Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shaq As Orlando Magic General Manager? Don't Bet On It

FSU Fans Have No Business Complaining About Top-10 Ranking

Andy Staples of Sports Illustrated is a friend of TomahawkNation.com and an excellent writer.  He came out with his "post-spring top-25" yesterday and placed Florida State 9th.  To my surprise, FSU fans were angry.  Aside from the fact that this is a meaningless pre-season poll done by a single voter (no offense, Andy), I have a hard time figuring out why FSU fans honestly believe FSU is being slighted here.

Let's start with a story.

41-24 in its previous five seasons.  It finished 2009 on a tear and almost won its conference championship game.  In its last 21 games leading up to the 2010 season this team was 16-5.  The team had a new head coach, the energy had returned, and the recruiting was really picking up.  The pollsters placed this team 8th to start the year.  The fans complained.  

Sound familiar?

What team fits that profile?

Star-divide

That team was Nebraska.  And the Cornhuskers again finished with an excellent season, again going 10-4 and again playing for (and losing) the conference championship.

This sounds very, very familiar.  Scarily so.

Florida State is 40-26 in its last five seasons.  True, the 'Noles are 15-6 in its last 21.  FSU played for its conference championship.  The recruiting is trending into the stratosphere. The team is trending up, but like Nebraska, it lacks some consistency.  One good season is not going to convince voters who have been repeatedly burned by the Seminoles.

Category 2010 Nebraska 2011 FSU
Previous 5-year record 41-24 40-26
Last 21 games 16-5 15-6
Coaching change during stretch? Yes Yes
Recruiting on the rise? Yes Yes
Talk if darkhorse nat'l title contention? Yes Yes

Now, in FSU's defense, it has played a much tougher schedule over the last five years than Nebraska did.  And Nebraska's bad losses were worse than FSU's.  But the similarities are remarkable!  

 

 

 

Would any FSU fan complain about another 10-4 finish (keeping in mind that FSU went 7-4 against bowl teams last season)?  I suspect a few would, but it is a pretty spoiled program to complain about that.

And now the poll.

Oklahoma, Oregon, Alabama headline post-spring Top 25 - Andy Staples - SI.com

Returning starters: 16 (eight offense [maybe 6 if Spurlock and Reliford don't return], eight defense)
Key returnees: RB Jermaine Thomas, OT Andrew Datko, OT Zebrie Sanders, LB Nigel Bradham, CB Greg Reid, CB Xavier Rhodes
Spring star: QB E.J. Manuel
Spring recap: Because I'm doing this poll a little later than usual, I've gotten a chance to see how many of my colleagues ranked teams after the spring. Some of them really love the Seminoles. Top-five love, even. Jimbo Fisher is building something special in Tallahassee, but I'm not sure Florida State is back to late-90s, baddest-team-in-the-universe mode. Yet. That day doesn't seem far off, though. Fisher has spent the past few years working FSU's offense back into shape, but the hallmark of those late-90s Seminoles teams was an athletic, almost vicious defense. The coaching staff has spent the past few years stockpiling the same type of players Mickey Andrews used to unleash upon the world, and second-year coordinator Mark Stoops now has a deep(ish), athletic group that should be able to hang with elite offenses. The names Telvin Smith, Christian Jones and Lamracus Joyner, already well known to recruitniks, probably will become more familiar to a mainstream audience this season.

I'm comfortable with this ranking.

The 1-4 this year is pretty much set in stone: some order of Oklahoma, Alabama, LSU, and Oregon.

But after that, everything is a mess between 5-13, typically seeing these teams in some order: Arkansas, Boise State, Florida State, Oklahoma State, Ohio State, Nebraska, Stanford, South Carolina, Texas A&M.

As 'Nole fans, you probably think FSU is head-and-shoulders above that group of teams.  Personally, I would not have Stanford in my top 15.  Everyone has his or her own preference, and that is part of what makes college football fun.  But FSU does have a lot of questions that 'Nole fans assume will be answered.  But, for a moment, think about what writers might see.  For instance:

  • Will EJ Manuel be able to throw accurately?
  • How will the team be affected by Jimbo Fisher's time while dealing with his son's illness? (get well, Ethan.  You're in the thoughts and prayers of every Seminole)
  • Will the receiving corps mature and play to its potential?
  • Will FSU lose anyone to academic issues?  Reliford (missed spring ball)?  Others?
  • Will Andrew Datko and Zebrie Sanders, two senior tackles with a combined 65+ starts between them get back from off-season surgery in time to benefit from the off-season program?
  • Who will play the other guard spot?  Will David Spurlock hang up the cleats after multiple significant concussions?
  • Who will start at middle linebacker and safety?

If all of these issues work out, then and only then is FSU a dark-horse national title contender.  Now, most of these will work out.  But assuming everything here works out is likely foolish.  And considering this is May, and we don't know the answers to many of these questions, FSU's ranking of 9th doesn't look so crazy.

Further, I find that often, fans of one team know little or nothing about the other teams against which they argue the merits of their own team.  How many players can you name from the other teams ahead of FSU?  Not as many as Andy Staples can, I bet.  If you don't know about the other teams, you don't have a defensible argument that Florida State is better than them.

Further, fans seem to be quite angry that FSU is ranked behind South Carolina, who FSU beat in the Chick-Fil-A bowl, 26-17.  But what many fans fail to remember is that South Carolina lost its All-SEC running back on the first series to a nasty hit by 175-pound Greg Reid.  Would the result have been different had the Gamecocks been able to run Lattimore?  Maybe, maybe not.  Further, the Stephen Garcia suspension appears to be bunk.  But the very fact that this is a debatable issue means that it is not crazy to put South Carolina ahead of the 'Noles.  

As for other thoughts on the poll?

  • Stanford at 5?  Losing its head coach, its excellent defensive coordinator, and half of its starters.  I don't see it.  Andrew Luck is probably a better QB prospect than even Peyton Manning, but it takes more than one guy to dominate.
  • Three Schedule Frauds: Michigan State- TCU- Wisconsin at 13-15.  Again, these teams play awful schedules.  Just horrible.  Combined they played 12 bowl teams during the regular season.  FSU played 9.  Oh, and these three also lost half their starters, or close to it.
  • Auburn at 18?  Auburn lost 16 of its 22 starters and more than 10 of its 22 backups.  This team is in major re-build mode and unless they get Russel Wilson (possible), they should not be in the top 25.
  • I think VT is a bit low at 19 and WVU is a bit low at 20, and Notre Dame is a bit low at 21, but I do want to comment that I believe they will combine to be no worse than 27-9 in the regular season.  
  • I can't see Mississippi State at 22.  They had their breakout year last season, and this year the schedule is tougher.  
  • Utah and Maryland?  Really? 24 and 25?  Utah was unranked at the end of last season, faces a major step up in competition from the garbage that is the MWC, and loses half its starters.  No thanks.  I've covered Maryland before and see a 7-5 team.  They were incredibly fortunate last year.   

And because as a rule, if you say a team does not belong, you should provide an alternate, I'll do just that:

Auburn, Mississippi State, Arizona State, Maryland, and Utah should not be ranked.  So, who are my 5 replacement teams?

  • N.C. State.  They boasted an excellent defense last season and have steadily improved each year under O'Brien.  People point to Russel Wilson's loss, but he was very average for them last year (QB rating of 127 in ACC play). It was the defense that carried the Wolfpack last season!
  • Georgia.  6-7 last year, but 0-4 in games decided by a TD or less.  Could have easily gone 9-4.  Return 15 starters, lots of talent, one of the best QB situations in the SEC, and a fast-improving defense that finally has two monsters in the middle. 

I could only come up with two that definitely should be in. I think that shows how hard this is.

 

Stay connected to Tomahawk Nation via facebook  Facebook_16 and twitter  Twitter_16

Like this story?  E-mail it to your friends and spread the word!

Comment 305 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

May be a bit off topic

But who does Vegas have for winning it all? I know OU is number one because FSU plays them and they are pretty much all we talk about. But who are they likely to play?

Also. Slight typo. After (no offense, Andy) I believe it should be figured not figuring.

by FSUKook on May 25, 2011 10:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Also. Slight typo. After (no offense, Andy) I believe it should be figured not figuring.

I believe you figured wrong

>>>-----------;;;-->"I guess they have a reputation of being more of a tricky team and not being tough. You hit 'em in the mouth, and they don't like it. Other teams that have beat them just hit them in the mouth, so that's what we started out with.'' - Nick Moody >>>-----------;;;-->

by RollNole5 on May 26, 2011 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Crown Royal is delicious

So i could be wrong. But I’m pretty sure it got fixed.

by FSUKook on May 26, 2011 10:23 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Still says figuring. And Crown Royal is delicious.

>>>-----------;;;-->"I guess they have a reputation of being more of a tricky team and not being tough. You hit 'em in the mouth, and they don't like it. Other teams that have beat them just hit them in the mouth, so that's what we started out with.'' - Nick Moody >>>-----------;;;-->

by RollNole5 on May 26, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Johnny Walker Blue Label.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Johnnie*.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

As of last week Vegas had OU the clear number 1

They started out 5/1 and moved down to 4/1 again as of last week. Bama would be second at 5/1 but they are not getting much action. FSU was 10/1 after starting 15/1 (I think it could have been 20/1).

by TheJim on May 26, 2011 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

vegas does not predict who will win

they predict who ppl thinks will win and to make the betting even on both sides

by newdynastynole on May 26, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was answering the OP question

but more than that Vegas does predict who will win that is what they do when the set a line they will move a line based on money coming onto a side and the sports books do not necessarily try to even up the money on both sides of a wager they try to induce action and plenty of times will set a line and keep it there even with all the money going to one of the sides.

by TheJim on May 27, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with us being #9

That said, I can see why many are upset too. I have seen FSU #2, #3, #5, #6 etc. If you look at who they have ranked ahead of us or around us, the argument can made that on paper that FSU is better than a lot of them imo.

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 10:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Only one legit poll has FSU higher than 5 at this time

https://spreadsheets3.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?authkey=CPSR97gK&hl=en_US&key=tz5Dh6b3fMk6qFaHPpFf4Xg&hl=en_US&authkey=CPSR97gK#gid=0

Not sure where you saw #2

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only polls that matter is the AP & Coaches & even those are meh lol

All the rest are just opinions of people. Although as you said some are much more respectable than others. People on CSS & ESPN had FSU #2 & #3 in their polls.

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cool! Where did you see #2

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah I saw both of those

Robert Smith and the other guy on CFL both laughed when he said FSU was #2. They both knew he was just saying it to hype the OK/FSU game and they couldnt help themselves.

by Noleforever9399 on May 25, 2011 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bruce Feldman also has us I think at #3 idr.

I like Feldman & Schlabach! They both said FSU would curb stomp FU & Miami in 2010 for the 1st time in a decade. They were right. Hope they are right about us being a top 5 team in 2011

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

were those post-spring?

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Schlabach’s is in the link I posted, right?

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also saw him say it post NSD in Feb on CFB Live too

He said that FSU is back & Jimbo has the program headed in the right direction. I hate him but I have to agree with that statement.

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its just one man's opinion

We are the sexiest program in all of football, our momentum is undeniable and there have been a lot of teams that have thrived on that momentum in recent years. I’m going to enjoy it while it lasts. Of course it will feel like the worst hangover of our lives if we don’t back it up, but if we don’t finish top 10 it is going to be disappointing either way.

by vanillathrilla83 on May 25, 2011 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember that FU was preseason #3 last year. lol

I just hope we do not have a season like they did after starting in the top 5

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

There were a lot of people

Who noted FU’s many major issues prior to last season. I did not see them as a top 20 team. There is no way our questions = FU’s 2009-2010 questions.

2011 BCS Bowl
2012 MNC
Eeeeeeexcellent

by SoCalNole on May 26, 2011 5:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Other than QB what were their issues?

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but you are DocHollidayv2.0.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 27, 2011 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Almost, I am Nolestradamus ;-)

Do not forget about my Waisome prediciton which at the time was told not to bring him up & was told not to ask about him due to him not even being on the Big Board. I also called JWJ when everyone else said Gate lock.

This year I said book Casher, Edwards Jr, (Barry)Sanders Jr. So far, so good. I realize BSJ is a reach but so was JWJ & Waisome at the time.

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 28, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

::bows::

with a resounding zzzzzzzzzzz.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.
ODU Monarchs football - 17-5 in years one and two.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 28, 2011 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Notre Dame

Hate to see it happen but they have a conducive schedule to get 10 wins.

by DesiNole on May 25, 2011 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

I bet you USF scores less than 10 through 3 quarters.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like USF's RB duo of Murray(powerhouse Buford HS) & 5* transfer Scott has a 2nd chance

Think the Bulls could be good on the ground if those 2 get it going. USF always has a pretty good/fast D. BJ Daniels has to cutout the turnovers. He has to improve as a passer for them to have a good year.

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Notre Dame is enormous in the front seven, very well coached, and will make BJ pass, which he does not do.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

No way!

It’s ND’s first game and he’s a true freshy. I see him getting solid reps in the second half of the season, but very few in the first game!

2011 BCS Bowl
2012 MNC
Eeeeeeexcellent

by SoCalNole on May 26, 2011 5:36 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

He was dominant in spring.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

He would have gotten reps in game 3 against OU if he had come to FSU.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

They're 3 down linemen average ~300

They’re about 10-15 lbs. heavier already in the front 7 than they were even last year, when they fielded the #9 F/+ defense. They’re 4 LBs average 250.

What are you glorifying with your life?

by ricobert1 on May 26, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep. Notre Dame’s D is nasty

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bud, you're way off base here.

The entire FSU and ACC fanbases are very well informed and realistic. Nobody (I say nobody with absolute certainty) expects us to contend for the NC this year.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 25, 2011 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Speak for yourself

we are going undefeated this year and winning our closest game by 20.

Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole

by Miaminole on May 26, 2011 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's much more fun to speak for everyone.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 26, 2011 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think...

If we play ro our potential and beat OU we have a very realistic shot at it.

"Forever and always... GO NOLES!"

by GoNoles56 on May 26, 2011 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

BIG ifs ...

And we were unable to do either of those things last year … (equating potential with consistently playing at a level we played against UM or UF).

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn't mean they won't be significantly improved this year.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

True ...

Just saying that it is hard to tell at this point, based on the body of work we did last year.

Will we be better? I think so … though difficult to determine how much the OL may hurt us.

Will being better translate into more wins? That’s the $100,000 question.

Not saying it won’t happen, just that there is no guarantee and I will feel more comfortable making a future prediction when we have demonstrated past performance of consistent play up to our potential.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we are better than last year I would hope it translates to at least one more win.

Our schedule is easier. UNC replaced with Duke. BYU replaced with UL-M. OU at home.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 27, 2011 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha, the Gators aren't even in the top 25

and I like what you said about Utah, Wisconsin, and TCU. I’m sick of teams who play cupcake schedules and then whine about their ranking.

by Nole Patrol on May 25, 2011 10:39 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Eventually FSU will wise up and play something like 8 bowl teams in 14 games, not 11.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bud, Who is you auburn for the year?

i.e. team under the radar and a chance of making a run. I think Notre Dame.

by DesiNole on May 25, 2011 10:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Hmm.

WVU, Notre Dame, and Virginia Tech all have a shot to be 12-0.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just looked up VT's schedule

They have the best non-con schedule. Wish we already are working towards a non con sched with UF + 3 cupcakes.

by DesiNole on May 25, 2011 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does Notre Dame play all 3 service academys again this year? AF,Army,Navy?

by jenolesone on May 25, 2011 11:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Sat. 09/03/11
3:30 p.m. ET USF Buy
Tickets
Sat. 09/10/11
8:00 p.m. ET at Michigan Buy
Tickets
Sat. 09/17/11
3:30 p.m. ET Michigan State Buy
Tickets
Sat. 09/24/11
Time TBA at Pittsburgh Buy
Tickets
Sat. 10/01/11
8:00 p.m. ET at Purdue Buy
Tickets
Sat. 10/08/11
3:30 p.m. ET Air Force Buy
Tickets
Sat. 10/15/11 Open Date —- —-
Sat. 10/22/11
7:30 p.m. ET USC Buy
Tickets
Sat. 10/29/11
3:30 p.m. ET Navy Buy
Tickets
Sat. 11/05/11
Time TBA at Wake Forest Buy
Tickets
Sat. 11/12/11
7:30 p.m. ET Maryland 1 Buy
Tickets
Sat. 11/19/11
4:00 p.m. ET Boston College Buy
Tickets
Sat. 11/26/11
8:00 p.m. ET at Stanford Buy
Tickets

No army

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow Notre Dame could really make a run.

USC may be tough but other than that, sheeesh. Maybe Stanford will be in a groove by that last game but I can see 12-0. MichSt was luckier than LSU last year and with Les Miles as coach that’s sayin something. Bama just killed them.

by jenolesone on May 25, 2011 11:27 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

You heard that Aubrun just landed FU transfer Mike Blakely?

They got a dangerous 1-2 punch at RB with those 2 young backs. Dyer is a beast & if Blakely can run like he did in HS, watch out. I wonder how much AU paid for him?!. lol

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

He is not eligible until 2012.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah that has to suck for a kid that thought he would get some PT as a freshy

I’m just happy that we won’t have to tackle him at Florida. He played well at Manatee & I think Auburn got a nice pickup

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 25, 2011 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

He will still play as a freshman in 2012.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm in the minority with you ... and agree.

Lots of great things last year … but we had a lot of struggles that people tend to overlook after the fact. We were fortunate to beat Clemson, Boston College, S. Carolina, and Maryland. We just plain lost to UNC (only chance we had to win that one was the freak fumble play) and were destroyed by OU. VTech was the better team and legitimately beat us.

Miami and Florida were – far and away – the most dominating wins. USC was also a great win for us … likely was the best team that we beat last year. All things being equal, they were a better team than us talent-wise … but we played a great game that put us in a position to win (and losing Lattimore was likely the game changer leading to an over reliance on Garcia and ultimately leading to multiple momentum changing interceptions).

For a taste of extreme “homer” delusional slant … http://bleacherreport.com/articles/710951-florida-state-football-5-bold-predictions-for-the-2011-college-football-season Starting out with a #1 in nation defense prediction is laughable based on any actual analysis of what has occurred (we will improve – but #1 defense with our schedule is delusional).

Loads of excitement around FSU. Loads of potential around FSU. Still surprising how quickly everyone has jumped right back on the bandwagon … with still much to prove this year.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

We were fortunate to beat Clemson, Boston College, S. Carolina, and Maryland. We just plain lost to UNC (only chance we had to win that one was the freak fumble play) and were destroyed by OU. VTech was the better team and legitimately beat us.

Yep, that’s why I say 2012.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Though I don’t agree we were all that fortunate against Maryland or BC. Here’s why:

Calls were mixed. We got the pick-6 nixed, then picked up a call on the other INT.

BC did NOTHING on offense. We gave them 150 yards on 2 runs to open the game because a staffer had mislabeled a skinny tight end as a receiver, thus we called plays as 2 TE 1 RB instead of 1 TE 1 RB, and we had an uncovered gap.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough ...

Perhaps better to say that we could have lost them if the ball didn’t bounce the right way.

Though until Bert Reed took that reverse (I think it was) in the 4th … I thought for sure we would give that one away. Ponder’s INTs in that game all but killed us …

We were definitely the better team against BC and Maryland … but somehow they were right in there until the end.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. Were we only a TD better than MD & BC? No. Were we 52 points better than UF/Mia? Probably not.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Put me down in this category...
I thought we were actually a touch overranked at 9
I’d stick us more around 11-13.

And I have no problem with it at all. I believe, that if the OL gets healthy, EJ catches fire and the defense improves to top 25, FSU will have a very good (maybe great) year and the ranking will come. I’m just not convinced all that happens in the upcoming season.

Gripper

Tommyhawk Nation: Bobby Bowden is the all-time ACC leader in conference titles, conference wins, total wins, winning percentage, bowl appearances & wins and owns the longest conference winning streak.

by Gripper on May 26, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think between 5-12 is fine

We have not proven we are a top 5 team yet. We are close. And next year I hope is the year. But this year we have a tough schedule and are coming off our first 10 win season in a few years and we still have not won an ACC in forever. Not to mention we had bad losses last year. Factor in losing a first round QB and I think the ranking is fine. Now If we knock off OU somehow, and follow it up with beating Clemson. I think we are a legit top 5. But that needs to happen first

A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love name @caine115

by caine115 on May 25, 2011 10:51 PM EDT reply actions  

If FSU is again 10-4, this time with fewer blowouts, the writers will buy in.

I see 7 regular-season bowl teams, + ACCCG + Bowl game. That’s 9 games against bowl teams.

I want to see a winning record there (5-3), or preferrably 6-3.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

O Line is by FAR my biggest worry.

A weak O Line will not only make it more difficult to have a consistent offense … it will increase the likelihood that EJ runs more and is injured.

If there were any doubters on the importance of the O-Line, the Spring game should have made it clear.

If it takes a year to develop … we will not end up Top 10. If the O-Line is above average, FSU has a chance to have a special season.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont have any complaints

nor do I see many fans having complaints either. Only ‘issue’ (not complaint!) I have is with the Aggies. As I am a PhD student here in Aggieland, I am forced to watch the Ags, and having watched both teams I can say that the Noles were the better team last year. This year is obviously a different story, but I don’t think we will have to wait long for the Ags to fall out of the top 10.

by LetsGoNoles on May 25, 2011 11:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Someone correct me if I’m wrong but after the Agg’s first few games weren’t they complaining about the coach and started talking hot-seat, and then they turned the season around?

by jenolesone on May 25, 2011 11:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes.

They started 3-0 against their ooc slate including nearly losing to FIU at home and then proceeded to lose their next 3 games to get to 3-3. Apparently at some point they benched their starting QB and the team went on a roll with the new guy.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're probably right that Stables has TA&M a little too high, but they beat OU (by 2 TDs)

we were blown out by OU. And both of us lost the same # of games.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Scenarios were totally different.

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

True (home vs. road) but for better or worse,

I would think that pre-season polls only look at W/L, quality wins, but not quality losses… or blowouts

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I honestly don't know what they look at.

I don’t know what the rankings represent (predicted start or expected finish). I do know why there are preseason rankings but I’d rather they wait until 4 games are in the books before they do this. Where a team starts is critical to where that team finishes and basing it on anything but the current season seems foolish.

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure what they look at either

in fact I’m fairly confident that different authors look at different things and no doubt weigh these things (e.g., 1-3 below) differently. But here are 3 things all pre-season polls consider:
1. prior season W/L (ignoring road/home),
2. post-season performance, i.e., if a team X wins their bowl game then X finished on a (so-called) “strong note”, which gives X confidence going into the new season, blah, blah, blah.
3. returning starters, potential of new starters, etc.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't doubt your 1-3.

It’s the inexactness (is that even a word?) that bothers me.

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think a one game sample is all that relevant.

But I wasn’t saying Texas A&M should or should not be ranked ahead of us. Just saying they were about ready to throw in the towel last year and bloom, things started clicking.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tricknole, you nailed it

According to FO, Texas A&M is the least deserving pre-season top 10 team: http://www.footballstudyhall.com/2011/5/27/2192943/fun-stat-nerd-tidbit-texas-a-m

FYI: FSU made the list, but just barely.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 27, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I believe 9th is very fair.

Not that you may consider these polls as relevant but Bruce Feldman (which I think does excellent work) has us #3 in his poll and another ESPN guy has us 3rd as well.

by jenolesone on May 25, 2011 11:09 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Interesting.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate anti-FSU ESPN bias ...

or maybe it was looking at FSU during the lost decade w/o the rose colored glasses. Everyone wants to jump on the “new” thing (TWSS) … and FSU is the new thing with the name recognition that gets everyone excited.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

We're still suffering from Battered Booster Syndrome, ESPN's suffering from Battered Pollster Syndrome.

Just as you are cringing at our OL prospects based on your experience from the past few years, so the writers at ESPN are cringing at saying FSU is back based on their own experience from the past few years.

Just two manifestations of the same snakebit feeling, really. In both cases we need to see more from the team to really feel comfortable about the future.

"My mistress is pooped, the reds have Oklahoma, and I'm going to bed."
-Hodge Podge, Bloom County

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. "
"In practice, there is."-Yogi Berra

by Dogrel on May 26, 2011 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont have a problem with nine.

Would’ve been happy with 15 or 16. Just saying USCe should be the team behind us. We beat them, we return more starters and have both have questions at QB. I disagree that the Garcia suspension is bunk. Sure he may not miss any games because of anything he has done to date, but he has been suspended from the team 4-5 times (article says both).

I didnt get a harrumph out of that guy!

by Dcubbienole on May 25, 2011 11:24 PM EDT reply actions  

He has been suspended multiple times, but this time is the one that matters, right?

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Article makes it sound like it doesnt.

But 4-5 times doesnt exactly mean he can keep his act together. And #6 could be the last, so I would consider it a question at QB.

I didnt get a harrumph out of that guy!

by Dcubbienole on May 25, 2011 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

SatDownSouth has some tremendous sources. I’ll give them that.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was supposedly drunk at a banquet/fundraiser type thing she organized.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you read the link? Very interesting.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

No.

I did read something on it a week or so ago. Perhaps it’s the same link.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Claims require zero sources ...

just a good imagination and desire to increase hits (BTW, I have NO knowledge of SatDownSouth specifically – just a general comment).

Isn’t the Internet great?

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Their claims

were very specific, which to me means they must have at least a good source inside the program. Hard to make up the type of stuff they claim in the article off the top of your head.

I didnt get a harrumph out of that guy!

by Dcubbienole on May 26, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spurrier has already come out and said

that his Broness has done everything he needs to get back on the team in his opinion. Steve said it is up to the school when his suspension ends but I can’t see Garcia not playing.

by osceolafan2.0 on May 26, 2011 4:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, he will be back on team.

Can he stay there? A 6th suspension would be the last i think, especially if the ADs wife really does have it out for him.

I didnt get a harrumph out of that guy!

by Dcubbienole on May 26, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

We were +4 in TOs against them

yet only won by 9 points. We were only up by 2 points in the 4th before EJ’s monster go-ahead drive.

What are you glorifying with your life?

by ricobert1 on May 26, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

We also could have

scored on the last drive.

'see da broad ta get tha booty yackum, layem down smackum yackum...ho got ta be.... shiiiiiit!' 'early to bed early to rise makes a man healthy wealthy and wise'

by jskipnole on May 26, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

True

But we were only up by 2 points in the 4th before EJ’s monster go-ahead drive. We were already +4 TOs at that point.

What are you glorifying with your life?

by ricobert1 on May 26, 2011 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Right but one of those turnovers

was a INT on the 1 yard line. Percentages show that you are unlikely to have 99 yard drives so in effect it was really only +3

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're also dismissing the potential points

USCe left on the field with that turnover at the 1. They had the ball at about midfield.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 27, 2011 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its also dismissing the notion that the 4th down play wasn't a turnover..

If Ponder doesn’t short arm it we’d have been +4 turnovers and up 16. I consider the 4th down to essentially be a turnover that took sure points off the board. Would you believe we were +3 when you consider the TO at our 1 AND the loss of ball and sure points from their 1?

by fsugrizz on May 27, 2011 6:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bud do you think USCe is better than us?

Im not complaining about the ranking at all just wondering what you think.

Me personally I dont think that they are, but I think that they are right there with us. Especially with the years experience that Lattimore now has under his belt. He is an absolute beast, dont remember where I heard it, but I heard that he has put on 15 pounds this offseason.

by Noleforever9399 on May 25, 2011 11:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Honestly…

I have us on a level with (no order) Boise State, Oregon, South Carolina, Florida State, Texas A&M, LSU Arkansas Virginia Tech Oklahoma State Ohio State Notre Dame Nebraska.

I think OU-Bama are on another level. I would not object if anyone put FSU anywhere from 3-14.

Now, if they have Lattimore and a non-drunk Garcia do I think they beat FSU? Maybe.

I just don’t get how people see huge differences between these teams.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree with you about FSU and all those teams being right there with each other

except maybe LSU, I think that could be up there with OU and Bama, but thats jmo.
I definitely think that FSU is as talented as all those teams you listed, and that you could make an argument that FSU could beat all of them. But on the same note you could make an argument that all of them could beat FSU.

Except Notre Dame, I didnt notice them at first glance, you think that they are up there with all those teams? I dont see it but thats jmo and you know more than me.

by Noleforever9399 on May 25, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they have a tremendous defense and were about as good as FSU last year (did win 1 less than FSU).

I don’t know more than you, all we have is opinions.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 25, 2011 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

there schedule is very favorable

so they very well could make some noise this season.

by Noleforever9399 on May 25, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree about being cautious

But I really think that both are on another level because of their defenses. They are stacked.

by Noleforever9399 on May 26, 2011 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

LSU has a new OC

which typically has a learning curve regardless of how much O talent there is and how simple the OC keeps the playbook.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

How are there O Lines?

A great O Line will do wonders for an average QB.

I would expect both are loaded based on their consistently lights out recruiting over the last 4 years …

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dont know to much about either of them

But I think Bama’s is supposed to be very good. I believe they have an all-american type center,and we all know how Saban recruits.
Really dont know much about LSU’s, but again Miles recruits very well,

by Noleforever9399 on May 26, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone know who has the best OL in the ACC?

Reading the SN piece of Virginia yesterday, I get the sense that Virginia’s OL should be above average.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

LSU is loaded with talent,

The last 2 years though has been disappointing for them. The clock mgt issues and lack of mental judgement will end up costing Miles one day. The QB situation keeps me from putting them up there with Bama and OU. Jefferson has been at LSU too long to average (and the other QB for that matter) around 100yds passing in lge play. He has to make signifigant strides in one off season to make that team elite, but he sure has enough talent around him to do it.

by jenolesone on May 26, 2011 12:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Also I'm glad to see that you didnt include Stanford on that list

Andrew Luck is amazing, but they are being super overhyped because of him. They lost a ton and I don’t see them being near as good as they were this past year.

by Noleforever9399 on May 25, 2011 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you

But I believe they are losing 4(maybe 3?) starters on the offensive line. and quite a few other players. Not to mention Harbaugh being gone, theres no telling how big of an impact that could make on this team.

by Noleforever9399 on May 26, 2011 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

The guys they are playing with now were not highly recruited.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

True but they have gotten some pretty good recruits the past 2 years & it looks like 2012 is on the right track with players like Noor Davis

Also Stanford reminds me of Va.Tech & gets the most out of their players that were not highly recruited like a Toby Gerhart for example

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 26, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except they do it with much less consistency than VT.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully FSU has a big jump in consistency this year ...

Last year we showed an ability to lose to any team in the top 55 and beat any team outside of the top 10.

Would be great to see UM & UF consistency in OTHER games as well.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

What do you think about Staples having Alabama #1 not OU?

Personally I’d rather play Alabama on a neutral site than OU. OU doesn’t have a single weakness; they only have 1 unknown: replacing 2 graduating CBs.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 6:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean Mandel?

Perfectly reasonable.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

witcha.

Garcia overthrew some game-changing plays with Bradham and Parks chasing from behind.

If you torture a statistic enough you can make it confess to anything.

by PeachTreeNole on May 26, 2011 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, and Ponder bounced a ball to a wide open Lonnie Pryor and Jimbo pulled him.

My point is the differences between 3-12ish are quite small

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

ahh

I hate remembering that play.

by NolenRyan on May 26, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Blakely.

So 2-3 times.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ah, ok. My apologies.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

As far as LSU/Oregon, I am not a fan of either so I looked at LSU's schedule(linked above & it says @ Oregon) It did not have (Dallas) as you can see. So it was my bad.

Like I said, I am not a fan of either & do not keep track of their schedules much. I still think Oregon wins based on their better QB play & crazy spread

GO NOLES!!! SCALP EM!

by NOLEFAN1 on May 26, 2011 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well we know now. It’s all good.

Surprised to see you stick with UO. I am undecided.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oregon returns 5 on D

and will likely have to play at least 1 true freshman at WR. Still the O will be good—the D is unknown.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 6:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like LSU's defense against Oregons spread.

watching a few games of LSU last season, when they are on they are fun to watch. Think the athleticism favors LSU in that matchup too. They remind me a lot of FSU’s defense in the 2000’s, extremely athletic and able to smother anyone as long as they don’t get out coached. While I do believe that they can get out couched in that game, I dont think they are out athleted

Course this is only going on what I saw last year and have no idea how many players are returning.

"Kill a fly with an axe"

by SteadfastNole on May 26, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

"In the nicest way possible"?

What an opening … I read that and new the hammer was going to fall after the comma.

If you have to write that … it probably wasn’t :)

I’m going to add that to my bag of tricks … along with “bless her heart.” Great phrasings that allow someone to say EXACTLY what they want without having to sugarcoat it and it STILL comes across as reasonable and nice.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hahhaa true

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

sorta ridiculous that in order to say something critical

it must be prefaced with something like “in the nicest way possible”… thin skin is pervasive on the interwebs…

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

its hard to convey tough love over the interwebs.

or “nothing personal” is probably the most representationally faithfull way of softening the blow, I know I have a habit of coming across too strong due the inability to put in a tone of voice.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like, "With all due respect,...."

It’s in the Geneva Convention.

"The worst kind of non-smokers are the ones that come up to you and cough. That's pretty f*^@ing cruel isn't it? Do you go up to cripples and dance too?"

- Bill Hicks (another dead hero)

by YouNoleIt on May 26, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes,

almost gives Ricky Bobby a international politics air about him

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unless its from FrankD

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

YO...my man...no disrespect....you don't know sh!t & I want to smash your wife...

#NoDisrespect

Follow me on Twitter for all the outrageous sh!t I can't say on Tomahawk Nation...
http://Twitter.com/DRusso97
#TellJokesGetMoney

by DRusso97 on May 26, 2011 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Me?

#ChucklingForSeveralMinutes.

any way you take “smash your wife”….it’s funny as hell.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 26, 2011 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its not about how you take it, what is really important is how she takes it.
#DoggieStyle

>>>-----------;;;-->"I guess they have a reputation of being more of a tricky team and not being tough. You hit 'em in the mouth, and they don't like it. Other teams that have beat them just hit them in the mouth, so that's what we started out with.'' - Nick Moody >>>-----------;;;-->

by RollNole5 on May 27, 2011 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Even better (for me) if you read it in a Brooklyn accent...

Follow me on Twitter for all the outrageous sh!t I can't say on Tomahawk Nation...
http://Twitter.com/DRusso97
#TellJokesGetMoney

by DRusso97 on May 27, 2011 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like both SEC teams.

Oregon will make it interesting, a la the BCS CG.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bud, when you say UGA

you just mean ranked right, no necessarily higher than say 20 right? The reason I mention this is because while I agree they have a really good QB, I wonder how the offense is going to be without the best WR in the country.

I dont know much about their defense or schedule though.

Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole

by Miaminole on May 26, 2011 12:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, just ranked. Like their defense and love their schedule.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree about their schedule

it sets up very nicely for them to be SEC east champions this year.

by Noleforever9399 on May 26, 2011 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep.

No Bama
No LSU
No Arkansas

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

It may be played in Florida but don't UGA show up in force for those games?

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Split down the middle 50/50, I think.

Unless UGA fans are selling their tix to UF.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's about 50/50.

Probably more UF fans at the tailgates due to them having a large following in Jacksonville/bandwagon fans recently, but the actual attendance is usually around 50/50

by seminoles44 on May 27, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you've never been, I recommend going.

Don’t bother with the game, just go to the Landing afterwards….Drink a lot and watch….like Mardi Gras for retards.

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 27, 2011 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

You got one right!

Just kidding.

"You make the helmet, the helmet doesn't make you." << Jimbo FN' Fisher

Twitter @RobbedbyJT

by Marmaduke1 on May 26, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d have fired him long ago.

Good = enemy of great.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I dont think he will be there much longer even if he does win the SEC east, unless he manages to win the SEC then I think that buys him a couple more years.

by Noleforever9399 on May 26, 2011 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

East championship gives him a contract extension imo.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

That would be a blessing for us,

then we can continue to pluck elite players out of Richt’s backyard, although it seems as if UF is starting to follow suit under Muschamp.

by mn nole on May 26, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we'd get a few recruits each year regardless.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

So THIS is why Jimbo got the extension??
East championship gives him a contract extension imo.

Follow me on Twitter for all the outrageous sh!t I can't say on Tomahawk Nation...
http://Twitter.com/DRusso97
#TellJokesGetMoney

by DRusso97 on May 26, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Special caveat in Richt's agreement

he can choose between hair, penis or contract extensions.

#AllAboutPriorities

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 26, 2011 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow. It's like I'm looking in a comment mirror.....

Follow me on Twitter for all the outrageous sh!t I can't say on Tomahawk Nation...
http://Twitter.com/DRusso97
#TellJokesGetMoney

by DRusso97 on May 27, 2011 3:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

When in Rome....

Better known as Dr. Kenneth Noisewater.

FSU football - the 2010 Florida and South Carolina state champs.

by Dr.KennethNoisewater on May 27, 2011 4:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

...I love lamp.

Follow me on Twitter for all the outrageous sh!t I can't say on Tomahawk Nation...
http://Twitter.com/DRusso97
#TellJokesGetMoney

by DRusso97 on May 27, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Worst situation for a premier program.

Not bad enough to get rid of … but not good enough to do what needs to be done.

Give BB 1 or 2 more wins a year during the lost decade and we still don’t have Jimbo at the helm … shoot, give him 1-2 more wins during his last couple of seasons and Jimbo is not at the helm.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

more than that...

UGA fans have been enamored with Richt’s good guy persona and have given him a pass since they feel he’s such a good representative of the school. That alone has been worth another 1-2 games a year in their minds.

If you torture a statistic enough you can make it confess to anything.

by PeachTreeNole on May 26, 2011 7:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have noticed this. Really strange.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Really strange in light of the fact that UGA,

despite Richt’s good-guy persona, regularly competes for the Fulmer Cup.

I feel more like I do now, than I did before

gatornation - ungracious in victory, arrogant in defeat

by HaveNoleOption on May 26, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Saw that. Really like Mark Richt as a person. Would not want him to coach my team in the current world of college football.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

but so many UGA fans conflate the two concepts

that he’s not going anywhere for a while.

If you torture a statistic enough you can make it confess to anything.

by PeachTreeNole on May 26, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

What if in the next few years the dynamic

radically changes regarding oversigning and what not? He has been a very vocal critic and it seems to me that there is a movement brewing to curb oversigning.

Bring back Peter Tom Willis— a true Nole! -FiestaNole

by Miaminole on May 26, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still think he is too nice. His teams lack mental toughness and attention to detail. They make really dumb errors.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

They certainly have the capability of being one.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Michigan State- TCU- Wisconsin

Bud, when you say that they have easy schedules, you are arguing that they are likely to finish the season with good records. Thus, they would be expected to end the season highly ranked. Losing their starters means that these teams are going to lose some of their harder games, but again the easy schedule guarantees that they finish highly ranked. This makes me wonder about the point of preseason polls. Should they:

1. Attempt to predict end of season rankings?
b. Attempt order the BEST teams in the country?

The two perspectives of preseason polls would lead to different rankings, but whether the ranking is “wrong” is really based on how they were ranking them.

(We can leave out the third method to rank polls: Rank teams such that your TV station hosts more matches between highly ranked teams.)

by Meehl on May 26, 2011 2:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Carryover polls ...

Polls are imperfect … and will always be imperfect with so many football teams and so few games (esp w/o a playoff).

Recognizing how much impact they do have, though, I’d like to see them tied to the end of the prior season. Auburn is still #1 … and all the way down.

In the college game where there is always huge turnover/development/uncertain recruits … at least it would require a team to win it/lose it on the field.

Downside is that it would create even GREATER incentive for the great teams to schedule patsies … but I think everyone is recognizing that is the way to go now anyways.

Bud – what was the method you used several years ago when you had Vanderbilt in the top 20 for the national site?

by txnole on May 26, 2011 3:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, that was the “nobody has played a game yet, I’ll rank anyone I want at #1”

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Strength of Schedule?

As I think about it more, didn’t you set up your preseason ranking based on strength of schedule – arguing that by actually scheduling tougher competition they had done more than anyone else. You may have been motivated by “I’ll rank anyone I want at #1” – but you came up with a methodology to do it.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, yes. You’re right!

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your points and questions are well reasoned and have been repeatedly debated many places with no clear answer, other than “eliminate pre-season polling”

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Top 5 ranking for FSU isn't justified--maybe top 10 is--for 2 reasons IMO:

1. losses to a debilitated UNC team at home—losses to OU and VT weren’t surprising, and IMO the NCState loss was flukish.

2. wins against BC (home), Maryland & Clemson were come from behind wins. Also the loss to NCState was a failed come from behind.

You can’t rank a team any higher than top 10 who had to rally and win in come from behind games against unranked teams like BC, Maryland, Clemson and lose to NCState & UNC.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 6:37 AM EDT reply actions  

How debilitated was UNC compared to its other games?

Was MD a come-from-behind win? Really?

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

weren't they missing like 7 starters

most of whom were NFL talent?

we were losing to Maryland in parts of the first half, but never trailed in the 2nd half, so I guess calling it a “come-from-behind rally” wasn’t really accurate.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I mean compared to other UNC games.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, compared to other games UNC played.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

not significantly weakened

but don’t see how this is relevant anyway. We got lucky—as did other teams—playing a significantly weakened UNC team… and unlike other top 10 teams, e.g., LSU, etc., FSU lost (at home).

btw, UNC lost to GT & Miami, which shows that missing players hurt them—no way they lose to these teams with all of their starters.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s relevant because they were missing an enormous amount of guys at some points in the season (Miami), while missing just a lot for other games.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

didn't think the difference was that large

e.g., 2. but I’m probably wrong. Still UNC was missing the best against us.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

They were missing the best against everyone. I am talking about missing the replacements.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

IMO here's all that's relevant: we lost to a team at home who had 1/3 back-ups

p.s. IMO doesn’t matter who we played against, our D performance was abysmal… and we didn’t deserve to beat anyone that day.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is what I am referencing. And they also had a bye, right? Or a 1-aa

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

c'mon now

we were favored against UNC and lost. Isn’t that all that matters?

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, actually.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

FYI: typed “” in subject line, but it vanished.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

1 more time:

typed “end thread here” between 2 flanking “<” and “>” and it didn’t appear.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

So Auburn shouldn't have won the title

Because the struggled with Clemson? If the goal is to win, and you do, who am I to criticize how you did it…. In ten years, you won’t remember the nc state game, you’ll remember Jimbo spanked UF and Miami and won ten games

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 9:39 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

NC State was pretty good though.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he means all of those teams competed and were right there with FSU

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand...

I just think back about games that sometimes a team shouldn’t have won, or a bad team played them really closely and think does it matter? If they won thats all that matters for voters and down the line no one remebers. Ohio State won the NC championship in 2002 yet does anyone remeber the fact they struggled to win a game against 4-5 Purdue and won 10-6? Nope, they remeber that Ohio State had help from the officials to beat a great UM team.

 I guess I’m thinking that last year we were a 10-20 team and theres no reason to think that with the recruiting, added depth, and experience FSU is a completely different team and I dont see how a team can be penalized a year later for a bad game the year before. OU shouldn’t have been close to Utah St last year but no one holds that against them because everyone sees the circumstances. We its very possible voters saw a healthy FSU against USCe and realized that with the added depth teams won’t be able to wear out the D so easily. They see EJ and see an immediate “talent” upgrade to Ponder. They see that we had clear issues with the health of the OL. The lack of receiving experience. The obvious issues at safety. There’s a slew of reason’s why FSU did poorly and then now people are making the judgement based on the Spring and the potentially that a healthy FSU is going to be night and day better then last year.

So essentially I fail to see why someone can hold events from a previous year without putting into context the events and recognizing that changes have been made/depth has been added and experience has been gained from a first year in a brand new style of defensive system. Am I expecting a NC, absolutely not. But can you argue realistically that FSU belongs in the 2nd tier of teams behind Bama and OU, absolutely.

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

even elite teams have 1 or 2 letdown games

where “letdown game” means a game you’re favored to win and end up losing or squeaking out a win. In 2010 FSU had four: NCST, UNC, BC, Clemson. We were favored in all 4 of these games and ended up losing 2 and squeaked out a win in the other 2.

IMO we’re definitely improving—in fact I think we over-achieved in Jimbo’s first year. IMO playing in the ACCCG was enough for a successful season—beating SCAR made it exceed my expectations.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Grizz, I think you are confusing two different issues.

On the one hand, you are correct that nobody cares how you got to 10-4 in terms of relishing the 10-win season.

But how a team plays is infinitely more important than its record in terms of projecting how a team will do.

And we arguing that FSU should be in that 2nd tier behind Bama, LSU, Oregon, Oklahoma (some order). The 5-13 tier.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just took exception to the notion

that a top 5 ranking isn’t justified do to an overacheive by a decent team last year because I personally believe it CAN be justified. I dont hold close games last year against this team this year. Based on what else is out there its defendable that FSU could be ranked in the top 5. Do I consider them to be a top 5 team, no but thats because I’ve been a Fan of FSU since I left VA and started attending FSU. So during my fanhood I’ve watched FSU go 9-5, 7-6,7-6,9-4,7-6,and 10-4 not exactly a lot to write home about. I see a team that is being rebuilt into an elite team and wont hold the building years against the potential of a good team.

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never said it was not justified. I said I think you can make a real case for anything from 3-13, and the writers can make a real case for anything from 5-13.

I see a team that is being rebuilt into an elite team and wont hold the building years against the potential of a good team.

I won’t either. Not sure what we are arguing about. I am not holding games against FSU, I am saying “look at FSU’s performance and not its record.”

Parts of that performance, like a 6-3 record against bowl teams regular season (7-4 including acccg and bowl). Others are not so encouraging.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Top 5 ranking for FSU isn’t justified—maybe top 10 is—for 2 reasons

IMO: 1. losses to a debilitated UNC team at home—losses to OU and VT weren’t surprising, and IMO the NCState loss was flukish.

2. wins against BC (home), Maryland & Clemson were come from behind wins. Also the loss to NCState was a failed come from behind.

You can’t rank a team any higher than top 10 who had to rally and win in come from behind games against unranked teams like BC, Maryland, Clemson and lose to NCState & UNC.

Championship!
by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 5:37 AM CDT reply actions

Never had any issue with what you were saying Bud. And its not a really big issue with TLHWG, just that I disagree with him and feel it is justifiable for FSU to be top 5

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ah, I thought it was a response to me. Carry on.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

said elsewhere that FSU couldn't justify putting FSU top 5 unless:

1. much more weight is placed on on potential, e.g., returning starters, talent of new starters, etc. than hard evidence, i.e., prior year W/L; and
2. FSU has more returning starters and more talented new starters than other teams vying for the top 5. (Note: I haven’t looked at returning starters and new starters for the other teams vying for a top 5 ranking.)

Personally, I deny 1, i.e., I don’t place more weight on potential than hard evidence.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

See I put a lot of stock in potential

Because from a personal stand point I see that FSU was in year one of a difficult transition from a man defense to a zone defense. FSU had very little depth in the front 4 and terrible safety play. From all accounts in year 2 the depth on the DL is much better, the secondary is much better with reading keys and LJ as a safety is a huge improvement. So I’d agrue that games such as the UNC debacle may not happen, plus a full UNC team would have been a NC contender so the lose there really isn’t bad just our defense performance. BC was only close because of the Ponder injury. Clemson we should have lost but the same Clemson team took the NC winner to the brink so they were a legit team (defensively), but we outplayed NC State. So from the record standpoint were hincast projected to had the same record.

FSU presents itselft this year as the team that beat USCe with more experience, less gaping holes, and with more depth. So I put last years performance in context realizing the lack of depth, injuries along the OL and at QB, poor safety play, and first year in a new defensive system.

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Putting lots of significance in potential is fine

would you actually place a fat wager that FSU finishes top 5? If so, then I got no problem with you putting that much weight in potential. IMO we actually exceeded our potential/expectations last year, so this may be the start of a trend under Jimbo.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

No but with the exception of

two teams, I wouldn’t put a fat wager on any team to be in the top 5. I consider there to be an elite 2 then a group of 7-10 teams who round out the top ten and don’t really feel any one is better or significantly worse then others. I consider FSU to be a potential top 5 team, that doesn’t mean they will finish top-5 nor does it mean its not justifiable to have them preseason ranked top 5. Either way this is really just sillyness as preseason rankings dont mean anything unless you do it on the field. They only matter in terms of not falling as far because perception is that they are a better team. As far as I’m concerned I want the media’s perception to be that we are a NC contender because tahts better for the end of year rankings anyways.

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the problem.

You CAN rank any team anywhere you choose to. There are some that are looking at FSU 2010 and feeling that those close games are a sign of pulling away from the competition and not falling back to them or staying level with them.

For instance, Pollster Joe might say, “FSU won games in 2010 they would’ve lost in 2009 which means they are improving. That trend will continue and I think they’ll be top 10 in 2011.” How do you determine he’s wrong without playing a game?

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

and someone who gives FSU a higher preseason ranking than someone else (e.g., Feldman, et. al.) is probably placing more weight on FSU’s potential (i.e., lots of returning starters, talented new starters—QB, WR, RB, etc.) than prior season results (hard evidence). I see no reason why reasonable people might disagree about the answer to the following question: what’s more important for predicting a team’s performance in the coming year: prior year results (hard evidence) or potential?

In public, I only feel comfortable basing FSU’s pre-season ranking based on hard evidence; privately (or over a beer with good friends), I give potential more weight, knowing that I can’t refer to any relevant evidence to convince someone who has serious doubts.

p.s. I applied the same logic when predicting how Jimbo would do as a 1st time HC. That is, although I couldn’t refer to any hard evidence—and there were lots of counterexamples of great OCs who sucked as HCs (e.g., Zook, Weis, et. al.)—I could only refer to potential indicators of success, i.e., his performance as a OC, recruiter, his chances of every aspect of our program, etc. This didn’t convince others b/c it wasn’t HC experience, but to me these things were good indicators of how successful he’d be as HC.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is Jimbo's schedule like these days?

Does anyone have any revealable information on how much Jimbo’s actual coaching/offensive-scheming schedule has been affected, or is it out of line to even ask? My biggest worry is that he’s not able to devote the usual amount of time and effort to coaching and overseeing the workings of the program, but I really don’t have any idea how his actual coaching activities have been affected (I am glad that he’s sending assistants to cover for him at booster appearances). Obviously there’s nothing that can be done about the situation and I will happily live with the consequences (I would never, ever suggest that Fisher should do anything except what is right for his child), but this is my biggest question mark about FSU right now.

The lack of a known quantity backing up EJ is also pretty disconcerting, particularly in conjunction with the unknowns on the offensive line and the running game (the two being intimately connected). If we knew we had either a solid backup QB or a consistent running game that could see us through regardless (and preferably both), I would feel a lot more confident about our prospects.

As far as the rankings go, I personally don’t see how anyone could be very confident in the ordering of most of the top 20 (once you get beyond the first few). It’s best for us to be highly ranked, so I’m all for it, but it doesn’t seem reasonable for us to complain about anything within the top 15, say. Frankly, I’m surprised at how highly we are ranked in many places, given that we play everyone’s number 1 pick in week 3, and that losing that game would almost surely drop us out of the top 10 with another tough game staring us in the face.

One thing that does bug me is that many of the columnists and talking heads imply by their statements that our 2011 recruiting class is somehow going to make a big difference this season (it’s almost always mentioned when our preseason ranking is under discussion). Sorry, but I just don’t see that. I’ll be really happy if I’m wrong, but I’m certainly not counting on it. Are they serious about this, or is it just a way of hyping the FSU story? (I guess I should be glad they’re doing it, regardless.)

by csfuu on May 26, 2011 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Does anyone have any revealable information on how much Jimbo’s actual coaching/offensive-scheming schedule has been affected, or is it out of line to even ask? My biggest worry is that he’s not able to devote the usual amount of time and effort to coaching and overseeing the workings of the program, but I really don’t have any idea how his actual coaching activities have been affected (I am glad that he’s sending assistants to cover for him at booster appearances). Obviously there’s nothing that can be done about the situation and I will happily live with the consequences (I would never, ever suggest that Fisher should do anything except what is right for his child), but this is my biggest question mark about FSU right now.

I am told it was very different at first, but the coaches smoothed it out and practices were running much better at the end of spring.

The lack of a known quantity backing up EJ is also pretty disconcerting, particularly in conjunction with the unknowns on the offensive line and the running game (the two being intimately connected). If we knew we had either a solid backup QB or a consistent running game that could see us through regardless (and preferably both), I would feel a lot more confident about our prospects.
I am not worried about EJ, I just listed it as a factor writers may consider.
As far as the rankings go, I personally don’t see how anyone could be very confident in the ordering of most of the top 20 (once you get beyond the first few). It’s best for us to be highly ranked, so I’m all for it, but it doesn’t seem reasonable for us to complain about anything within the top 15, say. Frankly, I’m surprised at how highly we are ranked in many places, given that we play everyone’s number 1 pick in week 3, and that losing that game would almost surely drop us out of the top 10 with another tough game staring us in the face.
Yep, and Athlon is about to make FSU #4
One thing that does bug me is that many of the columnists and talking heads imply by their statements that our 2011 recruiting class is somehow going to make a big difference this season (it’s almost always mentioned when our preseason ranking is under discussion). Sorry, but I just don’t see that. I’ll be really happy if I’m wrong, but I’m certainly not counting on it. Are they serious about this, or is it just a way of hyping the FSU story? (I guess I should be glad they’re doing it, regardless.)
Agreed! Which freshmen do they really expect to contribute? I see very few, if any.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't understand

Why people keep talking about backup qb… Our situation wasn’t normal… Normally when your starter gets hurt your season is toast… Nobody is thinking OU is gonna win the nc if Jones goes down…and I’m pretty sure you’re not hearing from the ou crowd their fears about backup qb

by fsugrizz on May 26, 2011 9:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Good point

We have been a bit spoiled with EJ for the last season and a half or so. However, I’m sure that many top teams either have backup QBs with more experience than our backups, who have none at all, or they rely less on the QB to make things go (i.e., their running game is a known, solid quantity). Such a team, particularly one with a top 10 defense and a smart coach, are probably better positioned to survive if their QB is lost for a few games, and maybe even the season. I don’t think that we’re there yet.

To be clear, I’m very, very comfortable with Manuel. I guess Bud thought that I was worried about EJ not cutting it as a starter, but that is way, way down on my list of concerns. (If it comes to it, I will be very patient with any growing pains he might have as well, even though I don’t expect much trouble in that regard.) As you have correctly sussed out, my worry is what happens if EJ is injured.

by csfuu on May 26, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn

Such a team IS better positioned.

Self policing.

by csfuu on May 26, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. Rec’d

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

As a rule of thumb, if a plan has 3 or more variables, then chances of it working

are very low. And we have some big variables at OL, safety, WR, LB— not only in terms of which personnel can play at an elite level, but as to experience and knowledge of the position sufficient to turn the talent loose. I agree that to assume we fix all of those and become a better team by game 3, with less vulnerability than we had by end of last year, is unrealistic.

If you torture a statistic enough you can make it confess to anything.

by PeachTreeNole on May 26, 2011 7:30 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think the LB unit will be bad

in fact IMO the LBs will be slightly better than last year—trade Kendall Smith for Telvin Smith, CJones a year older, etc.; and WRs will definitely be better than last year—we don’t lose anyone and bring in 4 2nd year guys.

The quality of the OL is definitely TBD….

Last, TE. I’d prefer to have Reliford return b/c of his experience. But even if he doesn’t, IMO we can expect Tye & NOL to get some receptions.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I share your reservations.

With those many questions, we won’t likely be able to consistently hang with the big dogs. Luckily we don’t have to play many of them and an earlier game with OU helps our chances of beating the odds.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

and heres to hoping Auburn picks up RW and makes somewhat of a game out of their match with Clemson.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good question. The optimist inside me wants to say yes, but then I realize he’s no Cam Newton. Although Cam did jump right in.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cam jumped in 9 months before the season started.

RW is looking at three months at best.

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

A) I doubt the first 6 months were as formative as the last 3.
2) RW has played better competition than Cam did.
D) No doubt Cam will have done better than RW, but I would say that RW can still jump in and be productive given the program and 2) above.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those 6 months still count

They may be less formative than the final trimester but Cam was still learning something other than how to hide $200k. If nothing else his learning curve wasn’t as steep as RW’s would be. The playbook will be easy (36 is a play? Really?) but jiving with his WRs is going to be tough.

AU’s sched is much more brutal this year than last and he will have an inexperienced OL in front of him. Weak pass pro against the likes of Bama, LSU, UF, and UGA isn’t conducive to keeping your QB alive let alone successful.

My team doesn't have to be the best. They just have to win.

by Jamil Dawson on May 26, 2011 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The 6 months still count, but the effect is mitigated by the fact they aren’t as formative, plus RW has more experience against better competition. How can RWs learning curve be steeper? Its a push at best assuming Auburn increases the complexity of their playbook. I’m still not saying that RW will do as well as Cam, so that brings me to the next paragraph:

AU’s schedule may be tougher, but that doesn’t matter in the context of whether RW can jump in and give Clemson a better battle than their current void.

Auburn had Cam jump in, that bodes well for RW to jump in better than if Auburn hadn’t had a similar situation the prior year (although obviously best if he had more time).

Why are we arguing? We both agree that Cam will do better than RW. I’m only pointing out that its not the first time a QB jumps into the Auburn program, therefore that provides a little optimism to the RW jump – hower lesser of an extent than Cam.

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats an indirect way of saying, “doubtfull.”

"You are the hope I have for change, You are the only chance I'll take"
-Switchfoot

by FSUvaFan on May 26, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

They just have nothing at QB otherwise

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Relax

Reported today: Tate Forcier says he’s interested in Auburn

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes

was a joke anyways. IMO Forcier should start researching D2 (DI-AA) programs… & he probably will never play a down of FB again b/c he’s such a headcase.

Championship!

by TLHWG on May 26, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we've seen bigger headcases start at big programs

though his quotes are just silly. “I didn’t really like Michigan so I went down to Miami, but I wanted to be a little closer to family than Miami, so… Auburn?”

by stevib on May 26, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Forcier is doodoo for real

>>>-----------;;;-->"I guess they have a reputation of being more of a tricky team and not being tough. You hit 'em in the mouth, and they don't like it. Other teams that have beat them just hit them in the mouth, so that's what we started out with.'' - Nick Moody >>>-----------;;;-->

by RollNole5 on May 26, 2011 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Guy was taken to a hospital last month for hanging out his window and scaring his neighbor into thinking he was going to jump.

Somethin’ like that.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 27, 2011 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think linebacker or receiver are an uncertainty. I just listed things that writers could see as an uncertainty.

And yeah, Oklahoma was up 5 touchdowns when they pulled their starters. They get better, FSU improved by more than OU does, game is in Tally, but still… that just doesn’t seem all that realistic.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think WR is a question mark at all.

OL is only a question mark if our two OT don’t come back healthy. Orelus, Stork and Fahrenkrug can hold down the inside 3 adequately.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 26, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

OL ...

Though there are question marks for TE & S, much less chance that there would be a regression based on where we were the last two years for those positions.

It’s the regression that concerns me more than the potential for status quo. We know what we can do with questions re TE & S … if OL has issues, we are in a boat we haven’t been since Ponder was running around for his life his first year starting.

by txnole on May 26, 2011 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

The problem with these polls are they

Are predicting where you will finish. He said usc had an easy schedule, so it doesn’t matter we beat them if they don’t have to play us this year. What makes people mad is that this sets the table for the season polls where they ought to be ranking how good you are, not what your end record will be. It double rewards an easy schedule.

Good news for you, I'm a drunk and a washout already, so I can talk to whoever I want, burned or not. -Sam Axe

by Ponder This on May 26, 2011 7:41 AM EDT reply actions  

I think #9 is fair.

Like you say, Bud, it’s a mess once you get beyond OU and ‘Bama. If we get a win against OU and survive Clemson — sure, then we’re Top 5. But unless we can get to the Bye Week undefeated, I can’t get too excited yet about the rankings.

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assault of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes

"We'll be here 'til midnight. We ain't not gonna practice."
- Jimbo Fisher

by Drew J Jones on May 26, 2011 7:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't count the chickesn before they hatch.

FSU is looking very very promising….but being an old school Nole fan, I appreciate being in this position many many times before only to have something happen and dash those hopes.

No doubt we are on the right track, we have great coaches, the new players show tremendous promise and we are coming off a great first year for our head coach.

I want the Noles to be back in the top 5 as much as anybody but getting there is all about what you have done lately and timing. Keep in mind, we did lose a couple of games last year we could and should have won (UNC and NCSU)…we have to prove we can win those types of games this year and the accolades will follow.

Go Noles….I love ya!!!!

by SeminoleDan80 on May 26, 2011 8:27 AM EDT reply actions  

If FSU recruits 2012 and 2013 like they did 2010 and 2011, FSU will easily get there. It’s when, not if.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on May 26, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Complaining about a preseason poll seems kind of silly,

there are just too many unknowns.

I think this will be a really interesting year with regard to how the final polls turn out, due to conference realignment.

For example, at least one of: Michigan/Iowa/Penn State has finished ranked in the top 25 of the AP poll since 1967 (though the AP poll sometimes only ranked 10 or 20 teams). Since the beginning of the AP poll in 1936, at least one of those teams has finished ranked greater than 90% of the time. This year Nebraska enters the picture, so things may turn out differently. Still, I predict that one of those three will end up ranked, even if they all lose to Nebraska.

UF and Georgia both seem to have reasonable chances of ending the season ranked in the top 25. Georgia has the easier schedule, but the polls recently have typically included a 4 loss SEC team in the final top 25. I think that either of these teams can end up with 4 or fewer losses. Feel free to disagree about UF, but they still have talented players— it just depends how quickly they can pick up the new system.

Lastly, I don’t really know why, but I’d really love to see Utah end up with a 6-6 season or worse.

by IndyFSUnole on May 26, 2011 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

I can see Jimbo in a dark lit room sitting at the end of a long conference table with all the other coaches...
Gentlemen, it’s time…. Baddest-team-in-the-universe mode…ENGAGE!

>>>─────;;─►

by NorFla_Nole on May 26, 2011 9:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Some of your best work to date.

"It's one thing to grab an extra shampoo bottle off her cart, but I draw the line at actually raping hotel maids." - Norm MacDonald

by TRMNole on May 26, 2011 9:52 AM EDT reply actions  

The article

I am with you about the tiering of the teams. There is a clear cut top 2 and clear cut top 4 and than you have about 10 teams that can legit be anywhere from 5 to 15.

I am not buying the Nebraska FSU comparison though. While superficially they look the same there are some major differences, Nebraska played in a conference that is more top heavy while the ACC is more a bunch of good teams with only 1 other top team. Also, Nebraska lost Sue who might have had the greatest single defensive season I have ever seen in 25 odd years of watching college football.

On the little sisters of the poor. The moves this off season seem to be overlooked. BSU move from the WAC to MWC is a fairly large jump especially with TCU still there. They have replaced some of their high school teams with actual competition now and should expect to lose nearly a game if not more from an expected win perspective. This is not an endorsement that the MWC is in anyway near AQ status its an indictment on how bad the WAC was and is. Utah going to the Pac 12 has to be worth what 2 maybe even 3 games in expected wins? And this before thinking about the losses of personal. Utah has to win at least half of their Pac 12 games this season to be a medium term threat out there otherwise too many programs in the conference offer too much.

by TheJim on May 26, 2011 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

No need getting our undies in a bunch over rankings

Game 3 against OU will be our NC measuring stick. I personally think 9th is about right. We have to “earn” the right to be in the NC hunt. Quite frankly, it’s refreshing for us to be having this debate. We haven’t been able to do so “realistically” in the last 5 – 7 years.

by MarchingChiefsRock on May 26, 2011 10:57 AM EDT reply actions  

You didn't suffer under Rix

He took us to BCS Bowls 2 out of 4 years. You suffered under Drew Weatherford.

Shot a Gator in Jean Shorts just to watch him die.

by AMFKNole on May 26, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

You suffered under Drew Weatherford Jeff and Bobby Bowden.

MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Trick is right.
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
Thanks tricknole!
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick

by tricknole on May 27, 2011 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good thing about Datko

is that he’s got such great footwork and technique that I don’t mind if he gets a ton of time off. Zebrie, now, may be a bit rusty and will need a healthy summer and fall practice to keep up his improved play.

What are you glorifying with your life?

by ricobert1 on May 26, 2011 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

this is a great post.

I agree 100%

Why is the sky blue? Because, God Loves the Infantry

by Desman on May 26, 2011 12:49 PM EDT reply actions  

This is a fantastic thread.

So many different point of views that will really get you thinking. Great job guys.

by jenolesone on May 26, 2011 11:45 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

We talk FSU

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eddiegoldman_small
2013 Recruiting Discussion Thread #10
Fsu1_small
Ongoing/Off-Topic Discussion Thread #78
Small
Inside the University: FAQ
Small
ACC vs. Big 12 Fan Travel Costs By the Numbers
Small
Is FSU Really The ACC's Most Valuable Team?

Recent FanPosts

Lp_small
I hope we can still be friends...
Hal9000_small
"New" Big 12 F/+ Rankings
Osceola_unconquered_small
HD: 'Champions Bowl' won't freeze out ACC
Photo_small
FSU Softball 2012 Final Update
Small
Is FSU Really the ACC's Most Valuable Team? (Follow Up Part 1)
Small
Visualizing the ACC 2005-2011
Small
Last ditch effort to save the ACC
Dutchfsu_small
Likely start time for FSU/Clemson

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SHOP THE TOMAHAWK NATION STORE

Florida State Seminoles Apparel


Chiefs

Recruiting_image_small Bud Elliott

Editors

Miller_small basaltrock

Img_4552_small TrueCubbie

Winston_small nolesblogger

Small Fsued

Doak_1968_small pbysh

Vacation_013_small MattDNole

Creek_6th_small DKfromVA

Nattylite3_small Nattylite

Peter_ernie_small The K-Man

Fsu1_small FrankDNole

Robbowtiedrink_small ricobert1

Florida-county-map_small SWFLNole.

Highlife_small fsu44

Seminoleswag_small NoleLaw

Newyear06_small Dr.KennethNoisewater

Avatar_2_small SheenaLouise

Go-fsu-seminoles-red_small Michael@TN

Macho-man-randy-savage-7_small ScottCrumbly

Screenhunter_02_oct Michael Rogner

Authors

Db_small Chris Gadsden

1209_large_small FSUvaFan

Westcott1_small NoleThruandThru

Superman_20classic_20logo_20design_small Jamil Dawson

Small Matt Minnick