’t. I know you know all about that, too. That’s why you don’t see FSU losing to Miami, it shouldn’t be an easy win.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Worry doesn't reflect the strength of the opponent...

UNC and Clemson are much tougher teams, but my point is that there are intangibles that make certain games during a season more likely to be a loss. Remember with NCState and Maryland we needed miracles to beat them here @ home last year (and admittedly needed a miracle to beat UNC at Chapel Hill)

We’ve lost @ NCState, UVA, and Maryland in the last 5 years, and road games, in general, are more likely losses…thus the whole “home field advantage”.

As for the “toughness” building up over the course of a season, that’s true for ALL BCS conference teams, and the reason why Boise State should be docked for their conference schedule.

But our schedule doesn’t have a “brutal stretch” of games, and is balanced through the season….. that’s my point… it makes the schedule easier than it LOOKS…not “easy”.

by burkenole on Jul 27, 2010 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

No....

I do think we’re more likely to go 2-1 against that road line up, than 1-1 or 0-2 against the home lineup, but that’s not the point. Road Games matter. My point is that our ROAD lineup is easier, so therefore we’re more likely to go 3-0 against NCST, UVA and MD, than a road lineup of Clemson, UNC, and BC like we had last year (where we went 1-2).

I think we’ll have a better home performance this year than the recent years. The whole “Take Back Doak” campaign is a good one. Our poor play at home has to stop, and it should.

I think our team under the old coaching staff took SUCCESS for granted…they did not understand the “process” (there’s that word again) it took to achieve success. The new coaching staff does preach that, and there is no reason to think our team wouldn’t buy into it. This was as seamless a coaching transition as any team could ask for.

by burkenole on Jul 28, 2010 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup.

Agree with the first—we have a good mix at home. As for the week-to-week brutality being a plus by keeping us focused, I think the increased wear and tear factor (RaysNoles) is much more likely to be a negative. However, an imposing schedule is a great off-season motivator and some coaches swear that a team’s final W/L record is forged during the summer.

Any way you cut it, nobody has challenged (yet) my assertion that we have an unprecedented raft of positive intangibles working in our favor this season. Maybe it’s best viewed like this—if we do exceed expectations, we have a good working theory in place as to why.

Dogs bark in the night but the caravan moves on.

by fmnole on Jul 25, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I like the whole intangible theory, buuuuut

I’ve watched several replays of games played last season. On a scale of 1 (worst) – 10 (best), FSU defense was clinging to a .50…I just find it hard to believe that these same players will be able to play at a 6 (above average) or better.
I hope I’m wrong…and I’m not watching any more of last year’s games.

Gripper

by Gripper on Jul 27, 2010 2:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Everyone applauds the change in scheme,

and I think it was much needed. The game had passed Mickey by, as he could no longer out athlete the opponent. That said, Stoops better be running LOTS of tackling drills.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 27, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

The fact that our defense had no playbook....

should tell you a lot about the level of instruction going on as far as the process of being a great defense. The days of just putting better players on the field were over. It worked for many years, but we saw the deterioration happen before our eyes. It actually is a credit to Mickey that he got our defense to “hang in there” despite the lack of scheme.

They actually did have some big stops that won us games last year (of course the reason why we needed them to was the horrendous play other than the one stop) Maryland last year comes to mind.

by burkenole on Jul 28, 2010 7:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Last year our D only played well on the LAST SERIES of a game in which we had just gone ahead...

UNC, NCState, Maryland, and WVU……but NOT BC

That is because the former 4 teams were sold on the Hail Mary and Boston College ran Harris right up the middle to win the game.

by TheMarchingChief on Jul 28, 2010 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Winning the ACC is entirely realistic.

There is no way even a massively improved FSU team could defeat the likes of Alabama or Texas. We’re just not there yet.

However, the ACC is well within reach. This conference is ripe, and there isn’t another team that comes close to our growth this off-season, or returning the same kind of weapons on offense.

If you want to talk perfect storm, I’d say a better comparison is to our situation in the ACC.

Andrew Carter (whom I generally agree with) is picking Boston College as the pre-season favorite, and I know it’s mainly due to their schedule. But if FSU can get off to a strong start, there is absolutely no reason they should lose to BC at Doak, or drop enough other ACC contests to fall behind the Golden Eagles. No. Way.

Which is to say, I think it’s realistic to expect this team to play in the Orange Bowl. I’m sorry, but I don’t think UNC is going to have a very good year when the dust settles, and Georgia Tech lost far too many weapons on both side of the ball. Not to mention we beat UNC last season, and would’ve beaten the Ramblin’ Wreck if we’d made even one defensive stop.

So there.

by Jtyler998 on Jul 28, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

My "perfect storm" comment...

…was offered to make a case for our intangibles being ridiculously upbeat with respect to 7-9 wins as a “reasonable” expectation. It’s not hard to see the likelihood of losing to OU, UM and UF. To exceed nine during the regular season, we pretty much have to beat one of them (and even then we could slip up in several other games). But there is no logical reason to be upbeat about our chances against OU or UF except for intangibles. Probably the same is true for UM.

End of the day, I’ll happily take 9 wins with the bowl. If we do better than that I’ll claim I posted the explanation for the sweet surprise here in July.
:-)

fm

Dogs bark in the night but the caravan moves on.

by fmnole on Jul 28, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Um... not if you count quarterback or offensive line...

Miami DEFINITELY has a better team and better talent. But I don’t think they have the better offense. Perhaps better receivers.

This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.

Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on Jul 29, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

The ONLY question mark

is O Line, and I don’t think it’s gonna be as bad as last year. Losing Pipho will reduce the number of sacks is we replace him with a turnstyle. I think other than that we’re pretty much even. There’s no reason to think Harris won’t progress greatly from his soph to junior year, since that’s when most college qb’s improve the most. We’re deeper at reciever, we’re at least 4 deep in quality rb’s.

Not bashing, just saying……. I wouldn’t be suprised if y’all pull out the win against us. It’s FSU – Miami, nothing suprises me except a blowout. Those nearly never happen. All I can say is if you beat us in Miami, be ready to do it again in Charlotte. i honestly think we’ll play twice this year. Of course irony’s a bitch, since this is the first year the game isn’t in Florida.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 29, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think most of us expect Miami to be favored

We also expect our offense to be a better unit again. The two statements aren’t mutually exclusive.

>>---l>

by DKfromVA on Jul 29, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the offenses will pretty much cancel each other out.

Defense and special teams will be the differnce in a game with a combined score of 60+. Looking forward to seeing two heavyweights slugging it out again, instead of the slapfights we’ve had the past few years.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 29, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, no.

The edge has to go to FSU on offense. The question is whether or not their defense can hold. Jacory Harris needs to go eat some quarter pounders or something.

by Jtyler998 on Jul 29, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

The String Bean of Doom

always gets up. That’s all that matters.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 29, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think FSU wants this game more this year

… given the way, and the fact that, we lost last year. Going to be a helluva game……

Accountabilty is back in Tallahassee....

by TLHWG on Jul 29, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would not be surprised if FSU plays with more heart than UM.

>-----:----:------>Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.

by FrankDNole on Jul 30, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't talking specifically in terms of the one game

I meant season end rankings. I do not expect to win at Miami this season.

>>---l>

by DKfromVA on Jul 29, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

They just moved Fig to RT. Interesting there. Your thoughts?

Ben/ Jermaine not working out?

I think Harris can be good, but not great.

And most college QBs make the big jump between their 1st and 2nd year. So I guess if you say LY was year 1, true. Heard he is bigger now.

This team will improve in '10... on its 16-16 conference record over the last 4 years.... after losing 20 games in the last 4 years... after having the 7th worst major-conference defense... after not even winning its own division in the ACC in the last 4.

Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on Jul 29, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly...

I hate Harris not just because he is a Cane, but because he looks so much like Marlowe Stanfield from the Wire. And I hated Marlowe.

by Jtyler998 on Jul 30, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

HAHA

He does, except about a foot taller. Great show. When I think of Harris I think of Starvin Marvin…

Not an alcoholic, just an FSU grad.

by onebarrelrum on Jul 30, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Randy requires his linemen to learn to play all the positions.

He’s moving Fig to RT because he wants his most experienced players on the outside. Fig has dropped down to 318 from aroun 330 to gain mobility to play the outside. Seantrel may even redshirt, he has NEVER had to practice South Florida humidity. No way he just steps off a plane next week conditioned for the humidity coming from Minnesota.

by Cane Ressurection on Jul 30, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to Tomahawk Nation, your home for no-holds-barred analysis of FSU Athletics. Remember the Community Guidelines.
Start posting about the Seminoles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

7316_134825997732_809077732_2422207_1054137_n_small
Ongoing Discussion Thread #31
Crib_009_small
Stormin in Norman!
Greg_reid_small
2011 Recruiting Discussion Thread #10
Crib_009_small
FSU Football WX Outlook
Seminole_small
Continuing the Zone Discussion: An Amateurs Breakdown

Recent FanPosts

Att6489293_small
FSU's forgotten first football teams 1899-1904
Small
Late preseason hot seat analysis
Unconquered_statue_fsu_2_920_small
my feelings after samford
Small
Excited for Oklahoma game on Saturday
Small
Oklahoma = Biggest game of the season. Here's why...
Small
Knowledgeable GA fan on OU's new secondary coach
Dsc03214_small
Who impressed you the most?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Alabama wide receiver Julio Jones makes a diving one hand grab of a pass for a touchdown during the first half against San Jose State in Tuscaloosa, Ala., Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010.  (AP Photo/The Decatur Daily, Gary Cosby Jr.)

The College Football Alphabetical, Week 1: N Is For Nugatory Results

LANDOVER MD - SEPTEMBER 06:  (Clarified) Running back #22 Doug Martin of the Boise State Broncos runs past linebacker #43 Jeron Gouveia-Winslow of the Virginia Tech Hokies at FedExField on September 6 2010 in Landover Maryland.  (Photo by Geoff Burke/Getty Images)

Week 2 AP Poll: Boise State Inches Up, TCU Leaps; Florida, Oklahoma Fall

NEW YORK - DECEMBER 10:  (FILE) Running back Reggie Bush #5 of the USC Trojans poses with the 2005 Heisman trophy after winning the award at the 71st Annual Heisman Ceremony on December 10, 2005 in New York City. According to reports the NCAA will announce a ban on June 10, 2010 on the USC football program from bowl games for two years, a possible loss of over 20 scholarships and will have to forfeit wins from at least the 2004 season.  (Photo by Stephen Chernin/Getty Images) +34 updates

USC Scandal: Reggie Bush Will Reportedly Be Stripped Of Heisman Trophy

More from SBNation.com >


Chiefs

Img_4552_small TrueCubbie

29seminoles Bud Elliott

Editors

Miller_small basaltrock

446905_small nolesblogger

Small Fsued

Doak_1968_small pbysh

Small CaStauch

Vacation_013_small MattDNole

Mickey_a_small FSUSOM

Frank_the_tank_small DKfromVA

Peter_ernie_small The K-Man

_1_small FrankDNole

Robbowtiedrink_small ricobert1

Florida-county-map_small SWFLNole.

Highlife_small fsu44

Moderators

Peter_warrick_small TRMNole

Seminoleswag_small NoleLaw