FSU To Hold Open Practice On Sunday While SEC Presidents Meet To Discuss Expansion (Maybe)
According a story published by the New York Times, reporter Pete Thamel spoke "to a high-ranking SEC official with first-hand knowledge" of the expansion talks who informed him that 11 of the 12 Southeastern Conference presidents will meet on Sunday at a secret location (Atlanta) to discuss the admission of Texas A&M to the league.
The official said there was a 30 to 40 percent chance that the presidents could vote against Texas A&M’s membership. (The president who will not be there in person will be on speakerphone.) He also said there was the issue of which university would become the 14th team, something many in college sports will monitor.
"We realize if we do this, we have to have the 14th," the SEC official said. "No name has been thrown out. This thing is much slower out of the chute than the media and blogs have made it."
The SEC official said he wondered if the presidents would vote for A&M only if they were assured that a team from one of their states — Florida State, Clemson or Georgia Tech, for example — would not be added. "I’m going to try and say, don’t bring it up now," the SEC official said. "That shouldn’t be a condition or part of the negotiation for this next issue. But it could."
Or maybe not. A Sporting News source very close to the situation said that no such discussion or meeting is planned.
If TAMU is invited, SB Nation's SEC blog Team Speed Kills, makes an interesting observation on how, depending on who the 14th team is, might affect Texas A&M's status and whether or not the SEC will even expand.
Also, if I'm reading between the lines correctly, it sounds like fighting over the 14th team could cause the 13th team not to even get an invitation. The conference official who talked to Thamel hoped that wouldn't be the case but couldn't rule it out. Four schools have in-state rivals that they would prefer not to be in the league, and if they don't get promises that their counterparts won't get invitations, they could vote against admitting A&M. Four no votes is enough to kill an invitation to another school.
This story does lend some credence to all of the denials from ACC schools like FSU, VT, and Clemson who have said they aren't talking to the SEC. I would be surprised if some back channel feelers haven't gone out to them, but I don't think any serious talks have been going on anymore. If there is a chance, even if it's less than a coin flip, that fighting over No. 14 could prevent No. 13 from even coming aboard, then I doubt anything has gotten hot and heavy. The ACC schools have to deny anything anyway to prevent there from being hard feelings should they remain in the conference.
So, is it possible that UF, UGA and USCe could form an alliance to prevent FSU, GT and Clemson from being the 14th, 15th, or even 16th team considered for SEC inclusion? All they would need is one more SEC school to join their conspiracy and they would have the 4 votes needed to block any of those ACC teams mentioned from joining. On the other hand, if the SEC wants FSU, or any of those other teams who reside in the same state as their SEC rival, then those 4 teams could squash Texas A&M's admission and put an end to any SEC expansion, for now at least.
Despite all the rumors swirling, the only comments continuing to come from FSU officials, from the top on down, are denials of any contact, discussions, or offers (as one would reasonably expect) about defecting to the SEC, according to published quotes in the Tallahassee Democrat.
"There has been no contact on this topic," [FSU President Eric] Barron said. "None."
"We have not been invited to the SEC," [Randy] Spetman said. "That is a fact. I can't say the SEC won't come to us because I don't know what the future holds. I can't say things like 'forever' or 'never' because I simply don't know what will happen in the future.
"But I know this: We are extremely happy in the ACC. Our football coach is happy in the ACC. We are doing well in the ACC. And I think things are going pretty well for all of us in the ACC."
"No one has talked to me and there has been no proposal that I'm aware of at all," Fisher said following Saturday's morning practice session. "We're in the ACC and we're happy to be in the ACC."
What we do know however, is that after a Sunday morning session with the media, the entire Florida State football team will head off to the Donald L. Tucker Center for the annual FSU Fan Day. Following the two-hour session the Seminoles will return to Doak Campbell Stadium, where Fisher will open up the 4 p.m. practice to the public for a second consecutive year. If you live in Tallahassee, I can't think of a better way to spend a Sunday afternoon, and I know we are all looking forward to onebarrelrum's photos. Anyone else interested in having their photos published here on TN, please submit them.
Hit the jump to read the latest practice reports and about some interesting position battles going on.
Day 6 Observations
Saturday was supposed to be the Florida State football team's first day in pads. But after changing the schedule and starting the work in pads a day early, FSU instead had another first for the fall on Saturday: the first two-a-day practice.
The Seminoles began the double practice day at 9 a.m. The second of the two sessions was slated for Saturday evening.
Day 6 Observations:
![]()
Redshirt junior OL Garrett Faircloth continues to impress at right guard.
One of the story lines that continues to play out this fall has been the shuffling of the offensive line. I wrote the past two days about the personnel being evaluated at the two guard positions.
As was the case on Friday, redshirt sophomore Garrett Faircloth continues to run with the first team at right guard while Brtan Stork is working on the left. The question is, where is David Spurlock? FSU's senior guard is at practice; but because of his past concussions, he is being held out of team drills and is instead working on individual drills.
Head coach Jimbo Fisher said Saturday that this was the plan all along as the doctors wanted Spurlock to be brought back gradually. You never want a player to miss any action but the byproduct of his absence has been the emergence of Faircloth. He has been performing well at right guard and Stork has done well in his switch to the left side.
Spurlock is expected to make his full return at some point in the near future. In the event that he cannot, FSU has a good contingency plan in place.
Another senior that was not in action on Saturday was running back Jermaine Thomas, who has been dealing with migraines. Fisher said he was not sure when Thomas will be cleared to return. Luckily for the Seminoles, depth is not a concern at tailback.
Following practice, Fisher commented on the play of the wide receivers and backup quarterback Clint Trickett. He said that he has been pleased with the consistency of the pass catchers and that Trickett has been showing real signs of improvement as the backup to starter EJ Manuel.
Defensively, the battle is still going on at one of the safety spots between veterans Terrance Parks and Nick Moody. Saturday they were still splitting repetitions with the first team. At the other safety spot, sophomore Lamarcus Joyner continues to impress; as does junior Greg Reid at cornerback.
Courtesy of Brandon Mellor, Seminoles.com
Heatin' Up!
With temperatures climbing throughout the morning, the Florida State football team took to the Al Dunlap Practice Fields Saturday for the first of five scheduled two-a-day sessions this preseason.
The Seminoles were back in full pads for the morning session - they are scheduled to wear shorts in the evening practice - and worked for nearly 2 ½ hours. The second consecutive workout in full pads failed to produce the same consistent results that FSU head coach Jimbo Fisher had praised following Friday's workout.
"I wasn't as pleased," Fisher said. "We did some good things, but not as much consistency as yesterday. Focus wasn't there as much. ... Drifting, that scared me, and by some veterans on both sides of the ball. That can't happen. We've got to fix it; we can't allow that to happen."
Fisher won't accept the two-a-day schedule as a crutch for a lack of focus and execution.
"There are so few of them (and) I think they are inconsequential," Fisher said, acknowledging that FSU's five is more than usual; the result of a compressed schedule between the start of practice and the Sept. 3 opener against Louisiana Monroe. "If we can't handle that adversity, lord o' mighty when the schedules comes."
`Noles get some red zone work against secondary For the first time this preseason, FSU's offense went to work against the secondary in the red zone, which put quarterback EJ Manuel and the receiving corps to the test. The tight quarters - from the 15 yard line and then the 8 - puts a premium on precision.
Fisher said Manuel was "solid" throughout Saturday's morning session, but has room to grow and improve in his red zone precision.
"We've got to play better around him (Manuel) and he's got to pull the trigger," Fisher said. "Things happen a little faster and quicker on his first day down there. We've got to polish a few things up route-wise and him (Manuel) timing-wise. Not that he was bad today; it's just hard down there. When you first get into the red zone - the tight zone - it's a different animal. ... It takes a day or two to get acclimated to that."
Fisher added that he has been pleased with quarterback Clint Trickett's progression. Trickett is currently get most, if not all, of the repetitions with the second-team offense.
Receivers appear to be making significant strides Throughout much of the 2010 preseason, FSU's wide receivers drew the brunt of Fisher's ire when it came to executing with proficiency, especially in practice. That appears to be changing in 2011 as the more veteran receivers, pushed by a small but talented group of newcomers, have been a pleasant surprise.
Senior Bert Reed and seasoned juniors Willie Haulstead and Rodney Smith are leading the way by example, with sophomores Scooter Haggins, Greg Dent and Kenny Shaw are following suit. So is redshirt freshman Christian Green, who has the same amount of collegiate playing time as impressive incoming fresh Rashad Greene.
"We've had some things we've got to work out, but I think they are progressing nicely," Fisher said of the segment coached by Lawrence Dawsey. "I am not disappointed in them one bit. I mean you always push for great plays and great catches. Those guys out there are [who] can change football games; those guys in space that make the phenomenal one. They're starting to do some of those. I'm always going to push it because those guys out there, when you get those special ones, they change the whole dynamic of the game."
Don't go to sleep on Jeff Luc While many preseason queries center around the newest players and how they may impact the Seminoles in 2011, there are a handful of sophomores and redshirt freshmen who often get overlooked. That may have been the case with sophomore weakside linebacker Jeff Luc, who came to FSU last season as one of the most celebrated recruits but was relegated to specials teams play and spot duty on defense.
Luc played in eight games and registered eight tackles, but five of those came early on against Oklahoma. Now he's running second team behind senior and two-time tackle leader Nigel Bradham. That's quite a climb for a player who missed all of the spring following surgery.
"I've been pleased with Jeff right now," said Fisher, adding that Luc is, "playing probably as good as he's been since he's been here at FSU. [He] has a sense of urgency about getting out there and playing."
Courtesy of Bob Thomas, Seminoles.com
Safety earns high praiseIf you want to get Florida State coach Jimbo Fisher smiling, even when he's obviously angry about what he just saw on the practice field, ask him about starting safety Lamarcus Joyner.
Instantly, a smile appears ear to ear.
"Oh, he's playing great," Fisher said. "Lamarcus Joyner is playing fabulous. He loves to play. If we practiced out here for 12 hours he'd stay here for 12 hours and play."
OU already has its eyes on Florida State
When Oklahoma players ran grueling, sweaty, stadium steps this summer, waiting atop Owen Field was a Florida State football helmet.
113 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dear OBR,
Please take an ungainly amount of pictures. Last year’s were great for those of us who couldn’t make it to the practice.
(bonus points if you can get a shot of Jeff Luc looking pensive)
Thanks!
-Everyone who doesn’t live in Tallahassee
by paperjames on Aug 13, 2011 11:51 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
HAHA. Will do,
maybe O’Leary and Luc will have a stare down. Think K-Man is going to be in the action too. Should be good stuff for all. Look for it tomorrow morning, hopefully.
FSU Football, making bad teams look bad since 2010.
by onebarrelrum on Aug 14, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Not sure what to make the Parks/Moody Battle
Parks was better than Moody, and you figure he isn’t regressing now that he’s in a more natural position… so I guess the worst case is Parks is a bit better now that he’s not our of possition and Moody is catching up to him…
Best case is possible here too… Parks is the bomb at Strong side FS and Moody is catching him.
"Don't bite your friends" - DJ Lancerock
Rashad Greene was my favorite WR recruit
I think he’s gonna a star at the position.
"Expectations are high and you can't run from expectations"-Jimbo Fisher
by WinstonSalemNole on Aug 14, 2011 12:16 AM EDT reply actions
Those voting scenarios are scary
Hopefully if we get blocked, they just decide not to expand. That would be disappointing but maybe we can sit tight and get in down the road.
If those in favor of expansion compromise and add schools that UF, UGA, SCarolina won’t object to, we’re in trouble.
$$ talks
watch when the real power behind the choice, ESPN, starts waving more $$ for FSU than a team that meets the “no school in the same state” ‘rule’. FSU’s national appeal (i.e. eyes on the tube potential) is stronger than schools close enough to the current SEC geographic footprint to be considered (Missouri, NC State (or other NC school), etc).
by Wild@Heart Nole on Aug 14, 2011 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
l'm starting to wonder if this is an ESPN push.
They are still discussing FSU, Clem, and Missouri despite all the contrary reports from other sources.
Pursue some path, however narrow and crooked, in which you can walk with love and reverence.
Henry David Thoreau
by slumgullion on Aug 14, 2011 10:33 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
I think the idea is
aTm and Mizzou first round and then Clemson and FSU in the following year or two.
If they did that they would have to change the current divisional alignment for a year or two before switching it back once FSU and Clemson joined.
Not sure they’d want to do that. If they added 2 now and 2 later, it’d make more sense to get 1 for each division…UNLESS the 2 they landed were an OU and A&M combo.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
I would think ESPN wants things to stay as they are.
They stand to lose a chunk of money with their Longhorn network, not to mention the inevitable post-expansion SEC contract renegotiation.
I wouldn’t put it past them to be floating whatever names they think will throw a wrench in the whole thing.
ESPN would just take money out of their ACC contract and put it into their SEC one if a school like FSU switched.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
Much ado about nothing.
Classic case of rumors running wild.
Conference expansion isn't over.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
Google around a bit.
FSU has been in “discussions” for a looooooooooooong time with the SEC and its ancestors. Why would they all of a sudden take us now if they haven’t in the past? I’m not saying we’ll never get in, but don’t be disappointed if we don’t.
They would've likely taken us in the early 90's if we hadn't gotten tired of being denied entrance throughout the 80's.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
If SEC votes to shelf expansion talk
The Big 12 just got a reprieve, and needs to urgently get their act together.
by fsu2wall on Aug 14, 2011 1:14 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I still don't know what adding FSU to the SEC will bring to the SEC
Another program that has national buzz? With money being the instigator, I see them trying to woo Virginia Tech to expand their foot print into another major tv market. FSU just doesn’t have anything to offer them in my eyes.
Also, for all of the conspiracy talk about our new indoor practice facility being funded by SEC money… maybe it’s the ACC funding it so we stay!
FSU is a huge name
Big TV draw, iconic program, creates instant epic rivalries, top recruiting team, fits the SEC bill almost perfectly. And possibly a NC contender yet again. And maybe most importantly…it puts a big hurt on the one conference (the ACC) that sits right in its midst (and is superior in some ways). I certainly don’t think the SEC fears the ACC…but I do think the SEC folks aware of its potential of getting a lot better someday. Who knows what the future might bring…and stealing its marquee football program would be a great strategic move.
Is it the right move financially for the SEC…hard to say…I’d guess it could be a very wise move in the long haul. But “nothing to offer”? That’s plain nuts!
Yes, but...
Big TV draw, iconic program, creates instant epic rivalries, top recruiting team, fits the SEC bill almost perfectly
other than that?
Dogs bark in the night but the caravan moves on.
by fmnole on Aug 14, 2011 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
As a fan I of course agree with all of that
And I know the numbers are there to show TV viewership for big games, etc… but thinking objectively I just feel it would be in the SEC’s best interest to increase their geographic footprint rather than the concentration of their current footprint, so they can go back and negotiate and even better tv contract. We all agree that’s exactly why they are going after A&M, so I feel it shows that they prefer geography over national prominence and recruiting.
It is interesting what you say about stealing another conference’s premiere team to make them weaker. I don’t know if I fully buy into it yet, but it’s interesting to think about.
Footprint does not matter that much to the SEC
Footprint matters to the Pac 12 and B1G because every new area is more cable sets to get subscriber fees. If the B1G where to add Rutgers for example they can get on cable systems in New Jersey which ups what the BTN revenue. But even these two conferences have national contracts for Tier 1 and 2 games which means brand names help them get big pay days and why the B1G added Nebraska. If it was just about adding footprint they would have gone Mizzou with Nebraskas 800k TV homes compared to about 4 million in Missouri. But, Nebraska is a top 10 football brand with big national ratings. It’s why the B1G would kill to get ND even though they already have 2 schools in Indiana.
The SEC though only has national contracts. CBS and ESPN are already availble in pretty much every home. They need teams that will add more eyeballs to Tier 1 and 2 games. Right now, the SEC has a ton of 2nd tier brands but only a couple Top 10 brands. Sure you add TAM for footprint but that is a footprint in to the 2nd biggest state in the nation and its second most popular college football team. That is a far different sitution than either Va Tech or Mizzou. Mizzou is not the most popular team in KC and is split in St Louis with Illinois. Va Tech too is not going to land you the DC market. The DC market has no 1 specific team as its a destantion city for grads from the ACC and B1G and Big East. The SEC is far behind those 3 conferences in alumni living in the DC market. Its the reason why getting Rutgers does not get you the NY market. What you need is Va Tech plus a Maryland and Virgnia to have a chance. And the idea that WVU is viable because they are a new market is laugable. WVU is a small state, poor and with low growth rates. Wow you get 12 new viewers in WV instead of solidifying the soon to be 3 largest state.
by TheJim on Aug 14, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Does the DC market (or anything else even with/north of Virginia) even really watch college football anyway?
Most of your significant college viewership is in the South, with the Midwest and West also being fairly solid. Once you get up very far past the Carolinas/Kentucky heading northeast…all they care about are the Steelers, Jets, Giants, etc.
If this sounds ridiculous, then you’ve probably never been up there or talked to any of those people.
We have a lot of pull for national viewership via nationally televised marquee games (which the SEC has and will continue to have). If you think SEC-tilts like FSU-Georgia, FSU-LSU, and the already huge but potentially bigger than ever FSU-UF games won’t give CBS and ESPN a gigantic marketing hard-on, then you’re not using your head.
If we were to ever find our way into the SEC, I think – much like UF, LSU, and Bama – that we would have a LOT of our games as the “marquee” games of the week, especially if we hold course with the direction Jimbo has set for this program.
As I've pointed out many times
The SEC’s CURRENT contracts demand ratings, not subscribers. You seem unwilling to consider future potential every time you talk about the SEC’s television contracts. With the confs with their own networks surpassing the television earnings of the conf with the past five NC winners, why wouldn’t the SEC have an eye on a network in the future??? Ergo, footprint might very well matter to the SEC – either when the current contracts are up (yes, that’s over a decade from now, but entities that are not personal businesses can and do look long term), or if their current contract allows for renegotiation in the even of expansion (and the UGA SB site says that it does).
Its fools gold though
When the Big 10 talks about footprint that is going into a new state and grabbing the biggest brand in the state namely the huge state school with prestige with the biggest following and controlling the states college football future. Lets assume for a moment that these schools do as well in the SEC as Arkansas and USCe did.
Missouri- For the SEC to control the state meaning make it so cable companies put the SEC channel on the basic tier you have to assume Kansas grads no longer end up in KC. Or if they do they become SEC fans or to turn the casual KU fans in the market into casual Mizzou and SEC fans. That is going to be an uphill battle to say the least with Mizzou over 100 miles further away than KU.
You also have to assume that Illinois grads stop ending up in St Louis where again the UI campus is closer than the Mizzou campus.
I mean it can possibly be done but Mizzou is not already the most popular team in its own state.
Move on to NC
NCST is not anywhere close to being the most popular program in the state. That is UNC by a country mile.
Now Virgnia
Again VA Tech is not the clear cut most popular team in the state (even excluding DC) if you include DC its no where close.
None of these teams are national brands with Va Tech being closest. USCe and Arkansas too though are not national brands either so being in the SEC is not a ticekt to that level by itself.
TAM while a 2nd brand in its state its located in a huge State that has a bigger population than the 3 teams we already talked about. That is why you go after them if you are the SEC. MO, NC and VA are not going to be mega population states anytime soon read 50 years.
The contract allows for a look in which is not the same as renegotation. Negoation implies that both sides hold leverage when in this case CBS ESPN hold all the leverage as the only option for the SEC will be to go to court to try to argue that CBS ESPN had bad faith.
All you need is sufficient interest
In the Big Ten’s home states, the BTN is part of your cable package whether or not you watch it. Something like 70 cents (maybe 10 in the footprint, 70 outside it; it’s one of the two, and one source said 70 inside) of your cable bill goes to the BTN. Not all providers immediately picked it up, but enough people wanted it that they finally did.
I’m not sure what the magic number would be, but if enough people in the state wanted the SEC Network, the cable stations would pick it up. I bet the SEC thinks it generates enough interest that people would want the network – Mizzou alum, SEC fans residing in the state, CFB fans in general. Even if the cable providers didn’t pick it up, people could add it to their own packages for a little extra.
Same for NC, VA, etc. If there is enough interest (doesn’t have to be everyone in the state), the network would get picked up. Then, those UNC fans would be paying for the SEC Network, whether they wanted it or not.
That’s why I’ve always supported an ACC Network. We have some good markets. If we improve our product, we could make some god money, from Miami to Boston.
This is the point I have been trying to make about footprints
The BTN averages 70 cents average in market 10 cents out of market. Some cable systems pay over a dollar.
The BTN had to fight to get on cable in the state of Ohio. I am sure its going to be a little easier for the SEC knowing the success that the BTN was. But, my point about the programs in the Big Ten are why they are able to get 70 cents. In every state the BTN is in they control the most popular team in the state (even Indiana ND is more popuar nation wide but both other schools more popular in state).
With Missouri the SEC wont have the most popular team. There is not enough other SEC alumni living in the state to make a difference. The only way this changes is if there is major demographic changes like KU grads go some place other the KC and Illinios grads go some place else. If the B1G did not see the ability to montize the state with all of the Illinois and Iowa grads how is the SEC going to do it?
The same with VA and NC. Lets say there is some intrest in putting in the 3rd most popular team in the state of NC and getting the SEC network. They are not going to get the full rate that Alabama or Lousiana or Florida pays. I believe NC has about 4.5 million households IIRC while Florida has 12 million. Say the SEC channel launches and with NC they get 60 cents a channel but in florida with just UF they get 70 cents but they add in FSU which allows them to bump it up to 85 cents. Adding FSU made the SEC more money than NCST did.
But, the most likely outcome is NC cable system never add the SEC channel because NCST fans are not in a great enough number to justify it so the channel goes to the Sports Tier and .20 land. The same thing with the DC market Va Tech plus the likely candidates and SEC will not be enough to get their systems to carry the SEC channel.
Having those teams yes makes more likely than if the SEC does not have those teams but that is going from a 0 percent chance to 10 to 30 percent chance (depending on the exact state and major market).
Valid point.
I think a school like Missouri or Virginia Tech would do just as well as South Carolina and Arkansas did. And both would expand the footprint. Does it matter if Missouri is THE school in Kansas City or St. Louis, or Virginia Tech is THE school in Washington, DC? Not at all. As long as the SEC gets a future SEC Network to be picked up by DC, STL and KC cable/dish providers.
A school like Florida State being added would allow a higher price for an SECN in Florida, which is much more populous than either a Missouri or Virginia (so it’s not like FSU adds literally zero value to an SECN) and would still add the valuable matchups that ESPN/CBS want for their broadcasts as well.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
SC and Ark had advantages that teams do not have today. They where brought in to go to 12 which allowed for the CCG that alone made money. They where also brought in when TV was not a primary revenue stream like it is today. Even in the early 90s a new team only needed to be worth a couple million in revenue to make it worth doing while today you need to be worth 18 plus million.
As Invectius and I have said, VT and Mizzou are likely big enough to get an SEC Network carried in KC, STL and DC if an SECN were added in the future.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
How do you not buy into it?
Just out of curiosity.
It is interesting what you say about stealing another conference’s premiere team to make them weaker. I don’t know if I fully buy into it yet, but it’s interesting to think about.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
Maybe not the right word
Because I get it, but I just feel that the SEC’s top priority is to worry about themselves and make themselves better, rather than trying to figure out how to make another conference weaker. If at the same time they can do damage to a competing conference by taking their top team, I think that is just an added benefit. So therefore I don’t buy into the idea that it is a top goal of theirs, more than just an added benefit of their move.
I don't think their priority is to weaken another conference.
But it’s obviously going to happen because they aren’t going to take some mediocre programs from other conferences. So whether it’s the intent or not, it’s a plus.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
what did we have in 1990 that we don't have now?
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 14, 2011 7:27 AM EDT up reply actions
We don't want to join now?
I think that is completely false IMO.
And the answer is, we don’t have Bowden now (who was really against it back then)
"I wish you loved me as much as you love TomahawkNation!"
""--;;--ⒻⓁⓄⓇⒾⒹⒶ-ⓈⓉⒶⓉⒺ--;;-->
by freshcollegeboy on Aug 14, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the ACC made pretty good money back then in comparison to what it makes now, too.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
it was about money and our national brand then as well.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 15, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Any chance you get to add a recognized NCAA Dynasty to your league it is a good thing vs.
a mizzzou or clemmons college.
by Blue Horseshoe on Aug 14, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I hope the SEC doesn't expand
It’s absolutely the best current (and recent) football conference…but its really quite an unlikeable organization. I really wished the ACC would have progressed more football…it’s comprised of better and classier universities on the whole. Even with all of the upside of going to the SEC for strictly football reasons…it will be very bitter-sweet leaving the ACC. I’d have to hold my nose if I had the opportunity to vote “yes” towards leaving.
I hope someday these conferences can better geographic sense. Colorado in the PAC10? Texas A&M possibly in the Southeastern conference? Even the ACC having BC sitting way up north well beyond its contiguous region just doesn’t work.
the ACC will never push to upgrade its football programs as long as Swofford is in charge.
He’s a UNC basketball fan through and through.
The ACC needs dynamic leadership. If FSU had dynamic leadership, we could form an alliance with Clemson, VT miami, Mary and BC to force Swofford out and hire a commish from outside Tobacco Road to focus on pushing the ACC schools to position themselves to improve football and compete with the Big 10/SEC/Pac 12 for TV viewers.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 14, 2011 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
The SEC wants to exand beyond 12 bc
It’s the best conference but other conferences are.competing w them financially. I don’t blame them but one superconference doesn’t really exist happily w regular conferences & the BCS (which expires in 2014 BTW).
Championship!
by TLHWG on Aug 14, 2011 8:04 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I couldn't care less about "class", would not be bittersweet and don't give a damn if conferences make "geographic sense"...
as long as whichever one we’re in provides us the necessary financial security for our athletic’s programs to continue to thrive.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
the old guard needs to wake up to this thinking
every day in the ACC is more and more risk to the long term security of having “winning programs”
the SEC is as close to no risk as exists in the current landscape
Agreed.
If there isn’t a huge wave of expansion by the time the ACC’s contract is up then I would be fine with the ACC. I’d also be very much in favor of adding some schools and creating a ACC Network. With the right additions we could get it on tv throughout the entire eastern seaboard. That would be a ton of tv revenue and we’d be able to keep the “easiness” of the ACC so we’d have an easier route to a national title. If, however, the ACC doesn’t do that then I’d be of the same mindset I am today: JUMP at the first chance from the ACC.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
I agree
An ACC Network could go a long way in making the conf profitable in the long term. FSU is about to start doing its part. We need a couple other teams to step it up to about VT’s level – and VT needs to win a few big OOC games. With a Tier 1 FSU and a handful of Top 25 type teams, the ACC would start becoming viable and marketable (again).
Swofford = Bobby Bowden: napping at the wheel.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 15, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
FSU is OU's toughest game.
B Stoops’s staff will have done their homework and will have a wrinkle or two. There were times the USCe WRs were open and Garcia missed them. OU will design the plays to have Landry exploit whatever those weaknesses were.
But I’m sure our coaches know that too. And Heupel may have to rethink some things once he sees how significantly better our safety play has become in the first 2 games.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
I've been told by OU fans that Heupel...
will be calling an aggressive game as OC. They say he is willing to take chances. Hopefully, M. Stoops will be able to take advantage of such aggression, like Andrews did to Spurrier all those years.
Gripper
Tommyhawk Nation: Bobby Bowden is the all-time ACC leader in conference titles, conference wins, total wins, winning percentage, bowl appearances & wins and owns the longest conference winning streak.
I know it was last year, things have changed etc......but
I watch this occasionally just to remind myself of just how drunk I got that day……..
Have we been running stadium steps? What kind of conditioning have we been doing to make sure our guys won't be sucking wind like they were last year?
Conditioning = having talent and experience beyond the starters
so the defensive linemen don’t have to play 80 snaps a game.
Trouble is, even our DBs were huffing from having to cover their wideouts. No subs on either side, just our guys huffing.
UF's wideouts are known for huffing too.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 15, 2011 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Looking at how ripped our players are all getting
even Freshmen. Combined with a deeper team. And the conditioning program now in its second year. Vic has these guys working. The best scenario is a nice humid day that we have been practicing in and now can sub some and have them huffing and puffing.
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
It seems completely obvious to me
that Jimbo is focused more on Oklahoma than on the ACC schedule.
He has changed he composition of his defense to focus on one team: Oklahoma. This guy thinks he has a real chance and has decided to build the team to around one major opponent and let the chips fall where they may for the other guys.
1. He moved an undersized (I don’t buy 205 on bit) player to safety, who may be a liability in run support but will be great covering slot guys.
2. He installed a 209 pound middle line backer because of “coverage” responsibilities.
When asked about some of these changes Jimbo responded that you’ve got to have guys who can cover to “face all these passing teams out there”. Look at our schedule. There is only one legitimate passing team on there. One could make the argument that if he was focused on the ACC and letting the OOC take care of itself, he would have build a more run centric defense (BC, Miami, Clem) . Half the ACC has lost their starting QBs and the one we face that didn’t is starting a whole slate of new WRs with a new coach. No one on our ACC schedule is a passing threat.
Jimbo has been a part of great teams so he must see something in these guys for him to focus so obviously on one opponent which is the key to a MNC run.
Tuck I hope you are not criticizing being prepared
The first part of the season and in fact the most important game of the year is Oklahoma-we win that game and we have a chance. That is going to be a war-we might as well be prepared for it. This is what makes football great-looking forward to it.
No
Pointing out that Jimbo clearly thinks this team should be aiming for a MNC this year.
You don't have a problem with this, do you?
As has been well-documented on this site, we have the personnel to tweak our approach down the stretch against pro-style offenses if we need to do so. We will have situational substitutions in all games anyway, even vs. OU.
I just think this is another documented example of why this coaching staff is so far-improved over the last days of the old regime. Being able to read into a viable plan is nice.
We play 6 spread teams in a row dont we
then 6 pro to end the year. Wasnt that the stat? So hes preparing for the first 6 games. And Stoops has more then 1 way to play defense. And we have different sized players at multiple positions and can give multiple looks. Criticizing Joyner at safety? really?
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
was to tuch
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
tuck* grrr edit please!!!!
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
Have you seen Joyner hit people?
He’s not a liability in run support at all.
And have you watched Smith play linebacker? He may turn out to be the best one on the team. I have no problem doing whatever we can to get him on the field.
Your comment read as if you thought these were potentially poor decisions. If that wasn’t your intent then you can just ignore my reply.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
by tricknole on Aug 14, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Then you read it wrong
or are in the arguing mood.
I see this as a completely positive sign. If Jimbo believes it. I believe it. If Jimbo was positioning the team for “lets just focus on the ACC, we aren’t ready for the big time yet”, I would be fine with that, but it has me extremely excited that he is taking the approach of “the ACC is in the bag, lets just focus on OU”.
And yes, I’ve seen Joyner hit….. WR’s who are in the open and often off balance as CB’s get to do. Totally different if he is down in the box mixing it up with 210-220 lb running backs headed down hill. I don’t care what the roster says, I would be shocked if Joyner is over 185. Look at this picture. The guys to the left and right of him are listed at 195.
I think Joyner will be phenomenal, but lets not pretend like he isn’t back their for passing support.
I don't think anyone thinks Joyner was moved to S for run coverage. That is what Moody, Parks, and Williams are for.
I would be shocked to see Joyner as the 8th man in the box and Moody playing center-field. He was moved b/c we are deep at corner, not as deep at S, and you have to find a way to get your best players on the field. I don’t care whether we are playing UM, UVA, or OU, pass coverage from the safeties was an area where we could improve. The Joyner move should improve that without giving up quality depth at CB. Having a fast guy like Telvin at Mike is the same sort of upgrade as we saw Kendall Smith giving up wheel routes that went for long yardage. We needed one guy at Mike that could handle that, but it was not a full sell-out to cover the spread or you would probably see the 2-deep at Mike being Telvin and Moody. Instead you have Vince and Holmes listed at Mike along with Telvin. Telvin’s size and speed at Mike gives us the flexibility to be better at situational football. How many snaps he sees per game is likely going to depend on the opponent. When we play the likes of BC, be prepared to see plenty of Vince. Getting the guys bigger up front, without losing speed, also helps against any team. In Jimbo’s words, it’s why boxing has different weight classes.
In his second season, I think Jimbo would be satisfied if we win the ACCCG and make it to a BCS bowl. The goal is always winning every game and every Nole-be it coach, player, or fan, would love to see us get redemption for the Nightmare in Norman.
Jimbo wants to build a championship team. I highly doubt that he set out to build a team specifically to beat OU. We just have one more game against them to finish the home-n-home that Bobby scheduled. I don’t think Jimbo would even schedule this sort of game in the future. ACC + UF + ACCCG + lowly OOC teams to practice up on is part of his equation for success. None of that includes OU. We do have the game this season. He and everyone else wants us to win it. Since 2003, there have been 9 times where OU has blown out a team one year and lost to that team the next. Here’s hoping that we will be number ten.
If I wanted to argue I wouldn't have put in the last line there.
I don’t care what Joyner’s weight is, he can hit.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
If people can rally behind Jared Lorenzen,
Nole nation can rally behind Clint Trickett.
What are you glorifying with your life?
by ricobert1 on Aug 14, 2011 2:38 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
The last time Jared Lorenzen was Clint Trickett's size
was on the day of his birth
by mn nole on Aug 14, 2011 2:48 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
But humor success.
What are you glorifying with your life?
by ricobert1 on Aug 14, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I wonder if these "migraines" that Jermaine Thomas has been having are actually something like concussion side-effects.
Just saying…it seems a little weird and we’ve seen stuff like this before with this staff. They will throw info out there, but sometimes they don’t tell you every little detail exactly how it really is (see: Ponder, some of our OL injuries, etc. last year).
Ever had a migraine???
Truly brutal experience and you are not yourself for several days.
by RANOLE on Aug 14, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
But has Thomas had migraines before?
lawdy’s just saying he wonders if Thomas was actually concussed but the staff is just calling it “migraines” to the media.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
I just hope he doesn't relieve his migraine pain
The same way Percy Harvey does. No need to get suspended, JT!
gotta be dumb enough to get caught
A UF specialty
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
And now A&M's leadership gets to learn the lesson about loose lips and sinking ships
Those will be some awkward Big12-2 meetings.
If all sports fandom is a form of emotional gambling, football is poker and hockey is Russian roulette.
And I sincerely hope the ACC
Starts looking to the future. Let’s strengthen our position so that our member institutions aren’t the targets of other confs.
How do you strengthen the ACC that much?
The ACC will be making something like half of the Big Ten’s money and less than half of the Pac 12’s. We make like 2/3 of what the SEC makes and the Big East may equal the ACC in payouts with their new contract.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
This
FSU needs to take care of FSU. ACC be damned.
Pursue some path, however narrow and crooked, in which you can walk with love and reverence.
Henry David Thoreau
Where does FSU go?
The following 2 reasons seem sufficient to prevent a SEC invite: no new TV market, UF would no longer be the only member school in Florida.
Championship!
The SEC doesn't have its own network so this whole new market thing is overblown.
Who would more people watch play nationally: FSU or NC State?
Who offers that “valuable” new market?
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
agreed.
We present the same draw we did in 1990: there would be more national viewers of SEC games in which FSU was involved, meaning an even better TV contract.
In fact, if the SEC played it right, they could use the potential admission of FSU as a bargaining chip with ESPN, who knows our ratings well, and get a better TV contract that’s more on par with the PAC 12 deal— enough of a deal to cover our loss of $4Million (75% of the ACC revenues during the 1 year waiting period after we give notice).
Think Spetman is creative enough to think of any of that?
Me neither.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 15, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions
And if the SEC were smart they'd combine national programs like FSU with solid regional programs like VT and A&M to help expand the footprint and increase markets for when a future/potential SEC Network comes along.
Jmo.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
Not sure.
A resurgent FSU will help a lot and VT needs to stay strong (and win some OOC games), but we’ll probably need a couple programs to step it up. Probably the best bets are: UNC (well, one day…); UM (well…), Clemson (not the best for us). I think UVA could make some noise, though maybe not unless VT takes a step back. There is some talent in VA, right, but probably not enough to feed two strong teams?
Some teams probably need to schedule smarter. E.g., UNC plays Rutgers, ECU and Louisville (and James Madison) this year. The conf needs to help teams with the scheduling (not putting the biggest divisional game right after two of the biggest OOC games for both us and Clem).
We also should make advances to ND. They really are probably the only other “premier” team we have a shot at. Find out what appeals to them, find a way to make it happen or come close. Don’t give them a Texas-style sweetheart deal, though. Point out some of the things we have in common: academics, non-football sports, etc. See if there are a couple teams they’d want to bring in, too (probably Pitt, since they play them). Put ND’s mass on the ACC Network on Sunday morning – that’s a beautiful building, so even if you’re not Catholic (I’m not) you can admire the architecture. And that’s, what, an hour a week? I think they air it on the internet anyway.
I dunno. Any other suggestions?
The ACC office could make the schedule more favorable for its member schools.
Other than that there isn’t anything the conference can do other than hope and pray at this point in time.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
This
The ACC needs to make sure that FSU, miami, UNC, Clemson, and Virginia Tech do not play any of these stupid type games that they schedule. I understand the need to schedule Thursday night games but if you are going to do that either make sure its home for the big boy schools or in the case of FSU against lower opponents. If FSU does have to play a mid tier team like BC than either give them a bye the week before or schedule Duke. When they see their brand teams playing a tough OOC give them a break the week after with a no better than mid tier team the next week. I understand that sometimes this is not going to be possible but it should be the rare occurance not something every fan base has a legit complaint about.
These are the 5 big brands in your conference let them be the best they can and it will help everyone.
Thursday night games
Should only come after a bye week. Not only are you not playing on a short week, but you get an extra two days before your NEXT game.
Actually, playing Virginia on a Thursday night before uf isn’t a bad idea (well, if we were coming off a bye). Two more days of rest/planning before a huge OOC game.
Just got back from Fan Day
This is the biggest I’ve ever seen the team. Jenkins is definitely bigger in the arms than he was last year. (Got him to sign the MSP mag cover). NLS is HUGE. Looks like the biggest guy on the D line … as a freshman. Parks is noticeably bigger as well.
Coach Elliot (Happy Bday) was very interested in the MSP mag. Bud, you should send him one if you get a chance. We got the D Line, LB, and DB’s to sign and all the guys were asking about the mag.
Heading out to the open practice
Greatness is consistency and performance over a long period of time - CJF
by GrassyNole on Aug 14, 2011 4:19 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Rec
"I wish you loved me as much as you love TomahawkNation!"
""--;;--ⒻⓁⓄⓇⒾⒹⒶ-ⓈⓉⒶⓉⒺ--;;-->
by freshcollegeboy on Aug 15, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Looks like we can finally get back to football instead of conference realignment
“http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6861385/sec-extend-invitation-texas-leaves-options-open”
by seminolesrule!!!!!!!! on Aug 14, 2011 4:27 PM EDT reply actions
yet.
It could still happen in a matter of days. This statement means zero. It just says that as of today things are status quo.
by Blue Horseshoe on Aug 14, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea, you have to assume that as soon as they tell the SEC, "We want in" that the SEC will get them that offer in short time.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
sounds pretty definitive to me
Looks like SEC brass had their vote…and it was a big NO. For this year anyway. I’m glad. Now the ACC better start thinking ahead.
by PoseidoNole on Aug 14, 2011 5:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Nah...A&M is getting in.
THis is all just legal posturing and timing. Who does what at what time. TV contracts by ESPN with two major conferences have to be figured out as well. But when he dust settles A&M and the SEC will consumate,
by Blue Horseshoe on Aug 14, 2011 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Read a few comments on a UF board and their "interpretation" is that they want A&M to "get their house in order" before officially extending an invitation.
And that the invitation would come as soon as that occurs. Only real hold up is who the 14th team would be, apparently.
MiNDSET? SWAG-ER-ISM!!!
---------------------------------------------------------
Wherever you are, Trick, you are wise, indeed.
Correct, Sir Trick.
You truly are one of God's treasures, Trick
You’re right.
I wonder of that means they need to get things straight in regards to
their TV contracts with ESPN. Outkick the Coverage has an interesting article detailing the intricate TV entanglements between ESPN, Big 12 and the SEC. Seems very complicated involving ESPN violating their fiduciary repsonsibilities to the Big 12, etc.
THe SEC is basically waiting for everybody to do their due diligence from a legal standpoint, but as these happen in the proper order aTm will be voted in.
by Blue Horseshoe on Aug 14, 2011 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions
The SEC is very concerned about being sued for conference tampering most importantly, and the image of conference raiders to a lesser extent.
If sued for tampering, their could ask for $1 billion dollars and the SEC does not want to even consider the possibility of having that kind of exposure.
>------::----::------->Spearing 'em and Scalping 'em like it's 1999
I'm not so sure this Jimbo fella is the right man for the job.
they could get sued for that regardless whether the offer is formal at this point.
Not saying the suit ultimately would be successful.
It is better to fail honorably than to succeed by deceit.
by PeachTreeNole on Aug 15, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Could mean they cant agree on the 14th
as said
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
Sounds like 1968 all over again.
From the Florida Times Union, 2/18/1968, page A-22
TALLAHASSEE, FL, February 17, 1968 – Florida State’s annual safari to the hallowed halls of the Southeastern Conference to seek membership has drawn a blank each time.
There are now those in Tallahassee who feel perhaps FSU has prostrated itself long enough. The Seminole war party is grown up now, and if the SEC doesn’t want them, forget it.
But there are also those who feel the other way. Not for more prostration, but for continued efforts to join.
Among those are Athletic Director Vaughn Mancha and FSU President Dr. John Champion.
Mancha is as weary of the annual brush-off as the president. But the former All-American from Alabama feels Florida State may be closer to membership than most people think.
“No one knows just how close we came in 1964,” Mancha stated, "when Georgia Tech dropped out. In fact, the late Bernie Shively of Kentucky, who was all in favor of our admission, told me to be sure and have Dr. Gordon Blackwell (FSU president at that time) there for the meeting to accept membership.
“But at that particular meeting we didn’t get a strong lobby from the University of Florida. They submitted our name, but that was about it. Also, LSU was strongly against our admission, favoring the smaller 10-team league.
“We still would have made it, I think, if political forces from the State of Tennessee hadn’t intervened on behalf of Memphis State, and the whole plan was pigeonholed.”
Since that time, Mancha said, when Florida State has asked for entry, there has been no strong voice raised on behalf of the Seminoles, although Florida has supported the move each time.
Dr. Champion believes President Stephen O’Connell of Florida will play a strong role in seeking admission for the Seminoles.
“I think President O’Connell wants us in the Southeastern Conference very much,” Dr. Champion said, “and we believe he will actively assist us in this quest.”
Manch agrees. “President O’Connell is a sincere and forthright man,” he said. “We discussed this proposition at the last SEC meeting in Tampa, and he told me he was going to do all he could to gain admittance for Florida State.”
Some local fans and sports authorities feel FSU is better off as an independent, but Mancha disputes this quite strongly.
“Our main problem in all athletics is scheduling,” Mancha said. “If we could gain membership in the SEC our problems would be lessened considerably. Too, every year the SEC has from four to six representatives in bowl games, and the split is quite substantial. Of course, we have become a good bowl team, too, so we would be giving a great deal to the SEC, not just taking.”
Mancha went into some detail about his scheduling, particularly in the two top sports, football and basketball.
“Right now, in our immediate scheduling, we have only Florida and Mississippi State as SEC opponents. The SEC is engaging in round-robin scheduling now, especially in basketball, and we’re not playing the teams we once were. This year in basketball we do not play Georgia, Auburn, Alabama or Mississippi State. It is getting that way in football, too.
“We are making some progress in future scheduling, but it is difficult. We have been successful in football negotiations with Auburn, with a six-year home-and-home contract starting in 1970.
“I am hopeful of making some arrangements with Alabama, but in cases like these the life of an athletic director can be hectic. Last year when we signed Alabama, Coach (Bill) Peterson had misgivings about it. He didn’t want any part of Alabama, but as things turned out, Alabama made our season for us.
“We are making some headway in future schedules,” Mancha said, “but it would be so much easier if we were sure of six conference games a year.”
Mancha listed some of the teams that look like “sure things” on future FSU schedules, including Texas, Georgia Tech, Baylor, Kansas, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Iowa State, Kansas State and Houston.
“I have a call to make to Penn State this week,” he said, “and I feel real good about a home and home signing with them.”
In addition to these teams, the Seminoles will have annual tussles with Florida, Miami and Virginia Tech. Georgia Tech has signed contracts for 1970, 1971 and 1975, and the Seminoles have signed to meet Clemson in Tallahassee in 1970 and 1976 and in Clemson in 1975.
Mancha said Florida State could probably get into the Atlantic Coast Conference quite easily, and the Seminoles even have been approached by the ACC. “But we play in the SEC’s neighborhood,” Mancha said. “Affiliation with the ACC in football, and especially basketball, would be fine,” he said, “but the other sports would suffer because of travel distances.”
The Seminoles are playing ACC opponents quite regularly in football, including South Carolina, N.C. State, Maryland, Wake Forest and now Clemson, but have made little progress in meeting these teams in basketball, with the exception of North Carolina.
by gonoles74 on Aug 14, 2011 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
They did support us?
Since that time, Mancha said, when Florida State has asked for entry, there has been no strong voice raised on behalf of the Seminoles, although Florida has supported the move each time.
after the first debacle?
A Seminole warrior killed in battle is a legend remembered. A Gator lost in battle becomes a pair of boots and a belt.
twitter of random stuff and tons of confessing FSU love @caine115
I view their support as being as helpful as floating seat cushions on an airplane.
They ain’t worth a damn thing.
The SEC strikes again
Draws the entire country into this crap. Some of us fell for it. Nice, marketing ploy. The SEC has been the talk over the last week, and everybody looks like an idiot. Yet, the SEC has all this publicity. What a bunch of Dickheads…
I thought that was the best part of your post.
Perhaps the most salient point on this whole thread.
Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your teeth.
You're an idiot, babe.
It's a wonder that you still know how to breathe.
by FLpanhandler on Aug 14, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
It is a little more complicated than you might think
http://outkickthecoverage.com/how-espn-is-complicating-am-to-sec-deal.php
The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.....Thomas Jefferson
"My choice early in life was either to be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference." - President Harry S. Truman
Actually that simplified matters for me. Thanks.
Idiot wind, blowing every time you move your teeth.
You're an idiot, babe.
It's a wonder that you still know how to breathe.
by FLpanhandler on Aug 14, 2011 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions
And why nothing will change any time soon
Only TAM is hotheaded enough to make a decision like this. This all but blocks anyone from any AQ except the Big East (and that might change any day now) from being available. I mean really is Mizzou going to take the chance they are blowing in the wind yet again? The SEC can’t know what they are worth without them being free agents and schools can’t be free agents until they know what the SEC is willing to pay them.

by 































