Here are this week's updated ACC Bowl projections. FSU is right between 9-3 and 10-2 but with some uncertainties regarding the team's health, a lean to 9-3 is probably more appropriate. This is not a projection of a loss to UF, but rather a 3-2 finish down the stretch. If FSU pulls off the win at NC State next Thursday, the 'Noles will be projected to go 10-2.
|Bowl Game||Last Week||This Week|
|Orange Bowl (ACC Champ)||FSU (9-3, 7-1)||FSU (9-3, 7-1)|
|Chick-fil-A Bowl ACC #2 v. SEC 3/4/5||Miami (8-4, 6-2)||Miami (9-3, 6-2)|
|Champs Sports Bowl ACC #3 v. BE #2/ ND||Clemson (8-4, 5-3)||VT (8-4, 6-2)|
|Sun Bowl ACC #4 v. Pac 10 #4||VT (8-4, 6-2)||NCST (8-4, 5-3)|
|Meineke Car Care Bowl ACC #5 v. Big East #3||NCST (8-4, 4-4)||Clemson (7-5, 4-4)|
|Music City Bowl ACC #6 v. SEC 6/7/8||GT (7-5, 5-3)||GT (7-5, 5-3)|
|Independence Bowl ACC #7 v. MWC #3||UNC (6-6, 4-4)||UNC (7-5, 4-4)|
|EagleBank Bowl ACC #8 v. Army or C-USA #6||BC (7-5, 4-4)||BC (6-6, 4-4)|
|Fight Hunger Bowl #9||MD (6-6, 3-5)||MD (6-6, 3-5)|
Inside, find this week's blogpoll
I am excited to be taking over the blogpoll for Bud.
This is not a power poll. I don't attempt to rank teams based on how good I think they are. I only rank teams based on their resume. What have they done? Not how talented are their players or what other polls project them to do, but what have they done? The poll is designed to be dynamic. I try to start from scratch every week.
I do attempt to reward teams for "quality losses," while punishing them for poor performances. I do not give excessive credit for stomping horrible teams. I reward quality play, win or lose, particularly against other good teams. I am not bumping team A 10 spots and docking team B 10 spots when team A beats team B by a field goal in what was essentially an equally played game. I like to reward playing well against good teams, win or lose, and punish losing to poor teams more harshly than I reward defeating poor teams. To that end, TCU and Boise will probably not climb much higher in my poll for the rest of the year because they don't really play anyone. And if those two don't blow out the weak competition every week they will start to slip in addition to not climbing.
I Reward Grinders. I reward those who play difficult schedules. Teams that play a tough team every week don't get to spend extra time preparing for their tough games, and they also don't face the attrition other teams face because they are able to pull their starters in blowouts. Fewer plays for important players reduces the chance those players will get injured.
Change my mind using my criteria if you can.